Search

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient's characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinicacid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95%CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) includes cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. BTCs are known to have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival below 20%.1 Unfortunately, majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage, being palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine the current standard of care.2 Poor prognosis is due to the fact that only 20% of patients are diagnosed in early stages3 and the high risk of relapse following curative surgery. Unfortunately, the lack of randomised studies has made the role of adjuvant treatment in BTC following surgery an unresolved matter for many years.4 5 Adjuvant therapy (either in the form of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) was supported by a meta-analysis published in 2012, which showed that tumours with lymph node metastases and microscopic invasion of resection margins were the ones benefiting the most.5 However, this meta-analysis consisted of retrospective studies that employed different chemotherapy schedules; thus, adjuvant strategies were not widely adopted and practice varied significantly between countries worldwide. Fruit of a huge effort and investment from the BTC scientific community, three phase III randomised trials were recently reported.6–8 All these three prospective studies randomised patients with resected BTC to chemotherapy or observation alone. The chemotherapy arm consisted of gemcitabine in the bile duct cancer adjuvant trial (BCAT), which included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma only,6 gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx) in the PRODIGE-12 (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy or Surveillance in Resected BTC) study7 and capecitabine in the resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP) study.8 BCAT and PRODIGE-12 randomised 225 and 186 patients, respectively. Unfortunately, none of these studies showed a significant benefit from adjuvant therapy (BCAT: primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) (HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.45); p value 0.964); PRODIGE-12: primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.28 (95% …

Purpose This study investigated the safety and clinical activity of lumretuzumab, a humanised antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) monoclonal antibody, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC). HER3 ligand heregulin and HER3 protein expression were evaluated as potential biomarkers of clinical activity. Patients and methods This open-label, phase Ib/II study enrolled patients receiving lumretuzumab at 800 mg (flat) in combination with carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) 6 mg/mL×min) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m 2) administered intravenously on a every 3-week schedule. Adverse event (AE) rates and tumour responses were determined. Heregulin messenger RNA (mRNA) and HER3 protein expression were investigated in archival tumour biopsies. Results Altogether, 12 patients received lumretuzumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal, haematological and nervous system toxicities, which were generally mild and manageable. Partial responses were observed in 3 of 12 patients lasting 81, 177 and 207 days. All responses were achieved in tumours expressing higher heregulin mRNA levels. Conclusion Lumretuzumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel was well tolerated. Objective responses were enriched in tumours expressing higher heregulin mRNA levels.

[EN] Somatic mutation analysis and evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) have become mandatory for selecting personalized therapy strategies for advanced colorectal cancer and are not available as routine methods in Paraguay. The aims of this study were to analyze the molecular profile as well as the microsatellite status in a series of advanced colorectal patients from two public hospitals from Paraguay, to introduce these methodologies in the routine practice to guide the therapeutic decisions. Thirty-six patients diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer from two referent public hospitals from Paraguay were recruited from May 2017 to February 2018. Sequenom Mass spectrometry, Oncocarta Panel V.1 was applied to analyze the mutational profile from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The microsatellite status was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The mean age of the patients was 52 years with a range from 20 to 74 years. Eighty-three percent of the patients included in the study have advanced-stage tumors at the moment of the diagnosis. Sixteen patients (44.4%) were wild-type for all the oncogene regions analyzed with the Oncocarta panel. Thirty-two hot-spot pathogenic variants on seven oncogenes, among 20 patients (55.6%), were identified, including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA, FGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, and PDGFRA. Moreover, 14 (38.8%) of these patients presented pathogenic variants in KRAS/NRAS or BRAF genes that have implications in the clinical practice decisions. Five patients (14%) presented MSI. The IHC study for microsatellite status and the molecular profile analysis through Sequenom mass spectrometry are feasible and useful methods, due to identify those patient candidates for targeted therapies and for the budgetary calculations of the National Health Plans, CONACYT Paraguay, Grant/Award Number: PINV-156/2015; INSTITUTO CARLOS III, Grant/Award Number: 17/00026 and CD15/00153; FONDOS FEDER; Bankia

Background The molecular classification of gastric cancer recognises two subtypes prone to immune checkpoint blockade: the microsatellite unstable and the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related tumours. We aim to assess the concordance between immunohistochemistry and PCR for microsatellite status evaluation, and explore the value of microsatellite instability (MSI) and EBV as predictive survival factors. Material and methods We collected 246 consecutively diagnosed gastric cancer cases in all stages and evaluated the microsatellite status using immunohistochemistry for mismatched repair (MMR) proteins and PCR. EBV expression was studied through in situ hybridisation. Results Forty-five (18%) cases presented MSI and 13 (6%) were positive for EBV. MSI was associated with female sex, older age, distal location and distal non-diffuse type of the modified Lauren classification. EBV expression was most frequent in proximal location and proximal non-diffuse type. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of immunohistochemistry for the microsatellite study were 91%, 98%, 91% and 98%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, MSI was an independent predictor of favourable tumour-specific survival (TSS) in stages I–III (MSI: HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.95, p=0.04). Conclusions The MSI status and the EBV expression should be incorporated in routine pathological report for two reasons. First, MSI defines a different pathological entity with a better outcome. Second, MSI and EBV may be useful biomarkers to identify patients who will respond to immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors. For this purpose, immunohistochemical study for MMR proteins and in situ hybridisation study for EBV evaluation are feasible and cost-effective methods.