9 results on '"Matsuda, Akihisa"'
Search Results
2. A Trial Protocol to Investigate the Incidence of Postoperative Bowel Obstruction after Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery Using an Absorbable Adhesion Barrier Material (INTERCEED®) (Balsam CEED Study): A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study
- Author
-
Sonoda, Hiromichi, Yamada, Takeshi, Hirata, Keiji, Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa, Ichikawa, Daisuke, Yukawa, Norio, Eto, Ken, Koda, Keiji, Hasegawa, Suguru, Matsuda, Akihisa, Ito, Shingo, Yokoyama, Yasuyuki, Yoshida, Hiroshi, and Ishihara, Soichiro
- Subjects
interceed ,adhesion prevention barrier ,colorectal cancer ,RC799-869 ,Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology ,laparoscopic surgery ,Trial Protocol - Abstract
Background: Some studies have reported that adhesion prevention barriers (APBs) reduce adhesion after abdominal surgery; however, evidence showing that APBs reduce the incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO), one of the most serious complications after abdominal surgery, is little. One concern is that APBs are usually applied only under the midline incision, although adhesion can occur at any place in the peritoneum where an incision is made during surgery. INTERCEEDⓇ is an APB that reportedly prevents postoperative SBO after surgery. This study aims to assess the clinical utility of INTERCEEDⓇ for the prevention of SBO after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and determine whether the application site of INTERCEEDⓇ affects the incidence of SBO. Methods/Design: This study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in Japan. The primary end point is the incidence of postoperative SBO 2 years after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary end points include whether the site of the application of INTERCEEDⓇ affects the incidence of SBO. Each surgeon selects one of the following three procedures: 1) INTERCEEDⓇ is placed only under the midline incision; 2) INTERCEEDⓇ is placed at the site of bowel mobilization and/or lymph node dissection, but not under the midline incision; and 3) INTERCEEDⓇ is placed at both sites. Discussion: This is the first study to assess whether the placement of APBs affects the incidence of SBO. The study results may lead to a subsequent randomized study.
- Published
- 2021
3. A case report of anal fistula-associated mucinous adenocarcinoma developing 3 years after treatment of perianal abscess.
- Author
-
Koizumi, Michihiro, Matsuda, Akihisa, Yamada, Takeshi, Morimoto, Koji, Kubota, Itaru, Kubota, Yawara, Tamura, Shuzo, Tominaga, Kenta, Sakatani, Takashi, and Yoshida, Hiroshi
- Subjects
MUCINOUS adenocarcinoma ,ANAL fistula ,ABSCESSES ,ABDOMINOPERINEAL resection ,LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,HISTOPATHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: A long-standing (over 10 years) anal fistula is considered a fundamental cause of fistula-associated mucinous adenocarcinoma (FAMC). Perianal abscesses and anal fistulas are two sequential phases of the same anorectal infectious process. We experienced a case of FAMC which developed 3 years after the treatment of a perianal abscess. Case presentation: A 68-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of progressive anal pain and a palpable tumor. She had a history of undergoing a drainage operation for a perianal abscess 3 years previously. A 15 × 15-mm tumor at the former drainage site was identified; transanal ultrasonography showed an intersphincteric fistula connecting to the tumor. A biopsy taken from the tumor demonstrated mucinous adenocarcinoma; the tumor was diagnosed as FAMC. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was performed. Histopathology showed highly dysplastic cells lining the lumen of the anal fistula and poorly differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma proliferating in the dermis and epidermis in the distal aspect of the fistula. Conclusions: FAMC can develop within fewer than 3 years after the development of a perianal abscess and anal fistula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Clinical impact of laparoscopic surgery and adhesion prevention material for prevention of small bowel obstruction.
- Author
-
Yamada, Takeshi, Hirata, Keiji, Ichikawa, Daisuke, Ikeda, Masataka, Fujita, Fumihiko, Eto, Ken, Yukawa, Norio, Kojima, Yutaka, Matsuda, Akihisa, Shimoyama, Rai, Ochiai, Hideto, Kumamoto, Kensuke, Takayama, Yuichi, Komono, Akira, Sonoda, Hiromichi, Ohta, Ryo, Yokoyama, Yasuyuki, Yoshida, Hiroshi, Kaibori, Masaki, and Takemasa, Ichiro
- Subjects
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,BOWEL obstructions ,SMALL intestine ,ABDOMINAL surgery ,PROCTOLOGY - Abstract
Aim: Adhesive small bowel obstructions (SBO) are one of the most common complications following abdominal surgery, and they decrease patient quality of life. Since 2000, laparoscopic surgery has been employed with increasing frequency, as has adhesion prevention material (APM). In this study we tried to evaluate whether laparoscopic surgery and APM reduce the incidence of SBO. Methods: In Cohort 1, we included patients who developed SBO and received inpatient treatment between 2015 and 2018. We evaluated the elapsed time between precedent surgery and the onset of SBO, and what kind of surgery most often causes SBO. In Cohort 2, we included patients who underwent digestive surgery between 2012 and 2014 and evaluated SBO incidence within 5 y after the precedent surgery. Results: In all, 2058 patients were included in Cohort 1. Of these, 164 had experienced no precedent surgery. Among patients with a history of abdominal surgery, 29.7% experienced SBO within 1 y after the precedent surgery and 48.1% within 3 y. Altogether, 18798 patients were analyzed in Cohort 2. The incidence of SBO after laparoscopic colorectal surgery was lower than that of open colorectal surgery (P <.001), and laparoscopic gastroduodenal surgery was also lower (P =.02). However, there were no differences between laparoscopic and open surgery for other types of surgery. The use of APM had no effect on SBO incidence in any type of abdominal surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery helps to reduce SBO incidence only in colorectal surgery, and possibly in gastroduodenal surgery. APM does not reduce SBO after abdominal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of suction‐tip forceps, a new tool for laparoscopic surgery, for gastric cancer.
- Author
-
Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki, Harada, Jun‐ichiro, Ando, Fumihiko, Arai, Hiroki, Kuge, Komei, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Kawano, Youichi, Matsuda, Akihisa, Suzuki, Hideyuki, and Yoshida, Hiroshi
- Subjects
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,DRUG efficacy ,STOMACH cancer ,MINIMALLY invasive procedures ,OBSTETRICAL forceps ,FORCEPS - Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgery; however, obstacles to its functional optimization remain. Surgical ports can accommodate only one instrument at a time so complex exchange manipulations are necessary during surgery which increases operation times and patient risk. We developed a new laparoscopic instrument that functions as both forceps and a suction tube, which renders intraoperative tool exchange unnecessary. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel dual‐function device in laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. Methods: This single‐center pilot study assessed patient safety during and after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer with the suction‐forceps using intraoperative video and clinical follow‐up, respectively. To evaluate instrument efficacy, we measured the time interval between the start of any bleeding and the start of aspiration ("suction access time") and compared this time with that of a conventional surgical setup. Results: In total 15 patients participated, with all procedures being successful. No excess tissue damage occurred during surgery. Suction access time was significantly shorter in cases of bleeding when the suction‐tip forceps were used for aspiration (2.01 seconds) compared to an ordinary suction tube (12.5 seconds; P <.01). Conclusion: These findings suggest that our new suction‐tip forceps are a useful, safe, and efficacious operative tool. This surgical innovation may considerably simplify gastric laparoscopic surgery. This pilot study was registered with Japan Clinical Trial Registration on 22 June 2017 (registration number: UMIN000027879). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Development of transomental hernia shortly after laparoscopic colonic surgery: a case report.
- Author
-
Haruna, Takahiro, Matsuda, Akihisa, Koizumi, Michihiro, Yamada, Takeshi, Shinji, Seiichi, Yokoyama, Yasuyuki, Takahashi, Goro, Hotta, Masahiro, Iwai, Takuma, Hara, Keisuke, Takeda, Kohki, and Yoshida, Hiroshi
- Subjects
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,HERNIA ,POSTOPERATIVE pain ,BOWEL obstructions ,SMALL intestine ,ABDOMINAL pain ,INGUINAL hernia - Abstract
Background: A transomental hernia is defined as bowel invagination into an abnormal hiatus of the omentum. It is a rare type of internal hernia that is sometimes lethal. We herein report a case of a transomental hernia developing shortly after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Case presentation: A 71-year-old man underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. He was admitted to our hospital because of abdominal pain and nausea on postoperative day 12. Laboratory investigation showed increased levels of inflammatory markers. Abdominal computed tomography showed a closed loop and mesenteric edema of the small intestine with ascites. We performed an emergency operation under the diagnosis of strangulated bowel obstruction. Operative findings showed internal herniation of strangulated ileal loops through a defect of the omentum with hemorrhagic ascites. The incarcerated small bowel was resected and reconstructed because the ischemic change was irreversible after the reduction. We partially resected the omentum that had formed the defect. The patient's postoperative progress was good, and he was discharged on postoperative day 8. Conclusions: Almost all internal hernias after intestinal surgery are mesenteric hernias; however, we should bear in mind that the more lethal transomental hernia is also possible. Therefore, immediate surgical exploration should be performed in a timely manner for internal hernias, especially for patients with early-onset symptoms after laparoscopic intestinal surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for strangulated inguinal hernia.
- Author
-
Matsuda, Akihisa, Miyashita, Masao, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki, Kawano, Youichi, Kuriyama, Sho, Sekiguchi, Kumiko, Ando, Fumihiko, Matsutani, Takeshi, and Uchida, Eiji
- Subjects
- *
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery , *SURGICAL complications , *ENDOSCOPIC surgery , *HERNIA surgery , *INGUINAL hernia , *ABDOMINAL surgery - Abstract
Abstract: Introduction: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) is widely accepted in elective inguinal hernioplasty. However, given the scarcity of data, the feasibility and safety of TAPP in strangulated hernia cases have not yet been determined. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data from a consecutive series of 33 patients who had undergone surgery for acute strangulated inguinal hernia associated with suspected visceral ischemic damage by either TAPP (TAPP group, n = 11) or conventional open hernioplasty via the anterior approach (anterior group, n = 22). Results: The TAPP group had a significant longer surgical duration than the anterior group (147 vs 84 min) and relatively less blood loss. Incision and enlargement of the hernial orifice, which enables easy reduction of the strangulated organ, was performed in the last 7 of 11 cases in the TAPP group. The morbidity was lower in the TAPP group, but the difference was not statistically significant (18% vs 23%). The TAPP group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the anterior group (7 vs 10 days). Conclusion: For surgeons with sufficient knowledge of the anatomy and expertise in reducing the strangulated organ, TAPP for strangulated inguinal hernia is at least comparable to open hernioplasty via the anterior approach in short‐term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Life‐threatening hemorrhage from the corona mortis after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Report of a case.
- Author
-
Yasuda, Tomohiko, Matsuda, Akihisa, Miyashita, Masao, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki, Kawano, Youichi, Sekiguchi, Kumiko, Ando, Fumihiko, Matsutani, Takeshi, and Uchida, Eiji
- Subjects
- *
INGUINAL hernia , *HEMOSTASIS , *HERNIA surgery , *OPERATIVE surgery , *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery - Abstract
Abstract: Along with the increased use of other laparoscopic procedures, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become widely used because of its minimally invasive nature. Here, we report a case of 66‐year‐old man who underwent transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty and developed hemorrhagic shock on postoperative day 1. CT showed postoperative venous hemorrhage from the retropubic space. Successful hemostasis of the massive hemorrhage was achieved laparoscopically. The origin of the hemorrhage was assumed to be the corona mortis vein, which was slightly injured during the operation. Despite the rarity of this complication, surgeons must be aware of the need to carefully dissect and fix the mesh in the retropubic space to avoid injuring the corona mortis. Laparoscopic hemostasis may be an effective alternative to the open approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Laparoscopic mesh repair for lumbar hernia after iliac crest bone harvest.
- Author
-
Matsuda, Akihisa, Miyashita, Masao, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki, Kawano, Yoichi, Matsutani, Takeshi, and Uchida, Eiji
- Subjects
- *
LUMBAR vertebrae diseases , *INTERVERTEBRAL disk hernias , *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery , *SURGICAL complications , *CAUCASIAN race , *DISEASES - Abstract
Lumbar hernia after iliac crest bone harvest is relatively rare. When it does occur, it presents as a flank abdominal protrusion through a lateroposterior abdominal wall defect. A laparoscopic approach for this type of hernia is reported to have advantages over the classic open method. Here, we present a case of a 49-year-old Caucasian man who presented with an enlarged left flank mass after iliac bone harvest for pseudarthrosis. He had undergone open onlay mesh repair for inferior lumbar hernia, but the hernia recurred 3 months postoperatively. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a composite mesh was performed 7 months after recurrence. The patient was discharged 6 days postoperatively without complications. No signs of recurrence were detected during 1-year follow-up period. The laparoscopic approach for lumbar hernia conferred excellent visualization of the hernia defect and enabled a safe mesh repair using intra-abdominal pressure to hold it in position. This approach provided all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.