Search

Background and Aims: There is evidence for an association between thrombosis in the hepatic microcirculation and liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of daily low-dose aspirin (75 or 100mg, given for prevention of hepatic artery thrombosis) in fibrosis progression to ≥ F2 fibrosis score in liver-transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV)., Methods: All HCV-positive patients who had undergone liver transplantation (LT) between 2000 and 2010 were included. Exclusion criteria were negative HCV RNA, previous LT or death within a year of LT. Liver fibrosis was assessed by histological evaluation. Data were censored at the date of the last histological evaluation before starting anti HCV therapy. Progression to fibrosis F ≥ 2 was analyzed with a multistate model with time-dependent covariables., Results: One hundred and eighty-eight patients were included. In univariate analysis, older recipient and donor age, male donor gender, activity score ≥ A2 after LT, number of steroid boluses and aspirin intake (HR: 0.75 [0.57-0.97]; P=0.03) influenced the risk of progression to fibrosis ≥ F2. In multivariate analysis, adjusted on site, older donor age, male donor gender, activity score ≥ A2 and number of steroids boluses, remained independent predictors of fibrosis progression, while younger recipient age and aspirin intake (HR: 0.65 [0.47-0.91]; P=0.01) were associated with a slower fibrosis progression., Conclusion: Low-dose aspirin treatment might be associated with a lower risk of liver fibrosis progression in patients with HCV recurrence after LT., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The development of liver fibrosis markers in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is needed to facilitate the assessment of its progression and the effectiveness of new therapies. Here, we investigated the potential usefulness of transient elastography (TE) in the noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis stage and disease progression in PBC. We performed, first, a prospective performance analysis of TE for the diagnosis of METAVIR fibrosis stages in a diagnostic cohort of 103 patients and, second, a retrospective longitudinal analysis of repeated examinations in a monitoring cohort of 150 patients followed-up for up to 5 years. All patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. Diagnostic thresholds of liver stiffness in discriminating fibrosis stages ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and =F4 were 7.1, 8.8, 10.7, and 16.9 kPa, respectively. TE showed high performance and was significantly superior to biochemical markers (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/platelet ratio, FIB-4, hyaluronic acid, AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio, and Mayo score) in diagnosing significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, or cirrhosis. Analysis of the monitoring cohort data set using generalized linear models showed the following: (1) an overall progression rate of 0.48 ± 0.21 kPa/year (P = 0.02) and (2) no significant progression in patients with F0-F1, F2, or F3 stages, but a significant increase (4.06 ± 0.72 kPa/year; P < 0.0001) in cirrhotic patients. A cut-off value of 2.1 kPa/year was associated with an 8.4-fold increased risk of liver decompensations, liver transplantations, or deaths (P < 0.0001, Cox regression analysis)., Conclusion: TE is one of the best current surrogate markers of liver fibrosis in PBC. Over a 5-year period, on-treatment liver stiffness appears stable in most noncirrhotic PBC patients, whereas it significantly increases in patients with cirrhosis. Progression of liver stiffness in PBC is predictive of poor outcome., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Blood tests and transient elastography (Fibroscan™) have been developed as alternatives to liver biopsy. This ANRS HCEP-23 study compared the diagnostic accuracy of nine blood tests and transient elastography (Fibroscan™) to assess liver fibrosis, vs. liver biopsy, in untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC)., Methods: This was a multicentre prospective independent study in 19 French University hospitals of consecutive adult patients having simultaneous liver biopsy, biochemical blood tests (performed in a centralized laboratory) and Fibroscan™. Two experienced pathologists independently reviewed the liver biopsies (mean length=25±8.4 mm). Performance was assessed using ROC curves corrected by Obuchowski's method., Results: Fibroscan™ was not interpretable in 113 (22%) patients. In the 382 patients having both blood tests and interpretable Fibroscan™, Fibroscan™ performed similarly to the best blood tests for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Obuchowski's measure showed Fibrometer® (0.86), Fibrotest® (0.84), Hepascore® (0.84), and interpretable Fibroscan™ (0.84) to be the most accurate tests. The combination of Fibrotest®, Fibrometer®, or Hepascore® with Fibroscan™ or Apri increases the percentage of well classified patients from 70-73% to 80-83% for significant fibrosis, but for cirrhosis a combination offers no improvement. For the 436 patients having all the blood tests, AUROC's ranged from 0.82 (Fibrometer®) to 0.75 (Hyaluronate) for significant fibrosis, and from 0.89 (Fibrometer® and Hepascore®) to 0.83 (FIB-4) for cirrhosis., Conclusions: Contrarily to blood tests, performance of Fibroscan™ was reduced due to uninterpretable results. Fibrotest®, interpretable Fibroscan™, Fibrometer®, and Hepascore® perform best and similarly for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing fibrosis but has several limitations. We evaluated a noninvasive method, so-called diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI), which measures the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of water, for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We analyzed 20 healthy volunteers and 54 patients with chronic HCV (METAVIR: F0, n = 1; F1, n = 30; F2, n = 8; F3, n = 5; and F4, n = 10) prospectively included. Patients with moderate-to-severe fibrosis (F2-F3-F4) had hepatic ADC values lower than those without or with mild fibrosis (F0-F1; mean: 1.10 +/- 0.11 versus 1.30 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm2/s) and healthy volunteers (mean: 1.44 +/- 0.02 x 10(-3) mm2/s). In discriminating patients staged F3-F4, the areas under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.92 (+/-0.04) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 0.92 (+/-0.05) for elastography, 0.79 (+/-0.08) for FibroTest, 0.87 (+/-0.06) for the aspartate aminotransferase to platelets ratio index (APRI), 0.86 (+/-0.06) for the Forns index, and 0.87 (+/-0.06) for hyaluronate. In these patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87%, 87%, 72%, and 94%, respectively, with an ADC cutoff level of 1.21 x 10(-3) mm2/s. In discriminating patients staged F2-F3-F4, the AUC values were 0.79 (+/-0.07) for MRI, 0.87 (+/-0.05) for elastography, 0.68 (+/-0.09) for FibroTest, 0.81 (+/-0.06) for APRI, 0.72 (+/-0.08) for the Forns index, and 0.77 (+/-0.06) for hyaluronate., Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that DWMRI compares favorably with other noninvasive tests for the presence of significant liver fibrosis.

The progression of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a process in which genes interact with environmental factors. A "clotting process" is involved in fibrogenesis. ABO blood group distribution is associated with thrombotic disease, non-O blood group increasing the risk of venous thrombosis. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ABO blood type contributes to the severity of fibrosis. We studied blood group distribution in 346 French patients with HCV infection who underwent biopsies. The distribution of non-O blood group was 40%, 55%, 62%, 71%, and 73% for the F0, F1, F2, F3 and F4 fibrosis scores, respectively. Non-O blood group was associated with increased severity of fibrosis, even after adjustment on gender, age, duration of infection, and alcohol consumption (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.9; P=.04). Non-O blood group is an independent risk factor for the progression of liver fibrosis in HCV infection.

Background: Insulin resistance is a frequent feature of chronic hepatitis C. Whether insulin resistance could be the cause or consequence of steatosis and fibrosis is unknown. The ability of HCV genotype 3 to promote steatosis by itself provides an unique opportunity to answer this question., Aims: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationships between insulin resistance, steatosis, and fibrosis according to genotype in 141 non-diabetic patients with biopsy proven non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C., Methods: All patients had fasting serum glycaemia and insulinaemia measurements. Insulin resistance was evaluated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA IR) method. Liver steatosis was determined according to hepatitis C virus genotype (1 or 3). Logistic regression and multivariate regression analysis were used to identify variables independently associated with insulin resistance, fatty liver, and fibrosis., Results: Although steatosis and fibrosis were more severe in genotype 3 patients, median HOMA IR was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 related steatosis than in those with genotype 3 related steatosis (2.1 v 1; p = 0.001). Independent risk factors for steatosis were insulin resistance in genotype 1 patients (p = 0.001) and viral load in genotype 3 patients (p = 0.003). Among genotype 1 patients, independent parameters associated with insulin resistance were age (p = 0.04) and steatosis (p = 0.004). Steatosis was associated with more severe fibrosis whatever the genotype (p = 0.002). Among genotype 1 patients, although there was a significant relationship between circulating insulin level and fibrosis stage (p = 0.006), only steatosis and inflammatory score were independently associated with fibrosis., Conclusion: This study shows that insulin resistance is the cause rather than the consequence of steatosis and fibrosis in genotype 1 patients and that increased circulating insulin is a risk factor for fibrosis through insulin resistance induced steatosis.

Background/aim: We have previously shown that the histological stage and severity of lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis (LPN) are independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development in ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Our aim during this study was to determine whether biochemical parameters classically used in PBC management and measured under UDCA could be considered as reliable surrogate markers for these histological prognostic indices in clinical practice., Method: The study included 153 patients with PBC who had undergone a control liver biopsy after 2 years of UDCA therapy. The relationships between histological and biological features were assessed by variance analysis and logistic regression. The diagnostic value of independent markers was assessed in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative value (NPV) and receiver-operating characteristic curves., Results: Two variables were independently associated with extensive fibrosis (i.e. advanced histological stages): serum levels of bilirubin and hyaluronic acid (HA). A fibrosis index ([bilirubin (micromol/l)/14]+[HA (microg/l)/143]) higher than 1.5 exhibited good PPV and specificity (>74%) but rather poor NPV and sensitivity (<64%) regarding a diagnosis of extensive fibrosis. The only independent marker of LPN was aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity. AST activity of more than twice the upper limit of normal showed acceptable PPV (>70%) but very low sensitivity (<25%) for a diagnosis of LPN., Conclusions: Serum bilirubin and HA levels measured under UDCA therapy are of acceptable diagnostic value for extensive fibrosis, but none of the biochemical tests commonly employed in the management of PBC can be considered as surrogate markers of LPN. Taken together with our previous results, these findings suggest that liver biopsy may be necessary to screen UDCA-treated patients who might require additional therapies., (Copyright 2004 Blackwell Munksgaard)

Objectives: Liver steatosis is a common histopathological finding in patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Patients with chronic hepatitis C having both steatosis and factors causing oxidative stress may be at a higher risk of fibrogenesis. In a subset of patients with a definite date of contamination, our study aimed to assess the potential synergistic interaction between steatosis and factors likely to induce oxidative stress-namely, alcohol intake, iron overload, and drugs., Methods: Out of 700 anti-HCV-positive screened patients, 142 untreated patients with liver biopsy and with one known risk factor were selected. Liver fibrosis, inflammation, and necrosis were graded according to the Knodell score, and steatosis as moderate to severe if more than 30% of hepatocytes were affected. Drinkers were defined as having daily mean alcohol intakes of more than 30 g in men and 20 g in women., Results: In multivariate analysis, two factors were independently associated with extensive fibrosis: the degree of severity of piecemeal necrosis (OR = 3.27, CI = 1 .17-9.16) and a combination of moderate to severe steatosis and alcohol intake (OR = 7.02, CI = 1.12-44). The median progression rate of fibrosis was about twice as high among drinkers with steatosis than among drinkers without steatosis or nondrinkers with or without steatosis (0.25 vs 0. I vs 0.13 vs 0.08, respectively; p = 0.02). Independent parameters significantly associated with moderate to severe steatosis were body mass index (OR = 1.13, CI = 1.02-1.26) and infection with genotype 3 (OR = 5.5, CI = 1.88-16), but not alcohol consumption., Conclusions: As well as the key role of the severity of piecemeal necrosis, the study underlines the synergistic interaction between steatosis and even low alcohol consumption as a contributory factor in extensive liver fibrosis.