Search

Background: Donors bravely donate their kidneys because they expect that living donor kidney transplantation (LKT) confers benefits to recipients. However, the magnitude of the survival benefit of LKT is uncertain., Methods: This prospective cohort study used two Japanese nationwide databases for dialysis and kidney transplantation and included 862 LKT recipients and 285,242 hemodialysis (HD) patients in the main model and 5299 LKT recipients and 151,074 HD patients in the supplementary model. We employed time-dependent model in the main model and assessed the hazard ratio and the difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) between LKT recipients and HD patients. In the main analysis of the main model (LKT, N = 675; HD, N = 675), we matched LKT recipients with HD patients by age, sex, dialysis vintage, and cause of renal failure and excluded HD patients with dementia or performance status grades 2, 3, or 4., Results: The median observational period was 8.00 (IQR 3.58-8.00) years. LKT was significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality (hazard ratios (95% confidence interval (CI)), 0.50 (0.35-0.72)) and an increase in life expectancy (7-year RMST differences (95% CI), 0.48 (0.35-0.60) years) compared with HD. In subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of LKT was greater in female patients than in male patients in the Cox model; whereas older patients gained longer life expectancy compared with younger patients., Conclusions: LKT was associated with better survival benefits than HD, and the estimated increase in life expectancy was 0.48 years for 7 years., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: In Japan, donations after circulatory death kidney transplantation are widely performed due to legislation delays. The number of donations after brain death kidney transplantations is increasing, but the target remains unmet. We reviewed the outcomes of donation after circulatory death in Japan., Methods: We analyzed 2923 deceased kidney transplantations (2239: donation after circulatory death (DCD), 684: donation after brain death (DBD)) performed in Japan from 2000 to 2019. The outcomes of the DCD and DBD groups were compared. We examined the risk factors for graft loss in the DCD group., Results: The 5-year patient survival and death-censored graft survival rates of the DCD group, obtained by propensity score matching, were 93.6% and 95.2%, respectively, which were equivalent to 94.2% and 93.8%, respectively, obtained in the DBD group. Older donors (≥ 50 years) and prolonged cold ischemia time (≥ 12 h) were risk factors for graft loss; in the presence of these, graft survival was lower in the DCD group., Conclusions: Older donors and prolonged cold ischemia time reduced graft survival in the DCD group. Proper evaluation of donors and careful preparation for transplant surgery are, therefore, essential to ensure good transplant outcomes., (© 2021. Japanese Society of Nephrology.)

Objective We studied three types of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations and evaluated which type was strongly associated with comorbidities in living kidney transplantation (LKT) donors. Methods We compared the Japanese modified eGFR, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations (Jm-eGFR, Jm-MDRD, and Jm-CKD-EPI, respectively) for Japanese LKT donors with respect to their relationships with obesity, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. Results Of the 8,176 enrolled Japanese LKT donors, the eGFR calculated using Jm-CKD-EPI (eGFR/Jm-CKD-EPI) detected significant differences in 4 of 5 comorbidities between the comorbidity-positive and comorbidity-negative groups, whereas the eGFR calculated using Jm-MDRD (eGFR/Jm-MDRD) and Jm-eGFR (eGFR/Jm-eGFR) detected only 3 and 1 comorbidities, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Jm-CKD-EPI was larger than those of Jm-eGFR and Jm-MDRD for all five comorbidities. Conclusion We found that the eGFR/Jm-CKD-EPI correlated better with comorbidities than the eGFR/Jm-eGFR and eGFR/Jm-MDRD in Japanese LKT donors. We recommend using the eGFR/Jm-CKD-EPI for the initial assessment of the renal function in LKT donor candidates when evaluating the presence of associated comorbidities.

Background: Extensive data have been accumulated for adults who have undergone ABO-incompatible (ABOi)-living kidney transplantation (LKT). In contrast, available published data on pediatric recipients who underwent ABOi-LKT from the early to middle 2000s is very limited. Thus, pediatric ABOi-LKT has remained relatively rare, and there is a lack of large, multicenter data., Methods: We analyzed data from the Japanese Kidney Transplant Registry to clarify the patient and graft outcomes of pediatric recipients who underwent ABOi-LKT from 2002 to 2015. A total of 102 ABOi and 788 ABO-compatible (ABOc) recipients were identified in this study. All recipients had received basiliximab and a triple immunosuppressive protocol comprising calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The ABOi recipients also received preconditioning therapies including B-cell depletion by a splenectomy or rituximab treatment and therapeutic apheresis., Results: Death rates for ABOi and ABOc recipients were 0.17 versus 0.17 deaths per 100 patient-years. Graft loss rates for ABOi and ABOc recipients were 1.58 versus 1.45 events per 100 patient-years. No particular causes of death or graft loss predominantly affected ABOi or ABOc recipients., Conclusions: The results of this registry analysis suggest that pediatric ABOi-LKT can be performed efficiently. Although further studies are clearly required to perform pediatric ABOi-LKT more safely and less invasively, ABOi-LKT is now an acceptable treatment for pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease.

Objectives: Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease post-transplantation. Data regarding which strategy is superior are sparse, especially in high-risk recipients (donor CMV seropositive (D+) and recipient CMV seronegative (R-))., Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2015. The incidence of CMV infection/disease and patient and graft outcomes were analyzed and compared between high-risk recipients (D+/R-) and intermediate-risk recipients (D+/R+ or D-/R+), all managed with preemptive therapy., Results: Of 118 kidney transplant recipients, 21 were high-risk and 97 were intermediate-risk. Over a median follow-up period of 3 years, asymptomatic CMV infection developed significantly more frequently in high-risk patients than in intermediate-risk patients (38.1% vs. 16.5%, p=0.04), and CMV disease developed in a similar manner (28.6% vs. 3.1%, p<0.01). Among high-risk patients, CMV infection developed within the first 3 months post-transplantation and CMV disease within the first 9 months post-transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in the probability of mortality (log-rank p=0.63) or graft loss (log-rank p=0.50) between the patient groups. Graft rejection occurred more frequently in high-risk than in intermediate-risk patients, but the difference was not significant (log-rank p=0.24)., Conclusions: These results suggest that further studies on universal prophylaxis in high-risk patients are needed to elucidate whether preventing CMV infection/disease during the early post-transplant period leads to better outcomes, especially in terms of reducing graft rejection., (Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)