Search

Purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESSDN) is a feasible and effective procedure because of its non-invasiveness and better cosmetic outcomes. However, there have been few multi-institutional studies conducted by multiple surgeons on LESSDN. We retrospectively compared the clinical data and outcomes between LESSDN and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) at multiple institutes in Japan., Materials and Methods: From 2009 to 2015, the clinical data of 223 donors who underwent LESSDN and 151 donors who underwent LDN were collected from 10 institutes. All LESSDNs were performed transperitoneally, whereas LDNs were performed transperitoneally (P-LDN) in 75 patients and retroperitoneally (R-LDN) in 76 patients., Results: In the LESSDN group, the single-incision site was pararectal in 155 (69.5%) patients and umbilical in 65 (29.1%) patients. Multiple surgeons (one to eight per institute) performed the LESSDN. No significant differences were observed between the three groups regarding estimated blood loss and warm ischemic time. The operative time was significantly shorter in the LESSDN group than in the R-LDN group (p = 0.018). No significant differences were observed regarding the rates of blood transfusion, open conversion, visceral injuries, and postoperative complications. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed regarding the dose of analgesic and the rate of delayed graft function. One patient required open conversion due to injury to the renal artery. Selection of LESS procedure was not an independent risk factor for the median serum creatinine level of above 1.27 mg/dL in recipients at 1 year after kidney transplantation., Conclusion: The results showed the technical feasibility of LESSDN compared with the standard LDNs in a multi-institutional and multi-surgeon setting. A few observed non-negligible complications and the significantly higher levels of serum creatinine in patients who underwent LESSDN indicate that this procedure should be employed cautiously when performed by surgeons without ample experience in performing LESS procedures.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) nephrectomy in hemodialysis patients, we compared outcomes between LESS nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic nephrectomy in hemodialysis patients with dialysis-related renal tumors., Material and Methods: A total of 16 hemodialysis patients who underwent LESS nephrectomy (LESS-N; n = 8) or conventional laparoendoscopic nephrectomy (C-N; n = 8) between November 2003 and July 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes were compared between the two groups., Results: Patient and tumor characteristics were similar between the LESS-N and C-N groups. The mean operative duration was longer in the LESS-N than in the C-N group (231.0 ± 26.7 min versus 188.6 ± 36.4 min; p = .025). The mean estimated blood loss was lower in the LESS-N compared with the C-N group (26.4 ± 14.4 ml versus 65.6 ± 45.2 ml; p = .047). Postoperative complications were observed in three cases, comprising one case of retroperitoneal hematoma in the LESS-N group and one case each of peritoneal hematoma and retroperitoneal abscess in the C-N group. Surgical scarring was minimal in the LESS-N group., Conclusions: Although there is a little extension of the operating time, LESS nephrectomy in hemodialysis patients is a feasible procedure compared with the conventional method.

Objectives: To evaluate the current status of urological laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery in Japan., Methods: Of the 152 institutions to which councilors of the Japanese Society of Endourology belong, 42 (28%) have carried out laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery. A total of 32 of these institutions agreed to participate in this survey. Patients who had undergone surgery between January 2008 and March 2014 were included in the present study., Results: Overall, 1145 cases of laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery were recorded during the study period. The most frequent procedures were adrenalectomy and radical nephrectomy. Laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery represented 12% (872/7311) of all laparoscopic procedures carried out at participating institutions. The number of patients who underwent pyeloplasty, donor nephrectomy and simple nephrectomy tended to increase, whereas those who underwent adrenalectomy, radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy peaked in 2012, and then tended to decrease in 2013. The rates of conversion, perioperative and postoperative complications, were 2.7%, 2.2% and 4.5%, respectively., Conclusions: The number of laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port urological surgeries in Japan has increased for benign indications, such as pyeloplasty, donor nephrectomy and simple nephrectomy. In contrast, procedures such as adrenalectomy and radical nephrectomy are trending down after reaching a peak in 2012. Overall, laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port urological surgery in Japan is being safely carried out when compared with other reported series of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery., (© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is a recently innovated urologic surgical procedure. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) is technically safe and feasible in patients with benign adrenal tumors. To improve patient counseling and informed consent, we evaluated patient-reported postoperative pain, body image, and cosmetic satisfaction after transumbilical LESS-A., Methods: We reviewed 24 patients who underwent transumbilical LESS-A and assessed their operative and esthetic outcomes and incisional pain. Incisional pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale, and the body image and cosmetic satisfaction were measured using a questionnaire that included a body image scale (range, 5-20 points) and a cosmetic scale (range, 3-24 points)., Results: Pure LESS-A was performed on 10 patients using a multichannel port; an additional 5-mm trocar was used in two obese patients. Supplementary to the single-incision approach, one or two 3-mm ports were used in 12 patients. The mean operative time was 203 min; the mean blood loss was 41 mL. The mean pain visual analog scale scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 were 3.5, 2.2 (P = 0.012), and 1.5 points (P = 0.018), respectively. The mean body image scale and cosmetic scale scores indicating wound satisfaction 1 month after the surgery were 20 and 22 points, respectively. Although one patient had liver injury during surgery, the postoperative course during the 3-month follow-up was uneventful., Conclusion: Transumbilical LESS-A confers less postoperative pain and better cosmetic satisfaction than conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Therefore, this procedure could potentially become a standard treatment option for benign adrenal tumors., (© 2017 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To report on a multi-institutional series of non-robotic urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in Japan., Methods: Consecutive cases of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery carried out between February 2009 and December 2012 at nine academic institutions were included. We examined the surgical outcomes, including conversion and complications rates., Results: Four hundred and sixty-nine cases were included in the analysis. The most common procedure was adrenalectomy (n = 177) and the second most common procedure was radical nephrectomy (n = 143). The procedures also included nephroureterectomy (n = 40), living donor nephrectomy (n = 40), pyeloplasty (n = 30), urachal remnant excision (n = 9), simple nephrectomy (n = 7), radical prostatectomy (n = 6) and others (n = 17). The access sites included umbilicus (n = 248, 53%) and other sites (n = 221, 47%). A transperitoneal approach was used in 385 cases (82%), and retroperitoneal approach in 84 cases (18%). The median operation time of all procedures was 198 min. Conversion to reduced port surgery, conventional laparoscopy, or open surgery was noted in 27 cases (5.8%), 12 cases (2.6%), and two cases (0.4%), respectively, with an overall conversion rate of 8.7%. Intraoperative complications occurred in 10 cases (2.1%). Post-operative complications were noted in 29 cases (6.2%), including five major complications (1.1%). No mortality was recorded in this series., Conclusions: Non-robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is technically feasible and safe for various urologic diseases in Japan. Furthermore, urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is a promising minimally invasive surgical option that is feasible for experienced urological surgeons in intermediate-volume centers as well as high-volume centers., (© 2016 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: We previously reported cases of laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy performed through an umbilical or pararectal incision. To improve cosmesis and operability, we performed three Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced-port nephrectomies., Materials and Surgical Technique: In the first case, a GelPOINT access was placed through a 2-cm umbilical incision, and two additional 3-mm trocars were inserted. The specimen was extracted through a 4-cm Pfannenstiel incision. In the second and third cases, a GelPOINT access was placed through a 5-cm Pfannenstiel incision, and two additional 3-mm trocars were inserted. The specimens were extracted without additional skin incisions. In all cases, the endoscope and vessel-sealing device were inserted through the GelPOINT access. We used 3-mm scissors, dissecting forceps, and bipolar forceps., Discussion: The operating time and estimated blood loss were 228, 280, and 155 min and 10, 410, and 5 mL, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The 3-mm forceps showed similar efficacy as the conventional 5-mm forceps. Therefore, a Pfannenstiel reduced-port nephrectomy using 3-mm working trocars is a safe and feasible procedure with good cosmesis., (© 2016 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: We examined laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for urachal remnants and evaluated its usefulness and efficacy., Patients and Methods: From August 2011 to July 2012, we underwent this surgery for 5 patients (3 males, 2 females). The mean age was 30.8 (25-36) years old. A 2 cm incision was made around the umbilicus and Access Platform was placed. The entire urachal tissues were excised, and this 2 cm incison was reshaped as the umbilicus., Results: The median operative time was 220 (156-460) minutes, and the median operative blood loss was 10 (10-70) ml. They had no operative complications, and were discharged 6 (5-14) days after surgery., Conclusions: Our surgical procedures have very excellent cosmesis and advantages in particular for young because we reshape as the umbilicus the surgical wound. We think that this surgery can be performed safe and effectively for surgeons trained in the conventional laparoscopic procedures.

Background: Infected urachal remnant is an uncommon benign disease but is generally symptomatic and commonly recurs. The standard of care for this disease is complete resection of all anomalous tissue including a bladder cuff to avoid recurrence. Recent minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques can effectively manage this disease, but multiport laparoscopic techniques are reported to still leave scars outside the umbilicus., Subjects and Methods: A novel technique of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery for 2 patients with symptomatic urachal remnant is presented in this study., Results: In both cases, the entire urachal tissues from the umbilicus to the anterior bladder dome were successfully excised by the umbilical LESS technique without any extra ports or needlescopes. An articulating needle holder enabled water-tight bladder closure, resulting in early removal of the indwelling catheter. Without any signs of infection, the wound healings were completed 4 weeks after surgery in both cases. The patients had no complaints of symptoms at 6 months and 4 months, respectively, after surgery,and they were quite satisfied with their cosmetic results., Conclusions: We propose that the umbilical LESS technique is a promising surgical option for patients with a symptomatic urachal remnant and that this technique provides satisfactory cosmetic results.

We report here a case of recurrent pheochromocytoma successfully managed by laparoscopic surgery in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. A 25-year-old man presented with the contralateral adrenal mass after earlier right adrenalectomy. For the preoperative diagnosis of left adrenal pheochromocytoma, adrenal sparing surgery was considered. From the intraoperative laparoscopic view, we found that the tumor originated in periadrenal sympathetic ganglia, and laparoscopic excision of paraganglioma was successfully performed that preserved the integrity of normal adrenal gland. Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma is rather rare in MEN 2A and it is important to identify precise intraoperative localization of pheochromocytoma with laparoscopic surgery.

In this paper, we describe a case of ovarian vein syndrome (OVS) successfully treated with retroperitoneoscopic techniques. A 41-year-old woman complained with right flank pain, especially with a recumbent position. OVS was diagnosed and ureterolysis and ovarian vein resection were successfully performed, using retroperitoneoscopic techniques. The patient has been completely pain free for 36 months of follow-up. To our knowledge, no previous reports have described the retroperitoneoscopic treatment of OVS. With the minimally invasive approach, postoperative recovery and patient quality of life were markedly improved.