Search

Objectives: The Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) is studied as an alternative to the holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for lithotripsy, with the advantage of an induced bubble stream (IBS). This in vitro study compared the TFL's IBS with 150- and 272 μm-core-diameter laser fiber (CDF) and in four irrigant fluids. Methods: A TFL of 50 W (IPG Photonics©) and 150 and 272 μm-CDF (Boston Scientific©) were used, comparing nine energies (in the range from 0.025 to 4 J). An experimental setup consisted of a vertically disposed fiber in a cuvette filled with saline, iodinated contrast agent (IOA), human urine, or deionized water (DW) at ambient temperature. High-speed imaging of three consecutive IBS was performed to determine the influence of energy on their maximum length (ML; μm), width (MW; μm), and duration (MD; μs). Fibers were cleaved with ceramic scissors between each experience. Results: The IBS had higher ML and MW and MD with 150CDF than 272CDF. Maximum pulse rate for 150CDF and 272CDF was 2182 and 2000 Hz, respectively. Every maximum power was higher than the technological limit of TFL (>50 W). At equal energy density, 150CDF was associated with lower dimensions and durations. The IBS had higher maximum dimensions in IOA compared with saline solution (SS). Compared with DW and urine, IBS in IOA were longer beyond 500 mJ. Over 25 mJ, IBS were thinner in DW, urine, and SS. The IBS in DW, urine, and SS had similar maximum dimensions. The IBS's duration was higher in IOA compared with DW, urine, and SS, meaning a lower theoretical maximum pulse rate and power in IOA. Conclusion: Lasering with 150CDF fits with lower pulse energies–higher pulse rates settings than 272CDF, such as fine dusting mode. In IOA, Induced Bubbles Streams present higher dimensions and durations than in other studied fluids, related to its higher viscosity. Safety distance and pulse rate should be increased and decreased, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There is no clear evidence that high-power (HP) laser generators perform better than low-power (LP) ones in terms of lithotripsy outcomes. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature to compare the efficacy outcomes of both HP and LP during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting perioperative outcomes of HP and LP lithotripsy. Using the methodology recommended by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we identified 22 nonrandomized noncomparative retrospective studies published between 2015 and 2019 that were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Because of the lack of comparative studies, we decided to perform two separate meta-analytic syntheses for LP and HP studies, then we compared them using a Wald-type test. Results: Overall, the selected studies included 6403 patients. Study design, exposure assessment, selection criteria, and outcome of interest were heterogeneous. LP studies were more common (n = 17, 77%), whereas HP studies were more common in the latest inclusion period. Faster lithotripsy (32.9 minutes vs 63.9 minutes, p < 0.01) was observed in HP studies. However, stone volume resulted twofold higher (2604 mm3vs 1217 mm3, p = 0.048) in LP studies. Pooled stone-free rate was similar in both LP and HP studies, 81% and 82%, respectively, p > 0.05. No difference in complication rate was observed between the two groups, p = 0.12. Conclusions: HP laser lithotripsy appears to require shorter operative time, with similar stone-free and complication rates as compared with LP traditional lithotripsy. However, when taking into account stone burden, this advantage seems to be lost, or at least not to be comparable with what observed in laboratory studies. Because of the lack of high-level comparative evidence, further clinical studies are needed to elucidate the benefits of using HP laser generators during ureteroscopic stone treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Holmium:yttrium–aluminium–garnet (Ho:YAG) is currently the gold standard for lithotripsy for the treatment of all known urinary stone types. Stone composition and volume are major determinants of the lithotripsy. This in vitro study evaluated the required energy to ablate 1 mm3 of various stone types with different laser settings using Ho:YAG. Methods: 272 µm core-diameter laser fibers (Boston Scientific©) were connected to a 30 Watt MH1 Ho:YAG generator (Rocamed®). An experimental setup consisting of immerged human stones of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), uric acid (UA) or cystine (Cys) was used with a single pulse lasing emission (0.6/0.8/1 J), in contact mode. Stones were dried out before three-dimensional scanning to measure ablation volume per pulse (AVP) and required energy to treat 1 mm3 (RE). Results: All settings considered, ablation volumes per pulse (AVP) for COM were significantly lower than those for UA and Cys (p = 0.002 and p = 0.03, respectively), whereas AVP for Cys was significantly lower than those for UA (p = 0.03). The mean REs at 0.6 J pulse energy (PE) for COM, Cys and UA were 34, 8.5 and 3.2 J, respectively The mean REs at 1 J PE for COM, Cys and UA were 14.7, 6.4 and 2 J, respectively. At 0.6 J PE, RE for COM was more than tenfold and fivefold higher than those for UA and Cys, respectively. Conclusion: This in vitro study shows for the first time a volumetric evaluation of Ho:YAG efficiency by the ablation volume per pulse on human stone samples, according to various pulse energies. The REs for COM, UA and Cys should be considered in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The holmium YAG (Ho:YAG) laser penetration depth (PD) of 0.4mm has been widely described. Nonetheless, in physics, this concept refers to the tissue thickness at which 90% of the energy has been absorbed and not to the incision depth (ID) that the laser can achieve in tissue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ablation efficiency of Ho:YAG laser on soft tissue. Materials and Methods: With an automated robotic arm, systematic fissures were performed on flat veal kidney specimens. Broad setting spectrums from 2.5 to 80 W, short and long pulse, were tested with 272 and 365 lm laser fibers. Experiments were repeated three times. Two pathologists in a blinded manner measured the width, depth, and coagulation area with electronic microscopy. Results: The overall mean ID was 2mm (0.25-4.39) and the mean width was 1mm (0.3-3.1). The mean coagulation thickness was 0.48mm (0.25-1.73). The higher the frequency and energy, the deeper and wider was the incision p < 0.001. No differences were observed regarding the fiber diameter. The pulse length did not affect the ID, although the mean width was greater with short pulse p = 0.04. The outer mean coagulation was increased by increasing energy but not by increasing frequency p > 0.119. Conclusions: The overall mean ID was significantly higher than the theoretical 0.4mm PD described for Ho:YAG laser. The energy, frequency, and pulse length had individual effects regarding ID, incision width, and coagulation. The ID should be specified in accordance with the laser's power output and should not be confused with the physics of PD concept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To analyze the risk factors for laser fiber fractures when deflected to form a curve, including laser settings, size of the laser fiber, and the fiber bending diameter. Materials and Methods: Single-use 272 and 365 lm fibers (Rocamed®, Monaco) were employed along with a holmium laser (Rocamed). Five different fiber curve diameters were tested: 9, 12, 15, 18, and 20 mm. Fragmentation and dusting settings were used at a theoretical power of 7.5 W. The laser was activated for 5 minutes and the principal judgment criterion was fiber fracture. Every test for each parameter, bending diameter, and fiber size combinations was repeated 10 times. Results: With dusting settings, fibers broke more frequently at a curved diameter of 9mm for both 272 and 365 lm fibers ( p = 0.037 and 0.006, respectively). Using fragmentation settings, fibers broke more frequently at 12mm for 272 μm and 15mm for 365 μm (p = 0.007 and 0.033, respectively). Short pulse and high energy were significant risk factors for fiber fracture using the 365 μm fibers ( p = 0.02), but not for the 272 μm fibers ( p = 0.35). Frequency was not a risk factor for fiber rupture. Fiber diameters also seemed to be involved in the failure with a higher number of broken fibers for the 365 μm fibers, but this was not statistically significant when compared with the 272 μm fibers ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: Small-core fibers are more resistant than large-core fibers as lower bending diameters (<9 mm) are required to break smaller fibers. In acute angles, the use of small-core fibers, at a low energy and long-pulse (dusting) setting, will reduce the risk of fiber rupture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]