Search

The design and synthesis of clusters possessing the same number of cores but different connection methods and properties have always been difficult. Herein, we used 2‐pyridinaldehyde, 1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol, and Dy (ClO4)3·6H2O at room temperature (RT) to obtain the cluster [Dy4(L1)4(μ2‐OH)4]·4ClO4− (1, HL1 = 2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol) with square Dy4O8 cluster cores. Cluster 1 consisted of four Schiff base ligands (L1)−, four Dy(III) ions, four bridged (μ2‐OH)−, and four free ClO4−. The ligand HL1 was formed by in situ Schiff base reaction with 2‐pyridinecarbaldehyde and 1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol in the presence of Dy(III) ions. 2‐Aldehyde‐8‐hydroxyquinoline, 1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol, and Dy (NO3)3·6H2O reacted at RT to yield a tetranuclear Dy(III) cluster [Dy4(L2)2(μ3‐OH)2(NO3)4(EtOH)2]·2CH3CN (2, H3L2 = 2‐aldehyde‐8‐hydroxyquinoline‐1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol) with butterfly‐shaped Dy4O6 cluster core. Cluster 2 consisted of two ligands (L2)3−, four Dy(III) ions, two bridged μ3‐OH, two end‐group‐coordinated ethanol molecules, and four bidentate‐chelated NO3−. The in situ reaction of 2‐aldehyde‐8‐hydroxyquinoline and 1,3‐diamino‐2‐propanol under Dy(III) ion‐assisted catalytic conditions provided the ligand H3L2. It is worth noting that the magnetic test showed that 1 is a typical single‐molecule magnet (SMM), whereas 2 only showed a significant frequency dependence behavior. We considered Orbach and Raman processes (τ−1 = τ0−1 exp(−Ueff/kBT) + CTn) to fit 1 and 2 in the high‐temperature range and obtained Ueff = 7.01 and 5.43 K and τ0 = 1.18 × 10−4 and 4.14 × 10−5 s, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We obtained a binuclear Gd(III) complex [Gd2(L1)2(NO3)4] (1, HL1 = (E)-2-(2-(pyridin-2-ylmethyleneamino)ethoxy)ethanol) by reacting N2O2-tetradentate chelating ligand HL1 with Gd(NO3)3·6H2O at solvothermal temperature of 100 °C. Time-dependent high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESI-MS) followed the formation of 1 and revealed it's the assembly mechanism: HL1 → Gd(L1) → Gd2(L1)2. When we used the NO2-tridentate chelating ligand HL2 (HL2 = 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol) under the same reaction conditions, we obtained an "hourglass-like" nonanuclear Gd(III) cluster [Gd9(L2)8(μ3-OH)8(μ4-O)2(NO3)8]·2CH3OH·H2O (2). Their assembly mechanism was proposed: HL2 → Gd(L2) → Gd2(L2)2 → Gd3(L2)3 → Gd4(L2)4 → Gd5(L2)4 → Gd9(L2)8. Most notably, when we used the NO-bidentate chelate ligand HL3 (HL3 = picolinic acid), we obtained a dodecanuclear Gd(III) cluster [Gd12(L3)8(OH)16(NO3)8(OH)4(H2O)4]·22CH3OH·25CH3CN (3) under the same reaction conditions. We found that the formation process of cluster 3 involved two different and mutually interfering self-assembly processes, namely, multitemplate-induced assembly (HL3 → Gd(L3) → Gd2(L3)2 → Gd12(L3)8) and stepwise assembly (HL3 → Gd(L3) → Gd2(L3)2 → Gd3(L3)2 → Gd4(L3)2 → Gd5(L3)2 → Gd6(L3)2 → Gd12(L3)8). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The formation of high-nuclearity clusters of lanthanide usually involves many complicated self-assembly processes. Thus, tracking the formation process is extremely difficult and research on the assembly mechanism is very rare. In this study, a Dy-exclusive nanocluster containing vertex-sharing [Dy4(μ3-OH)4] cubanes, denoted as [Dy12(L)8(OH)16(CH3O)8(H2O)8]·(CH3O)4 (Dy12, L = quinoline-2-carboxylate), was designed and synthesized from L and DyCl3·6H2O. Eight quinoline-2-carboxylate ligands were encapsulated on the periphery of the Dy12 cluster, which served to stabilize the core. The high stability of the Dy12 cluster core was further confirmed by high-resolution electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (HRESI-MS). With increased ion-source energy, only CH3O− and OH− bridging ligands were replaced inside the Dy12 cluster. Notably, eight intermediate fragments were successfully observed from the Dy12 cluster formation by time-dependent HRESI-MS. First, ligand L captured Dy3+ to give Dy1, which further formed Dy2 through μ2-O bridging. The Dy12 cluster was constructed in one step with four Dy2 and four Dy3+ as templates: L → Dy1→ Dy2→ Dy12. Moreover, a series of Dy3–Dy6 fragment peaks with relatively weak intensities were observed, and an alternative stepwise-assembly route was proposed: L → Dy1→ Dy2→ Dy3→ Dy4→ Dy5→ Dy6→ Dy12. On comparing the two different assembly methods, the multitemplate guided assembly formed Dy12 was found to be dominant. To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to propose the involvement of two self-assembly mechanisms in the construction of lanthanide clusters, as further confirmed by HRESI-MS. Magnetic studies further showed that Dy12 clusters exhibited field-induced single-molecule magnet behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]