Search

Objectives: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and robotic SILS (rSILS) have been found to be safe, minimally invasive techniques in gynaecology. However, one major perceived drawback of these techniques is the increased risk of incisional hernia, compared to multiport laparoscopy or robotic surgery. This study's aim was to determine the optimal technique to reduce postoperative incisional complications such as hernia., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic centre from November 2014 to June 2022 on 1036 women who underwent SILS and rSILS gynaecologic procedures with various closure techniques. Techniques included running absorbable sutures without tagging incision apices (standard closure) and tagging incision apices at the beginning of surgery with the use of permanent suture, absorbable suture, or a combination., Results: Rates of hernia (primary outcome) and incisional issues (secondary outcome) such as separation or infection were analyzed by technique. Hernia rates were lower when incision apices were tagged compared to when not tagged (P < 0.001). Cellulitis/abscess rates were not significantly different. Incision separation was higher when apices were tagged with absorbable and a combination of permanent and absorbable sutures than if apices were tagged with all permanent sutures or not at all. In multivariate analysis, hernia rate decreased in groups with tagged apices, although other incision complications did not vary., Conclusions: The incidence of incisional hernia after SILS procedures is low, though it does vary by technique. Tagging apices for closure, regardless of suture type, can mitigate one of the biggest concerns of performing SILS by reducing postoperative incisional hernia risk., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes for robotic-assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-VNOTES) hysterectomy versus robotic-assisted single-site port (RSSP) hysterectomy when performed for benign indications. This is a retrospective chart review in an academic tertiary setting. 404 patients underwent hysterectomy for benign indications. R-VNOTES hysterectomy and RSSP hysterectomy were performed by a single minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon from January 2015 to August 2022. The primary outcome of our study was total operative time (minutes). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (mL), length of hospital stay (days), and postoperative pain score. Other intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications were also compared. 159 patients underwent R-VNOTES hysterectomy, and 269 patients underwent RSSP hysterectomy. Median length of surgery (minutes) demonstrated a statistically significant shorter operative time in the R-VNOTES hysterectomy group when compared to the RSSP hysterectomy group, (132 min versus 146 min, respectively, p = 0.0001). Additionally, patients in the R-VNOTES hysterectomy group experienced decreased postoperative pain levels at week 1 (6 versus 7, respectively, p = 0.01) and week 3 (1.5 versus 2.5, respectively, p = 0.01) after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups when comparing length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and weight of the uterus. There was no difference in rates of urinary tract infection, blood transfusion, bowel injury, readmission, reoperation, conversion, deep surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolism between both groups. However, there was a higher rate of superficial SSI in the RSSP hysterectomy group (0.6% versus 4.5%, respectively, p = 0.03). When compared to RSSP hysterectomy, R-VNOTES hysterectomy is safe and feasible, as both approaches have comparable surgical outcomes. Patients undergoing R-VNOTES hysterectomy had shorter length of surgery, decreased postoperative pain, and lower rates of superficial surgical site infections., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for robotic vNOTES hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in a World Health Organization class 3 obesity patient (body mass index = 70) as well as large fibroid uterus (16 weeks sized)., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. Our patient is a 50-year-old G0 with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding with an enlarged uterus; her endometrial biopsy showed complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia., Interventions: The surgical exposure for extremely obese patients with a concomitantly large uterus can be very challenging transabdominally due to the patient being unable to tolerate the Trendelenburg position and abdominal gas pressure [1-5]. Therefore, transvaginal NOTES can be an alternative option for these types of challenging patients. However, although there are clear benefits of vNOTES surgery in obese patients, we still need to be thoughtful and deliberate in handling this kind of surgery [6]. Several key success factors that aid in the completion of the surgery include 1. Appropriate patient positioning (Trenguard Position) as tolerated. 2. Initial vaginal section of hysterectomy. 3. Successful port placement. 4. Trendelenburg, as far as tolerated. 5. Harnessing the robotic camera for anterior colpotomy. 6. Utilizing alternative surgical exposure techniques: air seal for maintaining gas pressure for optimizing exposure, lap pad for thermal isolation, and maintaining the uterus for safe exposure during BSO. 7. After identification of the bilateral ureters, the broad, round, and uterine ovarian ligaments were transected with vessel sealer (less thermal spread), and the cystectomy was completed. (Supplemental Video 1) 8. BSO was completed. 9. In-bag uterine tissue extraction. 10. Vaginal cuff closure with V-Loc barbed suture., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted NOTES hysterectomy with BSO is feasible and safe in extremely obese patients with large uterus. The combination of all these strategies could aid in the feasibility and safety of patients with these challenging pathology and morbidity., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for improving safety in robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage via broad ligament window dissection., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. Our patient is a 32-year-old G8P2143, with a history of pregnancy loss at 19 and 23 weeks and 1 failed vaginal cerclage, presented to us at 13 weeks and 5 days for abdominal cerclage. We have completed a total of 5 successful procedures with this technique on pregnant patients ranging from 9 to 14 weeks., Interventions: Abdominal cerclage during pregnancy can be very risky and challenging to perform; however, it offers an increased success rate for continuing pregnancy [1]. Excessive bleeding and the rupture of membrane during the procedure could lead to pregnancy loss and a failed abdominal cerclage [2,3]. Therefore, seeking a feasible and safer technique would be preferable for the surgeons to decrease surgical risk and complications. We have developed a trans-broad ligament technique that would allow for the bilateral uterine vessels to be clearly exposed, thereby reducing the possibility of accidental damage to a major vessel and eliminating the risk of blind needle placement piercing through the amniotic sac resulting in rupture of membrane and subsequent pregnancy loss [4,5]. A dense adhesion band from the anterior uterus to the anterior abdominal wall was carefully taken down using the monopolar scissors. The assistant gently performed a digital vaginal examination to assist with the creation of a bladder flap. The bladder was carefully dissected off the lower uterine segment and uterus using the monopolar scissors. Bilateral uterine vessels were further skeletonized and exposed anteriorly using blunt dissection and the monopolar scissors. On the right, a window was created in the broad ligament using the monopolar scissors. The right uterine vessels were then further dissected and lateralized, creating a small window medial to the uterine vessels at the level of the internal cervical os. The mersilene tape was guided through the window from anterior to posterior. In a similar fashion, a window was created on the left; the mersilene tape was then guided from posterior to anterior. The mersilene tape was completely placed around the cervix circumferentially at the level of the internal cervical os, medial to the uterine vessels. Both ends of the mersilene tape were then pulled gently, while ensuring that the tape was lying flat on the anterior of the uterus. The tape was then tied anteriorly at the 12 o'clock position in an appropriate tension. A 2-0 silk was then sutured to the tails of the tape to ensure that it would remain in the correct location and prevent the loosening of the knot of mersilene tape. The pelvis was copiously irrigated, and hemostasis was assured. The fetal heart rate was 126 bpm, and patient was discharge next day. A healthy baby, 6 pounds 14 ounces, was delivered by cesarean section at 36 weeks 5 days because of early contractions and pain (Supplemental Appendix 1-4)., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage via broad ligament window dissection offers a possibly feasible and safe technique for surgeons seeking to reduce risks, although further research is needed., (Copyright © 2023 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To explore the use of indocyanine green (ICG) in highlighting ureteral anatomical landmarks for the successful and safe execution of robotic-assisted transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy with resection of deeply infiltrated endometriosis., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. Our patient is a 38-year-old G4P1031 with a symptomatic enlarged uterus secondary to adenomyosis and uterine myomas, dense adhesions between the posterior uterus, and left uterosacral ligament., Interventions: Stage IV endometriosis with obliterated cul-de-sac is a challenging procedure in the surgical management of endometriosis. Ureterolysis is the key step to performing this surgery successfully and safely; however, the routine dissection of ureters from the sacral promontory level to the uterine artery is challenging in obliterated cul-de-sacs with pelvic side wall adhesions with the proximal ureter at greatest risk [1-4]. Using the ICG firefly technique allowed us to rapidly identify and safely dissect the ureter through robotic transabdominal endometriosis surgery [5,6]. The angle of approach in transvaginal NOTES surgery for hysterectomy with obliterated cul-de-sac endometriosis leads to far more difficulty in identifying the ureter at the beginning of surgery [3]. Therefore, an obliterated cul-de-sac was associated with a potentially increased risk of ureteral injury and bowel injury. We used ICG to help identify the ureter at the beginning of the case leading to reducing the risk of surgical complication, in which the concept of ureterolysis from the level of the uterine artery to the bifurcation of common iliac vessels in vNOTES surgery will be referred to as "vNOTES retrograde ureterolysis." With the cystoscope in place, a ureteral catheter was inserted into the right ureter and 5 cc of ICG was injected, and the same procedure was done on the left [1,5]. Bovie electrosurgical device was used to incise circumferentially around the cervix. The bladder was dissected off the pubovesical cervical fascia anteriorly and posteriorly with a combination of the Bovie as well as blunt and sharp dissection. Bilateral uterosacral and cardinal ligaments, as well as uterine arteries, were then clamped, transected with Mayo scissors, and secured. Entry into the anterior cul-de-sac was completed, and a stitch using 0 vicryl was used to tag the anterior peritoneum to the anterior vaginal cuff. Posterior entry was attempted unsuccessfully. The Gelpoint mini device was then placed, and the Da Vinci XI robot was docked. Bilateral ureters were identified and dissected out of bilateral pelvic sidewalls using the firefly mode at the level of the uterine artery. The ureters were easily dissected away from the uterus. The left broad ligament was then cauterized and transected using the vessel sealer. The plane between the uterus and the rectum was identified laterally, and the rectum was taken down from the uterus from the right to the left side. Bilateral broad ligaments were then cauterized and transected using the vessel sealer, followed by cauterization and transection of the round ligaments, utero-ovarian ligaments, and mesosalpinx bilaterally. The vaginal cuff angles were secured with a figure-of-eight stitch of 0 vicryl, and the vaginal cuff was then closed in a running fashion with 0 V-Loc. The patient was discharged in one day with reports of minimal pain (Videos 1-3)., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted NOTES hysterectomy with deeply infiltrated endometriosis resection is feasible and safe with ICG-assisted ureteral labeling in a case of obliterated cul-de-sac. The unique green color labeling of ureters offers a prominent landmark in assisting the ureteral dissection while avoiding ureteral and bowel injury, resulting in the possibility of using vNOTES surgery in challenging cases., (Copyright © 2023 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate tips and tricks for the successful execution of robotic-assisted resection of a large bladder trigone endometriosis nodule while preserving the ureters., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. Our patient is a 36-year-old G0P0 with a symptomatic full-thickness ill-defined nodule located in the posterior wall and trigone of the urinary bladder with anterior cul-de-sac endometriosis., Interventions: Urinary tract endometriosis is a rare entity occurring in 1% of women with endometriosis and may involve the bladder and/or the ureters [1]. Bladder endometriosis (BE) frequently coexists with endometriosis in other locations such as the ovaries or peritoneum. Frequently seen lower urinary tract symptoms of BE include hematuria, frequency, and dysuria [2]. Previous literature has demonstrated the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach to BE in the trigone. However, there has yet to be any publications investigating the feasibility of robotic resection of bladder trigone endometriosis [3]. Cystoscopy was first performed, and the large mid-trigonal endometriosis nodule was noted to be extending within millimeters of the ureteral orifices. Bilateral ureteral orifices were identified, and double-J ureteral stents were sequentially guided up to the kidneys. The peritoneum lateral to the bladder bilaterally was incised to better define the edges of the bladder. Next, bilateral distal ureters were dissected out circumferentially, and the dissection was carried distally to the posterior bladder wall. Flexible cystoscopy with Firefly technology was then utilized to define the precise location and extent of the trigonal nodule to minimize removal of uninvolved bladder tissue and preserve the ureters. Using cystoscopic guidance, the dissection was first carried through the serosal and muscular layers, and once the circumference of the nodule had been clearly defined, we proceeded with the mucosal layer. The bladder lumen was entered, and the nodule was meticulously excised to avoid injury to the intramural ureters as the dissection was carried distally. We were able to preserve bilateral ureters despite the close proximity to ureteral orifices and also maintain enough bladder tissue for bladder closure. Once the resection of the trigonal nodule was completed, running 3-0 V-loc sutures were utilized in a 2-layer closure. The patient was discharged in 1 day with a Foley catheter and ureteral stents with reports of minimal pain. A cystogram at 10 days after the surgery was negative for leak, and the Foley catheter was removed. The ureteral stents were subsequently removed at 6 weeks after the surgery, and follow-up renal ultrasound demonstrated no hydronephrosis. Tips and tricks: (1) Utilizing robotic assistance in conjunction with cystoscopy aids the surgeon in precisely defining the boundaries of an endometriosis nodule and ureteral identification. (2) The precise dissection permitted by robotic-assisted surgery leads to greater tissue preservation of the bladder with complete endometriosis resection [4-6]. (3) Three-dimensional visualization provides depth of tissue analysis, which allows the surgeon to delicately dissect several centimeters of intramural ureter in the bladder wall and trigone. (4) Cystoscopy with Firefly technology guidance permits more precise localization compared with white light during dissection of the bladder nodule [7,8]. (5) The articulating instrumentation in the robotic surgical platform enables fine suturing technique [9,10]., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted resection of bladder trigone endometriosis with cystoscopic guidance may offer a precise and delicate dissection of large bladder trigone endometriomas, thus possibly providing optimal bladder trigone and ureteral preservation., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe a novel, minimally invasive technique for performing myomectomy, a fertility-sparing procedure., Design: This technique was developed based on similar techniques for other surgeries that showed a benefit. Liu et al. (1) described vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for myomectomy, in which a 6-cm myoma was resected transvaginally. An anterior colpotomy was made, and single-site surgical skills were used to perform the entire myomectomy without an abdominal incision and with minimal blood loss (1). Another study showed that this technique was also feasible in 8 patients with type 3-7 myomas, and the patients were discharged within a day (2). Robotic vNOTES surgery has been performed for various gynecologic procedures, including hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and the resection of endometriosis (3-6). One study showed that robotic vNOTES was a viable alternative to traditional vNOTES for hysterectomy, with no differences in operative time, the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain levels, or conversions (3). This study in fact proposed that robotic vNOTES was beneficial because of the opportunity to use wristed instruments to increase an otherwise limited range of motion. Another study showed that if surgeons already have significant experience with laparoscopic single-site and abdominal robotic surgeries, only 10 cases of robotic vNOTES and 10-20 port placements with robotic docking are needed to become proficient in robotic vNOTES (7). Another study showed that robotic vNOTES was a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of endometriosis with hysterectomy and the resection of endometriosis, which may be technically challenging because of distorted anatomy or scar tissue due to endometriosis (4). This video demonstrates a robotic vNOTES for myomectomy, a novel, minimally invasive technique for performing myomectomy. Vaginal surgery is the preferred route for hysterectomy compared with other techniques, and this parallel can also be made for other gynecologic procedures, including myomectomy (8). The vaginal approach is preferred for hysterectomy because it is associated with shorter hospital stays and operative time as well as faster recovery. Given these factors, the vaginal approach is preferred over the more traditional umbilical or abdominal laparoscopy. However, visualization and fine movement can be difficult in vaginal surgery, given the lack of space. Robotic techniques in place of traditional or vaginal laparoscopy do not require the surgeon to have a large amount of space to make fine movements because the camera and small robotic instruments are docked close to the tissue. This allows for precision while suturing and performing more layers in the myometrium after myomectomy. This is more difficult to achieve with traditional umbilical laparoscopy and may potentially reduce the risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies. Given the advantages of the robotic and vaginal approaches, the robotic vNOTES route was pursued for this procedure because it combines the benefits of robotic and vaginal surgeries and can be considered as a feasible alternative to open, vaginal, or laparoscopic techniques., Setting: Academic-center hospital., Patient(s): A 28-year-old presented with heavy periods and pelvic pain. Imaging showed a large, 8-cm posterior fibroid, and the patient strongly desired a fertility-sparing approach., Intervention(s): Robotic vNOTES for myomectomy for the 8-cm posterior uterine fibroid., Main Outcome Measure(s): Feasibility and safety of using this technique for myomectomy., Result(s): Robotic vNOTES is a feasible option for performing minimally invasive myomectomy. In this technique, a posterior horizontal colpotomy was made and a gel port was placed through the incision. The DaVinci Robot was docked, and myomectomy was performed using single-incision surgical techniques. The uterine serosa was closed with the V-Loc suture, and an interceed adhesion barrier was placed over the incision. The surgeon should take care to notice that the entire surgery is essentially performed "upside down" compared with the traditional abdominal laparoscopic approach. With this change in perspective, the surgeon should have a very good understanding of the vaginal anatomy and the expected location of the uterine artery, ureter, and rectum to avoid any damage to surrounding structures (the uterus) or increased blood loss. The fibroid was morcellated out of the vagina using The Extracorporeal C-Incision Tissue Extraction technique, and the posterior colpotomy was closed (9). The patient was discharged for home on the same day, with minimal blood loss. A prelabor cesarean section was recommended for all future pregnancies to reduce the risk of uterine rupture. The rate of uterine rupture after myomectomy is approximately 0.6% (10). However, the rate of uterine rupture after classical cesarean section is approximately 1%-12% (11). Given that the incision made was similar to the classical incision, except on the posterior uterus, prelabor cesarean section was recommended, although the uterine cavity was not entered., Conclusion(s): In this video, we demonstrate a myomectomy performed using the robotic vNOTES technique. The traditional vNOTES technique for myomectomy has been previously described (1); however, this technique can be very burdensome for suturing and does not allow for precision, and performing multiple layers is challenging. However, the robotic vNOTES approach solves this issue and can allow the surgeon to perform very precise suturing. While choosing the ideal patient for this procedure, the preoperative considerations include the desire for future fertility, the size and location of the fibroid, ideally 1 large posterior fibroid, and adequate space for vaginal port placement. This technique combines the advantages of both vaginal and robotic surgeries while maintaining low blood loss, and patients may be discharged for home on the same day., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate tips and tricks for the successful use of single-site laparoscopic surgery for pedunculated myomectomy during pregnancy., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine. Our patient is a 39-year-old pregnant G1P0010 with a symptomatic 12-cm degenerating pedunculated myoma refractory to conservative pain management., Interventions: Recent literature has indicated that most laparotomic myomectomies performed during pregnancy showed overall positive pregnancy outcomes and low complications. This indicates that myomectomy in pregnancy is safe and can be used in cases unresponsive to conservative management [1]. However, cases in literature discussing the single-site techniques for laparoscopic myomectomy during pregnancy have been sparse [2]. Four case series were reviewed; a total of 62 pregnant patients underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery without any complications [3-6]. Using laparoscopy in myomectomy compared with laparotomy during pregnancy permits decreased postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and lowered risk of postoperative complications [5,7,8]. Single-site laparoscopic surgery also aids in improved patient cosmesis and can be used for the myoma removal. Literature has demonstrated that single-site laparoscopy is safe and feasible during all stages of pregnancy [3,4]. Nevertheless, this approach may be challenging for inexperienced surgeons owing to the lack of triangulation and crowding of instruments in single-site laparoscopy [5]. At 21 weeks and 3 days pregnancy, our patient underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery myomectomy. A 2.5-cm skin incision was made at the umbilicus to the abdominal cavity, and a GelPOINT Mini was inserted. Through the laparoscope, we can observe that a 12-cm pedunculated myoma was protruding from the right uterine fundus on a 4-cm stalk. A 0-Vicryl suture was tied around the base of the stalk. The stalk was then cauterized with bipolar energy and transected with the harmonic scalpel, completely detaching the myoma. Subsequently, an Endo Catch bag was placed around the myoma and brought up to the umbilical incision. Using a scalpel, bag-contained morcellation was completed within 22 minutes and the contents removed. As a result, the estimated blood loss was 50 cc and the total operative time was 123 minutes. The extended operating time was caused by slow movements to avoid disrupting the fetus. She had an unremarkable postoperative course, no medications were needed for pain management, and she was discharged home on postoperative day 2. At 38 weeks, she successfully delivered with elective cesarean delivery with no complications. Histopathology showed fragments of leiomyoma with diffuse necrosis. Tips and tricks: 1. Single-site entry technique uses the open Hasson technique, which reduces the risk of injury to the pregnant uterus and dilated surrounding vessels. 2. Through a 2.5-cm incision, the surgeon placed a suture in the myoma stalk because other hemostasis agents such as vasopressin are contraindicated in pregnancy. 3. Owing to difficulties related to single-site surgery, the surgeon should possess extensive expertise in single-site surgery. 4. Manipulation of the uterus should be minimized to reduce the disturbance of the pregnant uterus. 5. V-loc suture allows for faster and simplified uterine incision closure. 6. If the surgeon encounters excessive difficulty during the surgery, a 5-mm accessory port can be placed. 7. During tissue extraction, gentle traction should be used to reduce provoking the pregnant uterus. 8. When transecting the myoma stalk, it is important to leave a stump of more than 1 cm to increase suturing ease and prevent accidental suturing of the uterus., Conclusion: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery myomectomy for pedunculated myoma may be a practical technique in women refractive to conservative management. When performed by an experienced surgeon, the patient may benefit from faster specimen removal and recovery., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To explore the learning curve and safety outcomes of robotic assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) for hysterectomy in benign gynaecological diseases., Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing R-vNOTES hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease from 2019 to 2021., Setting: An academic tertiary care university hospital in Houston, TX, USA., Results: 84 patients were identified that met the study requirements. The mean hysterectomy time was 77.27 ± 2.89 min. The median additional operation time was 63 (8-206) min. There were two conversions to robotic assisted single incision laparoscopy. Thirteen (15.48%) patients had an associated complication. Analysis of the learning curve suggests plateauing of hysterectomy time at approximately 10 cases and time for robot docking and port placement after 10-20 cases., Conclusion: R-vNOTES is a safe and effective route for hysterectomy. For a surgeon with experience in laparoscopic single site surgery and abdominal robotic surgery, they need to perform 10 cases of R-vNOTES hysterectomy and 10-20 cases in port placement and robotic docking to achieve proficiency., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate safe identification of ureters in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis or severe adhesive disease using indocyanine green (ICG) under near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) on the robotic platform., Design: Stepwise demonstration using narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. A 43 year old G0 with stage IV endometriosis presented with chronic pelvic pain. Her surgical history is notable for 2 aborted hysterectomies due to severe adhesive disease, despite extensive lysis of adhesions. She desired surgical intervention., Interventions: In cases of stage IV endometriosis, localizing the ureters can be challenging due to severe adhesive disease, surrounding fibrotic tissue, and distorted anatomy. Intravenous ICG has previously been described to assist with resection of endometriosis [1-3]. Alternatively, we describe a technique that allows for easier identification of ureters using ICG injection retrogradely in ureteral stents while visualized under NIRF [4,5]., In Summary: The patient underwent robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, bilateral ureterolysis, low anterior bowel resection with primary anastomosis, and resection of endometriosis without intraoperative complications or ureteral injury. Her postoperative course was unremarkable. At her 3 week postoperative visit, pelvic pain had completely resolved., Conclusions: This case demonstrates the use of intraureteral ICG and NIRF to identify the ureters and perform ureterolysis in cases of deep infiltrative endometriosis., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate stepwise techniques for the successful utilization of the Robotic-assisted transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy Surgery (NOTES) technique for safely surgically managing deeply infiltrated endometriosis (DIE)., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital., Interventions: A 38-year-old woman-G3P3, who had 1 normal spontaneous vaginal delivery and 1 cesarean delivery for twin pregnancy-with worsening chronic pelvic pain. History of laparoscopic ablation of endometriosis 10 years ago. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated adenomyosis, deeply infiltrated endometriosis, and intrapelvic adhesions. Robotic transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe in the surgical management of benign gynecology disease compared with traditional NOTES hysterectomy; however, it can be technically challenging to perform, particularly in managing of additional deep infiltrated endometriosis removal surgery after hysterectomy. The researchers demonstrated that robotic vaginal NOTES surgeries are feasible in complex benign gynecologic procedures such as endometriosis and sacrocolpopexy [1-3]. The robotic wristed instruments with 3D visualization, resulting in delicate tissue dissection and easier suturing and knot tying, are beneficial to surgeons for overcoming the cumbersome surgical techniques in transvaginal NOTES complete endometriosis removal [4,5]. Integration of robotic transvaginal single site surgery and resection of DIE is a novel alternative minimally invasive route that is more cosmetic and less painful. The procedure was successfully performed in approximately 200 minutes, with unevenly postoperative recovery. The patient was discharged home the same day. Her pain level was 7 out of 10 in the first week, 5 out of 10 in the second week, and 2 out of 10 in the third week. Pathology confirmed uterine adenomyosis, endometriosis in the right ureteral, right uterine artery pedicle, and rectum with muscular propria involvement., Conclusion: Robotic transvaginal NOTES for deeply invasive endometriosis is challenging but feasible in patients with parametrial and rectal involvement. The advantages of articulating instrumentation and 3D visualization are especially pivotal in complex transvaginal NOTES surgery., (Copyright © 2021 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of treating stage I-IV endometriosis patients with robotic single-site surgery (RSSS). A retrospective chart review was conducted on 334 patients with endometriosis treated by a single surgeon at a university hospital from January 2015 to November 2019. Surgeries were performed in a single institution between 2015 and 2019. All patients presented with pelvic pain and underwent surgical resection of the lesion. American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) standards were used to classify endometriosis. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of RSSS for surgical resection of stage I-IV endometriosis patients. We will compare patient characteristics and surgical parameters, such as blood loss, operating time, and postoperative complications, across different endometriosis stages to evaluate the effectiveness of this novel technique. RSSS was used for all cases, with no conversions to laparotomy or traditional laparoscopy. One to two additional ports were placed in 41 patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) involving the colorectal and urinary tract and/or extensive pelvic adhesions. Across patient groups, there were no significant differences in age, BMI, fertility history, abdominal surgery history, and hysterectomy ratio (P > 0.05). The median operation time was 140.25 min (range: 85.50-260.00 min, P < 0.05) and median blood loss was 31.25 mL (range: 15-100 mL, P < 0.05). Histopathology supported the diagnosis in 259/334 patients. The undiagnosed patients were associated with lower ASRM scores. For 83.3% of patients (295/334), the length of hospital stay was < 24 h. The postoperative complication rate was 6.0% (20/334), although only two cases were severe. Our results indicate that RSSS is an alternative, safe, and acceptable platform for the surgical treatment of all stages of endometriosis., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd. part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study examined the feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for the treatment of adolescent endometriosis (n = 36). Additionally, we assessed a novel technique known as butterfly resection for severe cases., Methods: This was a retrospective study of women from 12 to 21 years old who received therapeutic robotic LESS for symptomatic endometriosis by a single experienced surgeon., Results: There were 32 cases of peritoneal and four cases of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Focal resection was performed in 9/32 peritoneal and all DIE cases; butterfly resection was performed in the remaining 23/32 peritoneal. At 3 months, 16/23 had complete resolution of pelvic pain in the butterfly group versus 10/13 in the focal group (P = 0.64)., Conclusion: Robotic LESS produces safe outcomes with low complication rates. Butterfly resection may be considered for extensive lesions, with similar levels of pain relief compared to traditional focal resection techniques., Capsule: Single-site robotic surgery produces safe outcomes with low complication rates in adolescents with endometriosis, with techniques customized based on disease severity., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate a novel "in-bag" ovarian cystectomy technique for a large adnexal mass in pregnancy., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. The patient was a 26-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 0, at gestational age of 7 weeks and 3 days who presented to the emergency department with persistent left pelvic pain and was diagnosed with a 16 cm × 10 cm × 12 cm dermoid cyst. She re-presented at gestational age of 16 weeks and 3 days with worsening pelvic pain, and the decision was made to proceed with surgical intervention., Interventions: Laparoscopic transumbilical single-site surgery for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe [1-3]. However, single-site laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy can be very challenging in pregnancy, especially when the need for suturing arises. Exteriorizing the ovary and cyst after intraperitoneal drainage may allow for extracorporeal suturing that is faster and easier; however, it may increase the probability of spillage of cystic contents if it is not performed in a bag, which can then cause peritonitis in cases of dermoid cysts. A combination of in-bag and extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy is a novel alternative minimally invasive approach that is cosmetic, safe, and effective. Several helpful techniques in this novel combination technique include the following: • Creating an umbilical incision of at least 2 cm or one that is large enough for better manipulation of both the surgical bag and adnexal mass. • Tightening the bag appropriately around the infundibulopelvic ligament so that it is not too tight leading to compromised blood supply and tissue necrosis, yet not too loose resulting in leakage of cystic contents. • Ensuring that the infundibulopelvic ligament is stabilized within the surgical bag. • Inserting small-sized wound retractor into the bag for better exposure during cystectomy. • Having a double-suction irrigation setup for large adnexal masses, as demonstrated in this patient, to reduce the spillage of cystic contents. The procedure was successfully performed in approximately 110 minutes, and the fetal heart rate postprocedure was 128 bpm through bedside transabdominal ultrasound. Estimated blood loss was 5 mL, and the patient was discharged the same day with an uneventful 4-week postoperative follow-up., Conclusion: Laparoscopic single-site "in-bag" ovarian dermoid cystectomy is feasible, effective, and safe in pregnant patients with a large adnexal mass. This technique results in better stabilization of the ovarian cyst and reduction of cystic content spillage., (Copyright © 2021 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and explore criteria for patient selection for three methods of LESS myomectomy: conventional (C-LESS), robotic-assisted (RA-LESS), and hand-assisted (HA-LESS). This was a retrospective case review of 72 patients with uterine myomas, conducted in a large academic tertiary care hospital between March 1, 2015, and November 7, 2018. LESS myomectomy via conventional, robotic, and hand-assisted routes. 43 patients underwent C-LESS, 15 underwent RA-LESS, and 14 underwent HA-LESS, with no conversions to open abdominal myomectomy. The operative outcomes were compared across the three approaches. The HA-LESS group had the largest mean number (HA: 6.9; C: 3.7; RA: 2.9, P=0.001), diameter (HA: 11.3 cm; C: 9.3 cm; RA: 7.1 cm, P=0.035), and weight (HA: 850.1 g; C: 320.7 g; RA: 181.1 g, P=0.003) of myomas removed per patient. The use of this method was also found to have a direct correlation with estimated preoperative uterine size (HA: 20.1 weeks; C: 16.2 weeks; RA: 12.0 weeks, P=0.001. Operative time and postoperative stay were found to be not statistically different across groups. We conclude that all three types of LESS myomectomy are feasible with comparable surgical outcomes. Most importantly, our findings indicate that hand assistance can be combined with C-LESS myomectomy for large or multi-fibroid uterus without compromising operating time or patient recovery. Notably, we found that uterine size could be a useful tool for the determination of the surgical approach., (© 2020. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate stepwise techniques for the successful use of the laparoscopic single-site technique for safely performing transvaginal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: Academic tertiary care hospital. The patient, aged 69 years gravida 2 para 2-0-0-2 with a history of SVD × 2, presented with symptomatic stage II anterior vaginal prolapse (Aa +1) and stage II posterior vaginal prolapse (Ap -1). The preoperative vaginal length was measured at 9 cm., Interventions: Laparoscopic transvaginal single-site sacrocolpopexy has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. However, the retroperitoneal dissection or suturing/knot tying can be technically challenging to perform, especially in the event of an anatomic variation of a deeply angled S1 vertebra. Wristed robotic instrumentation may overcome some of these obstacles and result in easier suturing and knot tying. Integration of a robotic platform for sacrocolpopexy is a novel alternative minimally invasive approach that is more cosmetic, safer, and effective. Several helpful techniques in robot-assisted transvaginal single-site include the following: (1)The use of a 30°-angled scope alternating between "facing up" and "facing down" depending on the need for dissection or suturing. (2) The use of 3-dimensional visualization with a robotic camera that can highlight the depth of the surgical anatomy, therefore facilitating easier identification in the dissection of a surgical pedicle. (3) The use of wristed instruments that permit increased articulation and triangulation that are lacking in traditional laparoscopic single-site surgery, allowing for much easier and proficient suturing and knot tying. (4) Integration of the robotic platform that stabilizes the fine motor movement in a surgeon's hands improving the precision of the suturing and knot tying. The procedure was successfully performed in approximately 227 minutes with a measured postoperative vaginal length of 7 cm. The patient's postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification was stage 0., Conclusion: Robot-assisted transvaginal single-site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse is feasible, effective, and safe in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Patients experience improved cosmesis, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recovery compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate stepwise techniques for the successful use of the laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) technique for safely performing pectopexy., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital., Interventions: Patient was a 48-year-old, gravida 2 para 2, having had 2 normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries, with stage III anterior vaginal prolapse and stage III uterine prolapse and posterior vaginal prolapse. The preoperative vaginal length was 6 cm. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the current gold standard for pelvic organ prolapse demonstrating a low recurrence rate; however, it can be technically challenging to perform, particularly in women with obesity or in the event of an anatomic variation. The pectineal ligament, also known as Cooper's ligament, is familiar to surgeons and can be used for a tension-free mesh suspension in patients with prolapse. Integration of LESS and pectopexy is a novel alternative, minimally invasive approach that is more cosmetic, simpler, and effective. The key steps in LESS pectopexy include the following: MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The procedure was performed successfully in approximately 80 minutes with a postoperative vaginal length of 6 cm. Postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification was stage 0., Conclusion: LESS is a feasible technique for pectopexy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. A LESS pectopexy results in better cosmesis and offers an alternative for patients with challenging pelvic organ prolapse, such as those with obesity., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgery is currently a preferred treatment for symptomatic ovarian cyst(s), with single-site techniques, such as transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) and transvaginal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TV-LESS), gaining increasing popularity. Although both methods have delivered positive outcomes, there is currently limited literature directly comparing TU-LESS and TV-LESS., Objectives: This study had two primary objectives: (1) to evaluate the safety and feasibility of TV-LESS and TU-LESS for the treatment of ovarian cysts and (2) to compare the surgical and postoperative outcomes of the two procedures., Method: This was a prospective observational clinical analysis of 81 patients with a diagnosis of benign ovarian cyst with indication for TV-LESS or TU-LESS. Surgeries were performed at a tertiary hospital between February 1, 2018 and January 31, 2020. Patients were divided into TV-LESS (n = 40) and TU-LESS groups (n = 40), with one excluded due to severe pelvic adhesive disease. Demographics, operation outcomes, and follow-up details were compared., Results: All 80 patients underwent uncomplicated procedures. The two groups were demographically matched (except age), with no difference in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hemoglobin loss, and hospitalization costs (P > 0.05). However, TV-LESS patients had significantly faster time to ambulation (P < 0.001), faster time to return of bowel function (P < 0.001), less postoperative pain level (P < 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). The cosmetic scores at 1, 4, and 24 weeks after surgery were also higher for the TV-LESS group., Conclusion: Our preliminary experience suggested that TU-LESS and TV-LESS are both feasible and safe for ovarian cystectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. However, TV-LESS may provide three main advantages including: (1) fewer postoperative complications (i.e. incisional hernia); (2) less postoperative pain; and (3) improved cosmetic satisfaction., (© 2021 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.)

Study Objective: The study objective was to assess the feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for the management of nonobstetric, gynecologic disease processes in pregnant patients., Design: A retrospective case series of 13 pregnant women aged 21 to 42 years who underwent LESS for various gynecologic pathology. If able to be contacted, the patients were followed up until the delivery of the fetus., Setting: The surgeries were performed in a single institution between January 2015 and June 2019., Patients: The patients were selected if a laparoscopic intervention was indicated., Interventions: The cases included 6 ovarian cystectomies and 2 salpingo-oophorectomies for adnexal masses; 1 myomectomy for a degenerated myoma; 1 salpingectomy for a heterotopic pregnancy; 2 cerclage placements for recurrent pregnancy loss and cervical insufficiency; and 1 paratubal cystectomy. The patients underwent LESS through a 2.5-cm umbilical incision. The masses were exteriorized using a laparoscopic specimen retrieval bag, with the exception of 2 large adnexal masses, which were aspirated at the incision site, exteriorized after content drainage, and cystectomies performed extracorporeally. The fascial incision was repaired with a permanent suture., Measurements and Main Results: Various data were collected from patients, including age, surgical and obstetric history, gestational age at surgery, and ultrasonic imaging results. The outcomes measured were operative duration, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative symptoms, fetal monitoring before and after surgery, pathologic findings, conversions, intraoperative complications, and pregnancy outcomes. Eight cases were performed in the first trimester, 4 in the second trimester, and 1 in the third trimester, with the surgeries lasting between 45 minutes and 298 minutes. The blood loss ranged from 5 mL to 300 mL, and postoperative symptoms of mild pelvic or abdominal pain were reported. There were 2 conversions to traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for the 2 cerclage cases, and there were no open surgery conversions or intraoperative complications. The fetal heart rate ranged between 130 beats per minute and 167 beats per minute postoperatively. Of the 9 patients who were able to be contacted for follow-up, all had successful deliveries. One patient was healthy at 31 weeks and 5 days without complication at the time of her last follow-up., Conclusion: LESS may be performed by experienced surgeons on gravid patients in any trimester for adnexal masses, myomas, heterotopic pregnancy, and cervical incompetence. Future multiple-center studies may provide further evidence that LESS is a feasible and safe option for gynecologic surgery during pregnancy., (Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), a promising innovation in minimally invasive surgery, has been used in treating gynecologic oncology diseases. There have been no reports in the literature regarding LESS for inguinal lymphadenectomy (LESS-IL) in gynecologic conditions. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of LESS-IL., Methods: Six patients with vulvar or vaginal cancer underwent LESS-IL from July 2018 to March 2019. Data regarding the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed., Results: All patients successfully underwent a bilateral LESS-IL without conversion. LESS pelvic lymphadenectomy via an umbilical incision was also performed in a patient with vaginal cancer. The median operation time for the single-port laparoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomies was 105 min (range 70-134), with a median estimated blood loss of 108 ml (range 40-170). Median time of hospitalization was 7.5 days (range 5-10). A median of 11 (6-15) lymph nodes were dissected in a unilateral groin. The suction drains were removed after a median duration of 5 days (range 3-7). There were no skin-related or lymph-related postoperative complications. At a median follow-up period of 9 months, all the patients were alive and no recurrence was found., Conclusion: LESS-IL is a feasible and safe technique for the surgical management of gynecologic cancers.

Study Objective: Our main purpose was to describe the surgical technique and short-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (S-LSC) for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)., Design: This study consisted of a retrospective analysis of 49 consecutive cases., Setting: This study was set at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from October 2016 to November 2017., Patients: The population for this study consisted of women with stage II to IV POP who met eligibility criteria for laparoscopic surgery., Interventions: S-LSC included the use of V-loc barbed suture and retroperitoneal tunneling, in addition to standard single-incision laparoscopic surgery techniques. All 49 cases were successfully completed. All cases included concomitant procedures; 42 (85.7%) had removal of the uterus and adnexa. The main measured outcomes include patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and change in pelvic floor support (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System), and quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire)., Measurements and Main Results: All patients were parous, and 42.9% had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative duration from skin to skin was 201.20 ± 46.53 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 27.0 ± 16.6 mL. The mean pre- and post-operative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System scores were 2.2 ± 1.1 cm versus -2.6 ± 0.5 cm for the Aa point and 3.2 ± 2.8 cm versus -4.6 ± 0.8 cm for the C point (p <.05 for both). The mean pre- and post-operative Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire scores were 106.4 ± 18.9 versus 8.9 ± 4.26 (p <.05), suggesting that S-LSC significantly improved physical prolapse and quality of life. Four patients suffered from postoperative complications (3 mesh exposure and 1 lumbosacral pain). Six patients complained of new onset of stress urinary incontinence., Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a feasible method to manage POP. However, the long-term effects and complications need to be further investigated., (Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the differences in operative time and postoperative complications for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) performed using conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus a robotic-assisted LESS approach., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of all cases of conventional LESS TLH (n = 47) and robotic LESS TLH (n = 129) for benign gynecologic conditions performed from November 2014 to October 2017. Patient characteristics, operative time for hysterectomy, estimated blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and short-term postoperative complications were compared using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests., Results: Conventional LESS TLH cases had a 16.36-minute longer mean operative time for hysterectomy ( P < .01). No difference was found in uterine weight, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, or incidence of postoperative complications when LESS TLH was performed with or without robotic assistance. When comparing uterine weight < 100 g, conventional LESS TLH cases had significantly greater operative time than the robotic LESS TLH cases (78.10 ± 23.97 minutes vs. 59.97 ± 35.17 minutes, P < .01). When comparing uterine weight > 100 g, conventional LESS TLH cases again had significantly greater operative time than the robotic LESS TLH cases (98.73 ± 50.16 minutes vs. 80.00 ± 42.97 minutes, P < .01). There was no difference in postoperative complications., Conclusion: Robotic single-incision laparoscopy can result in decreased operative time compared to a conventional LESS approach. Robotic-assisted and conventional LESS are similar in rate of postoperative complications, if performed by surgeons with abundant LESS experience., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Zhang and Dr. Kohn have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article., (© 2019 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.)

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic single-incision repair for a cesarean scar defect (CSD)., Design: Step-by-step explanation of surgery using an instructive video, with Institutional Review Board approval., Setting: University Hospital, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China., Patient(s): A 36-year-old G2P1011 woman presented with postmenstrual spotting and pelvic pain that was resistant to medical management. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a CSD measuring 1.08 × 0.71 cm with a residual myometrial thickness of 1.5 mm. She desired to preserve fertility and had cosmetic concerns related to surgery., Intervention(s): We performed single-incision laparoscopic CSD repair. After abdominal entry, the overlying peritoneum and bladder adhesion were dissected using a monopolar hook, cold scissors, and a grasper. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed to identify CSD boundaries. Cold scissors were used to resect the scar tissue, avoiding the use of thermal energy to prevent injury that would impair wound healing. Closure was performed using 2/0 Ethibond suture (Ethicon); the first layer was a running full-thickness vertical suture, and the second layer was a horizontal mattress suture to reduce incisional tension. Single-incision intracorporeal knot tying was successfully accomplished by forming a triangle with the straight laparoscopic forceps and the articulated instrument., Main Outcome Measure(s): Successful repair of CSD via single-incision laparoscopic surgery., Result(s): Operative time was 50 minutes; blood loss was 50 mL. At the postoperative visit, the umbilical wound had properly healed with excellent cosmetic results. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated that the CSD had disappeared. Cyclic menses resumed without postmenstrual spotting or pelvic pain., Conclusion(s): Our case suggests that single-incision laparoscopic repair is a feasible approach to treat CSD that can provide excellent cosmetic results. Additional studies should investigate the clinical utility of single-incision laparoscopic CSD repair in a larger sample to compare the outcomes with the vaginal and hysteroscopic approaches., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy., Case Presentation: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients., Management and Outcome: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was -5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50-99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications., Discussion: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Study Objective: To compare postoperative pain in patients using an abdominal binder with a control group after laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery., Design: A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification level 1)., Setting: An academic gynecologic surgeon's practice., Patients: Private patients undergoing surgery performed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon between April 2016 and April 2017., Interventions: Ninety total patients were selected for this study, with 60 randomized to receive an abdominal binder after surgery and 30 patients randomized to the control group without a binder., Measurements and Main Results: Using a 10-point verbal analog scale, patients recorded pain levels for 3 weeks postoperatively on a variety of measures, including overall and incisional pain. They recorded results on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21. On average, the association between time and the overall pain score did not differ with binder use (p = .37). The overall pain decreases significantly over time (p < .001). After adjusting for time, the overall pain score differed significantly by binder status (p = .04). Those without a binder reported an average pain score that was 1.13 (standard deviation = 0.55) points higher than those with a binder across the first week., Conclusion: The results suggest that abdominal binder use after LESS surgery may be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain in the first week. Results from this study can provide feasibility data for future studies., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe and demonstrate the single-incision laparoscopic technique with an articulated energy device for a uterus larger than 20 cm., Design: Stepwise demonstration of the single-site surgical technique and tissue extraction with narrated video footage (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: Single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy can be difficult because of the long operating time, steep learning curve, and need for articulated instruments, and it is especially challenging in patients with a uterus larger than 20 cm. However, the advantages of single-site laparoscopic surgery may include less bleeding, infection, and pain and a better cosmetic outcome., Interventions: A 49-year-old G3P3 female with a 24 weeks-sized fibroid uterus requesting supracervical hysterectomy presented to our tertiary academic medical center with a 2-year history of pelvic pain and menorrhagia with a normal Pap smear history. Uterine weight was 1900 g. Laparoscopic single-incision supracervical hysterectomy with contained bag tissue extraction was performed. Rotating between the patient's right and left side allowed the surgeon to access the entire abdomen from a single umbilical port. There was no complications or conversions to multiport in the surgery., Conclusion: Single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy for a uterus larger than 20 cm is possible and leads to better outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: With advances in laparoscopic surgery, the goal of surgeons and patients is to minimize pain to allow for faster recovery and return to normal daily activities. One of these advances is single-site surgery. In this study, we compared postoperative pain in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) to that in traditional multiple-incision hysterectomy., Methods: Seventy patients were selected for this prospective cohort study, with 35 undergoing multiple-incision and 35 undergoing LESS hysterectomy. All patients were included who were undergoing hysterectomy with the primary surgeon. All multiport hysterectomies were performed laparoscopically. Six patients underwent LESS hysterectomy and 29 underwent robotic single-site surgery (rLESS). Patients recorded pain levels for 3 weeks after surgery on a variety of measures, including overall and incisional pain. Linear mixed effects models for repeated measures were used for all multivariate analyses, with an unstructured covariance matrix accounting for correlation between time points., Results: Overall, across all time points, there was an average reduction in pain by 1.26 (SD 0.69) points in the single-site group ( P = .06). Days 3 and 14 had a marginally significant reduction in pain ( P = .06 and 0.058, respectively). On days 4 and 7 there was a significant reduction in overall pain ( P = .04 and .04, respectively)., Conclusion: Based on the results, it is likely that single-site hysterectomy leads to less postoperative pain and achieves a lower pain score faster than multiport surgery. A randomized control trial is necessary to confirm these results before accepting them in clinical practice.

Study Objective: To demonstrate the tips and tricks of a simpler technique for single-site sacrocolpopexy using barbed suture anchoring and retroperitoneal tunneling to make the procedure more efficient and reproducible., Design: Step-by-step description of surgical tutorial using a narrated video (Canadian Task Force classification III)., Setting: Academic tertiary care hospital., Patients: Patient with Stage III uterine prolapse., Interventions: Sacrocolpopexy is increasing utilized since the FDA warning about complications of vaginal mesh surgery. It is the gold standard for repair of apical prolapse. However, there is great variation in the sacrocolpopexy procedure techniques and they have not been standardized. Traditional single-site laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is very challenging as the procedure time is long and suturing is difficult. The advantages of suturing with wristed needle drivers in robotic single-site surgery simplify this complex procedure. Furthermore, using barbed suture anchoring and peritoneal tunneling technique potentially decreases the surgeon's learning curve and makes the procedure reproducible. In this video, we demonstrate a supracervial hysterectomy with a stepwise explanation of the correct technique for performing a robotic single incision sacrocolpopexy., Measurements and Main Results: Sacrocolpopexy is increasing used since the US Food and Drug Administration warning about complications of vaginal mesh surgery. It is the gold standard for repair of apical prolapse. However, a great variation exists in the sacrocolpopexy procedure techniques that need to be standardized. Traditional single-site laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is very challenging because the procedure time is long and suturing is difficult. The advantages of suturing with wristed needle drivers in robotic single-site surgery simplify this complex procedure. Furthermore, using the barbed suture anchoring and peritoneal tunneling technique potentially decreases the surgeon's learning curve and makes the procedure reproducible. In this video, we demonstrate a supracervical hysterectomy with a stepwise explaation of the correct technique for performing a robotic single-incision sacrocolpopexy., Conclusion: The possibility of using the barbed suture and peritoneal tunneling technique with wristed needle drivers in robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy offers the possibility of an effective, safe, reproducible, and cosmetic surgical option., (Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of robotic single-site resection of advanced endometriosis using new technology., Design: We show a video that demonstrates our technique for accomplishing single-site laparoscopic resection of advanced endometriosis. The video is a step-by-step explanation of robotic single-site resection of endometriosis nodules overlying the ureter and rectum., Background: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to effectively improve pain and fertility in women with endometriosis [1]. Compared with traditional multiport laparoscopy, single-incision laparoscopy is associated with similar incidence rates of blood loss, conversion to open laparotomy, and wound complications, but it has superior cosmetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction [2-5]. Furthermore, robotic single-incision laparoscopy combined with robotic Firefly technology potentially increases the removal of invisible endometriosis. Without complete resection of endometriosis, patients are less likely to achieve full pain relief postoperatively., Setting: University hospital., Patient: A 36 year old G1P1 female was referred for chronic pelvic pain. She described her pain as hip pain, pain with walking, dyspareunia, dyschezia and right anterior abdominal wall pain., Intervention: To improve detection of endometriosis, we injected the patient with indocyanine green (ICG), a fluorescent dye with widespread medical applications in identifying increased vascularity of tissues. We then visualized the tissues with robotic Firefly technology, a fluorescence-detection tool built into the da Vinci SI Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA)., Main Results: Because endometriosis lesions are associated with a high degree of neovascularization, the ICG turned the endometriosis tissues dark green, thereby enabling us to detect endometriosis that would not have been seen as readily with conventional single-site laparoscopy. This video demonstrates our technique for successfully accomplishing a single-site laparoscopic resection of advanced endometriosis, including ureterolysis, adhesiolysis, peritoneal stripping, and a rectal nodule excision., Conclusions: We found that Firefly technology and ICG facilitated identification of endometriosis in single-site robotic surgery. We were able to successfully perform single-site laparoscopic resection of advanced endometriosis nodules overlying the ureter and rectum with complete resolution of pelvic pain symptoms and excellent cosmetic results., (Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of laparoscopic single-incision myomectomy using new technology., Design: A step-by-step video demonstrating our technique for accomplishing a laparoscopic single-site myomectomy of a large intramural myoma., Setting: Single institution., Interventions: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been shown to have similar outcomes to multiport laparoscopy but with superior cosmetic results [1,2] but has traditionally been associated with an increased learning curve, primarily because of poor ergonomics and instrument collisions, lack of triangulation, and, until recently, inadequate instrumentation., Measurements and Main Results: We present a case of laparoscopic single-site myomectomy of an 11-cm intramural myoma. This video was exempt from institutional review board review at our institution. SILS has traditionally been associated with poor ergonomics; however, we found that the articulating Enseal G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Blue Ash, OH) enables completion of complex surgical procedures not traditionally associated with single-site laparoscopy. This video demonstrates our technique to successfully accomplish a single-site laparoscopic myomectomy including the importance of vertical closure with V-Loc (Covidien, New Haven, CT) at the surgical site., Conclusion: We found that the articulating Enseal enables a single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy to be performed with only minimal modifications on multiport surgery techniques. We were able to successfully perform a myomectomy on an 11-cm intramural myoma with excellent cosmetic results., (Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been used prior to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), but evidence for its use is lacking. Our study seeks to assess whether or not completion of preoperative MBP prior to TLH improves visualization of the surgical field, bowel handling, or overall ease of the operation., Methods: Women aged 18-65 years undergoing TLH for benign indications at a level 1 trauma center were randomized to a bowel preparation (BP; n = 39) or non-bowel preparation (NP; n = 39) regimen. After each operation, the surgeon completed a survey about intraoperative visualization of the surgical field, bowel handling, and the overall ease of the operation. The surgeon was also asked whether or not he thought the patient had completed MBP. The patient completed a survey about pre- and postoperative gastrointestinal discomfort. The surgeon was blinded to whether MBP was completed before the operation., Results: There was no difference in intraoperative visualization, bowel handling, or overall ease of the operation between the BP and NP groups. Comfort levels before and after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. The surgeon was able to correctly predict whether the patient performed MBP in 59% of cases., Conclusion: The routine use of MBP before TLH does not improve intraoperative visualization, bowel handling, or overall ease of performing the procedure. It also has no significant effect on patient comfort levels. MBP is not indicated before TLH for benign indications.