Search

Aim: To explore this hypothesis that smooth muscle cells may be capable of acquiring a myofibroblastic phenotype, we have studied the expression of smoothelin in fibrotic conditions., Methods: Normal liver tissue (n = 3) was obtained from macroscopically normal parts of hepatectomy, taken at a distance from hemangiomas. Pathological specimens included post-burn cutaneous hypertrophic scars (n = 3), fibrotic liver tissue (n = 5), cirrhotic tissue (viral and alcoholic hepatitis) (n = 5), and hepatocellular carcinomas (n = 5). Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemistry or were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane for confocal microscopy analysis. Sections were stained with antibodies against smoothelin, which is expressed exclusively by smooth muscle cells, and α-smooth muscle actin, which is expressed by both smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts., Results: In hypertrophic scars, α-smooth muscle actin was detected in vascular smooth muscle cells and in numerous myofibroblasts present in and around nodules, whereas smoothelin was exclusively expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells. In the normal liver, vascular smooth muscle cells were the only cells that express α-smooth muscle actin and smoothelin. In fibrotic areas of the liver, myofibroblasts expressing α-smooth muscle actin were detected. Myofibroblasts co-expressing α-smooth muscle actin and smoothelin were observed, and their number was slightly increased in parallel with the degree of fibrosis (absent in liver with mild or moderate fibrosis; 5% to 10% positive in liver showing severe fibrosis). In cirrhotic septa, numerous myofibroblasts co-expressed α-smooth muscle actin and smoothelin (more than 50%). In hepatocellular carcinomas, the same pattern of expression for α-smooth muscle actin and smoothelin was observed in the stroma reaction surrounding the tumor and around tumoral cell plates. In all pathological liver samples, α-smooth muscle actin and smoothelin were co-expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells., Conclusion: During development of advanced liver fibrosis, a subpopulation of myofibroblasts expressing smoothelin may be derived from vascular smooth muscle cells, illustrating the different cellular origins of myofibroblasts.

Background: The debate concerning the potential remodelling and/or reversibility of cirrhotic lesions and biliary fibrosis is still open., Aims/methods: In this work, we have used the precision-cut liver slice (PCLS) model, which maintains cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to study, by immunohistochemistry, the behaviour of the different fibrogenic cells, i.e. hepatic stellate cells (HSC) and portal fibroblasts, in cultured (for 1 week) PCLS derived from normal and fibrotic human livers., Results: In normal liver, before and after culture, α-smooth muscle (SM) actin was present only in the vessel walls. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor-β was expressed before and after culture by portal fibroblasts, and appeared after culture in HSC. Before culture, CD 34 was not expressed in parenchyma, but appeared after culture in sinusoidal endothelial cells. In cirrhotic lesions, before culture, α-SM actin, PDGF receptor-β and Thy-1 were expressed in septa; after culture, α-SM actin expression disappeared but the expression of the PDGF receptor-β and Thy-1 was maintained. In cholestatic liver specimens, α-SM actin, PDGF receptor-β and Thy-1 expression, which was present before culture in enlarged portal areas, disappeared after culture, and apoptosis was detected. In the parenchyma of both cirrhotic and cholestatic livers, the expression of the PDGF receptor-β and of CD 34, which was not observed before culture, was present in HSC and sinusoidal endothelial cells, respectively, after culture., Conclusions: These results indicate that during remodelling of pathological tissues in cultured liver slices, the myofibroblastic cells derived from HSC or from portal fibroblasts show different behaviours, suggesting different mechanisms of activation/deactivation., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Fibrosis, defined as the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix in an organ, is the main complication of chronic liver damage. Its endpoint is cirrhosis, which is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. The accumulation of extracellular matrix observed in fibrosis and cirrhosis is due to the activation of fibroblasts, which acquire a myofibroblastic phenotype. Myofibroblasts are absent from normal liver. They are produced by the activation of precursor cells, such as hepatic stellate cells and portal fibroblasts. These fibrogenic cells are distributed differently in the hepatic lobule: the hepatic stellate cells resemble pericytes and are located along the sinusoids, in the Disse space between the endothelium and the hepatocytes, whereas the portal fibroblasts are embedded in the portal tract connective tissue around portal structures (vessels and biliary structures). Differences have been reported between these two fibrogenic cell populations, in the mechanisms leading to myofibroblastic differentiation, activation and "deactivation", but confirmation is required. Second-layer cells surrounding centrolobular veins, fibroblasts present in the Glisson capsule surrounding the liver, and vascular smooth muscle cells may also express a myofibroblastic phenotype and may be involved in fibrogenesis. It is now widely accepted that the various types of lesion (e.g., lesions caused by alcohol abuse and viral hepatitis) leading to liver fibrosis involve specific fibrogenic cell subpopulations. The biological and biochemical characterisation of these cells is thus essential if we are to understand the mechanisms underlying the progressive development of excessive scarring in the liver. These cells also differ in proliferative and apoptotic capacity, at least in vitro. All this information is required for the development of treatments specifically and efficiently targeting the cells responsible for the development of fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Background/aims: Cellular retinol-binding protein-1 (CRBP-1) which is involved in vitamin A metabolism is highly expressed in liver cells, particularly in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). In this work, the CRBP-1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry in the different liver cell populations, including HSCs and portal fibroblasts, of normal liver and of fibrotic and cirrhotic liver., Methods: Normal liver, fibrotic liver in different stages and cirrhotic liver sections were studied. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against CRBP-1, alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD 68 and CD 34., Results: In normal liver, quiescent HSCs expressed CRBP-1, while portal fibroblasts did not. In fibrotic or cirrhotic liver, activated HSCs co-expressed CRBP-1 and alpha-SMA; a variable proportion of portal and septal (myo)fibroblasts, more important in cirrhosis, neo-expressed both CRBP-1 and alpha-SMA. Biliary epithelial cells both in normal and pathological situations expressed CRBP-1. Neither Kupffer cells, nor endothelial cells showed CRBP-1 expression., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that CRBP-1 is a good marker to identify HSC in normal human liver. Furthermore, in fibrotic or cirrhotic liver, the different patterns of expression for CRBP-1 and alpha-SMA allow the distinction of different subsets of fibroblastic cells involved in fibrogenesis and septa formation.

Background: The expression and the distribution of fibrillin-1 and elastin were studied in normal and pathological human liver samples., Methods: As controls, histologically normal/subnormal liver samples (n = 24) were used. Pathological samples corresponded to seven cirrhosis and eight hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) developed on cirrhotic (four) or noncirrhotic (four) liver., Results: In normal liver, fibrillin-1 and elastin co-localized in vessel walls and portal tract connective tissue. Fibrillin-1 alone was detected along sinusoids and in portal spaces at the interface with the limiting hepatocytic plates and close to the basement membrane of bile ducts. By transmission electron microscopy, typical bundles of microfibrils were detected both in Disse space and in portal zones. Cirrhotic nodules were usually rich in fibrillin-1 along sinusoids; fibrillin-1 and elastin were co-localized in fibrotic septa surrounding nodules. In HCC, fibrillin-1 was present between tumoral hepatocytes; stromal reaction around the tumors contained both fibrillin-1 and elastin., Conclusions: Fibrillin-1 was associated with elastin in portal mesenchyme and vessel walls of normal liver, in fibrotic septa around cirrhotic nodules and stromal reaction around HCC, but was expressed alone in the perisinusoidal space. The functional roles for fibrillin-1 in non-elastic tissues, such as the liver, remain to be elucidated.