Search

Purpose: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) faced many obstacles in obese male with narrow pelvis and bulky mesorectum with increased risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and distal resection margin (DRM). Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is reported to result in a better quality total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen, lower incidence of CRM and DRM involvement, and higher rates of sphincter preservation. To date, there is still a debate about the feasibility and efficacy of transanal versus the laparoscopic approach for TME in middle and low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective controlled clinical trial where 38 patients of middle or low rectal cancer from two tertiary centers were nonrandomly assigned to either TaTME or LapTME. Results: Eighteen patients were operated by TaTME versus 20 patients by LapTME. Mean body mass index was significantly higher in the TaTME group (30.74 ± 7.79) than in the LapTME group (25.99 ± 4.68) ( P  = .03). TaTME was associated with more transanal specimen extraction (55.5% versus 20%, P  = .06). No significant differences were detected in CRM, DRM, peri- or postoperative complications, or conversion rates with more reported Clavien-Dindo grade III complications in the TaTME group ( P  = .29). Conclusions: TaTME facilitated rectal cancer surgery in obese patients and increased the chance of transanal specimen extraction with equivalent oncological outcomes to conventional LapTME. Further studies are recommended to build better evidence.

Introduction: The introduction of new energy vessel sealing devices in minimally invasive proctectomy led to better hemostatic effect, less blood loss, and shorter operating time. At present, the available evidence from literature about the use of electro-thermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS) in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is weak where most studies are retrospective with non-homogenous patient groups., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where 40 rectal cancer patients operated by laparoscopic TME or laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision were classified in two groups according to approach of inferior mesenteric vessels ligation (EBVS versus Clipping)., Results: The operative time was significantly longer and the blood loss was significantly more in the EBVS group. However, hospital stay, time to oral, time to starting stoma function, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were not significantly affected by the method of vascular control., Conclusion: Both methods for control of vascular pedicle during minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery are safe, as such it is at the discretion of the operating surgeon to which method to use. Prospective well-designed trials are awaited to provide stronger evidence., (Copyright: © 2020 Permanyer.)