1. Prospective head-to-head comparison of non-invasive scores for diagnosis of fibrotic MASH in patients with type 2 diabetes.
- Author
-
Castera L, Garteiser P, Laouenan C, Vidal-Trécan T, Vallet-Pichard A, Manchon P, Paradis V, Czernichow S, Roulot D, Larger E, Pol S, Bedossa P, Correas JM, Valla D, Gautier JF, and Van Beers BE
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease complications, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease diagnosis, Biopsy methods, Liver pathology, Liver diagnostic imaging, Aspartate Aminotransferases blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 diagnosis, Elasticity Imaging Techniques methods, Liver Cirrhosis diagnosis, Liver Cirrhosis etiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
- Abstract
Background & Aims: Non-invasive scores have been proposed to identify patients with fibrotic, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), who are at the highest risk of progression to complications of cirrhosis and may benefit from pharmacologic treatments. However, data in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are lacking. The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of FAST (FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), MAST (MRI-AST), MEFIB (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] plus FIB-4), and FNI (fibrotic NASH index) for detecting fibrotic MASH in patients with T2DM., Methods: A total of 330 outpatients with T2DM and biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) from the QUID-NASH study (NCT03634098), who underwent FibroScan, MRI-proton density fat fraction and MRE at the time of liver biopsy were studied. The main outcome was fibrotic MASH, defined as NAS ≥4 (with at least one point for each parameter) and fibrosis stage ≥2 (centrally reviewed)., Results: All data for score comparisons were available for 245 patients (median age 59 years, 65% male, median BMI 31 kg/m
2 ; fibrotic MASH in 39%). FAST and MAST had similar accuracy (AUROCs 0.81 vs. 0.79, p = 0.41) but outperformed FNI (0.74; p = 0.01) and MEFIB (0.68; p <0.0001). When using original cut-offs, MAST outperformed FAST, MEFIB and FNI when comparing the percentage of correctly classified patients, in whom liver biopsy would be avoided (69% vs. 48%, 46%, 39%, respectively; p <0.001). When using cut-offs specific to our population, FAST outperformed FNI and MAST (56% vs. 40%, and 38%, respectively; p <0.001)., Conclusion: Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered., Impact and Implications: Among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), identifying those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis, who are the most at risk of developing clinical liver-related outcomes and who may benefit from pharmacologic treatments, is an unmet need. In this prospective multicenter study, we compared four non-invasive scores, three based on imaging (MRI or ultrasound technologies) and one on laboratory blood tests, for this purpose, using original and study-specific cut-offs. Our findings show that FAST, MAST, MEFIB and FNI are accurate non-invasive tools to identify patients with T2DM and fibrotic MASH in secondary/tertiary diabetes clinics. Cut-offs adapted to the T2DM population should be considered., Trial Registration Number: NCT03634098., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF