Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Catch‐at‐age data are used to inform important management decisions for recovering populations of Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush. Age data for Lake Trout are commonly derived from interpretation of annual growth marks (annuli) on the fish's otoliths. Due to the tendency for annuli to vary in appearance and the subjectivity that is inherent to any age interpretation method, it is important that the common sources of interpretation error be well understood for any aging method used to inform management plans. In this study, coded wire tags were used to establish true ages for 153 Lake Trout to measure the precision and accuracy of age interpretations made from transverse‐sectioned otoliths and to identify sources of potential age interpretation error that researchers and managers may encounter when using this method. Precision of age interpretations, as measured by average coefficient of variation, ranged from 7.9% to 9.2%. Accuracy of age interpretations varied among readers, with exact matches ranging from 41.8% to 53.6% and accuracy within ±1 year ranging from 81.0% to 83.0%. Age interpretation errors were more likely to be overestimates of true age for Lake Trout under age 7 and underestimates for Lake Trout over age 13. However, only reader 1 exhibited significant systematic bias in their age interpretations. Poor clarity of the first annuli, growth checks resembling annuli, and faintness of narrow annuli near otolith margins in older fish were identified as likely sources of interpretation error in this study. A digital reference collection of known‐age Lake Trout otoliths is provided as supplemental material in the online version of this article. This collection can be used for training new readers, measuring the accuracy of age interpretations, and monitoring for aging bias by anyone using otoliths to obtain age data for Lake Trout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lake Ontario boasts a diverse fish community comprised of native and introduced species that support vibrant recreational, commercial and Indigenous fisheries. The effective delivery of a program to assess and control the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is crucial to achievement of Lake Ontario Fish Community Objectives of rehabilitating native fish stocks while protecting and maintaining the abundance of introduced salmonines. During 2000–2019, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) and its control agents, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), delivered a consistent program of sea lamprey assessment and control. Beginning in 2004, rising sea lamprey abundance and marking rates on lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Ontario coincided with a decline of large lake trout in gillnet surveys. Efforts were undertaken to identify and control important sources of juvenile sea lampreys, including larvae that survived treatment, inhabited deepwater areas, or colonised previously uninhabited stream reaches and tributaries. A renewed reliance on proven conventional controls, including lampricide treatments and barriers, has resulted in consistent suppression of sea lamprey abundance and lake trout marking to prescribed targets in Lake Ontario during 2014–2019. This achievement is unprecedented in the 49-year history of Sea Lamprey Control Program delivery in Lake Ontario, and is attributable to the collaborative efforts of the GLFC, the control agents, and federal, provincial, state, and Indigenous partners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]