Search

Background: It is important to minimize risks associated with live donor nephrectomy. In this study we evaluated the results of left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomies in comparison with standard techniques., Methods: Data on perioperative results, kidney function, and recipient and graft survival were collected. All left-sided laparoscopic and hand-assisted procedures were selected as control groups., Results: Fifty-nine robot-assisted procedures were performed by two surgeons. Operative time was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group compared with both control groups. However, it decreased significantly during procedures 40-59 compared with procedures 20-39 (P = 0.014) to median 172.5 (114.0-242.0) min. One conversion to the open approach occurred in the robot group due to a bleeding of the renal artery stump. No difference was found between all techniques at 3 months post-donation., Conclusion: Left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomy is feasible with over time a significant decrease in operative time with good outcomes for donor and recipient. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is thought to result in a better cosmetic outcome for the altruistic healthy donor than open donor nephrectomy (ODN). To the authors' knowledge, no studies have established the opinion of donors with respect to their bodily appearance. This study investigates the body image of donors after ODN and LDN., Methods: Donors who underwent surgery between 1994 and 2001 were invited to fill out a body image questionnaire. This questionnaire consists of two subscales: the body image scale (BIS) and the cosmetic scale (CS). A total of 56 LDN subjects and 69 ODN subjects responded to the questionnaire (72% of 174 donors)., Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, current age, and body mass index (BMI). The time from donation until the time of this study (follow-up assessment) was significantly longer for the ODN groups. The BIS and CS were found to be comparable between the two groups. No associations were found between BIS or CS and follow-up duration. There also was no association between BIS or CS and gender, age and BMI., Conclusions: The body image ratings of donors do not significantly differ after ODN or LDN.

Background: Carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum (PP) increases mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) but decreases stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO). This study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP) occurring during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN)., Methods: Twenty-two patients undergoing LDN were investigated and hemodynamic parameters, P(v)CO2) (carbon dioxide partial pressure), and VCO2 (carbon dioxide production) were monitored during the procedure. Before and after PP, IAP was raised from 12 to 20 mmHg and the hemodynamic effects were measured every 30 s., Results: During IAP of 12 mmHg and stable serum CO2, there was no change in SV compared to preinsufflation levels. When IAP was elevated from 12 to 20 mmHg, SV initially decreased (p < 05), followed by an increase in MAP and SVR (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: This study shows that with the fluid and ventilation protocol used, PP has no significant effect on SV at an IAP of 12 mmHg, whereas increasing IAP to 20 mmHg does. In this study, the hemodynamic effects induced by CO2 PP of 12 mmHg are not due to changes in serum CO2. Compression of the venous system during a PP of 20 mmHg reduces preload, with an subsequent increase in SVR.

Objectives: To describe our experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and open donor nephrectomy (ODN) regarding ureteral complications. LDN has proved to be safe and to offer significant benefits to the donor compared with ODN. Of major importance is the effect of the surgical technique on the graft. Studies have shown an increased incidence of ureteral complications in recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys. Operative reconstruction results in additional morbidity for the recipient., Methods: Living donors and their recipients, who underwent surgery from January 1994 to April 2002, were included in this retrospective study. A total of 122 LDN and 77 ODN recipients were included., Results: Of the 122 LDN and 77 ODN recipients, 15 (12%) and 10 (13%), respectively, required percutaneous nephrostomy drainage. In total, 5 LDN (4.1%) and 5 ODN (6.5%) recipients required reconstruction of the ureter because of obstruction of the ureter or urine leakage (P value not statistically significant, excluding reconstruction required for technical errors). The operating time, warm ischemia time, and serum creatinine were comparable between recipients with or without ureter complications requiring reconstruction., Conclusions: In our experience, LDN was not associated with an increased incidence of ureteral complications in the recipient compared with ODN.

Background: Recent developments in laparoscopic solid organ surgery suggest a possible reduction in postoperative discomfort and disability for kidney donors. Technical aspects and the influence of surgical experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were evaluated., Methods: The clinical outcome of 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LapNx) was compared with that for a historic control group of 27 open donor nephrectomies (OpenNx)., Results: Three conversions to open nephrectomy (5.2%) were necessary. Postoperative complications were minor and comparable in both groups. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay, but operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly longer. Graft survival after LapNx was 100% during a median follow-up period of 13 months. Operative time for LapNx decreased considerably with experience gained and seemed to be less for right nephrectomy. Stenotic ureter-bladder anastomoses occurred after LapNx in four patients during the first half year (7.0%), but this problem seemed to be resolved after modification of the technique., Conclusion: LapNx is associated with less postoperative discomfort and improved convalescence.

Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has the potential to increase the number of living kidney donations by reducing donor morbidity. However, studies have shown that raised intraabdominal pressure can result in transient renal dysfunction. Therefore, laparoscopically procured kidneys might be at higher risk for suffering a period of ischemia during pneumoperitoneum. The objective of this study was to investigate the short-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient., Methods: EXPERIMENT 1: KIDNEY DONOR: Initially, 36 brown Norway (BN) rats were randomized for three procedures: 2 h of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation (8 mmHg), 2 h of helium insufflation (8 mmHg), and 2 h of gasless technique (0 mmHg). After this, a unilateral nephrectomy was performed in all the animals. EXPERIMENT 2: RECIPIENT: Subsequently, 36 donor BN rats were subjected to a similar insufflation protocol, but after nephrectomy, a syngeneic kidney transplantation (BN-BN) was performed. Urine and blood samples were collected on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14 for determination of renal function. Subsequently, donor and recipient kidneys were removed for histomorphologic and immunohistochemical analysis., Results: In both donors and recipients, no significant changes in serum creatinine, proteinuria, or glomular filtration were detected between the CO2, the helium, and the gasless control groups. In both experiments, histologic analysis of Kidney specimens did not show any deleterious effects from abdominal gas insufflation. Although kidney grafts exposed to CO2 showed significantly higher numbers of CD45+ leukocytes 3 days after transplantation, immunohistochemical analysis did not show significant differences in number of infiltrating cells (CD4, CD8, ED1, OX6, OX62) between the two insufflation groups and the gasless control subjects., Conclusions: Abdominal gas insufflation does not have an adverse effect on the renal function of the kidney donor 1 week after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. No differences in renal function or histomorphology were detected between syngeneic kidney grafts exposed to pneumoperitoneum and gasless control subjects.

Objective: Evaluation of safety and technical feasibility of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy., Design: Descriptive., Method: The per- and postoperative results were analysed of 15 patients subjected to laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dept. of General Surgery, the Netherlands. Both left and right nephrectomy were performed via the transperitoneal route. The kidney was removed via a subumbilical incision., Results: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was attempted in 15 patients and completed successfully in 14. Conversion to flank incision was resorted to one patient because of a venous bleeding. Median operating time was 290 min (SD: 57). Mean warm ischaemia time was 7 min (range: 4-17), including laparoscopic harvest. All kidneys were functioning well after transplantation. The mean duration of postoperative hospitalization of the donors was 4 days., Conclusion: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is a safe and technically feasible procedure in a kidney transplant programme involving a living relative.

Background: The ideal method for staging tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia is not known. This paper was designed to assess the value of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of oesophageal and cardial carcinoma., Methods: From October 1993 to January 1996, 60 patients in whom no metastases were seen on gastroscopy, ultrasonography of the abdomen and supraclavicular region, helical computed tomography of the chest and abdomen or endosonography were scheduled for laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography., Results: Some 40 patients had carcinoma of the oesophagus, in one of whom liver metastases were found at laparoscopy and proven histologically. On laparoscopic ultrasonography metastases were found in four patients but were impossible to biopsy. These lymph node metastases were confirmed at exploratory laparotomy. Twenty patients had carcinoma of the gastric cardia; distant metastases were found in four at laparoscopy. On laparoscopic ultrasonography metastases were present in four further patients, all proven by biopsy., Conclusion: In this study laparoscopy was not an effective staging technique for oesophageal carcinoma. The inclusion of laparoscopic ultrasonography was of little benefit. A problem that was encountered was biopsy under laparoscopic guidance. In carcinoma of the gastric cardia, laparoscopy was more effective; adding laparoscopic ultrasonography doubled the number of patients seen to have metastatic disease.