Search

The hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), consisting of elevated alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and intrapulmonary vascular abnormalities in the presence of advanced liver disease, is associated with high mortality. Liver transplantation (LT) has been used for the treatment of HPS; however, the success of LT for the treatment of HPS is not uniformly documented. We reviewed our experience over a 5-year period and identified eight adult patients with incapacitating respiratory symptoms compatible with HPS. Inclusion criteria included hypoxemia, normal lung volumes, reduced oxygen diffusing capacity (D(L)CO), and the presence of intrapulmonary shunting. Underlying liver disease was caused by hepatitis C (2 patients), primary biliary cirrhosis (1 patient), cryptogenic cirrhosis (1 patient), alcohol (2 patients), and hepatitis C with alcohol (2 patients). Six out of eight patients required preoperative oxygen support. Severe hypoxemia was present in seven patients (Pa(O2) 51.5 +/- 8.2 mm Hg). Three patients had complicating pulmonary hypertension. All patients exhibited a severely reduced D(L)CO (44.6 +/- 12.2% of predicted value). Six patients were transplanted, with five requiring oxygen support at the time of discharge. Resolution of oxygen dependency occurred in all patients but was delayed in the two patients exhibiting complicating pulmonary hypertension (288.5 +/- 37.4 v 53.5 +/- 35.7 days). All patients exhibited O2 saturations greater than 98% on room air. Currently, three patients are alive and off oxygen. The current report documents successful resolution of hypoxemia after LT in this pilot cohort. This supports the newly implemented United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria, that LT for HPS may be extended to include patients with Pa(O2) < 60 mm Hg.

Background: The shortage of cadaveric donor livers is the rate-limiting step in clinical liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation provides a means to expand the cadaveric donor pool. However, this concept has not reached its full potential because of inferior patient and graft survival and high complication rates when traditional ex vivo split techniques are used. Therefore we sought to evaluate the safety, applicability, and effectiveness of a new technique for split liver transplantation., Methods: This study consists of 15 in situ split liver procurements, which resulted in 28 liver transplants. In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at the donor hospital without any additional work-up or equipment being needed. In situ liver splitting is accomplished in a manner identical to the living-donor procurement. This technique for liver splitting results in a left lateral segment graft (segments 2 and 3) and a right trisegmental graft (segments 1 and 4-8). This procedure required the use of the donor hospital operating room for an additional 1.5-2.5 hr and did not interfere with the procurement of 30 kidneys, 12 hearts, 7 lungs, and 9 pancreata from these same donors., Results: The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rates were 92% and 92%, respectively, while the 6-month and 1-year actuarial graft survival rates were 86% and 86%, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rate of patients who received a left lateral segment graft was 100% and 100%, respectively, while those who received a right trisegmental graft had 6-month and 1-year rates of 86% and 86%, respectively. The actuarial death-censored graft survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 80% and 80%, respectively, for the left lateral segment grafts, and 93% and 93%, respectively, for the right trisegmental grafts. Alograft and patient survival was independent of United Network for Organ Sharing status at the time of liver transplantation. No patient developed a biliary stricture, required re-exploration for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, or suffered from portal vein, hepatic vein, or hepatic artery thrombosis, Conclusions: In situ split liver transplantation can be accomplished without complications and provides results that are superior to those obtained previously with ex vivo methods. It abolishes ex vivo benching and prolonged ischemia times and provides two optimal grafts with hemostasis accomplished. This technique decreases pediatric waiting time and allows adult recipients to receive right-sided grafts safely. In situ splitting is the method of choice for expanding the cadaveric liver donor pool.

Variceal bleeding (VB) and ascites refractory to diuretics (RA) represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been used effectively in patients with these complications, especially those individuals awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). From April 1992 to July 1995, 41 adult patients underwent an attempt at TIPS placement for refractory VB or ascites at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Technical success was achieved in 37 of 41 cases (90.3%) with only two technical complications. Immediate control of hemorrhage and significant improvement of ascites was obtained in 91.9% and 83.5% of the patients, respectively. Six patients (16.2%) died within a week of TIPS placement due to uncontrollable ascites and multiorgan failure. Four of 31 patients (12.9%) developed mild to moderate grades of hepatic encephalopathy that was controlled with lactulose. Rebleeding from recurrent portal hypertension was noted in 5 of 31 cases (16.1%). Shunt stenosis or occlusion was seen in 7 of 31 cases (22.6%) at an average of 6.3 months following TIPS placement. Six patients underwent OLT within an average of 87 days after TIPS. These results indicate that TIPS appears to be an effective method for treatment of refractory VB and RA, especially for patients who are poor candidates for a surgical shunt or awaiting OLT. However, TIPS may not be considered a definitive solution for all patients with portal hypertension because of its current rate of shunt occlusion or stenosis.