Search

We compared the accuracy of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using Leishmania braziliensis and L. major-like antigens and antigens from the Bio-Manguinhos kit for serological diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL). Cut-off values were defined by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. For ELISA, statistical analyses revealed better accuracy [95.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), 97.5% negative predictive value (NPV)] and reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.940] for L. braziliensis antigen compared with L. major-like antigen (78.7% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, 73.3% PPV, 86.6% NPV, ICC: 0.833). ELISA optical density values obtained for both antigens were higher in mucosal forms of ATL. For IIF, sensitivity and specificity were 81.5 and 86.2%, respectively, for the L. braziliensis antigen, compared with 95.4 and 77.7% for the L. major-like antigen and 75.4 and 89.2% for the Bio-Manguinhos kit. No difference in the specificity of the IIF test was observed between antigens, whereas sensitivity differed between the L. braziliensis and L. major-like antigens and the Bio-Manguinhos kit. Parallel ELISA and IIF testing increased sensitivity, irrespective of the antigen employed, and serial testing increased overall specificity. These results support the recommendation that ELISA employing L. braziliensis antigen be used as a diagnostic tool for suspected cases of ATL in L. braziliensis-endemic areas.

From a canine case of american cutaneous leishmaniasis in the locality of Santa Rita de Cássia, municipality of Barra Mansa, Rio de Janeiro, a serological survey was performed on 177 dogs and 43 cats. Evaluation of the canine serum samples showed that 10% had a positive reaction in the indirect immunofluorescence test and 10.7% in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Among the feline serum samples tested, none of the animals had a positive reaction in the indirect immunofluorescence test and only one (2.4%) showed a positive reaction in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The detection of an autochthonous case of Leishmania braziliensis in Barra Mansa gives warning that a focus of american cutaneous leishmaniasis is possibly becoming established in this region.

We compared the accuracy and reliability of three amplification systems for enzyme immunoassays in the detection of specific IgG antibodies for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in patients from an endemic area in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Partially soluble antigens obtained from the promastigote forms of L. (V.) braziliensis were used. For development of the reaction, two chromogens, 1,2-orthophenylenediamine (OPD) and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and a fluorogen, 4-methylumbelliferylphosphate (MUP), were tested. The performance of each system was compared using the following parameters: accuracy, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity was the same (97.4%) for all systems. The reliability was excellent (ICC = 98.6, 98.7, and 99.1%) and specificity was 93.7, 95.8, and 97.4% for OPD, MUP, and TMB, respectively, showing no statistical significance. Despite the absence of differences in the performance of the three systems, the use of TMB is suggested because of its operational advantages, such as low cost compared with fluorogens, easy manipulation, greater stability, and lower toxicity., (Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Flow cytometry employing Leishmania (L.) chagasi (Lc) and L. (Viannia) braziliensis (Lb) antigen was used to establish the differential diagnosis between visceral (VL) and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in dogs. Flow cytometry permitted the detection of Leishmania-specific immunoglobulin G in sera from 19 dogs: nine with CL and 10 with VL. A significant difference in the percentage of positive staining was observed in sera from dogs with CL between the homologous antigen (69% for Lb) and the heterologous antigen (42% for Lc). However, this difference was not significant in sera from dogs with VL (61% for Lb and 73% for Lc). No significant staining was observed in control sera (0.6% for Lb and 0.4% for Lc) consisting of samples from healthy dogs, or in the group with sporotrichosis (1.8% for Lb and 1.5% for Lc), a differential diagnosis of CL. The results suggest that flow cytometry might be useful for the differentiation between CL and VL in dogs, with practical applications in areas where the two infections overlap.