Search

Objective: Peritoneal involvement may be overlooked in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This may lead to underestimation of prognosis and to undertreatment limited to locoregional disease locations. However, staging laparoscopy in LACC is not routinely performed. The primary aim of this study was to determine the proportion of peritoneal metastasis by laparoscopy and the factors associated with peritoneal metastasis in patients with LACC. Secondary aims were to evaluate the performance of staging imaging in detecting peritoneal disease and the prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis., Methods: Retrospective single-institution study including consecutive patients with newly diagnosed LACC (FIGO 2018 stage IB3 and IIA2-IVA) between 06/2015 and 06/2020. All women underwent PET/CT scan, MRI scan and diagnostic laparoscopy at the time of examination under anesthesia (EUA), as part of cervical cancer staging. Peritoneal metastasis was histologically confirmed in all cases., Results: 251 patients were included. 33 (13.2 %) had peritoneal metastasis. The treatment plan was changed for 28/33 (84.8 %) patients with peritoneal metastasis (11.1 % of the entire LACC cohort). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that grade 3 (OR:1.572, 95%CI:1.021-2.419; p = 0.040) and AJCC stage T3-4 (OR:3.435, 95%CI:1.482-7.960; p = 0.004) were variables associated with increased risk of peritoneal metastasis. Sensitivity of PET/CT-scan and MRI-scan in detecting peritoneal metastasis was 4.5 % (95%CI:0.1-22.8) and 13.8 % (95%CI:3.9-31.7), respectively. Peritoneal metastasis was independently associated with worse PFS and OS (HR:3.008, 95%CI:1.779-5.087, p < 0.001 and HR:4.078, 95%CI:2.232-7.451; p < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusion: LACC patients with grade 3 histology and/or AJCC stage T3-4 had high-risk of peritoneal metastasis and diagnostic laparoscopy might be considered as part of cervical cancer staging in these patients. Peritoneal metastasis was an independent factor associated with worse PFS and OS., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Aim of our study was to evaluate whether the different laparotomic (ARH) or minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) approaches (MIS) in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer, present different patterns of recurrence of the disease. The secondary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the variables most involved with the risk of relapse and therefore lower DFS and OS., Material and Methods: The study enrolled patients with definitive histological diagnosis of squamous or adenocarcinoma stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive or abdominal radical hysterectomy from 2001 to 2018., Results: The study enrolled 360 patients and 59 patients (16.4 %) reported a disease relapse. The data showed that ARH group was not associated with different recurrence patterns than MIS group (p = 0.14). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference regarding DFS (p = 0.52) and OS (p = 0.29) between the ARH group and the MIS group., Conclusions: MIS, in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer, is not associated with different relapse patterns compared to ARH, nor with a higher risk of distance metastasis and finally, without significant difference in term of DFS and OS. More studies are needed to determine the factors that modify the site of relapse., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest is disclosed., (© 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ∼ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Simple Summary: Ovarian cancer (OC) represents one of the most lethal cancers in women, with most cases diagnosed at an advanced stage. Recurrence occurs in around 70% of women within 5 years of diagnosis. In this era, in which maintenance therapy with PARP-inhibitors is the standard of care, most recurrent OC (ROC) patients are platinum-sensitive, and the choice of treatment becomes crucial. Randomized clinical trials investigated the role of surgery plus chemotherapy in the treatment of ROC, underlying an advantage in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. New recommendations concluded that platinum-sensitive OC patients should be assessed for eligibility for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in a gynecological oncology center. In selected cases, a minimally-invasive approach can be used. This narrative review is focused on minimally-invasive SCS and on the wide range of elements that must be considered in patient selection. The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been widely increased in recent years, especially in trying to improve the quality of life of these patients by utilising a minimally-invasive (MI) approach. However, surgery in previously-treated patients may be challenging, and patient selection and surgical planning are crucial. Unfortunately, at the moment, validated criteria to select patients for MI-SCS are not reported, and no predictors of its feasibility are currently available, probably due to the vast heterogeneity of recurrence patterns. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery and, in particular, minimally-invasive procedures, in ROC, analyzing patient selection, outcomes, criticisms, and future perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]