Search

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in the repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture. Patients and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent LESS for intraperitoneal bladder rupture in three hospitals in Korea were included prospectively in this study. LESS was performed using a homemade single-port device composed of an Alexis wound retractor and a surgical glove. Results: Of the 22 patients, 18 were male. The mean age was 40.50 ± 11.83 years. The mean body mass index was 24.19 ± 2.61 kg/m2. The cause of rupture was trauma (n = 21) or iatrogenic injury (n = 1). The mean bladder rupture diameter was 3.41 ± 1.01 cm. LESS bladder rupture repair was completed effectively in all patients. The mean operative time was 89.05 ± 11.29 minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.91 ± 0.53 days. Postoperatively, none of the patients required patient-controlled analgesia, and none developed major complications. The urethral Foley catheter was removed 7.68 ± 2.08 days after surgery. Conclusions: LESS repair of intraperitoneal bladder rupture, which involves a homemade single-port device, was a feasible and safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy in this case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? LESS-NU may be an alternative minimally-invasive treatment option for patients eligible to undergo laparoscopic surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma., The true benefits of LESS-NU remain to be determined and require randomized control trials in the future. Despite encouraging early findings, clinical trials still are warranted before this procedure is adopted widely, and longer follow-up is needed to determine its oncological durability., Objective To report a large multi-institutional series of laparoendoscopic single-site ( LESS) nephroureterectomy ( NU)., Materials and Methods Data on all cases of LESS-NU performed between 2008 and 2012 at 15 institutions were retrospectively gathered., The main demographic data and perioperative outcomes were analysed., Results The study included 101 patients whose mean ( sd) age was 66.4 (9.9) years and mean ( sd) body mass index was 24.8 (4) kg/m2, and of whom 29.7% had undergone previous abdominal/pelvic surgery., The mean ( sd) operating time was 221.4 (73.7) min, estimated blood loss 231.7 (348.0) mL., A robot-assisted LESS technique was applied in 25.7% of cases. An extra trocar was inserted in 28.7% of cases to complete the procedure. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in three cases (3.0%). There was no bladder cuff excision in 20.8% of cases, and excision was carried out using a variety of techniques in the remaining cases., Six intra-operative complications occurred (5.9%). The mean ( sd) length of hospital stay was 6.3 (3.5) days. The overall postoperative complication rate was 10.0%, and most of the complications were low grade ( Clavien grades 1 and 2)., The mean tumour size was 3.1 (1.9) cm. Pathological staging was pTis in two patients, pTa in 12 patients, pT1 in 42 patients, pT2 in 20 patients, pT3 in 23 patients and pT4 in two patients. Pathological grade was high in 71 and low in 30 patients., At a mean follow-up of 14 months, six patients (5.9%) had died. Disease recurrence (including distant and bladder recurrence) was detected in 22.8% of patients, with a mean time to recurrence of 11.5 months., Conclusions This study reports the largest multi-institutional experience of LESS-NU to date., Peri-operative outcomes mirror those of published standard laparoscopy series., Despite encouraging early findings, longer follow-up is needed to determine the oncological efficacy of the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the safety of en bloc stapler ligation of the renal vascular pedicle during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Subjects and Methods: Clinical data were collected prospectively from 70 patients who underwent either en bloc stapling of the renal hilum ( n=35) (Group A) or the separate ligation method ( n=35) (Group B) to treat renal cell carcinoma. To evaluate the incidence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), blood pressure and heart rate were measured, and abdominal auscultation was performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Abdominal computed tomography was also performed at 6 and 12 months post-surgery. In addition, preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes (such as operation time and estimated blood loss [EBL]) were examined. Results: Both operation time and EBL were lower for Group A: operative time, Group A versus Group B, 60.26±10.94 minutes versus 67.51±10.49 minutes ( P=.007); EBL, Group A versus Group B, 33.53±13.46 mL versus 49.14±32.21 mL ( P=.011). No statistically significant differences were noted in either of the postoperative variables (blood pressure and heart rate), and there was no clinical evidence of bruit or AVF at 12 months post-surgery. Conclusions: No AVF was observed after en bloc ligation upon clinical follow-up or on radiological evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We compared postoperative outcomes in patients treated with laparoendoscopic single site varicocele ligation with or without testicular artery and lymphatic preservation. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients with left varicocele were randomly divided into 2 groups and treated with laparoendoscopic single site varicocele ligation with preservation of the testicular artery and lymphatics (40 in group 1) or complete ligation of the testicular vessels and lymphatics (40 in group 2). Operative time, hospital stay, return to normal activity, postoperative visual analog scale pain scores and complications were analyzed. In patients with subfertility preoperative and 3-month postoperative semen analyses were performed. In patients with scrotal pain preoperative and 12-month postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were analyzed. Results: A total of 35 patients per group completed the study. Hospital stay, return to normal activity and postoperative pain scores did not differ between the groups. No major complications were observed. Mean ± SD operative time was 60.7 ± 10.7 and 48.6 ± 6.0 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p <0.001). Patients with subfertility, including 22 in group 1 and 21 in group 2, showed improved semen parameters 3 months postoperatively but postoperative values did not differ between the groups. The 17 patients in each group with scrotal pain showed decreased pain scores 12 months postoperatively with no difference between the groups. Conclusions: Laparoendoscopic single site varicocele ligation is feasible. No differences in postoperative outcomes and complications were observed when preserving or not preserving the testicular artery and lymphatics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for complications and conversions in a large contemporary series of patients treated with urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery. Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of consecutive patients treated with laparoendoscopic single site surgery between August 2007 and December 2010 at a total of 21 institutions. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risks of conversion, and of any grade and only high grade postoperative complications. Results: Included in analysis were 1,163 cases. Intraoperatively complications occurred in 3.3% of cases. The overall conversion rate was 19.6% with 14.6%, 4% and 1.1% of procedures converted to reduced port laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopic/robotic surgery and open surgery, respectively. On multivariable analysis the factors significantly associated with the risk of conversion were oncological surgical indication (p = 0.02), pelvic surgery (p <0.001), robotic approach (p <0.001), high difficulty score (p = 0.004), extended operative time (p = 0.03) and an intraoperative complication (p = 0.001). A total of 120 postoperative complications occurred in 109 patients (9.4%) with major complications in only 2.4% of the entire cohort. Reconstructive procedure (p = 0.03), high difficulty score (p = 0.002) and extended operative time (p = 0.02) predicted high grade complications. Conclusions: Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery can be done with a low complication rate, resembling that in laparoscopic series. The conversion rate suggests that early adopters of the technique have adhered to the principles of careful patient selection and safety. Besides facilitating future comparisons across institutions, this analysis can be useful to counsel patients on the current risks of urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In patients with a renal cyst and concurrent symptoms, we examined the effectiveness and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for renal cyst marsupialization using a homemade single-port device (HSPD) by a single surgeon (S.W.L.). Patients and Methods: The present study was conducted on a total of 31 patients with a renal cyst. A LESS renal cyst marsupialization was performed using a HSPD based on the Alexis® wound retractor and a powder-free surgical glove. In our study, the mean age was 55.29 ± 10.86 (range 31-73) years and the mean size of the renal cyst was 6.83 ± 1.09 cm. Results: All the surgical procedures were successfully performed. The mean operative time was 101.35 ± 16.04 min. Of the patients who underwent the procedure, none presented with major complications. In 7 patients who had pain preoperatively, there was a significant difference in the visual analogue pain scale score at 6.86 ± 0.69 preoperatively and 1.71 ± 0.49 at postoperative week 4 (p < 0.001). The number of patients who were satisfied with the postoperative outcome was 29 (93.5%). Conclusions: In patients with a simple renal cyst, LESS renal cyst marsupialization using a HSPD might be considered as a feasible, safe surgical treatment option. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurpose:We evaluated the usefulness of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ureterolithotomy with a homemade single port device for upper ureteral stones in patients in whom previous shockwave lithotripsy or ureteroscopic stone surgery had failed or the stone was suspected to be impacted.Patients and Methods:LESS ureterolithotomy was performed on 30 patients by using a homemade single port device composed of an Alexis wound retractor and surgical glove. The mean age of the patients was 42.47±11.15 years (range 24–65 y), and the male-to-female ratio was 13:17. The mean stone diameter was 1.77±0.47 cm. One patient underwent a bilateral operation for bilateral ureteral stones.Results:The LESS surgery was converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery in one case. The mean operative time was 110.43±43.75 minutes. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.40±1.54 days. None of the patients used patient-controlled anesthesia, and none presented with major complications. The visual analog pain scale score improved significantly by postoperative day 7 (from 6.87±1.61 preoperatively to 1.67±1.16; P<0.001), and 28 (93.3%) patients said they were satisfied with the postoperative outcome. Postoperative radiologic evaluation revealed that the stones had been removed completely in 28 cases. There were no cases of urinary leakage.Conclusion:LESS ureterolithotomy using a homemade single port device can be considered to be a feasible and safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has gained popularity in urology over the last few years. Objective: To report a large multi-institutional worldwide series of LESS in urology. Design, setting, and participants: Consecutive cases of LESS done between August 2007 and November 2010 at 18 participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Intervention: Each group performed a variety of LESS procedures according to its own protocols, entry criteria, and techniques. Measurements: Demographic data, main perioperative outcome parameters, and information related to the surgical technique were gathered and analyzed. Conversions to reduced-port laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy, or open surgery were evaluated, as were intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results and limitations: Overall, 1076 patients were included in the analysis. The most common procedures were extirpative or ablative operations in the upper urinary tract. The da Vinci robot was used to operate on 143 patients (13%). A single-port technique was most commonly used and the umbilicus represented the most common access site. Overall, operative time was 160±93min and estimated blood loss was 148±234ml. Skin incision length at closure was 3.5±1.5cm. Mean hospital stay was 3.6±2.7 d with a visual analog pain score at discharge of 1.5±1.4. An additional port was used in 23% of cases. The overall conversion rate was 20.8%; 15.8% of patients were converted to reduced-port laparoscopy, 4% to conventional laparoscopy/robotic surgery, and 1% to open surgery. The intraoperative complication rate was 3.3%. Postoperative complications, mostly low grade, were encountered in 9.5% of cases. Conclusions: This study provides a global view of the evolution of LESS in the field of minimally invasive urologic surgery. A broad range of procedures have been effectively performed, primarily in the academic setting, within diverse health care systems around the world. Since LESS is performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, the risk of complications remains low when stringent patient-selection criteria are applied. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]