Search

Low yields of extracted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma limit continued development of liquid biopsy in cancer, especially in early-stage cancer diagnostics and cancer screening applications. We investigate a novel liquid-phase-based DNA isolation method that utilizes aqueous two-phase systems to purify and concentrate circulating cfDNA. The PHASIFY MAX and PHASIFY ENRICH kits were compared to a commonly employed solid-phase extraction method on their ability to extract cfDNA from a set of 91 frozen plasma samples from cancer patients. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used as the downstream diagnostic to detect mutant copies. Compared to the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (QCNA) kit, the PHASIFY MAX method demonstrated 60% increase in DNA yield and 171% increase in mutant copy recovery, and the PHASIFY ENRICH kit demonstrated a 35% decrease in DNA yield with a 153% increase in mutant copy recovery. A follow-up study with PHASIFY ENRICH resulted in the positive conversion of 9 out of 47 plasma samples previously determined negative with QCNA extraction (all with known positive tissue genotyping). Our results indicate that this novel extraction technique offers higher cfDNA recovery resulting in better sensitivity for detection of cfDNA mutations compared to a commonly used solid-phase extraction method., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Liquid biopsies, in particular, analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), have emerged as a promising noninvasive diagnostic approach in oncology. Abnormal distribution of DNA methylation is one of the hallmarks of many cancers and methylation changes occur early during carcinogenesis. Systemic analysis of cfDNA methylation profiles is being developed for cancer early detection, monitoring for minimal residual disease (MRD), predicting treatment response and prognosis, and tracing the tissue origin. This review highlights the advantages and disadvantages of ctDNA profiling for noninvasive diagnosis of early-stage cancers and explores recent advances in the clinical application of ctDNA methylation assays. We also summarize the technologies for ctDNA methylation analysis and provide a brief overview of the bioinformatic approaches for analyzing DNA methylation sequencing data., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests The authors have no interests to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Liquid biopsies enable noninvasive therapy monitoring in patients with solid tumors. Specific serum markers such as proteins, hormones, or enzymes released from tumor cells or in response to tumor growth can be used for quantification of the tumor burden. However, only a fraction of pediatric tumors has none of these serum markers, but tumor-specific genetic alterations represent reliable alternatives. Here we describe a method for using genomic fusion sequences as liquid biopsy markers in Ewing sarcoma patients.

Liquid biopsy, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), is a promising tool in oncology, especially in personalized medicine. Although its main applications currently focus on selection and adjustment of therapy, ctDNA may also be used to monitor residual disease, establish prognosis, detect relapses, and possibly screen at-risk individuals. CtDNA represents a small and variable proportion of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) which is itself present at a low concentration in normal individuals and so analyzing ctDNA is technically challenging. Various commercial systems have recently appeared on the market, but it remains difficult for practitioners to compare their performance and to determine whether they yield comparable results. As a first step toward establishing national guidelines for ctDNA analyses, four laboratories in Switzerland joined a comparative exercise to assess ccfDNA extraction and ctDNA analysis by sequencing. Extraction was performed using six distinct methods and yielded ccfDNA of equally high quality, suitable for sequencing. Sequencing of synthetic samples containing predefined amounts of eight mutations was performed on three different systems, with similar results. In all four laboratories, mutations were easily identified down to 1% allele frequency, whereas detection at 0.1% proved challenging. Linearity was excellent in all cases and while molecular yield was superior with one system this did not impact on sensitivity. This study also led to several additional conclusions: First, national guidelines should concentrate on principles of good laboratory practice rather than recommend a particular system. Second, it is essential that laboratories thoroughly validate every aspect of extraction and sequencing, in particular with respect to initial amount of DNA and average sequencing depth. Finally, as software proved critical for mutation detection, laboratories should validate the performance of variant callers and underlying algorithms with respect to various types of mutations.

Background: Next Generation Sequencing is one of the latest advances in molecular testing and clinical laboratory applications. Next Generation Sequencing techniques involving liquid biopsies are emerging as important tools in cancer diagnostics and prognostics. Thus, integration of liquid biopsy studies into clinical laboratory applications has become a necessity. By virtue of liquid biopsies, determining potential treatment targets through metastasis and primary tumor sites in the right clinical context can result in a more comprehensive treatment. This also helps to overcome re-sampling difficulties which require an invasive procedure with the problem of tumor heterogeneity. As the literature involving liquid biopsies and next generation sequencing increases, the rate of laboratories with competencies and experience in this novel technology remains limited., Methods: Next generation sequencing was performed via a comprehensive multi-gene cancer panel (Actionable In-sight Solid Tumor Panel, Qiagen) consisting of 12 solid tumor related genes (EGFR, ALK, KRAS, PIK3CA, NRAS, PDGFRA, KIT, ERBB2, ERBB3, ESR1, BRAF and RAF1) from lung cancer patients who applied or were referred to CU AGENTEM (Cukurova University Adana Genetic Diseases Diagnosis and Treatment Center) for routine genetic testing., Results: A modified next generation sequencing workflow was performed with a multi-gene solid tumor panel using liquid biopsies in comparison with formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples to integrate this technique into the routine clinical laboratory applications and bioinformatics. In this study, next generation sequencing of liquid biopsies in cancer patients was integrated into cancer diagnostics., Conclusions: Liquid biopsy studies provide numerous advantages when integrated with next generation sequencing through a well-optimized workflow.

ctDNA provided by liquid biopsy offers a promising alternative to tumor biopsy as it gives a non-invasive and «real-time» access to the cancer genome and reflects tumor intra and extra heterogeneity. ctDNA has shown growing clinical interest for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, theragnostics, therapeutic monitoring, and clonal evolution tracking. A major technical limit for ctDNA analysis from body fluids is the extremely low proportion of ctDNA compared to non-malignant cell-free DNA, underscoring the need for highly sensitive and specific detection techniques. The control of pre-analytical procedures appears essential for optimal ctDNA analysis and need to be standardized for clinical research applications. This chapter provides insights into major current technologies for ctDNA detection. Overall, PCR-based techniques are able to detect limited molecular alterations and have a high sensitivity suitable for monitoring purposes while NGS-based approaches are broad range molecular screening assays more specifically indicated for treatment selection. We briefly reviewed new technical innovations that are now available for ctDNA detection.

Liquid biopsy was introduced to the oncology field with the promise of revolutionizing the management of cancer patients, minimizing the exposure to invasive procedures such as tissue biopsy, and providing reliable information regarding therapy response and detection of disease relapse. Despite the significant increase in the number of published studies on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the past years, the emphasis of most studies is on the development of new technologies or on the clinical utility of ctDNA. This leaves a clear gap of knowledge concerning the biology of ctDNA, such as the fundamental mechanisms through which DNA from tumor cells is released into the circulation. Moreover, considering that ctDNA analysis is now currently being applied in clinical practice, the need for rigorous quality control is arising, and with it the necessity to standardize procedures, from sample collection to data analysis. This review focuses on the main aspects of ctDNA, including approaches currently available to evaluate tumor genetics, as well as the points that still require improvement in order to make liquid biopsy a key player in precision medicine., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Liquid biopsy provides the opportunity of detecting, analyzing and monitoring cancer in various body effluents such as blood or urine instead of a fragment of cancer tissue. It is composed of different biological matrices such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell free nucleic acids, exosomes or tumors "educated platelets." In addition to representing a non- or minimally invasive procedure, it should represent a better view of tumor heterogeneity and allows for real-time monitoring of cancer evolution. Recent technological and molecular advances, greatly facilitated by the use of microfluidics in many cases, have permitted large progresses both in our ability to purify and analyze liquid biopsy components. In particular, the great developments of droplet-based digital PCR and the various optimizations of next generation sequencing technologies are central to the several validations of CTC-free DNA as a strong cancer biomarker. However, complete adoption of liquid biopsy in clinics will require pursuing recent efforts in the standardization of procedures both on the pre-analytical and analytical aspects., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to short fragments of acellular nucleic acids detectable in almost all body fluids, including blood, and is involved in various physiological and pathological phenomena such as immunity, coagulation, aging, and cancer. In cancer patients, a fraction of hematogenous cfDNA originates from tumors, termed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and may carry the same mutations and genetic alterations as those of a primary tumor. Thus, ctDNA potentially provides an opportunity for noninvasive assessment of cancer. Recent advances in ctDNA analysis methods will potentially lead to the development of a liquid biopsy tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, therapy response monitoring, and tracking the rise of new mutant sub-clones in cancer patients. Over the past few decades, cancer-specific mutations in ctDNA have been detected using a variety of untargeted methods such as digital karyotyping, personalized analysis of rearranged ends (PARE), whole-genome sequencing of ctDNA, and targeted approaches such as conventional and digital PCR-based methods and deep sequencing-based technologies. More recently, several chip-based electrochemical sensors have been developed for the analysis of ctDNA in patient samples. This paper aims to comprehensively review the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive potential of ctDNA as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy for cancer patients. We also present an overview of current advances in the analytical sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analysis methods as well as biological and technical challenges, which need to be resolved for the integration of ctDNA analysis into routine clinical practice.

Background: In most research laboratories the use of EDTA tubes for the isolation of plasma DNA from tumor patients is standard. Unfortunately these tubes do not allow for an extended storage of samples before processing and prevent EDTA tubes from being shipped at ambient temperature. The aim of our study was to compare the quantity and quality of plasma DNA isolated from EDTA and PAXgene® Blood ccfDNA Tubes in different downstream applications., Methods: We enrolled 29 patients in our study. Blood samples were drawn into EDTA and PAXgene® Blood ccfDNA Tubes and were processed on day 0 and day 7 after storage at ambient temperature. The plasma DNA from 10 patients was isolated manually. For the DNA isolation from the plasma of 19 additional patients we used the automated QIAsymphony system. The total amount DNA from all samples was measured with a quantitative real-time PCR assay. In addition the amount of methylated mSHOX2 plasma DNA was determined., Results: While the 7day storage lead to an increased amount of total DNA in almost all EDTA tubes, this effect was only seen in very few PAXgene® Blood ccfDNA Tubes. The stabilization solution which prevents the lysis of blood cells had no effect on the method for quantification of methylated sequences in these samples., Conclusion: The quantity and quality of plasma DNA from both types of blood draw tubes are comparable. DNA from PAXgene® Blood ccfDNA was successfully used for PCR-based quantification of total amount of cell-free DNA and for methylation analysis as well., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)