Search

The response of periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors to mechanical stimuli was studied at different temperatures in anaesthetized cats. Recordings were made from functionally single fibres in the inferior alveolar nerve from mechanoreceptors which were located in the ligament by dissection and punctate stimulation and electrical stimulation. A thermode was used to alter and maintain small areas of periodontal ligament at temperatures ranging from thermode tip temperatures of 3 degrees C to 57 degrees C. The response to ramp-plateau mechanical stimuli applied to the tip of the crown of the canine tooth was greatest when the thermode temperature was 37.5 degrees C +/- 6.5 degrees C. The effect was similar for all receptors studied.

During the course of a study on the morphology of periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors it was observed that a direct relation, without intervening bone, existed between the mandibular canine and first premolar tooth roots in the cat. An area, representing a window in the alveolar septal bone, extended 2–3 mm from the apex towards the tooth crown. Ruffini nerve terminals were observed amongst the collagen bundles in the ligament between the roots of the two teeth. Light and electron microscopy were used to identify the receptors. It is proposed that a periodontal ligament mechanoreceptor can respond to forces applied to adjacent teeth; movement of both teeth need not occur. This may explain the observation made in the past that single periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors respond to forces applied to more than one tooth.

A correlative morphological study was carried out on two electrophysiologically identified and located periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors in anaesthetised cats. One mechanoreceptor had its cell body in the mesencephalic nucleus and the other had its cell body in the trigeminal ganglion. Physiological recordings were made from each of their cell bodies. The two receptors were located by punctate and electrical stimuli in the labial aspect of the periodontal ligament of the left mandibular canine tooth. Both receptors had similar positions relative to the tooth apex and fulcrum and were situated in the labial part of the ligament in each tooth. The receptor loci were marked, and these regions were studied in a series of semi-thin and ultra-thin sections. Only Ruffini nerve endings were observed under each ink mark. Both Ruffini nerve endings branched, were unencapsulated and were incompletely surrounded by terminal Schwann cells with extensions projecting towards collagen bundles. The results indicate that periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors with cell bodies in the mesencephalic nucleus and those with their cell bodies in the trigeminal ganglion can both be Ruffini nerve endings. Furthermore, there was no apparent morphological difference between the two periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors.

1. In anaesthetized cats recordings have been made in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve and the trigeminal ganglion from neurones that respond when forces are applied to the mandibular canine tooth. The site of the mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament and their distribution around the tooth root have been determined. 2. Receptors with their cell bodies in the mesencephalic nucleus were found to be situated in the periodontal ligament in a discrete area intermediate between the fulcrum and apex of the tooth, while those in the trigeminal ganglion were situated in the whole area of the periodontal ligament between the fulcrum and apex of the tooth. 3. All of the located mechanoreceptors responded maximally when that part of the ligament in which they lay was put under tension. 4. The directional sensitivities of the mechanoreceptors suggested that there was an uneven distribution around the tooth root of receptors with cell bodies in the mesencephalic nucleus. In contrast mechanoreceptors with cell bodies in the trigeminal ganglion were distributed more equally around the tooth root. The rationale for the differences requires further investigation.