Search

AimThe purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical application of Compressed SENSE accelerated single-breath-hold LGE with 3D isotropic resolution compared to conventional LGE imaging acquired in multiple breath-holds.Material & MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study including 105 examinations of 101 patients (48.2 ± 16.8 years, 47 females). All patients underwent conventional breath-hold and 3D single-breath-hold (0.96 × 0.96 × 1.1 mm3 reconstructed voxel size, Compressed SENSE factor 6.5) LGE sequences at 1.5 T in clinical routine for the evaluation of ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Two radiologists independently evaluated the left ventricle (LV) for the presence of hyperenhancing lesions in each sequence, including localization and transmural extent, while assessing their scar edge sharpness (SES). Confidence of LGE assessment, image quality (IQ), and artifacts were also rated. The impact of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), heart rate, body mass index (BMI), and gender as possible confounders on IQ, artifacts, and confidence of LGE assessment was evaluated employing ordinal logistic regression analysis.ResultsUsing 3D single-breath-hold LGE readers detected more hyperenhancing lesions compared to conventional breath-hold LGE (n = 246 vs. n = 216 of 1,785 analyzed segments, 13.8% vs. 12.1%; p

Abstract Background Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) represents the gold standard for assessment of myocardial viability. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of Compressed SENSE (factor 5) accelerated free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) whole heart LGE with high isotropic spatial resolution (1.4 mm3 acquired voxel size) compared to standard breath-hold LGE imaging. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study of 70 consecutive patients (45.8 ± 18.1 years, 27 females; February–November 2019), who were referred for assessment of left ventricular myocardial viability and received free-breathing and breath-hold LGE sequences at 1.5 T in clinical routine. Two radiologists independently evaluated global and segmental LGE in terms of localization and transmural extent. Readers scored scans regarding image quality (IQ), artifacts, and diagnostic confidence (DC) using 5-point scales (1 non-diagnostic—5 excellent/none). Effects of heart rate and body mass index (BMI) on IQ, artifacts, and DC were evaluated with ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Global LGE (n = 33) was identical for both techniques. Using free-breathing LGE (average scan time: 04:33 ± 01:17 min), readers detected more hyperenhanced lesions (28.2% vs. 23.5%, P