Search

Introduction: Successful stenting of an obstructing colorectal tumor can avert upfront emergency surgery in malnourished obstructed patients with metastatic disease and poor physiological condition. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of stenting followed by primary colorectal tumor resection among patients with obstructed stage IV colorectal cancer at presentation, over a 10‐year period. Methods: From 2007 to 2016, a cohort comprising 25 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. The durability of palliation of bowel obstruction, oncological outcomes and factors influencing overall survival were analyzed. Results: No re‐interventions were required for bowel obstruction during the study period. The overall perioperative morbidity rate was 16%, with no postoperative 90‐day mortality. Laparoscopic resection rate was 52% and stoma formation rate was 8%. The median overall survival was 24 months for the entire cohort, and the 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 80%, 35% and 23.33% respectively. More than one site of distant metastases, peritoneal involvement, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes. Patients with peritoneal‐only metastasis had worse outcomes, with a median survival of 7 months and no patients surviving beyond 18 months. Conclusion: Stenting followed by resection of the primary obstructing colorectal cancer provides durable palliation among patients with stage IV disease, with low perioperative morbidity and stoma formation rates. Superior survival was observed among patients with single‐site, non‐peritoneal distant metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ideal incision for laparoscopic specimen extraction is not known. There has been no randomised study thus far evaluating extraction site in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of our study was to compare post-operative outcomes, pain scores and quality of life scores of vertical periumbilical (VW) versus transverse left iliac fossa (TW) incisions for specimen extraction in laparoscopic anterior resections. Methods: Using an assumption of pain score of 5 in the VW group versus pain score of 2 in the TW group, on day one post-operatively, and based on a 80 % statistical power of analysis to achieve a statistical difference with reduction in pain scores, the sample size per arm calculated was 16. Forty patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection were randomised to VW ( n = 20) or TW ( n = 20). Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were post-operative outcomes, wound cosmesis using Hollander Cosmesis Score and quality of life assessment using EQ-5D at 2 weeks and 2 months post-operatively. Results: Median pain score on the first post-operative day was 2 in both groups ( p = 0.360). There was no significant difference in wound infection rates, operative time or post-operative recovery. Cosmesis scores and EQ-5D scores were also similar in both groups. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the incidence of extraction site incisional hernia was similar. Conclusion: Transverse and vertical incisions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have similar post-operative outcomes, with similar pain scores, cosmesis scores, quality of life scores and incisional hernia rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a recent development of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease. The literature comparing it against conventional laparoscopic colectomy remains limited. Methods: A retrospective case-cohort study compared the benefits and outcomes of SILS right hemicolectomy (SRH) with those of conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH). The medical records of consecutive patients from a prospectively collected database were reviewed. Demographic data, operative details, recovery parameters, and details of resected specimens were obtained and analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. Results: From January 2006 to March 2011, 104 elective LRHs (72 %) and 40 elective SRHs (28 %) were performed. The demographics for these two groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesiology score. As the records showed, 62 % of the LRHs and 57 % of the SRHs were performed for malignancies ( p = 0.536). Seven of the LRH cases (7 %) were converted to open procedure, whereas two of the SILS cases (5 %) were converted. Three SILS cases (7 %) were completed with additional laparoscopic ports. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of wound length, mean operative time, lymph node clearance, or margins of resected specimen. The recovery parameters (pain score, hospital length of stay, and complications rate) also were equivalent between the two groups. Conclusion: As a feasible and safe procedure with early postoperative outcomes equivalent to those for LRH, SRH is a suitable alternative. The possible advantages of SILS over conventional laparoscopic surgery may be validated only with randomized controlled trials in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The laparoscopic approach is increasingly becoming the gold standard for colorectal resections. While laparoscopic surgery of the left colon and rectum has been evaluated in many studies, laparoscopic resection of the right colon has not been as widely examined. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic right hemicolectomies and to determine if they were superior when compared with those after open resection. Consecutive cases of laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed between May 2005 and December 2007, in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, were compared with a matched series of patients who underwent open surgery. From a total of 37 laparoscopic cases, 36 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies. There was one conversion, giving a conversion rate of 2.7%. These 37 patients were compared with 40 patients who underwent open right hemicolectomies. The laparoscopic arm was characterised by shorter length of incisions (5.7 vs. 11.2 cm, p < 0.001) but longer operating times (110.8 vs. 71.6 min, p < 0.001). Mean number of lymph nodes harvested and length of proximal and distal margins were similar in both groups. There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of narcotic use, recovery of bowel function, length of stay, post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomies are as feasible and safe as the open technique. They confer improved cosmesis with smaller incisions but at the expense of longer operating time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by Min Hoe Chew and colleagues to a letter to the editor regarding their article "Evalaution of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a preliminary experience in 32 consecutive cases" in the 2011 issue is presented.