Search

Background and Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine incident cases of extrahepatic malignancy in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to identify whether the factors are associated with cancer development., Methods: Between 15 January 2001 and 14 March 2021, a total of 1365 patients had been diagnosed with NAFLD were enrolled in the study., Results: The median follow-up period was 59.5 months. The mean age was 50.9 ± 10.9 years. The female gender was predominant (57%). During the follow-up period, 62 extrahepatic malignancies and 11 hepatocellular carcinomas were identified. Of all extrahepatic malignancies, 51 were solid organ malignancies and 11 were hematological malignancies. Female breast cancer was the most frequent (25.8%), followed by thyroid cancer (19.4%), lymphoma (12.9%), and lung cancer (9.7%). In univariate and multivariable analyses, after adjusting for age and sex, the presence of diabetes and high initial baseline gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels were significantly associated with the development of extrahepatic malignancies [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-3.20, P = 0.036] and HR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14-3.38, P = 0.015, respectively). In 424 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients, the development of extrahepatic cancer was significantly associated with the severity of hepatic fibrosis (HR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.36-8.07; P = 0.008)., Conclusion: Extrahepatic malignancies are frequently seen in patients with NAFLD. Diabetes mellitus, high baseline GGT levels, and significant hepatic fibrosis are associated with the development of extrahepatic cancer in patients with NAFLD., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Goals: The aims of the present study were to investigate the natural history of cirrhosis and to determine trends in the etiology of cirrhosis., Methods: Between January 2001 and January 2018, a total of 1,341 patients had been diagnosed with cirrhosis and were included., Results: A total of 898 cirrhotic patients, who were followed up for at least 6 months were included into the analysis. The median age was 54 years. The median Child-Pugh and MELD scores were 7.5 and 11, respectively. Ascites (51%) was the most common causes of decompensation. Chronic viral hepatitis was the most frequent cause of cirrhosis (58%). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was the main etiology (34%), followed by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (18%). Among 129 patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC), 60 had metabolic abnormalities. If these 60 patients with CC were considered to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related cirrhosis, the proportion of NAFLD-related cirrhosis increased from 1.8 to 8.0%. At admission, 74 patients (8%) had been diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A new HCC developed in 80 patients during the follow-up period. The probability of developing HCC was 3.9% at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis showed that the development of HCC was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), male gender (p < 0.001), viral etiology (p = 0.026), and baseline high aspartate aminotransferase level (p = 0.01). Overall, 104 cirrhotic patients died., Conclusion: HBV and HCV remain the leading causes of etiology in cirrhosis and HCC. However, NAFLD-related cirrhosis is recognized as a growing burden., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To assess the usefulness of a single-phase contrast-enhanced CT to differentiate subtypes of neuroendocrine tumour (NET) liver metastases and to evaluate the correlation between CT features and Ga-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) findings., Methods: Between December 2017 and April 2019 patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumours who underwent CT and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT were enrolled in the study. All patients involved in the study had undergone a standardised single-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Whole body PET/CT images were obtained with a combined PET/CT scanner. All CT images were retrospectively analysed by two radiologists. Enhancement patterns of lesions were assessed. For quantitative examination; CT attenuation values of metastatic lesions, liver parenchyma and aorta were measured using a freehand ROI and tumour-to-liver ratio [T-L = (Tumour-Liver) / Liver] and tumour-to-aorta ratio [T-A = (Tumour-Aorta) / Aorta] were calculated. The lesion with the highest Ga-68 DOTATATE uptake in the liver was used for calculations. The metabolic tumour volume (MTV), maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max ) and SUV mean were calculated for the target liver lesion., Results: A total of 137 NET liver metastases divided into in three groups: 49 (35.7%) pancreatic, 60 (44.5%) gastroenteric and 26 (18.9%) lung NET liver metastases were analysed. Gastroenteric NET metastases often showed heterogeneous enhancement which was significantly higher than in the pancreas and lung NET liver metastases ( p < 0.001). 96.72% ( n = 59) of the gastroenteric NET liver metastases were hypoattenuating whereas the most frequent presentation for the pancreatic group was hyperattenuation (63.26%, n = 31). The difference in enhancement patterns of the liver metastases was statistically significant ( p < 0.001) with respect to the location of the primary tumour. For quantitative analysis; tumour CT values were significantly different between the groups ( p < 0.001). The T-L ratio was statistically different between gastroenteric and pancreatic NET liver metastases and pancreatic and lung NET groups ( p < 0.001). The T-A ratio was significantly higher in the pancreatic NET metastases ( p < 0.001). SUV max , SUV mean and MTV values, however, were not significantly different between the subgroups. There was a weak positive correlation between T-L ratio and SUV mean values., Conclusion: We noticed statistically significant differences in both qualitative and quantitative CT features between histologic subgroups of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases at a single phase contrast-enhanced CT., Advances in Knowledge: Our study will be the first in the literature which extensively focus on assessing the CT features of liver metastases of NETs at a single phase CT and Ga-68DOTATATE PET/CT. As the different histological subtypes of NET liver metastases exhibit different clinical outcomes, these features might help to identify the primary tumour to provide optimal treatment.

Purpose: To assess and compare the multiphasic computed tomography (CT) features of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases and to investigate the possibility to predict the histologic subtype of the primary tumor., Materials and Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2017 patients with biopsy proven NET with at least one liver metastasis who underwent multiphasic CT were enrolled in this study. All cases were acquired using a standardized multiphasic liver CT protocol, arterial, portal, and hepatic venous phases were obtained. Images were retrospectively analyzed in consensus by two abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical data and histologic subtype. The size, number, and location of lesions were noted. Enhancement patterns of each lesion on arterial, portal, and hepatic venous phases were assessed. For quantitative analysis, CT attenuation of tumors, liver parenchyma, and aorta were measured using a circular region of interest (ROI) on arterial, portal, and hepatic venous phases for reflecting the blood supply of the tumor. Tumor-to-aorta and tumor-to-liver ratio were calculated in all three phases. Differences between subtypes of NET liver metastases were studied using ROC analysis of clustered data., Results: A total of 255 neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases divided into 101 (39.6%) pancreatic, 60 (23.5%) gastroenteric and 94 (36.8%) lung NET liver metastases were analyzed. Contrast enhancement of lesions was homogeneous in 78% of patients (n = 199), which was significantly more frequent in patients with pancreatic group than in those with gastroenteric origin (n = 90, 89.1% vs. n = 28, 46.7%; p < 0.001). Gastroenteric NET metastases frequently showed heterogeneous enhancement, which was significantly higher than in the other two groups (50% vs. 3% and 2%). With respect to the location of the primary tumor, the difference in enhancement patterns of the liver lesions was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Pancreatic NET metastases were mostly hyperdense on arterial images and isodense on portal and hepatic venous phase images (79.2%, n = 80). Gastroenteric NET metastases were mostly hyperdense on arterial phase images and hypodense on portal and hepatic venous phase images (n = 28, 46.7%). The most frequent pattern for lung NET metastases was hypoattenuation on all three phase images (n = 44, 46.8%). ROC analysis of clustered data revealed statistically significant differences between pancreatic NET liver metastases, gastroenteric NET liver metastases, and lung NET liver metastases in terms of tumor-to-aorta (T-A) ratio and tumor-to-liver (T-L) ratio (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: We observed statistically significant differences in multiphasic CT features (enhancement pattern, T-A ratio, and T-L ratio) between histologic subtypes of NET liver metastases. As the difference in histological subtypes of NET liver metastases results in a different prognosis and different management strategy, these CT features might help to identify the primary tumor when it is not known to ensure accurate tumor staging and to provide optimal treatment.

Aims: In this study, the authors aimed to identify prognostic factors after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis., Methods: Forty-nine (28 male, 21 female; mean age: 64.6 ± 10.8) patients who received SIRT for CRC liver metastasis were studied. Effects of number (<5 vs. ≥5), maximum dimension, and standardized uptake value (SUV) of liver metastases, liver tumor load (<25% vs. 26%-50% vs. 51%-75%), presence of extrahepatic disease, and metabolic early response on overall survival were analyzed., Results: Mean follow-up time was 44.1 ± 27.5 months. Overall survival time was calculated as 10.03 ± 1.61 (95% CI; 6.86-13.20) months. SUV (0.004) of liver metastases, early metabolic response (p = 0.015), and presence of extrahepatic metastasis (p = 0.001) were identified as significant factors influencing overall survival. The hazard ratio was 1:2.3 for the presence of extrahepatic metastasis and 1:2.7 for the absence of early metabolic response., Conclusion: These findings suggest that patients with CRC liver metastasis who have lower SUV at presentation and early metabolic response have better outcomes after SIRT.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate tumor response using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients who received yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for colorectal liver metastases. The initial and sixth-week tumor lesion glycolysis values were calculated to evaluate the success of the treatment and compare it with patient survival., Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients (15 female, 20 male, mean age: 61.9 ± 9.0 years, range: 33-76 years) who received SIRT treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases in our hospital between June 2008 and May 2011 were included in the study. All patients included in the study had liver-only or liver-dominant disease. The treatment response was evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT in the sixth week after treatment. Response was evaluated according to the change in total lesion glycolysis (ΔTLG). The ΔTLG was calculated using the following formula: ΔTLG=100 ×[standardized uptake value (SUV) mean1 × total functional tumor volumes (FTVs)1-SUV mean2 × FTV2]/SUV mean1 × FTV1., Results: Mean FTV1 and FTV2 values were calculated to be 235.7 ± 203 and 107.3 ± 67 mm3, respectively (P=0.04). The mean ΔTLG was 43 ± 35 (range: 0-100). Mean overall survival time was 12.7 ± 8.0 months (range: 3-31 months). The cutoff value of ΔTLG was calculated to be 26.5 using receiver operating characteristic analysis (sensitivity 64%; specificity 85%; AUC=0.717 ± 0.087, P=0.034). Patients were allocated into those having values greater than the cutoff value (group 1) and those having values lower than the cutoff value (group 2) in order to calculate the effect of ΔTLG on survival. Survival was 11.32 ± 1.18 (95% CI 9.02-13.62) months in group 2 and 20.76 ± 2.71 (95% CI 15.46-26.06) months in group 1 (P=0.016). ΔTLG was found to be a significant factor in univariate analysis (P=0.01)., Conclusion: An 18F-FDG PET/CT scan with calculation of ΔSUVmax3, ΔFTV, and ΔTLG before and at the sixth week after SIRT may play an important role in evaluating early tumor response and survival expectancy in these patients and help decide whether these patients should be referred to other treatment modalities or to follow-up.