Search

Background: Massive bone allografts have been used for limb salvage of bone tumor resections as an alternative to endoprosthesis, although they have different outcomes and risks. The use of massive bone allografts has been thought to be associated with a high risk for infection, and there is no general consensus on the management of this complication and final outcome. Because infection is such a devastating complication of limb salvage, at times leading to loss of a limb, recognizing the risk factors for infection and the results of treatment is important., Questions/purposes: The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the frequency of infection in a group of patients treated with massive bone allografts; (2) to analyze risk factors such as age, sex, affected bone, type of reconstruction, operative room used, primary or revision procedure, length of postoperative antibiotic administration, and use of chemotherapy; and (3) to determine the likelihood that treatment of an infected allograft will result in a successful reconstruction., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients treated with massive bone allografts for a benign or malignant bone tumor or as a revision for a previous limb salvage procedure between 1985 and 2011. During this period, 673 patients were reconstructed with massive bone allografts in long bones, which included 272 osteoarticular, 246 intercalary, and 155 allograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions. Using a chart review, we ascertained the frequency of infection and reoperations after the treatment of infected allografts. Minimum followup was 2 years unless death occurred earlier (mean, 106 months; range, 6-360 months), and no patient was lost to followup. The selected variables were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for infection. We analyzed survivorship free of infection as the endpoint., Results: During followup, 60 patients (9%) had a bacterial infection of the allograft with a survivorship free from infection of 92% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-94%) and 91% at 10 years (95% CI, 89%-93%). We found that tibia allografts (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 3.17; 95% CI, 1.80-5.60), male patients (p < 0.029; OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.08-3.49), procedures performed in a conventional operating room (p < 0.002; OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.58-6.62), and the use of longer periods of postoperative antibiotics (p < 0.041; OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.02-4.88) were patient factors associated with a greater risk of infection. In 11 patients (18%, 11 of 60 infections) the infection was controlled with antibiotics and surgical débridement; however, in 49 patients (82%, 49 of 60 infections), this approach failed, so the allograft was removed and a temporary cement spacer with antibiotic was implanted to control the infection. Forty-one patients subsequently had the spacer removed and were reconstructed after infection control with another bone allograft in 24 and an endoprostheses in 17. Four patients underwent an amputation for infection and four died of disease with the spacer in place. When we analyzed the 41 patients with a second reconstruction, 14 failed with a new infection (34%, 14 of 41 secondary reconstructed) of whom 12 had been reconstructed with bone allograft (29%) and two had endoprostheses (5%)., Conclusions: Management of infections of massive bone allografts with antibiotics and surgical débridement usually resulted in failure. Infections could be treated with resection of the allograft, antibiotics, a temporary cement spacer with antibiotics, and a repeat reconstruction; however, this approach is unlikely to be successful if a second bone allograft is used. Infections are difficult to treat, and more studies are needed, but we propose that it might be preferable to use endoprosthesis reconstruction for salvage of an infected allograft., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Background: Bone tumor resections for limb salvage have become standard treatment. Recently, computer-assisted navigation has been introduced to improve the accuracy of joint arthroplasty and possible tumor resection surgery; however, like with any new technology, its benefits and limitations need to be characterized for surgeons to make informed decisions about whether to use it., Questions/purposes: We wanted to (1) assess the technical problems associated with computer-assisted navigation; (2) assess the accuracy of the registration technique; (3) define the time required to perform a navigated resection in orthopedic oncology; and (4) the frequency of complications such as local recurrence, infection, nonunion, fracture, and articular collapse after tumor resection and bone reconstruction with allografts using intraoperative navigation assistance., Methods: We analyzed 69 consecutive patients with bone tumors of the extremities that were reconstructed with massive bone allografts using intraoperative navigation assistance with a minimum followup of 12 months (mean, 29 months; range, 12-43 months). All patients had their tumors reconstructed in three-dimensional format in a virtual platform and planning was performed to determine the osteotomy position according to oncology margins in a CT-MRI image fusion. Tumor resections and allograft reconstructions were performed using a computer navigation system according to the previously planned cuts. We analyzed intraoperative data such as technical problems related to the navigation procedure, registration technique error, length of time for the navigation procedure, and postoperative complications such as local recurrence, infection, nonunion, fracture, and articular collapse., Results: In three patients (4%), the navigation was not carried out as a result of technical problems. Of the 66 cases in which navigation was performed, the mean registration error was 0.65 mm (range, 0.3-1.2 mm). The mean required time for navigation procedures, including bone resection and allograft reconstruction during surgery, was 35 minutes (range, 18-65 minutes). Complications that required a second surgical procedure were recorded for nine patients including one local recurrence, one infection, two fractures, one articular collapse, and four nonunions. In two of these nine patients, the allograft needed to be removed. At latest followup, three patients died of their original disease., Conclusions: The navigation procedure could not be performed for technical reasons in 4% of the series. The mean registration error was 0.65 mm in this series and the navigation procedure itself adds a mean of 35 minutes during surgery. The complications rate for this series was 14%. We found a nonunion rate of 6% in allograft reconstructions when we used a navigation system for the cuts., Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Vascular reconstruction in infants constitutes a surgical challenge and is indicated frequently for acute occlusions. With the presence of a subacute vascular occlusion, including that produced by tumor resection, collateral circulation develops quickly. Thus a surgeon can consider tumor and vessel resection, without the need for vascular reconstruction., Case Description: We report the 2-year postoperative outcome of a 2-month-old boy who had a groin synovial cell sarcoma with vascular involvement, treated using limb salvage surgery with resection of the femoral vessels and without performing vascular reconstruction., Literature Review: In adults with military wounds, ligation of the superficial femoral artery and common femoral artery reportedly result in amputation rates of 54% and 86%, respectively. Infants with a common femoral artery ligation may have a lower amputation rate because of some congenital collateral vessels, such as the sciatic artery. Further, when tumors involve major peripheral vessels, subacute or chronic vascular compression likely would facilitate development of collateral circulation. Similar chronic situations have been described in adults treated with debridement and common femoral artery ligation, after infected femoral artery pseudoaneurysms., Purposes and Clinical Relevance: Considering our patient's history and clinical and radiographic findings, infants with musculoskeletal sarcomas involving vascular structures can be treated selectively with tumor and vessel resection without the need for vascular reconstruction if distal limb perfusion is detected intraoperatively.

Background: The emergence of limb salvage surgery as an option for patients with osteosarcoma is attributable to preoperative chemotherapy and advancements in musculoskeletal imaging and surgical technique. While the indications for limb salvage have greatly expanded it is unclear whether limb salvage affects overall survival., Questions/purposes: We asked whether over the past three decades limb-sparing procedures in high-grade osteosarcoma had increased, and whether this affected survival and ultimate amputation., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 251 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma treated from 1980 to 2004 with a multidisciplinary approach, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We compared survival rates, limb-salvage treatment, and amputation after limb-sparing procedure during three different periods of time. Fifty-three patients were treated from 1980 to 1989, 97 from 1990 to 1999, and 101 from 2000 to 2004. Thirty-seven patients were treated with primary amputations and 214 with primary limb salvage., Results: The 5-year survival rate in the first period was 36%, whereas in the 1990 s, it was 60% and 67% from 2000-2004. Limb salvage surgery rate in the 1980s was 53% (28 of 53), whereas in the 1990 s, it was 91% (88 of 97) and 97% from 2000-2004 (98 of 101). In the limb salvage group, 22 of the 214 patients (10%) required secondary amputation; the final limb salvage rate in the first period was 36% (19 of 53), whereas in the 1990 s, it was 81% (79 of 97) and 93% from 2000-2004 (94 of 101)., Conclusions: Patients with osteosarcoma treated in the last two periods had higher rates of limb salvage treatment and survival, with lower secondary amputation.

Background: Resection of large tumors of the proximal tibia may be reconstructed with endoprostheses or allografts with fixation. Endoprosthetic replacement is associated with high failure rates and complications. Proximal tibia osteoarticular allografts after tumor resection allows restoration of bone stock and reconstruction of the extensor mechanism, but the long-term failure rates and complications are not known., Questions/purposes: We therefore determined (1) the middle- and long-term survival of proximal tibia osteoarticular allografts, (2) their complications, and (3) functional (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score) and radiographic (International Society of Limb Salvage) outcomes in patients treated with this reconstruction., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients (58 reconstructions including six repeat reconstructions) who underwent osteoarticular proximal tibia allograft reconstructions after resection of a bone tumor. The minimum followup of the 46 surviving patients was 72 months (mean, 123 months; range, 10-250 months). Survival of the allograft was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We documented outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scoring system and the International Society of Limb Salvage radiographic scoring system., Results: Six patients died from tumor-related causes without allograft failure before the 5-year radiographic followup. At last followup, 32 of the 52 remaining allografts were still in place; 20 failed owing to infections, local recurrences, or fractures. Overall allograft survival was 65% at 5 and 10 years, with an average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score of 26 points and an average radiographic result of 87%., Conclusions: Based on these data we believe proximal tibia osteoarticular allograft is a valuable reconstructive procedure for large defects after resection of bone tumors., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: As diagnostic and therapeutic techniques improve, patients with a musculoskeletal sarcoma should expect longer survival, fewer complications and side effects, and an improved quality of life. Functional longevity of the reconstruction after resection of the tumor becomes a major concern, especially in young and physically active patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mid-term and long-term survival of reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft in a series of patients., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of eighty reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft following resection of a bone tumor in seventy-six patients. The mean duration of follow-up was eighty-two months. The rates of survival of the allograft and the joint surface were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Functional and radiographic results were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up., Results: Five patients were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-five allografts in seventy-one patients available for study. Thirteen patients (thirteen allografts) died of tumor-related causes without allograft failure before a two-year radiographic follow-up could be performed. Of the remaining sixty-two allografts, fourteen failed: six failed as a result of infection; four, because of local recurrence; one, because of massive resorption; and three, as a result of fracture. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 125 months, forty-eight allografts were still in place. The overall rate of allograft survival was 78% at both five and ten years, and the rate of allograft survival without the need for resurfacing with a knee prosthesis was 71% at both five and ten years. With the numbers available, age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were not found to have a significant effect on the overall allograft survival rates. The patients who retained the original allograft had good or excellent functional and radiographic results., Conclusions: The life expectancy for most patients with a highly aggressive or malignant tumor in the distal part of the femur is now several decades. In this study, we found a high rate of survival of distal femoral allograft reconstructions at both five and ten years.

Background: As diagnostic and therapeutic techniques improve, patients with a musculoskeletal sarcoma should expect longer survival, fewer complications and side effects, and an improved quality of life. Functional longevity of the reconstruction after resection of the tumor becomes a major concern, especially in young and physically active patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mid-term and long-term survival of reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft in a series of patients., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of eighty reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft following resection of a bone tumor in seventy-six patients. The mean duration of follow-up was eighty-two months. The rates of survival of the allograft and the joint surface were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Functional and radiographic results were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up., Results: Five patients were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-five allografts in seventy-one patients available for study. Thirteen patients (thirteen allografts) died of tumor-related causes without allograft failure before a two-year radiographic follow-up could be performed. Of the remaining sixty-two allografts, fourteen failed: six failed as a result of infection; four, because of local recurrence; one, because of massive resorption; and three, as a result of fracture. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 125 months, forty-eight allografts were still in place. The overall rate of allograft survival was 78% at both five and ten years, and the rate of allograft survival without the need for resurfacing with a knee prosthesis was 71% at both five and ten years. With the numbers available, age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were not found to have a significant effect on the overall allograft survival rates. The patients who retained the original allograft had good or excellent functional and radiographic results., Conclusions: The life expectancy for most patients with a highly aggressive or malignant tumor in the distal part of the femur is now several decades. In this study, we found a high rate of survival of distal femoral allograft reconstructions at both five and ten years.

Even though massive osteoarticular allografts have been reported to restore function successfully after tumor resection, little has been published about this procedure in post-traumatic joint reconstruction. We report two pediatric patients who sustained a grade III open fracture of the distal femur and were treated with osteoarticular allografts as a salvage procedure. In each patient, a femoral condyle was inserted to treat the bone and cartilage defect, and a 4.5 dynamic compressive plate was applied to fix the graft to the host bone. There were no complications after the reconstructive procedure. At 2 and 10 years of follow-up, both patients showed a favorable functional and radiographic outcome using the scoring instruments of the Musculo-skeletal Tumor Society and the International Symposium on Limb Salvage.