Search

Objective: To assess the added value of arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) color maps for the differentiation of small metastases from hepatic benign lesions. Subjects and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent multiphasic liver CT imaging and had low-attenuating liver lesions smaller than 3 cm (123 total lesions; metastasis: benign = 32:91). AEF color maps of the liver were created from multiphasic liver CT images using dedicated software. Two radiologists independently reviewed multiphasic CT image sets alone and in combination with image sets with AEF color maps using a five-point scale. The additional diagnostic value of the color maps was assessed by means of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The area under the ROC curve (Az) increased when multiphasic CT images were combined with AEF color map analysis as compared with evaluation based only on multiphasic CT images (from 0.698 to 0.897 for reader 1, and from 0.825 to 0.945 for reader 2; P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). The increase Az was especially significant for lesions less than 1 cm (from 0.702 to 0.888 for reader 1, and from 0.768 to 0.958 for reader 2; P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). The mean AEF of tumor-adjacent parenchyma (35.07 ± 27.2) was significantly higher than that of tumor-free liver parenchyma (27.3 ± 20.6) (P = 0.04). Conclusions: AEF color mapping can improve the diagnostic performance for small hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer and may allow for the elimination of additional examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a result of recent developments in imaging modalities and wide spread routine medical checkups and screening, more incidental liver lesions are found frequently on US these days. When incidental liver lesions are found on US, physicians have to make a decision whether to just follow up or to undergo additional imaging studies for lesion characterization. In order to choose the next appropriate imaging modality, the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging study needs to be considered. Therefore, we tried to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for characterization of incidental liver masses. We included 127 incidentally found focal liver lesions (94 benign and 33 malignant) from 80 patients (M∶F = 45∶35) without primary extrahepatic malignancy or chronic liver disease. Two radiologists independently reviewed Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and MDCT. The proportion of confident interpretations for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions and for the specific diagnosis of diseases were compared. The proportion of confident interpretations for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions was significantly higher with EOB-MRI(94.5%–97.6%) than with MDCT (74.0%–92.9%). In terms of specific diagnosis, sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher with EOB-MRI than with MDCT for the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and focal eosinophilic infiltration. The diagnoses of the remaining diseases were comparable between EOB-MRI and MDCT. Hence, our results suggested that Gd-EOB-MRI may provide a higher proportion of confident interpretations than MDCT, especially for the diagnosis of incidentally found FNH and focal eosinophilic infiltration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & aims: Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing CEUS at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of the CEUS LR‐5 for HCC and the pooled proportions of HCCs in each CEUS LI‐RADS category. Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS LI‐RADS. Random‐effects model was used to determine summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of CEUS LR‐5 and the pooled proportions of HCCs in each CEUS LI‐RADS category. Risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool. Results: Eleven studies were included in the final analysis, which consisted of 5535 observations with 3983 HCCs. The pooled per‐observation sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS LR‐5 for diagnosing HCC were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64%–73%) and 92% (95% CI, 83%–96%) respectively. The pooled proportions of HCCs were 0% (95% CI, 0‐0%) for LR‐1, 1% (95% CI, 0%–4%) for CEUS LR‐2, 26% (95% CI, 14%–39%) for CEUS LR‐3, 77% (95% CI, 68%–86%) for CEUS LR‐4, 97% (95% CI, 95%–98%) for CEUS LR‐5, 57% (95% CI, 44%–69%) for CEUS LR‐M and 100% (95% CI, 93%–100%) for CEUS LR‐5V or TIV. Conclusions: The CEUS LR‐5 category showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for diagnosing HCC. The proportion of HCCs was higher in the higher CEUS LI‐RADS categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backgrounds & Aims The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significances of not only the initial and the best response during repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but if eligible, also the time point of achieving treatment responses. Methods Three hundred and fourteen treatment-naïve patients with well-preserved liver function undergoing TACE were recruited. Treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis. Results After adjusting other variables, objective response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) as the initial response (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.410) and the best response (adjusted HR 0.335) had independent prognostic significances for OS, respectively (both p <0.001). Objective responders as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by patients who subsequently achieved objective response after at least two sessions and those who did not achieve objective response during treatment course eventually (52.6, 27.0, and 10.8 months, respectively; log-rank test, p <0.001). Likewise, patients with CR as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by those who subsequently achieved CR after at least two sessions and those who achieved PR as the best response (70.2, 40.6, and 23.0 months, respectively; log-rank test, p <0.001). Large (>5 cm) and multiple (⩾4) tumors were independently associated with failure to achieve CR after the initial TACE (both p <0.05). Conclusion Both the initial and the best response predicts OS effectively. However, achievement of treatment response at an early time point is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: To evaluate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that developed in patients with no evidence of a tumor during a prior ultrasound (US) performed within 1 year of the diagnosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 100 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis who had undergone US within 1 year prior to HCC diagnosis and who showed no liver lesions on the previous US. Size and T stage of HCC were assessed as well as whether patients met surgical criteria for liver transplantation as HCC treatment [Milan or University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) criteria]. Results: The mean interval between the negative and diagnostic scans was 5 months, 13 days. HCC presented as a single nodule in 69 patients (size, 0.8–8.0cm), as two or more nodules in 18 patients, and as the diffuse form of HCC in 13 patients. HCC presented as a small tumor (<3cm) in 48 patients. T stages were: T1 in 26 patients, T2 in 45, T3 in 18, and T4 in 11. The Milan criteria were met in 79 patients. Eighty-five patients fulfilled the UCSF. Conclusion: Patients may present with advanced HCC, even if sonographic findings were negative within 1 year prior to diagnosis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To assess whether reticular hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) is a diagnostic finding of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) in patients with hepatic metastases who have undergone chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analysed EOB-MRI of 42 patients who had undergone chemotherapy before hepatic resection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Two radiologists, who were unaware of whether or not the patients had SOS, reviewed the hepatobiliary phase images to determine the presence of hypointense reticulation in the liver using a 5-point scale. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (A) were calculated for each reviewer. Results: The sensitivity, specificity and A for the diagnosis of SOS were 75%, 100% and 0.957 for reader 1 and 75%, 96.2% and 0.936 for reader 2, respectively. In one patient who received a false-positive diagnosis by one reader, there was sinusoidal fibrosis on histological examination, but not diagnostic for SOS. False-negative diagnosis occurred in four patients for both readers; histology of these patients showed minimal and localised sinusoidal congestion and fibrosis. Conclusions: Reticular hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images of EOB-MRI is highly specific for the diagnosis of SOS in patients with treated colorectal hepatic metastases. Key Points: • Gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) can identify the sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) • The diagnosis can be achieved with high specificity and good interobserver agreement. • SOS typically demonstrates diffuse hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images on EOB-MRI. • EOB-MRI may be falsely negative in patients with minimal degree of SOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]