Search

Combining bioclinical parameters with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has improved the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) for detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. However, this approach has not yet been tested in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of combining LSM-based scores with LSM alone for the detection of advanced fibrosis in LT recipients. Adult LT recipients with a liver biopsy, VCTE, and clinical data necessary to construct LSM-based fibrosis models (FibroScan-AST [FAST], AGILE-3+, and AGILE-4) were included ( n = 132). The diagnostic statistics for advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage 0-2 vs. 3-4) were determined by optimal cut-off using the Youden index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for LSM was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.89-0.99), FAST was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.79), AGILE-3+ was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), and AGILE-4 was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97). No statistically significant differences were noted between the AUROC of LSM versus LSM-based scores. The false-positive rates for AGILE-3+ and AGILE-4 were 14.5% and 11.8% compared with 8.3% for LSM alone. The false-positive rates in LSM-based scores were higher among patients with diabetes mellitus, higher AST levels, and lower platelet counts. The LSM-based scores did not improve the diagnostic performance of LSM alone in LT recipients for the detection of advanced fibrosis. This lack of improvement in diagnostic performance results from the impact of immunosuppression on bioclinical profile and underscores the importance of developing LSM-based scores that are specific to LT patients., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background & Aims: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is a non-invasive tool for detecting hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients who have not received liver transplants. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of VCTE in detection of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients who have undergone liver transplantation., Methods: We performed a prospective study of 99 liver transplant recipients assessed by VCTE using a standard protocol. Controlled attenuation parameter cutoff values for pairwise steatosis grade and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) and cutoff values for pairwise fibrosis stage were determined using cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve analyses. We calculated sensitivity (fixed at 90%) and specificity (fixed at 90%) values., Results: A controlled attenuation parameter cutoff value of 270 dB/m detected any hepatic steatosis with an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93). VCTE detected steatosis grades 2-3 vs 0-1 with an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) and steatosis grade 3 vs 0-2 was similar and AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). When we used an LSM cutoff value of 10.5 kPa, VCTE identified patients with advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stages ≥ 3) with an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99). At fixed sensitivity, the cutoff LSM value of 10.5k Pa excluded advanced fibrosis with a negative predictive value of 0.99. At fixed specificity, the cutoff LSM value of 16.9 kPa detected advanced fibrosis with a sensitivity of 0.86, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.40, and a negative predictive value of 0.99., Conclusions: VCTE accurately detects hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in recipients of liver transplants. This non-invasive method might be used to identify patients in need of confirmatory liver biopsy analysis., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a clinically aggressive variant of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is becoming an increasingly common indication for liver transplantation (LT); however, relatively little is known regarding its clinical course post-LT. The aim of the current study is to describe disease recurrence and clinical course after LT., Methods: All surviving patients transplanted for NASH at the authors' institution had transient elastography (TE) to evaluate hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. The charts of deceased patients were reviewed for liver biopsy to evaluate for disease recurrence. Finally, causes of mortality in these patients were evaluated., Results: Of the 103 patients who met criteria, 56 had TE, whereas 34 had a liver biopsy. Steatosis was detected in 49 (87.5%) of the patients who had a TE and were defined to have recurrent NAFLD. Most patients had liver stiffness measurements consistent with no fibrosis (42.9%) or F1-F2 fibrosis (30.4%). Advanced fibrosis was noted in 26.8%, whereas 5.4% had cirrhosis but were clinically compensated. In patients with liver biopsy, 88.2% had recurrent NAFLD, whereas 41.2% had recurrent NASH. Bridging fibrosis was noted in 20.6% of patients but no patients had cirrhosis. Within the cohort, 32 patients died with the leading cause of mortality cancer (25%), infectious complications (25%), and cardiovascular disease (21.9%). Only 9% of deaths were attributable to graft cirrhosis., Conclusions: Recurrent NAFLD is common post-LT occurring in nearly 88% of all patients, whereas nearly a quarter of patients were noted to have advanced fibrosis.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. Despite a high prevalence of de novo hepatic steatosis after liver transplantation (LT), there are no data exploring the association between hepatic steatosis after LT and atherogenic risk. The aim of the study was to explore the impact of hepatic steatosis on serum atherogenic markers in liver transplantation recipients (LTRs). Biomarkers of CVD risk were compared in 89 LTRs with no known history of dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, or graft cirrhosis. To avoid potential confounders, LTRs on oral hypoglycemic agents, exogenous insulin, corticosteroids, or lipid-lowering therapy were excluded. Only patients for whom histological assessment was available after LT were included in the study. Thirty-five LTRs had de novo hepatic steatosis after LT, whereas 54 did not. Both cohorts were similar with regards to age, sex, ethnicity, and follow-up from LT. Additionally, the traditional lipid profile was similar between the 2 cohorts. LTRs with hepatic steatosis had higher serum concentrations of small-dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C; 34.8 ± 16.9 versus 22.7 ± 11.2 mg/dL; P < 0.001), sdLDL-C to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (32.6 ± 11.6 versus 24.6 ± 10.2; P < 0.01), small-dense low-density lipoprotein particle concentration (sdLDL-P; 770 ± 440 versus 486 ± 402 nmol/L; P < 0.01), very low density lipoprotein particle concentration (VLDL-P; 7.90 ± 7.91 versus 3.86 ± 3.18 nmol/L; P < 0.01), and very low density lipoprotein size (VLDL-size; 51.9 ± 6.4 versus 48.7 ± 6.3 nm; P = 0.06). LTRs with hepatic steatosis had higher serum insulin concentrations (27.8 ± 41.8 versus 11.7 ± 7.8 uU/mL; P < 0.01) but similar fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c. Steatosis grade was directly related to sdLDL-C, sdLDL-P, insulin, VLDL-P, and VLDL-size. In multivariate analysis, the association between steatosis grade and sdLDL-C (β = 0.03; P = 0.029), VLDL-size (β = 0.316; P = 0.04), and low-density lipoprotein particle size (β = -0.27; P = 0.05) was independent of sex, body mass index, age, diabetes mellitus, time from transplant, and indication for LT. In conclusion, de novo hepatic steatosis after LT is associated with atherogenic lipoproteins and independent of traditional CVD risk factors., (© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)