Search

Background: Although the adoption of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy has expanded driven by considerations of donor cosmesis and function, the criteria for selecting candidates for pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) continue to be debated. This study aimed to delineate the distinctive characteristics of donors and recipients who underwent conventional open-donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) during the era of PLDRH., Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-centre database encompassing all right hepatectomies at Seoul National University Hospital from April 2016 to December 2021, a period during which there were no absolute contraindications for PLDRH., Results: During the exclusive PLDRH period, there were still 63 cases of CDRH alongside 362 cases of PLDRH. The CDRH donors were older, had a lower estimated remnant liver volume, and a higher incidence of expected multiple openings in the portal vein and bile duct based on preoperative imaging compared with PLDRH donors. In the subgroup analysis, including only donors meeting two or more criteria (age ≥40 years, estimated remnant liver volume ≥35%, or multiple anticipated vessel openings), recipients in the PLDRH group exhibited significantly more early major complications ( P =0.029) compared with those in the CDRH group., Conclusion: As PLDRH gains traction in practice, it is essential to acknowledge that specific donor conditions, such as advanced age, limited remnant liver volume, and anticipation of multiple portal or bile duct openings, may merit contemplating CDRH as a means of optimizing recipient outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become a routine procedure at Seoul National University Hospital, and the pure laparoscopic method is now being applied to liver recipients as well. This study aimed to review the procedure and outcomes of PLDH to identify any areas that required improvement. Data from 556 donors who underwent PLDH between November 2015 and December 2021 and their recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 541 patients underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). The mean hospital stay of the donor was 7.2 days, and the rate of grade I, II, IIIa, and IIIb complications was 2.2%, 2.7%, 1.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, without any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The most common early and late major complications in the recipient were intraabdominal bleeding (n = 47, 8.5%) and biliary problems (n = 198, 35.6%), respectively. Analysis of the PLDRH procedure showed that operative time, liver removal time, warm ischemic time, Δhemoglobin%, Δtotal bilirubin%, and postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated. In conclusion, the operative outcomes of PLDRH improved as the number of cases increased. However, continuous caution is needed because major complications still occur in donors and recipients even after hundreds of cases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify safety and risk factors of living donor after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in a Korean multicenter cohort study., Background: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is not yet a standardized surgical procedure due to lack of data., Methods: This retrospective study included 543 patients undergoing PLRDH between 2010 and 2018 in 5 Korean transplantation centers. Complication rates were assessed and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of open conversion, overall complications, major complications, and biliary complications., Results: Regarding open conversion, the incidence was 1.7% and the risk factor was body mass index >30 kg/m 2 [ P =0.001, odds ratio (OR)=22.72, 95% CI=3.56-146.39]. Rates of overall, major (Clavien-Dindo classification III-IV), and biliary complications were 9.2%, 4.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. For overall complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.007, OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.31-5.41), estimated blood loss ( P <0.001, OR=4.84, 95% CI=2.50-9.38), and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.25-4.88). For major complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.002, OR=4.01, 95% CI=1.67-9.62) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.003, OR=3.84, 95% CI=1.60-9.21). For biliary complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.01, OR=4.34, 95% CI=1.40-13.45) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=4.16, 95% CI=1.34-12.88)., Conclusion: Careful donor selection for PLRDH considering body mass index, graft weight, estimated blood loss, and operation time combined with skilled procedure can improve donor safety., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Given the global aging population, the average age of liver donors is increasing. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of grafts from pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) in liver donors aged > 50 years., Methods: The medical records of liver donors were retrospectively reviewed. The donors underwent conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) from January 2011 to May 2019 or PLDRH from March 2016 to May 2019. We divided the donors into three groups: PLDRH donors aged ≥50 (n = 26; Group 1) and aged < 50 (n = 257; Group 2), and CDRH donors aged ≥50 years (n = 66; Group 3)., Results: Operation time (p < .01) and hospital stay (p < .01) were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 3. Other postoperative outcomes of donors including graft anatomical variation, graft weight, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and hepatic steatosis were similar among the three groups. Although no postoperative complications occurred in Groups 1 and 3, they were detected in 17 cases (6.6%) in Group 2. No postoperative complications were detected among the recipients., Conclusions: PLDRH was feasible and safe in donors aged over 50 years, with outcomes similar to those for donors aged <50 years. PLDRH should not be avoided solely based on the donor's age ≥50 years., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are the most common and intractable complications due to both surgical and nonsurgical factors. External biliary drainage (EBD), a surgical option to prevent biliary complications, has recently been adopted in the era of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy, which may result in increased bile duct problems in the recipients. This study retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent LDLT with duct-to-duct anastomosis between July 2017 and October 2020 to analyze the initial outcomes of EBD and to compare the incidence of biliary complications in adult LDLT recipients who underwent duct-to-duct anastomosis with or without EBD. Only patients who underwent pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the application of EBD. The median follow-up period was 28.5 months. The overall incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa biliary complications was 35.0% (n=14) in the EBD group and 50.7% (n=76) in the non-EBD group ( p = 0.08). The incidence of biliary leakage was 0% in the EBD group and 15.3% in the non-EBD group ( p = 0.01). The EBD-related complication rate, that is, involving retraction, accidental removal, and dislocation, was 40.0%. EBD implementation is effective in preventing biliary leakage after LDLT with a graft procured using the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy method with duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis. However, efforts should be made to prevent EBD-related complications. Further studies are needed to establish appropriate selection criteria for EBD., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

In recent years, laparoscopic techniques for liver resection or living donor hepatectomy have become common surgical methods. However, reports on laparoscopic surgeries for recipients are lacking. Our center has launched the minimally invasive living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) program in March 2020, which is led by two surgeons who are experienced in laparoscopic surgeries. Recently, we reported our first successful pure laparoscopic recipient explant hepatectomy and the first laparoscopic explant hepatectomy and robotic-assisted graft implantation. In this article, we introduce a series of minimally invasive surgical cases that were conducted by a single experienced surgeon to share our early experiences leading to our recent successes. We included 10 cases performed from June 2020 to May 2021 in our initial attempt at laparoscopic explant hepatectomy, graft implantation using midline incision, and robotic-assisted graft implantation surgery. The first four cases required open conversion during the liver mobilization process because of bleeding. The next two cases required open conversion to facilitate portal vein and hepatic artery division. We successfully performed pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy in the last four cases. For the last case, we attempted to perform graft implantation using a robotic system, but bleeding required open conversion. All patients recovered without any significant acute postoperative problems and were discharged within 2 weeks. All 10 patients were followed up at outpatient clinics, and only one of the 10 patients had a late complication of LDLT. This study has shown that the minimally invasive approach in LDLT may be conducted safely without significant complications if it is performed by highly experienced surgeons working in high-volume centers., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background/purpose: Since minimally invasive surgery has been incorporated in overall surgery, pure laparoscopic technology is involved in most hepatectomies, including right hepatectomy, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its feasibility and safety in right hepatectomy are still controversial owing to the limited literature. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy (PLRH) with those of open right hepatectomy (ORH) in patients with HCC., Methods: The prospectively collected medical records of 327 patients with HCC who underwent right hepatectomy between January 2010 and April 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the PLRH and ORH groups. The primary end point was short-term outcomes, including hospital stay, blood loss, and morbidity; the secondary end point was long-term outcomes, including overall and recurrence-free survival., Results: Forty-nine patients were included in each group. Patients who underwent PLRH had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than those who underwent ORH (12.2 vs 8.9 days; P < .001). The requirement for blood transfusion was significantly lower in the PLRH group than in the ORH group (10.2% vs 2.0%; P = .010). The operative time (P = .479) and proportion of major complications (P = .487) were comparable between the groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (P = .524) and the recurrence-free survival rate (P = .576) between the groups., Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes, including oncological outcomes, were comparable between PLRH and ORH, showing that PLRH can be a safe and feasible option to replace ORH in patients with HCC., (© 2022 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

BACKGROUND Accurate volumetric evaluation of donors' livers before surgery is crucial for successful living-donor liver transplantation. However, there are few studies on the volumetric evaluation in the recently popularized pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy method, in contrast to the number of studies for conventional donor hepatectomy. We aimed to analyze the difference between estimated graft weight and actual graft weight in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The medical records of 612 donors who underwent right hepatectomy in living-donor liver transplantation between January 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The CDRH group targeted patients from January 2014 to October 2015, and the PLDRH group targeted patients from March 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS There were 119 and 376 donors who underwent CDRH and PLDRH, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the estimated graft weights (P=0.994) and actual graft weights (P=0.489) between the groups, the estimated graft weights were significantly higher than the actual graft weights in both groups. However, the estimated graft weight and actual graft weight showed linear correlations in both the CDRH (r=0.81, P<0.001) and PLDRH (r=0.76, P<0.001) groups, with the CDRH group having greater linearity. CONCLUSIONS The estimates of graft weight were similar between the 2 groups. However, since the actual graft weight tended to be smaller in the PLDRH group, this should be considered before surgery.

Minimally invasive surgery has been introduced for liver transplantations. Although laparoscopic or robot-assisted living donor hepatectomy is being used, minimally invasive surgery is rarely performed in recipients during liver transplantation. A 63-year-old patient (body mass index: 21.9 kg/m 2 ) with primary biliary cirrhosis underwent total laparoscopic explant hepatectomy, followed by robot-assisted liver engraftment using advanced technological innovations. The total operation time for the recipient was 12 h 20 min, including laparoscopic explant hepatectomy (140 min) and robot-assisted engraftment (220 min). Achieving hepatic and portal vein anastomoses consumed 35 and 28 min, respectively. The hepatic artery anastomosis and bile duct reconstruction took 83 and 66 min, respectively. The estimated blood loss was 3600 ml. The warm and cold ischemic times were 87 and 220 min, respectively. The patient received 10 units each of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma during the surgery and recovered from early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation. This case study suggests that laparoscopic explant hepatectomy followed by robot-assisted engraftment is feasible in selected recipients only. We obtained informed consent for this innovative procedure from the patient and from her living donor., (© 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Highlight Jung and colleagues demonstrated the feasibility of single-port laparoscopic multiple liver resection using the lift-up technique and the parallel method. In this video they present their technique, indicating the new possibility of hepatectomy using the ordinary skills of laparoscopic hepatectomy through a single port., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly being applied in surgeries and have recently been used in living donor hepatectomy. We have developed a safe and reproducible method for minimally invasive living donor liver transplantation, which consists of pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy and pure laparoscopic implantation of the graft, which was inserted through a suprapubic incision. Pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy without liver fragmentation was performed in a 60-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The explanted liver was retrieved through a suprapubic incision. A modified right liver graft, procured from his 24-year-old son using the pure laparoscopic method, was inserted through a suprapubic incision, and implantation was performed intracorporeally throughout the procedure. The time required to remove the liver was 369 min, and the total operative time was 960 min. No complications occurred during or after the surgery. The patient recovered well, and his hospital stay was of 11 days. Pure laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation from explant hepatectomy to implantation was performed successfully. It is a feasible procedure when performed by a highly experienced surgeon and transplantation team. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm its safety and feasibility., (© 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Objective: The aim of the study was to present the safety and feasibility of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) in comparison with those of conventional donor right hepatectomy., Summary Background Data: Although the use of PLDRH is gradually spreading worldwide, its outcomes, including the long-term outcomes in both donors and recipients, have not yet been evaluated in a large comparative study., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 894 donors who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2010 and September 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the PLDRH and conventional donor right hepatectomy groups. Subsequently, 198 donor-recipient pairs were included in each group., Results: The total operation time (P < 0.001), time to remove the liver (P < 0.001), and warm ischemic time (P < 0.001) were longer in the PLDRH group. None of the donors required intraoperative transfusion or experienced any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the PLDRH group (P < 0.001). The rate of complications in donors was similar between the 2 groups. Although other complication rates in recipients were, however, similar, the rates of early (P = 0.019) and late (P < 0.001) biliary complications in recipients were higher in the PLDRH group. There was no significant difference in overall survival and graft survival between the 2 groups., Conclusions: PLDRH is feasible when performed at an experienced living donor liver transplantation center. Further studies on long-term recipient outcomes including biliary complications are needed to confirm the safety., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is a complex procedure, and the safety and feasibility of this operation remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and learning curve of this operation performed by a single surgeon., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the initial 100 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy or open donor right hepatectomy by a single surgeon from December 2012 to May 2019. Endpoints analyzed included intraoperative results, postoperative complications, and learning curve, which was evaluated using the cumulative sum method based on the operation time. We divided the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group into initial and recent groups based on the time point of overcoming the learning curve., Results: The operative time was significantly shorter in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group (n = 57; 181.0 ± 35.7 min) than in the open donor right hepatectomy (n = 50; 203.0 ± 37.3 min) and initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (n = 43; 282.2 ± 59.2 min) groups (P < .001). Moreover, the length of hospital stay in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group was significantly reduced compared to that in the open donor right hepatectomy group (7.7 ± 1.2 vs 5.8 ± 1.4; P < .001). The complication rate was reduced from 10% in the open donor right hepatectomy group and 8% in the initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group to 2% in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group., Conclusion: As technology advances, the surgical outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy are comparable and the operation time of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is superior to those of open donor hepatectomy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Depending on a transplant center's level of experience, utilization of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) may be limited due to graft size or anatomical variations. Here, we aimed to evaluate the influence of large hepatic grafts (≥ 1000 g) when performing PLDRH in both donors and recipients of such grafts., Methods: Medical records of living donors who underwent either PLDRH from November 2015 to August 2019 or open conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) from January 2010 to August 2019 and those of the graft recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Donors were separated into three groups: PLDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 10; study group), PLDRH graft < 1000 g (n = 280; control-I group), and CDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 24; control-II group)., Results: Total operative duration (P = 0.017) and warm ischemia time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the study than in the control-I and control-II groups, respectively. ΔAlanine aminotransferase% was significantly lower in the study than in the control-I group (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in minor complication incidence between the study and control-I (P = 0.068) and control-II (P = 0.618) donors. There were no major complications in the study and control-II donors, whereas six control-I donors (2.1%) experienced a major complication (P = 1.000). Length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the study than in the control-II group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in early and late major complication incidence for recipients between the study and control-I and control-II groups., Conclusions: PLDRH for grafts weighing ≥ 1000 g appears to be safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons in a well-equipped center., (© 2020. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluoroscopy has been recently implemented in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH). This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of ICG fluoroscopy during liver midplane dissection in PLDH and to demonstrate that a single injection of ICG is adequate for both midplane dissection and bile duct division. Retrospective analysis was done with images acquired from recordings of PLDH performed without ICG (pre-ICG group) from November 2015 to May 2016 and with ICG (post-ICG group) from June 2016 to May 2017. 30 donors from the pre-ICG group were compared with 46 donors from the post-ICG group. The operation time was shorter (P = 0.002) and postoperative peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were lower (P = 0.031 and P = 0.019, respectively) in the post-ICG group than the pre-ICG group. Within the post-ICG group, the color intensity differences between the clamped versus nonclamped regions in the natural, black-and-white, and fluorescent modes were 39.7 ± 36.2, 89.6 ± 46.9, and 19.1 ± 36.8 (mean ± SD, P < 0.001), respectively. The luminosity differences were 37.2 ± 34.5, 93.8 ± 32.1, and 26.7 ± 25.7 (P < 0.001), respectively. Meanwhile, the time from when ICG was injected to when the near-infrared camera was turned on for bile duct visualization was 85.6 ± 25.8 minutes. All grafts received from the 46 donors were successfully transplanted. In conclusion, ICG fluoroscopy helps to reduce operation time and lower postoperative AST/ALT levels. ICG injection visualized with black-and-white imaging is most effective for demarcating the liver midplane during PLDH. A single intravenous injection of ICG is sufficient for midplane dissection as well as bile duct division., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Donor safety and cosmetic outcome are the main concerns raised by most living-donors. Pure laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy (PLLDH) can provide the balance between those concerns. No studies evaluated the donors' satisfaction after PLLDH. The aim of this study is to evaluate the donors' satisfaction after PLLDH compared with donors who underwent open approach., Methods: We randomly assigned a questionnaire (Donor satisfaction questionnaire) to the donors, operated between 2011 and 2017, during their follow-up visits in the outpatient clinic. Donors who responded to the questionnaire were included in our study. Donors were divided into 3 groups: L group (conventional inverted L incision), M group (midline incision), and PL group (laparoscopic approach)., Results: 149 donors were included in our study. L group included 60 donors (40.3%), M group included 39 patients (26.2%), and PL group included 50 patients (33.5%). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding preoperative and perioperative outcomes apart from shorter operation time in PL group and higher wound infection in M group. Body image scale was significantly better in PL group (p = 0.001). Cosmetic scale was significantly higher in PL group (p = 0.001). Regarding self-confidence scale, it was significantly higher in PL group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the sense of dullness or numbness on the scar (p = 0.113)., Conclusion: PLLDH is safe and feasible for living-donor hepatectomy. Donors operated by pure laparoscopic approach have better satisfaction scores compared to conventional open approach.

According to recent international consensus conferences, pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH), particularly right and left hepatectomies, is not yet considered a standard practice because studies remain limited. Thus, we present the outcomes of more than 500 PLDH patients, mostly receiving a right hepatectomy. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date on PLDH. Data from all living liver donors who underwent PLDH at 5 centers in Korea until June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes of both donors and recipients were included. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between the duration of surgery and cumulative experience at each center, which reflects the learning curve. Overall, 545 PLDH cases were analyzed, including 481 right hepatectomies, 25 left hepatectomies, and 39 left lateral sectionectomies (LLS). The open conversion was necessary for 10 (1.8%) donors, and none of the donors died or experienced irreversible disability. Notably, there were 25 (4.6%) patients with major complications (higher than Clavien-Dindo grade 3). All centers except one showed a significant decrease in surgery duration as the number of cases accumulated. Regarding recipient outcomes, there were 110 cases (20.2%) of early major complications and 177 cases (32.5%) of late major complications. This study shows the early and late postoperative outcomes of 545 donors and corresponding recipients, including 481 right hepatectomies and 25 left hepatectomies, from 5 experienced centers. Although the results are comparable to those of previously reported open donor hepatectomy series, further studies are needed to consider PLDH a new standard practice., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become increasingly accepted in the era of minimally invasive surgeries. However, the outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor left hepatectomy (PLDLH) are relatively less known than for left lateral sectionectomy or right hepatectomy. This study aimed to report our experience with and the outcomes of PLDLH including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and to compare these outcomes with conventional donor left hepatectomy (CDLH). The medical records of living liver donors between January 2010 and January 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Donors who underwent left hepatectomy including the MHV were included. To minimize selection bias, donors who underwent CDLH after the initiation of the PLDH program were excluded. Finally, there were 18 donors who underwent CDLH and 8 who underwent PLDLH. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) warm ischemia time (11 [10-16] minutes versus 4 [2-7] minutes; P = 0.001) was longer in the PLDLH group than the CDLH group. The total operation time (333 [281-376] minutes versus 265 [255-308] minutes; P = 0.09) and time to remove the liver (245 [196-276] minutes versus 182 [172-205] minutes; P = 0.08) were also longer in PLDLH although not statistically significant. The length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the PLDLH group (7 [7-8] days versus 9 [8-10] days; P = 0.01). There were no postoperative complications in the PLDLH group. The rate of complications in recipients was similar in both groups. In conclusion, PLDLH including the MHV appears to be safe and feasible. Further analysis including longterm outcomes is needed., (Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Although the use of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) is increasingly common, it remains limited to a few experienced centers and no data on the learning curve are currently available. The aim of this study is to evaluate the learning curve associated with the use of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH)., Methods: Data from donors undergoing PLDRH performed by a single surgeon between November 2015 and October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method based on duration of surgery., Results: Of 100 donors evaluated, none required transfusion or conversion to open hepatectomy and no irreversible disability or mortality was reported. The mean operative time was 320.7 ± 51.8 min, and all grafts were successfully transplanted. The CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of approximately 60 cases of PLDRH. Estimated total liver volume > 1400 cm 3 and double portal vein orifices were seen to be risk factors for longer surgery time. Having adjusted for case mix with these factors, the risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 65-70 cases of PLDRH., Conclusions: In conclusion, PLDRH is a feasible and safe procedure with a learning curve of 65-70 cases.

Background: Interest in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) is increasing worldwide with the donor's cosmetic demands and improvements in surgical techniques. Efficient manipulation of flexible scope is mandatory for successful PLDH, especially in right hepatectomy which requires more mobilization. This study provides guidelines on how to manipulate optimally a flexible scope., Methods: Data from 158 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) between November 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed., Results: None of the donors required transfusion, conversion to open hepatectomy, or experienced any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. Three types of laparoscopic view provided by the flexible scope, which are bird's eye view, low angle view, and lateral view, were applied to each step of the procedure., Conclusions: PLDRH can be successfully performed with maximizing visibility given by the tips and pitfalls in manipulating the flexible scope.

Background: The pure laparoscopic approach to donor hepatectomy is being taken more often. However, few centers perform pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) because it requires a high level of surgical skill. Studies reporting initial outcomes of PLDRH may prompt further implementation of the technique and help reduce initial learning curves at other transplant centers. This study reports performance of PLDRH at a single center with extensive experience of adult living donor liver transplantation., Methods: Data from 115 donors (and recipients) who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the initial (November 2015 to October 2016) and more recent (November 2016 to June 2017) periods., Results: During the initial period, 3 (2.6%) donors experienced complications greater than grade III on the Clavien-Dindo scale. By contrast, no donors developed complications during the recent period. The operative time (293.6 minutes vs 344.4 minutes; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (7.3 days vs 8.3 days; P = 0.002) were significantly shorter during the more recent period. Also, Δhemoglobin (Hb)%, calculated as ΔHb% = [(preoperative Hb - postoperative Hb)/preoperative Hb] × 100 (14.9% vs 17.5%; P = 0.042), and Δaspartate aminotransferase (AST)%, calculated as ΔAST% = [(peak AST - preoperative AST)/preoperative AST] × 100 (1048.9% vs 1316.6%; P = 0.009), were significantly lower during the recent period., Conclusions: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is both feasible and safe when performed at a center experienced in adult living donor liver transplantation. Performance of about 60 PLDRHs over 1 year is sufficient to standardize the procedure.

Background: Improvements in laparoscopic imaging systems and instruments have increased the performance of pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy. This operation is no longer limited to left lateral sectionectomy but is used for left hepatectomy and right hepatectomy.1-5 This report describes a donor who underwent pure laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and in situ reduction using 3D laparoscopy and indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography to obtain a monosegment., Methods: A 43-year-old woman offered to donate part of her liver to her daughter, who required a transplant for acute liver failure after a Kasai operation for biliary cirrhosis caused by biliary atresia. Donor height was 150.4 cm, body weight was 56.8 kg, and body mass index was 25.1 kg/m 2 . Liver dynamic CT showed a left lateral liver volume of 223 cm 3 , and an estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of 4.4%. The entire procedure including in situ reduction was performed under 3D laparoscopic view. The optimal bile duct division point was determined by real time ICG fluorescence cholangiography., Results: The total operation time was 320 min, with no transfusion required and no intraoperative complications. Intraoperative real time ICG fluorescence cholangiography revealed the donor's bile duct anatomy and identified the optimal division point. The final graft weighed 167 g, 48 g being reduced in situ, with a GRWR of 3.3%. The donor was discharged on postoperative day 8 with no complications., Conclusion: Pure 3D laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and in situ reduction are feasible for obtaining a donor monosegment for pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Purpose: It has not been clearly proved in real practice whether early rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors starting immediately after radical prostatectomy improves erectile function recovery more effectively than delayed treatment with the same regimen. We performed a prospective randomized trial to identify this., Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate cancer and an IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function-5) preoperative score of 17 or greater were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil 100 mg regularly twice per week for 3 months immediately after urethral catheter removal as the early group or only 3 months after nerve sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as the delayed group. The study primary end point was the full erectile function recovery rate, defined as an IIEF-5 score of 17 or greater, during the 12 months., Results: Of the 120 randomized patients the proportion who achieved full recovery was significantly higher during the 12 months in the early group than in the delayed group (β = 0.356, p <0.001, generalized estimating equation). After 9 months postoperatively the proportion of patients who achieved full recovery steadily increased to 41.4% at 12 months in the early group while patients in the delayed group showed no further improvement. Thus, full recovery was achieved in only 17.7% of patients at 12 months. Only early sildenafil treatment independently improved full recovery at 12 months (HR 2.943, p = 0.034)., Conclusions: Our trial provides clinical data to suggest that earlier rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors can contribute to the recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy in the clinical setting., (Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There may be concerns about purely laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) compared with open donor right hepatectomy, especially when performed by surgeons accustomed to open surgery. This study aimed to describe technical tips and pitfalls in PLDRH., Methods: Data from donors who underwent PLDRH at Seoul National University Hospital between December 2015 and July 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Endpoints analysed included intraoperative events and postoperative complications. All operations were performed by a single surgeon with considerable experience in open living donor hepatectomy., Results: A total of 26 donors underwent purely laparoscopic right hepatectomy in the study interval. No donor required transfusion during surgery, whereas two underwent reoperation. In two donors, the dissection plane at the right upper deep portion of the midplane was not correct. One donor experienced portal vein injury during caudate lobe transection, and one developed remnant left hepatic duct stenosis. One donor experienced remnant portal vein angulation owing to a different approach angle, and one experienced arterial damage associated with the use of a laparoscopic energy device. One donor had postoperative bleeding due to masking of potential bleeding foci owing to intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy. Two donors experienced right liver surface damage caused by a xiphoid trocar., Conclusion: Purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy differs from open donor hepatectomy in terms of angle and caudal view. Therefore, surgeons experienced in open donor hepatectomy must gain adequate experience in laparoscopic liver surgery and make adjustments when performing PLDRH., (© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Although laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is increasingly common, few centers with substantial experience have reported the results of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). Here, we report the experiences of 60 consecutive liver donors undergoing pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH), with most undergoing right hepatectomy. None of the 60 donors who underwent PLDH had intraoperative complications and none required transfusions, reoperation, or conversion to open hepatectomy. Forty-five donors who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and December 2016 were compared with 42 who underwent conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) between May 2013 and February 2014. The total operation time was longer (330.7 vs 280.0 minutes; P < .001) and the percentage with multiple bile duct openings was higher (53.3% vs 26.2%; P = .010) in the PLDRH group. However, the length of postoperative hospital stay (8.4 vs 8.2 days; P = .495) and rate of complications (11.9% vs 8.9%; P = .733) and re-hospitalizations (4.8% vs 4.4%; P = 1.000) were similar in both groups. PLDH, including PLDRH, is feasible when performed by a highly experienced surgeon and transplant team. Further evaluation, including long-term results, may support these preliminary findings of comparative outcomes for donors undergoing PLDRH and CDRH., (© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Aim: To evaluate the effects of prostatic apex shape variations on positive apical margin (PAM) rate after radical prostatectomy (RP) by undertaking a comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) vs open radical prostatectomy (ORP)., Patients and Methods: A total of 3324 cases of RP (1004 ORP and 2320 RALP) from January 2004 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent preoperative MRI and the cohorts were stratified into four categories according to prostatic apical shape at the midsagittal plane. Between ORP and RALP groups, age, body mass index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy and pathological Gleason score (GS), clinical and pathological stage, and prostatic apex shapes were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate significant predictors of PAM. Propensity adjustments were undertaken before statistical analysis to minimize the lack of randomization., Results: ORP and RALP groups showed no significant differences in age, body mass index, PSA, biopsy and pathological GS, clinical and pathological stage, as well as prostatic apical shape variations. The ORP group showed a PAM of 17.5% that was significantly higher than 12.3% of the RALP group (p < 0.001). Both groups showed the highest PAM with apical type 3, which is the apex covering the posterior aspect of membranous urethra (ORP 33.9%, RALP 28.5%). In unadjusted data, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that prostate apical type 3 was a significant independent predictor of PAM, but other apex types were not., Conclusions: Prostate apical type 3 was a significant independent predictor of PAM. The RALP group showed better outcomes in terms of PAM compared with the ORP group. Preoperative MRI might be a potentially useful tool for preoperative designing of the surgical modalities.

Rationale: Hepatectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis (SIT) is technically challenging, and pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy has not been previously described., Patient Concerns: A 70-year-old male with SIT was referred to our hospital for investigation and treatment of a liver mass in segment 5/6., Diagnosis: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed features of chronic liver disease and a 5-cm sized mass with a bulging contour at segment 5/6., Interventions: Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy was performed., Outcomes: There was no intraoperative complication and the procedure was completed without a transfusion. The patient recovered well and was discharged on postoperative day 8., Lessons: Considering the position of the port sites and the assistant, and the operator's hand for the working port, a pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy can be a feasible procedure, even in a patient with SIT.

Objective: The study presents a matched-pair analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to compare the perioperative incidence of complications and chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: All 46 RFA and 206 RALPN cases from June 2005 to December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed from the medical records and were matched 1:1 based on propensity scores by sex, tumor size, tumor laterality of kidney, tumor location within the kidney, and clinical T stage. Hilar vessel clamping was performed in all RALPN patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was used to define the CKD of < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. All patients with baseline CKD or solitary kidney were excluded prior to the matching analysis. The complication was noted with modified Clavien grades ≥ 3. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the perioperative incidence of complications and CKD., Results: A total of 27 matched pairs of RFA and RALPN patients were enrolled for analyzing CKD and perioperative complications. The better general conditions, higher estimated blood loss and transfusion rates, and longer operative time and hospital stay were observed significantly in RALPN patients (p < 0.05). Matched analysis demonstrated that the incidences of both perioperative complications (p = 0.434) and of CKD (p = 0.500) were not significantly different. No complication higher than Grade 4 was detected in either group., Conclusion: Despite the intraoperative renal ischemia and invasiveness of the procedure associated with RALPN, the incidence of perioperative complication and of CKD developing rates were statistically similar., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.)

Purpose: We devised a 1-step posterior reconstruction technique that opposes the median dorsal raphe only to the posterior counterpart of the detrusor apron rather than to Denonvilliers' fascia. In a retrospective study we previously found that during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy this new technique could significantly shorten continence recovery time. We designed a prospective clinical trial to confirm this., Materials and Methods: We designed a single-blind, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 100 men who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon at a referral center were randomly allocated to the intervention group (50) or the control group (50) from October 2012 through August 2013. The intervention group underwent posterior reconstruction with this new technique before vesicourethral anastomosis. All patients in each group were treated with anterior reconstruction. The study primary end point was time to continence recovery, defined as no pad use. Secondary outcomes were time to recovery of social continence, defined as 0 or 1 pad used per day., Results: One control was excluded from analysis due to open conversion and 4 patients were excluded since they withdrew from participation. Median time to complete continence recovery did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (106 and 119 days, respectively, p = 0.890). However, time to social continence recovery was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in controls (median 18 vs 30 days, p = 0.024)., Conclusions: One-step posterior reconstruction did not significantly shorten time to complete continence recovery. However, it seemed to have a marginal benefit on early recovery of social continence., (Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to assess the long-term oncologic outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HLRN) compared with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 1098 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy at five institutions in Korea between 2000 and 2011 for clinically localized RCC. One hundred ninety-seven patients in the HLRN group were compared with 901 patients in the ORN group. Univariate and multivariate analysis assessed the effects of operative method on oncologic outcomes., Results: The median duration of follow-up was 69 months for the HLRN group and 63 months for the ORN group. No statistically significant difference was found in the operative time (170.2 minutes versus 168.9 minutes, P=.793) between the HLRN and ORN groups. However, estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the HLRN group than in the ORN group (245.9 mL versus 422.4 mL, P<.001). The pathological T stage was significantly higher in patients in the ORN group: 79.9% of patients in the HLRN group derived from pT1, versus 54.7% of those in the ORN group (P<.001). A statistically significant difference was found in the 5-year disease-free (90.6% versus 79.6%, P<.001), cancer-specific (95.7% versus 91.1%, P=.019), and overall (93.4% versus 85.4%, P<.001) survival between the HLRN and ORN groups. However, multivariate analysis by Cox's proportional hazards model does not retain surgical methods as an independent predictive factor for cancer-related death or recurrence., Conclusions: HLRN may be a preferable minimally invasive surgical treatment for clinically localized RCC with comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.

Background: The current articulating instruments used in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery do not appear to provide the joint forces required. Thus, we measured the joint forces of first-generation articulating laparoscopic instruments. To compare these forces with those necessary in the surgical context, we evaluated the forces sufficient to produce secure surgical ties in an animal model., Methods: The articulating instruments tested were Laparo-Angle (Cambridge Endoscopic Devices Inc, Framingham, MA), RealHand (Novare Surgical Systems Inc, Cupertino, CA), and Roticulator (Covidien Inc, Mansfield, MA). For each, we measured the angle between the end-effector and the shaft in proportion to the articulating force using a push-pull gauge. Two fixed-position configurations of the instruments were predetermined: the neutral and the fully articulated positions. The forces required to secure surgical ties for the ureter, renal artery, and renal vein were evaluated using kidneys harvested from a female pig., Results: The bending forces required to bend from the neutral position to 30° were 5.6 ± 1.2 and 4.7 ± 1.0 N with the Laparo-Angle and RealHand, respectively. Furthermore, the slippage forces in the fully articulated state were 1.8 ± 0.3, 1.6 ± 0.2, and 1.5 ± 0.2 N in the above order. In contrast, the mean forces to produce surgical ties of the ureter, renal artery, and renal vein were 14.5 ± 2.3, 11.5 ± 0.8, and 10.3 ± 2.3 N, respectively., Conclusion: The joint forces of first-generation articulating instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery are not sufficient to meet the usual operative needs. Improved articulating instruments with greater articulating forces should be developed.

Objectives: Due to lack of tactile feedback, dissection of surgical planes during delicate procedures of nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) can be hampered more by postbiopsy hematomas or adhesions compared with open surgery. Thus, we investigated association between extent of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed via preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with surgical difficulty of RALRP., Methods: We reviewed records of 154 men who received prostate biopsy, MR imaging, and subsequently, nerve-sparing RALRP for clinically localized prostate cancer within 2 weeks of MR imaging. We scored degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage as shown on T1-weighted MR imaging (hemorrhage score) and analyzed potential association of hemorrhage score with variables representative of surgical difficulty (operative time, estimated blood loss, and margin positivity) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function)., Results: Among our subjects, total hemorrhage score demonstrated no significant associations with interval from biopsy to MR imaging (p = 0.210). In multivariate analyses, prostate volume and total hemorrhage score were observed to be significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.004 and 0.039, respectively) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). Patients' age and total hemorrhage score was observed to be independent predictor of the return of erectile function sufficient for vaginal intercourse at 6 months following RALRP (p = 0.003 and 0.036, respectively)., Conclusions: Degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed in preoperative MR imaging may be predictive of surgical difficulty for RALRP. Such findings provide concrete evidences that aftereffects of prostate biopsy have significant impact on performing RALRP.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)., Patients and Methods: In this exploratory study, we analysed the data of 141 patients who underwent RALP for clinically localized prostate cancer after undergoing MRI at our institution. Associations of various clinicopathological factors were analysed, including pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative MRI, with operative duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical margin status, and postoperative urinary continence and erectile function., Results: For operative duration, no pelvic dimension had a significant association on univariate analysis, with only the newly developed variable of pelvic cavity index approaching significance (P=0.071). Only prostate volume had a significant association with operative duration on multivariate analysis (P=0.015). For EBL, no bony pelvic dimension had a significant association on univariate analysis, with only intertuberous distance and interspinous distance approaching significance (P=0.087 and P=0.072, respectively). Again, only prostate volume was significantly associated with EBL on univariate analysis (P=0.045). No pelvic dimension had any significant effect on surgical margin status, recovery of urinary continence or erectile function at 6 months after RALP., Conclusion: Bony pelvic dimensions may not be a significant factor contributing to the technical difficulty of RALP among Korean patients compared with other patient-related factors such as prostate volume.