Search

Objective: Numerous studies in high-risk populations established that variations in infant neuromotor development predict poor cognitive function. It is unclear whether this association is found in the general population. Moreover, previous population-based studies mostly focused on motor milestone achievement., Methods: This study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Neuromotor development was assessed with an adapted version of Touwen's Neurodevelopmental Examination when infants (1205 males, 1278 females) were on average 12 weeks old (standard deviation 1, range, 9-15 weeks). To measure language function at age 1.5 years, the MacArthur Short Form Vocabulary Checklist was used. At 2.5 years, mothers completed the Language Development Survey and the Parent Report of Children's Abilities measuring language and nonverbal cognitive functioning, respectively., Results: After adjustment for confounders, less optimal neuromotor development, that is, more low tone symptoms, was associated with a delay in receptive language at 1.5 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.34) and in expressive language at multiple time points (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21). Higher scores on overall neuromotor development, indicating a less optimal neuromotor development, was associated with an increased risk of a delay in nonverbal cognitive function at 2.5 years (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35)., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that infants with more low tone symptoms, indicating minor deviances from normal neuromotor development, are somewhat more vulnerable to language delays than those infants who do not have these symptoms.

Purpose: The authors tested associations between (a) parent-reported temporary vs. persistent vocabulary delay and (b) parent-reported behavioral/emotional problems in a sample of 5,497 young Dutch children participating in a prospective population-based study., Method: Mothers completed the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory-Netherlands (Zink & Lejaegere, 2003) at age 18 months and the Language Development Survey (Rescorla, 1989) at age 30 months, with expressive vocabulary delay defined as scores in the lowest 15th age- and gender-specific percentiles. The Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000) was completed by mothers when their children were age 18 months and by both parents when their children were age 36 months, from which Internalizing Problems and Externalizing Problems scores were analyzed., Results: All analyses were adjusted for covariates. Expressive vocabulary delay at age 18 months was weakly related to Internalizing Problems scores at age 18 months as well as mother-reported Externalizing and Internalizing Problems scores at age 36 months (the latter for boys only). Expressive vocabulary delay at age 30 months was weakly associated with mother-reported Externalizing and Internalizing Problems scores (the latter for boys only) and father-reported Internalizing Problems scores. Persistent expressive vocabulary delay predicted the highest risk of mother-reported internalizing and externalizing problems at age 36 months., Conclusion: This population-based study showed modest associations between vocabulary delay and behavioral/emotional problems detectable from 18 months onward.

Purpose: The authors investigated continuity and discontinuity of vocabulary skills in a population-based cohort in the Netherlands., Method: Mothers of 3,759 children completed the Dutch version of the MacArthur Short Form Vocabulary Checklist (Zink & Lejaegere, 2003) at 18 months and a Dutch translation of the Language Development Survey (Rescorla, 1989) at 30 months. At both ages, expressive vocabulary delay was defined as vocabulary scores <10th age- and gender-specific percentile., Results: Of the children, 85.2% had normal vocabulary development at both ages, 6.2% were "late bloomers," 6.0% had late onset expressive vocabulary delay, and 2.6% had persistent expressive vocabulary delay. Word production and comprehension at 18 months explained 11.5% of the variance in 30-month vocabulary scores, with low birth weight, child age, gender and ethnicity, maternal age and education, and parenting stress explaining an additional 6.2%. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify biological, demographic, and psychological factors associated with each of the vocabulary delay outcome groups relative to the typically developing group., Conclusions: Although multiple perinatal, demographic, and maternal psychosocial factors significantly predicted vocabulary skills at 30 months, positive predictive value and sensitivity were low. Future studies should address to what extent additional factors, such as brain maturation and genetic influences, can improve the prediction and understanding of continuity and discontinuity of language delay.