Search

Herbal products have been used for centuries among indigenous people to treat symptoms and illnesses. Recently, their use in Western countries has grown significantly, rivaling that of prescription medications. Currently, herbal products are used mainly for weight loss and bodybuilding purposes but also to improve well-being and symptoms of chronic diseases. Many people believe that because they are natural, they must be effective and safe; however, these beliefs are erroneous. Few herbal products have been studied in well-designed controlled trials of patients with liver or other diseases, despite testimony to the contrary. Moreover, current highly effective antiviral drugs make efforts to treat hepatitis C with herbal products redundant. Herbal products are no safer than conventional drugs and have caused liver injury severe enough to require transplantation or cause death. Furthermore, their efficacy, safety, and claims are not assessed by regulatory agencies, and there is uncertainty about their reported and unreported contents. We review the history of commonly used herbal products, as well as their purported efficacies and mechanisms and their adverse effects., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Chronic liver disease (CLD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, but the epidemiology is not well described. We conducted prospective population-based surveillance to estimate newly diagnosed CLD incidence, characterize etiology distribution, and determine disease stage., Methods: We identified cases of CLD newly diagnosed during 1999-2001 among adult county residents seen in any gastroenterology practice in New Haven County, Connecticut; Multnomah County, Oregon; and Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPMCP, Oakland, California [total population 1.48 million]). We defined CLD as abnormal liver tests of at least 6 months' duration or pathologic, clinical, or radiologic evidence of CLD. Consenting patients were interviewed, a blood specimen obtained, and the medical record reviewed., Results: We identified 2,353 patients with newly diagnosed CLD (63.9 cases/100,000 population), including 1,225 hepatitis C patients (33.2 cases/100,000). Men aged 45-54 yr had the highest hepatitis C incidence rate (111.3/100,000). Among 1,040 enrolled patients, the median age was 48 yr (range 19-86 yr). Hepatitis C, either alone (442 [42%]) or in combination with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) (228 [22%]), accounted for two-thirds of the cases. Other etiologies included nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, 95 [9%]), ALD (82 [8%]), and hepatitis B (36 [3%]). Other identified etiologies each accounted for <3% of the cases. A total of 184 patients (18%) presented with cirrhosis, including 44% of patients with ALD., Conclusions: Extrapolating from this population-based surveillance network to the adult U.S. population, approximately 150,000 patients with CLD were diagnosed in gastroenterology practices each year during 1999-2001. Most patients had hepatitis C; heavy alcohol consumption among these patients was common. Almost 20% of patients, an estimated 30,000 per year, had cirrhosis at presentation. These results provide population-level baseline data to evaluate trends in identification of patients with CLD in gastroenterology practices.

Purpose: The United States National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) uses death certificate data to estimate the burden of serious disease. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the NCHS method for estimating the burden of chronic liver disease (CLD)., Method: The authors identified death certificates of New Haven County residents who died from October 1999-September 2000 that were assigned one of 115 ICD-10 codes that might indicate CLD. They reviewed medical charts, medical examiner records and a certifier questionnaire to determine whether CLD was the cause of death., Result: Using the authors' determination of CLD status as the gold standard, the specificity of the NCHS classification was high (86%), but the sensitivity was low (36%). The authors found that adding selected ICD-10 codes to those considered by the NCHS to be CLD (certain CLD malignancies and viral hepatitis) could improve sensitivity. Ensuring that deaths attributed by certifiers to "End Stage Liver Disease" were coded as CLD could also improve completeness. These modifications could increase sensitivity substantially with little effect on specificity., Conclusion: The NCHS method may understate the CLD burden substantially which could have a detrimental effect on planning for and evaluating prevention and treatment. Modifications could improve completeness.

Background: Over-the-counter analgesics (OTCAs), principally paracetamol (acetaminophen)-containing compounds and NSAIDs, are commonly used medications. Guidelines for the use of these agents in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are not available, despite the possibility that such patients may be more susceptible to the effects of an adverse reaction. Notwithstanding the lack of guidelines for healthcare providers, patients are often counselled to modify their use of these drugs. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to assess healthcare providers' recommendations on how OTCAs should be used by patients with CLD., Methods: An 11-question web-based survey was distributed via email to healthcare providers participating in four healthcare networks in the US, to determine what recommendations they make to patients with cirrhosis (compensated and decompensated) and chronic hepatitis regarding the use of paracetamol and NSAIDs. Healthcare providers were also queried about the recommendations they make to patients with cirrhosis regarding pain control, and on the use of paracetamol for patients who consume alcohol daily., Results: Overall, a 12% response rate was obtained. Internal medicine, family practice, paediatrics, and gastroenterology were the most represented practice types. Recommendations against the use of NSAIDs were significantly less common than recommendations against paracetamol use, in cases of both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis (p = 0.001). Non-gastroenterologists and non-primary care physicians were the least likely to recommend against NSAID use (p = 0.001), while gastroenterologists were the least likely to recommend against paracetamol in these patients (p = 0.001). It was the recommendation of most respondents that OTCAs should be avoided in patients with cirrhosis, and that paracetamol should be avoided or its dose reduced in the setting of daily alcohol use., Conclusions: Significant variability exists among healthcare providers on their recommendations for OTCA use in the setting of chronic liver disease. Non-gastroenterologists are more likely to recommend against the use of paracetamol than NSAIDs, and patients with chronic liver disease may be under-treated for pain.

Background: Current evidence shows limited patient understanding of liver disease, coupled with no standard guidelines or methods to offer patient education in a busy clinical environment. We developed multimedia-based education (MBE) for those with cirrhosis & tested its effectiveness in improving patient knowledge from baseline to 1 month. Methods: This prospective study enrolled cirrhotic patients who had a scheduled visit with a hepatologist at an ambulatory academic practice or were admitted to the liver inpatient service. Once consented, patients completed a baseline knowledge questionnaire, and were given a link to watch the videos (text or email). Four videos were developed by the study team with input from clinicians and patients (liver function, symptoms and complications, medical management and preventive actions & nutrition). At month 1, the study coordinator confirmed with the patient that they had watched the videos at least once, and patients completed the same knowledge questionnaire. The scores between pre- and post-intervention were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Of the 120 enrolled, 113 completed baseline and 75 completed follow-up. 48% had alcohol-related liver disease as the underlying cause of cirrhosis. Mean MELD score at enrollment was 14.7 ± 8.14. There was a statistically significant improvement in knowledge scores across all domains from baseline to month 1 (p < 0.05). The overall knowledge score improved from 65 to 83% (p < 0.001), with highest improvement by 40% in the domain of liver function and causes of cirrhosis. Conclusions: MBE can help improve patients' knowledge about liver function, management, and prevention and can be used in both ambulatory and inpatient hepatology practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The botanical product silymarin, an extract of milk thistle, is commonly used by patients to treat chronic liver disease and may be a treatment for NASH due to its antioxidant properties. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of higher than customary doses of silymarin in non-cirrhotic patients with NASH. This exploratory randomized double-blind placebo controlled multicenter Phase II trial tested a proprietary standardized silymarin preparation (Legalon®, Rottapharm|Madaus, Mylan) and was conducted at 5 medical centers in the United States. Eligible adult patients had liver biopsy within 12 months showing NASH without cirrhosis with NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) ≥4 per site pathologist’s assessment. Participants were randomized to Legalon® 420 mg, 700 mg, or placebo t.i.d. for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was histological improvement ≥2 points in NAS. Of 116 patients screened, 78 were randomized. There were no significant differences in adverse events among the treatment groups. After 48–50 weeks, 4/27 (15%) in the 700 mg dose, 5/26 (19%) participants randomized to 420 mg, and 3/25 (12%) of placebo recipients reached the primary endpoint (p = 0.79) among all randomized participants, indicating no benefit from silymarin in the intention to treat analysis Review by a central pathologist demonstrated that a substantial number of participants (49, 63%) did not meet histological entry criteria and that fibrosis stage improved most in the placebo treated group, although not significantly different from other groups. Silymarin (Legalon®) at the higher than customary doses tested in this study is safe and well tolerated. The effect of silymarin in patients with NASH remains inconclusive due to the substantial number of patients who entered the study but did not meet entry histological criteria, the lack of a statistically significant improvement in NAS of silymarin treated patients, and the unanticipated effect of placebo on fibrosis indicate the need for additional clinical trials. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the application of genetic testing to contemporary medical diagnostics and practice, it has become apparent that the phenotypes of many disorders are modulated by host genetic factors. The aim of the current study was to determine whether selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) unrelated to the human leukocyte antigen region or other immune pathways, including those associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), may influence development, severity, or outcomes of drug‐induced liver injury (DILI). Thirteen variants previously associated with NAFLD and/or selected other liver diseases were tested in 832 Caucasian DILI cases and 10,397 Caucasian population controls. DILI cases were attributed to multiple agents (177 individual drugs), with 56 cases due to herbal/dietary supplement products. Allele frequencies were imputed from recent genome‐wide association studies and compared to those for European control samples from the Gnomad database. Significance was tested by linear regression or logistic regression, depending on the nature of the trait. Any variant that passed the Bonferroni threshold of P < 0.0004 (0.0513) was considered a significant association. None of the variants proved to be significantly associated with DILI as phenotype nor with any of the selected severity traits. Among the variants studied, rs1421085, found in the fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene, showed a marginal protective effect (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.77‐0.95; P = 0.005). None of the genetic polymorphisms tested were significantly associated with the risk of development, severity, or outcome of DILI. Conclusion: SNPs implicated in common liver diseases, such as NAFLD, do not play a substantial role in DILI pathogenesis across agents. It remains possible that these variants could be involved with DILI due to single agents, but this will require the evaluation of larger numbers of bona fide cases. We found no association of genetic variations in PNPLA3, TMSF6, FTO, HSD17B13, or other genes that have been reported to influence NAFLD or other liver disorders and the development or progression /outcome of drug‐induced liver injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alcohol use disorder, substance abuse, and depression are illnesses that deteriorate the quality of life (QOL) of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Screening and behavioral health programs integrated into routine practice can mitigate the deleterious effects of such illnesses but have not been adopted in hepatology practices. We implemented a behavioral health program based on the Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model and assessed its acceptability and effectiveness in improving QOL. This was a quality improvement study. Patients with CLD and a scheduled outpatient visit in the hepatology clinic were screened while waiting for their appointment. All patients who screened positive for any of the three illnesses were offered a brief intervention (BI) at the point of care and at 3 months by a trained social worker. The BI used the principles of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy. Severity of illness was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Participants completed an acceptability survey at 6 months. We screened 303 patients; 61.7% were positive for any of the three illnesses assessed. Among the positive patients, depression was most common (48.4%), alcohol and substance abuse were each 26%. For the 95 patients who underwent BI, QOL improved from baseline to 3 and 6 months (P < 0.001) and patients with depression improved the most. Depression was the only independent predictor of change in QOL over time. Of the enrolled patients, 82% agreed BIs improved their overall care and 87% indicated a desire to continue with the behavioral program. Conclusion: An outpatient behavioral health program based on the SBIRT model is acceptable to patients with CLD and may help improve QOL over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Changes in levels of cytokines and chemokines have been proposed as possible biomarkers of tissue injury, including liver injury due to drugs. Recently, in acute drug-induced liver injury (DILI), we showed that 19 of 27 immune analytes were differentially expressed and that disparate patterns of immune responses were evident. Lower values of serum albumin (< 2.8 g/dL) and lower levels of only four analytes, namely, IL-9, IL-17, PDGF-bb, and RANTES, were highly predictive of early death [accuracy = 96%]. The goals of this study were to assess levels of the same 27 immune analytes in larger numbers of subjects to learn whether the earlier findings would be confirmed in new and larger cohorts of subjects, compared with a new cohort of healthy controls. We studied 127 subjects with acute DILI enrolled into the US DILIN. We also studied 118 subjects with severe acute liver injury of diverse etiologies, enrolled into the ALF SG registry of subjects. Controls comprised 63 de-identified subjects with no history of liver disease and normal liver tests. Analytes associated with poor outcomes [death before 6 months, n = 32 of the total of 232 non-acetaminophen (Apap) subjects], were lower serum albumin [2.6 vs 3.0 g/dL] and RANTES [6,458 vs 8,999 pg/mL] but higher levels of IL-6 [41 vs 18], IL-8 [78 vs 48], and MELD scores [30 vs 24]. Similar patterns were observed for outcome of death/liver transplant within 6 months. A model that included only serum albumin < 2.8 g/dL and RANTES below its median value of 11,349 had 83% (or 81%) accuracy for predicting early death (or early death/liver transplant) in 127 subjects from DILIN. No patterns of serum immune analytes were reflective of the etiologies of acute liver failure, but there were cytokine patterns that predicted prognosis in both acute DILI and ALF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Silymarin, derived from the milk thistle plant Silybum marianum, is widely used for self-treatment of liver diseases, including hepatitis C virus (HCV), and its antiviral activity has been demonstrated in vitro and in HCV patients administered an intravenous formulation of the major silymarin flavonolignans, silybin A and silybin B. The safety and dose-exposure relationships of higher than customary oral doses of silymarin and its acute effects on serum HCV RNA were evaluated in noncirrhotic HCV patients. Four cohorts of 8 patients with well-compensated, chronic noncirrhotic HCV who failed interferon-based therapy were randomized 3:1 to silymarin or placebo. Oral doses of 140, 280, 560, or 700 mg silymarin were administered every 8 hours for 7 days. Steady-state exposures for silybin A and silybin B increased 11-fold and 38-fold, respectively, with a 5-fold increase in dose, suggesting nonlinear pharmacokinetics. No drug-related adverse events were reported, and no clinically meaningful reductions from baseline serum transaminases or HCV RNA titer were observed. Oral doses of silymarin up to 2.1 g per day were safe and well tolerated. The nonlinear pharmacokinetics of silybin A and silybin B suggests low bioavailability associated with customary doses of silymarin may be overcome with doses above 700 mg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]