Search

This paper contributes to classification and identification in modern finance through advanced optimization. In the last few decades, financial misalignments and, thereby, financial crises have been increasing in numbers due to the rearrangement of the financial world. In this study, as one of the most remarkable of these, countries' debt crises, which result from illiquidity, are tried to predict with some macroeconomic variables. The methodology consists of a combination of two predictive regression models, logistic regression and robust conic multivariate adaptive regression splines (RCMARS), as linear and nonlinear parts of a generalized partial linear model. RCMARS has an advantage of coping with the noise in both input and output data and of obtaining more consistent optimization results than CMARS. An advanced version of conic generalized partial linear model which includes robustification of the data set is introduced: robust conic generalized partial linear model (RCGPLM). This new model is applied on a data set that belongs to 45 emerging markets with 1,019 observations between the years 1980 and 2005. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nowadays, the importance of financial crises and defaults of countries are becoming clear due to the globalization in the economic area and investments. Generalized partial linear model (GPLM) is a combination of two different regression models connecting with the mean of the dependent variable with the help of a link function. It is adequate to high-dimensional, non-normal data sets having the flexibility to reflect all anomalies effectively. The nonlinear patterns are also easily explained by the nonparametric component of the model. In this study, we introduce a newly developed conic GPLM (CGPLM) to predict default probabilities of 45 emerging markets using the contribution of a continuous model CMARS and a discrete model logistic regression. We present its application results on a data set with 13 macroeconomic variables in 25 years’ time. To predict debt crises, CGPLM gives better results than a single CMARS and a single logistic regression. In fact, we have 91.81% and 89.31% accuracy rates, computed according to the correctness of the model output, for training and validation sample, respectively. This improvement in prediction of crises can contribute to new prospects and developments in financial mathematics to make more accurate previsions for investments and to take measures due to coming risks. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]