Search

Twelve patients were treated with three dose levels of minocycline for 30 days, primarily to detect the dose-related effects on Mycobacterium leprae viability, followed by another 5 months of daily minocycline for overall efficacy and persistence of clinical and antibacterial effects. Subsequently, the patients were given standard WHO/MDT chemotherapy for multibacillary leprosy. Clinical improvement was recognizable during the first month, occurring much earlier among those on minocycline 200 mg daily than those who received minocycline 100 mg daily. A similar change also was observed in one patient 11 days after three daily doses of 100 mg of minocycline. At the end of 6 months, all patients were clinically improved with a slight reduction in the average bacterial index (BI) and logarithmic index of bacilli in biopsy (LIB). The effects of minocycline on viability by mouse foot pad inoculation and palmitic acid oxidation assays were noted beginning at 10 to 14 days of daily dosing and becoming more definite after 30 days of treatment. Both tests correlated fairly well. Doses of 200 mg daily did not appear to be more efficient than minocycline 100 daily. Phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) antigen determinations done on some patients during the first month remained positive and did not correlate with changes in viability results. At the end of 6 months, after 5 months of 100 mg of minocycline monotherapy, no viable organisms could be demonstrated by mouse foot pad inoculation and palmitic acid oxidation assays; assays for PGL-I antigen were all negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Since phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) is an unequivocal marker of Mycobacterium leprae, the antigen has been a good candidate for the serodiagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of leprosy chemotherapy. As an effort to define the kinetics of the PGL-I antigen and its antibodies in leprosy patients, this study was initiated to examine the serum specimens obtained serially from lepromatous patients under chemotherapy trials. PGL-I was detectable in 64 (94.1%) of 68 new lepromatous (bacterial index, BI = 3.2 to 5.8) and in 26 (78.8%) of 33 relapsed lepromatous patients (BI = 3.0 to 5.3). Meanwhile, virtually all of the new and relapsed patients were strongly seropositive to PGL-I. PGL-I was not detectable in any of the patients about 18 months after chemotherapy was initiated; however, anti-PGL-I reactivity declined by 50% at 2 years and by about 70% at 5 years after chemotherapy regardless of the drug regimens under study. Considering the rapid disappearance of the PGL-I antigen and steady decrease in anti-PGL-I IgM antibodies following chemotherapy, the PGL-I-based serology may be useful for monitoring the effectiveness of treatment, at both the early and late stages, in leprosy patients whose initial sera contain a significant level of PGL-I antigen or antibodies.

Chemotherapy trials in lepromatous leprosy using various combinations of existing antileprosy drugs were conducted jointly by Korea, The Philippines, and Thailand. The general objective of these trials was to determine the most effective and practicable regimen or regimens for field application. Lepromatous patients were divided into two groups: Group I was comprised of new, untreated patients infected with dapsone-sensitive Mycobacterium leprae and Group II consisted of relapsed patients with dapsone-resistant disease. Four different regimens were administered to each group for 5 years. Comparison among the regimens was based on antileprotic efficacy, drug safety, acceptability, field practicability, and economic feasibility. No significant differences were noted among the various regimens as judged by the reduction in the bacterial index (BI), clinical response, and change in biopsy index. Toxicity was seen only in the regimens containing prothionamide and rifampin. The regimens were acceptable to the patients and all were found practical for field use. Clofazimine, even in low doses, was found to suppress the frequency and severity of erythema nodosum leprosum. A multidrug regimen effective against both new and relapsed cases of lepromatous leprosy, whether dapsone sensitive or dapsone resistant, is recommended for field use. Given priority, the cost of the regimens is affordable in the three countries.