Search

Decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer are major risk factors for mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT), both live-donor LT or deceased-donor LT, are lifesaving, but there are several barriers toward equitable access. These barriers are exacerbated in the setting of critical illness or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Rates of LT vary widely worldwide but are lowest in lower-income countries owing to lack of resources, infrastructure, late disease presentation, and limited donor awareness. A recent experience by the Chronic Liver Disease Evolution and Registry for Events and Decompensation consortium defined these barriers toward LT as critical in determining overall survival in hospitalized cirrhosis patients. A major focus should be on appropriate, affordable, and early cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer care to prevent the need for LT. Live-donor LT is predominant across Asian countries, whereas deceased-donor LT is more common in Western countries; both approaches have unique challenges that add to the access disparities. There are many challenges toward equitable access but uniform definitions of acute-on-chronic liver failure, improving transplant expertise, enhancing availability of resources and encouraging knowledge between centers, and preventing disease progression are critical to reduce LT disparities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. J.S. Bajaj reports financial support was provided by US Department of Veterans Affairs and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cirrhosis, the end result of liver injury, has high mortality globally. The effect of country-level income on mortality from cirrhosis is unclear. We aimed to assess predictors of death in inpatients with cirrhosis using a global consortium focusing on cirrhosis-related and access-related variables., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, the CLEARED Consortium followed up inpatients with cirrhosis at 90 tertiary care hospitals in 25 countries across six continents. Consecutive patients older than 18 years who were admitted non-electively, without COVID-19 or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, were enrolled. We ensured equitable participation by limiting enrolment to a maximum of 50 patients per site. Data were collected from patients and their medical records, and included demographic characteristics; country; disease severity (MELD-Na score); cirrhosis cause; medications used; reasons for admission; transplantation listing; cirrhosis-related history in the past 6 months; and clinical course and management while hospitalised and for 30 days post discharge. Primary outcomes were death and receipt of liver transplant during index hospitalisation or within 30 days post discharge. Sites were surveyed regarding availability of and access to diagnostic and treatment services. Outcomes were compared by country income level of participating sites, defined according to World Bank income classifications (high-income countries [HICs], upper-middle-income countries [UMICs], and low-income or lower-middle-income countries [LICs or LMICs]). Multivariable models controlling for demographic variables, disease cause, and disease severity were used to analyse the odds of each outcome associated with variables of interest., Findings: Patients were recruited between Nov 5, 2021, and Aug 31, 2022. Complete inpatient data were obtained for 3884 patients (mean age 55·9 years [SD 13·3]; 2493 (64·2%) men and 1391 (35·8%) women; 1413 [36·4%] from HICs, 1757 [45·2%] from UMICs, and 714 [18·4%] from LICs or LMICs), with 410 lost to follow-up within 30 days after hospital discharge. The number of patients who died while hospitalised was 110 (7·8%) of 1413 in HICs, 182 (10·4%) of 1757 in UMICs, and 158 (22·1%) of 714 in LICs and LMICs (p<0·0001), and within 30 days post discharge these values were 179 (14·4%) of 1244 in HICs, 267 (17·2%) of 1556 in UMICs, and 204 (30·3%) of 674 in LICs and LMICs (p<0·0001). Compared with patients from HICs, increased risk of death during hospitalisation was found for patients from UMICs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2·14 [95% CI 1·61-2·84]) and from LICs or LMICs (2·54 [1·82-3·54]), in addition to increased risk of death within 30 days post discharge (1·95 [1·44-2·65] in UMICs and 1·84 [1·24-2·72] in LICs or LMICs). Receipt of a liver transplant was recorded in 59 (4·2%) of 1413 patients from HICs, 28 (1·6%) of 1757 from UMICs (aOR 0·41 [95% CI 0·24-0·69] vs HICs), and 14 (2·0%) of 714 from LICs and LMICs (0·21 [0·10-0·41] vs HICs) during index hospitalisation (p<0·0001), and in 105 (9·2%) of 1137 patients from HICs, 55 (4·0%) of 1372 from UMICs (0·58 [0·39-0·85] vs HICs), and 16 (3·1%) of 509 from LICs or LMICs (0·21 [0·11-0·40] vs HICs) by 30 days post discharge (p<0·0001). Site survey results showed that access to important medications (rifaximin, albumin, and terlipressin) and interventions (emergency endoscopy, liver transplantation, intensive care, and palliative care) varied geographically., Interpretation: Inpatients with cirrhosis in LICs, LMICs, or UMICs have significantly higher mortality than inpatients in HICs independent of medical risk factors, and this might be due to disparities in access to essential diagnostic and treatment services. These results should encourage researchers and policy makers to consider access to services and medications when evaluating cirrhosis-related outcomes., Funding: National Institutes of Health and US Department of Veterans Affairs., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JSB has received grants to his institution from the NIH and is editor-in-chief and board of trustees member for the American College of Gastroenterology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aims of this study were to investigate biliary complications in liver transplant recipients with choledochocholedocho stomy anastomosis, to identify the risk factors for the development of such complications, and to evaluate the success of endoscopic approaches in liver transplant recipients., Methods: Between January 2013 and May 2021, a total of 238 patients with liver diseases underwent liver transplantation: 174 recipients undergoing choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis were included in the analysis., Results: Their median age was 54.0 years. The median posttransplant follow-up period was 29 months. Hepatitis B virus infection (33%) was the most common indication for liver transplantation. Most patients (87%) received living donor liver transplantation. The overall prevalence of posttransplant biliary complications was 31%. Anastomotic biliary strictures were the most common biliary complications (72%), followed by biliary leakage (13%). The median time between endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and liver transplantation was 4 months, with a mean of 3 ± 1.6 sessions. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography-guided drainage and balloon dilation with or without stent placement was the most common treatment modalities for recipients with biliary strictures. The overall success rate of endoscopic treatment modalities was 83.3%, with 65% of the recipients exhibiting complete biochemical and endoscopic responses. The response did not differ significantly between living donor liver transplantation and cadaveric donor liver transplant recipients (P > .05). Three recipients required revision surgery for biliary complication repair. Six patients died due to biliary sepsis., Conclusion: Biliary stricture and leakages were the most common biliary complications after liver transplantation. Endoscopic treatment was successful in most recipients.

Background: Liver graft fibrosis affects long-term graft and patient survival in liver transplant recipients. Transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography are widely used for the assessment of liver fibrosis in routine clinical practice, but are limited in liver transplant settings. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastograph in the assessment of liver fibrosis in liver transplant recipients, and to determine the recurrence rates of post-transplant hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis., Methods: A total of 126 consecutive liver transplant recipients were included. Magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography were performed for to measure liver stiffness., Results: The most common cause of liver transplantation was hepatitis B virus-induced cirrhosis (50%). The mean liver stiffness value with transient elastography was 6.1 ± 3.0 kPa, and the mean magnetic resonance elastography value was 2.7 ± 1.0 kPa. A significant positive correlation was found between magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography in terms of liver stiffness measurement (r = 0.61, P < .001). Obesity and the underlying etiology of liver diseases did not have any significant negative effect on magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography measurements. During the follow-up, the post-transplant recurrence rates of hepatic steatosis and hepatic fibrosis were 26% and 37%, respectively. The recurrence rates of post-transplant hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis were slightly higher in recipients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related cirrhosis than those with viral hepatitisrelated etiologies (44% vs 27%, P = .43; 44% vs 30%, P = .45, respectively)., Conclusion: Magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography are accurate in assessing liver fibrosis in the liver transplant setting. Obesity and the underlying etiology of primary liver disease do not influence the measurements.

The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and potent nucleos(t)ide analogs after liver transplantation is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence. However, the recommended doses, route of administration, and duration of HBIG administration remain unclear. Moreover, hepatitis B immunoglobulin-free prophylaxis with potent nucleos(t)ide analogs has shown promising disease outcomes in preventing hepatitis B virus recurrence. The current recommendations, produced by the Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver, Acute Liver Failure and Liver Transplantation Special Interest Group, suggest a reduced need for hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration with effective long-term suppression of hepatitis B virus replication using potent nucleos(t) ide analogs after liver transplantation.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a novel acute infectious disease that has rapidly reached staggering pandemic proportions. This review addresses gastroenterologists, hepatologists, liver transplant (LT) specialists, and health-care professionals working in the field of liver diseases and liver transplantation. It has been written based on a limited number of publications, recommendations of national and international liver and organ transplantation societies, and experiences of patients with COVID-19 around the world. The purpose of this review is to provide information addressing questions and concerns about COVID-19, to reveal the effects of the novel disease on patients with chronic liver disease and LT recipients, and to share information about ways in which this pandemic will affect clinical practices. We, the Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL), would like to remind you that this text is actually not a practical guide. It is imperative to act according to the standards set by health-care institutions and the Ministry of Health, Republic of Turkey.

Living donor liver transplantation is a widely accepted option to treat liver diseases in several indications. Risk of liver donation is being discussed and quality of life of donors is also studied. Changes and the change pattern of quality of life were analyzed in this prospective longitudinal study., Patients and Methods: Fifty-five donors were included. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) was fulfilled either in-person or during a telephone interview each donor preoperatively and at the end of the third, sixth, and 12th months., Results: Physical subdomain scores of SF-36 decreased significantly in the third postoperative month compared to preoperative score. The scores recovered in the sixth postoperative month, except for the bodily pain domain. The pain score recovered at the end of the 12th month. While social functioning score among mental subdomains of SF-36 temporarily decreased and recovered at postoperative 12th month, other mental subdomain scores and mental composition summary scores did not show a significant change., Conclusion: The quality of life of living liver donors is not permanently affected by donation. There are well-defined changes in the physical aspects of the quality of life that all seem to recover within 1 year. Donors should be preoperatively informed about this temporary change as well as complications., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) and low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) combination treatment for preventing post-transplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence., Methods: A total of 296 patients with HBV-associated liver disease who underwent liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. A combination of a daily NA and low-dose HBIG was used after LT., Results: The median follow-up period was 46 months. HBV recurrence occurred in eight patients. The cumulative probability of HBV recurrence at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was 1%, 3%, 3%, and 4%, respectively. Seven were on lamivudine (LMV) or adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), or LMV and ADV and HBIG combination treatment and one entecavir (ETV) and HBIG. With Cox regression analysis, HBV recurrence was determined to be associated with the presence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) prior to LT (HR: 12.3, P=.02). Overall, 44 patients died. Survival was significantly better in the ETV or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and HBIG group than the other group (P<.001)., Conclusion: The combination of ETV or TDF and low-dose HBIG achieved a more favorable prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT. The presence of HCC prior to LT was associated with post-transplant HBV recurrence., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aims: The aims of the present study were to review biliary complications following liver transplantation in a single-center experience, to identify the factors associated with biliary complications, and to evaluate the success of endoscopic and percutaneous treatment in such patients., Materials and Methods: Between January 1994 and June 2010, a total of 176 patients with liver disease underwent liver transplantation; 119 recipients were included in this retrospective analysis. Median posttransplant follow-up period was 49 months., Results: Mean age was 43.0±12.7 years. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were performed in 71 and 48 patients, respectively. Duct-to-duct anastomosis and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were performed in 68 and 51 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of posttransplant biliary complications was 36%; anastomotic biliary strictures were the most common biliary complications (42%), followed by biliary leakage (28%). On logistic regression analysis, duct-duct anastomosis was the only risk factor associated with the development of biliary complications (Odds ratio (OR), 3.346; p=0.005). Endoscopic and percutaneous treatment was successful in the majority of patients (81%), and the remaining 19% recipients underwent surgery for biliary repair. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guided drainage and balloon dilatation with stent placement were the most common treatment modalities., Conclusion: Biliary complications were most frequent after liver transplantation; biliary strictures were the most commonly seen. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis for biliary reconstruction is a risk factor for the development of biliary complications. Endoscopic and percutaneous treatment was successful in the majority of these patients.

Background: ''Bone marrow-derived stem cells'' have attracted great attention as potential candidates for liver-directed gene therapy and as a tool for regenerative medicine. However, the fate of these cells is not well-known. The aim of this present study was to investigate the fate of ''recipient-derived repopulated hepatocytes'' in sex-mismatched liver allografts in individuals following liver transplantation during systematic longitudinally performed liver biopsies., Methods: Paraffin-embedded sex-mismatched liver biopsy samples of nine recipients (male/female ratio 5/4; mean age: 39.7 yr) were reviewed. Double labeling with immunohistochemistry for hepatocytes and recipient-specific bone marrow-derived cells and fluorescence in-situ hybridization for visualizing X and Y chromosomes were performed. These slides were examined systematically using an image analyzer system (Olympus microscope; Cyto-Vision, Applied Imaging, Biosciences Centre, Newcastle, UK). Only cells with two nuclear spots were considered for interpretation., Results: The mean times from transplantation to first biopsy and between the first and the second biopsies were 5.9 and 20.9 months respectively. The proportion of recipient-derived repopulated hepatocytes was significantly decreased in the late biopsies when compared with the early biopsies (p = 0.001). All nine samples of the first biopsies had demonstrated recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation, with a mean of 2.0%, whereas only seven of nine samples of the second biopsies had demonstrated recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation with a low mean of 0.5% (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Based on these results, we suggest that ''recipient-specific bone marrow-derived hepatocyte repopulation'' in liver allograft during tissue injury is a relatively early event.

Standard antituberculous therapy including isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide is widely used for the treatment of active tuberculosis. Its most important side effect is hepatotoxicity, ranging from asymptomatic transaminitis to fulminant hepatic failure. A 19-year-old woman was admitted to our unit due to jaundice and unconsciousness. According to her past medical history, she was diagnosed as having extrapulmonary tuberculosis and had been prescribed standard antituberculous therapy. The patient became icteric and unconscious on the fourth day after therapy initiation. She was diagnosed with drug-induced acute fulminant hepatic failure and underwent living-related liver transplantation. Nonhepatotoxic antituberculous therapy (cycloserine, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and ethambutol) and low-dose immunosuppressive therapy were started after transplantation. Currently the patient is very well with normal graft function 42 months after transplantation. Here we report a case of a patient with acute fulminant hepatic failure caused by isoniazid, rifampicin, or both, who was successfully treated with living-related liver transplantation and a relatively less hepatotoxic antituberculous therapy. In conclusion, liver transplantation is a feasible therapy for individuals with standard antituberculous therapy-induced hepatic failure. Nonhepatotoxic antituberculous therapy may achieve control of active tuberculosis in such individuals after transplantation.

Background: The presence of microchimerism in transplanted tissues is well defined; however, the timeframe of appearance and disappearance of engraftment in liver allograft is unknown. The aims of this study were to analyze for the presence of "recipient-derived cells" in sex-mismatched individuals after liver transplantation, comparing the frequency of "recipient-derived cell repopulation" in early versus late transplant biopsies and to evaluate the relationship between "recipient-derived cell repopulation" and the severity of graft injury., Methods: Paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples of 18 recipients were reviewed. Sixteen of them were obtained from recipients with sex-mismatched donors. The remaining two were obtained from recipients with sex-matched donors and were used as controls. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization double-labeling method were performed on pretreated slides using anti-human hepatocyte antibody to identify hepatocytes, a mouse anti-human cytokeratin-7 to identify ductal epithelial cells, and using CEPX/Y DNA probes for visualizing X and Y chromosomes. The double-labeled slides were examined systematically using an image analyzer system., Results: The mean time from transplantation to biopsy was 8.1 months. Eleven of the 16 samples obtained from recipients with sex-mismatched grafts demonstrated "recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation," comprising a mean of 2.1% of the hepatocytes. In the control biopsies, none of the cells demonstrated different nuclear signals from the donor's sex origin. The presence and proportion of "recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation" rate were significantly higher in early transplant biopsies than in late transplant biopsies (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Some hepatocytes of sex-mismatched liver grafts were replaced by "recipient-derived cells" during injury. Such repopulation is more common in the early liver-graft biopsies. The severity of acute cellular rejection appears to have no effect on the rate of recipient-derived repopulation.

The etiology and prognosis of individuals with various forms of fulminant hepatic failure are reviewed. Special techniques of clinical management and decision making as to when and to whom to transplant in cases of fulminant hepatic failure are reviewed.

Liver transplantation (LTx) for chronic viral liver disease has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. The major problem in cases of LTx for viral hepatitis is the extremely high rate of recurrent viral infection in the liver allograft. While recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection typically causes a mild hepatitis and has a slow progression, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection of the liver allograft has been reported to result in cirrhosis in as short a period of time as 1 year. The risk of graft infection is greatest for patients with actively replicating virus. The high rate of disease recurrence, and the accelerated course of both HBV and HCV related liver disease post LTx, is a consequence of the high viral loads experienced by the allograft and the life-long immunosuppression required to prevent allograft rejection. Thus, efforts to clear virus prior to LTx, in order to prevent disease recurrence, are extremely important. In cases where this is not possible, the use of treatments directed at controlling or inhibiting recurrent disease in the allograft are essential. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) is an example of the latter, while the recent introduction of nucleoside analogues, molecules targeted at essential steps in viral replication such as lamivudine and famciclovir, are example of the former. The use of these two agents is likely to markedly change current approaches to transplantation for viral hepatitis.

Organ transplantation has become a practical and effective option for patients with acute and/or chronic irreversible organ disease. However, solid organ transplantation is associated with many different complications which depend upon the specific surgical procedure and/or confounding medical problems (e.g. rejection, infection, adverse effect of immunosuppressive agents) experienced by a given patient. Tacrolimus and cyclosporin A are immunosuppressive drugs used to prevent rejection following allogeneic solid organ transplantation. Adverse events are common with both drugs and include long-term organ dysfunction, opportunistic infections, haematopoietic alterations, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Neurological complications, both central and peripheral, occur in 10-42% of transplant recipients using either of these two immunosuppressive agents. Two cases of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy manifested by headache, nausea and seizures associated with the use of immunosuppressive drugs following liver transplantation are reported.