Search

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the efficacy of this strategy and the need for combined therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients who select lamivudine-resistant strains (YMDD) before surgery is still unknown. Twenty-two patients treated with lamivudine (LAM) who underwent LT after YMDD-mutant selection were studied. In 13 patients, YMDD mutants were associated with an HBV DNA breakthrough greater than 5 log10 (group A: phenotypic resistance), and 11 were treated with ADV to decrease viral load before LT. In the remaining 9 patients who did not experience the viral breakthrough, YMDD mutants were detected only retrospectively in sera stored at the time of LT (group B: genotypic resistance). During 35 months of post-LT follow-up, none of the 11 patients of group A treated with ADV before and after surgery (in addition to HBIG and LAM) had HBV recurrence, and neither did any of the 7 subjects of group B treated with LAM before and after transplantation (in addition to HBIG). HBV recurred in 2 patients of group A (untreated with ADV before surgery and transplanted with an HBV DNA exceeding 5 log10) and in 2 subjects of group B (who spontaneously stopped HBIG after surgery). In carriers of YMDD mutants, the risk of post-LT HBV recurrence is low, provided that preemptive and prophylactic ADV (in addition to LAM and HBIG) treatment is used in highly viremic patients and prophylactic LAM (or ADV) and HBIG therapy is continued in low viremic patients.

Objective: Determine the histologic response-rate (complete versus partial tumor extinction) after single radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhosis. Investigate possible predictors of response and assess efficacy and safety of RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation (OLT)., Background: RFA has become the elective treatment of local control of HCC, although histologic data supporting radiologic assessment of response are rare and prospective studies are lacking. Prognostic impact of repeated RFA for HCC persistence is also undetermined., Methods: Percentage of RFA-induced necrosis and tumor persistence-rate at various intervals from treatment was studied in 60 HCC (median: 3 cm; Milan-Criteria IN: 80%) isolated in 50 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing OLT. Single-session RFA was the only treatment planned before OLT. Histologic response determined on explanted livers was related to 28 variables and to pre-OLT CT scan., Results: Mean interval RFA-->OLT was 9.5 months. Post-RFA complete response rate was 55%, rising to 63% for HCC 3 cm (P = 0.05). Post-RFA tumor persistence probability increased with time (12 months: 59%; 18 months: 70%). Radiologic response rate was 70%, not significantly different from histology. Major post-RFA morbidity was 8%. No mortality, Child deterioration, patient withdrawal because of tumor progression was observed. Post-OLT 3-year patient/graft survival was 83%., Conclusions: RFA is a safe and effective treatment of small HCC in cirrhotics awaiting OLT, although tumor size (>3 cm) and time from treatment (>1 year) predict a high risk of tumor persistence in the targeted nodule. RFA should not be considered an independent therapy for HCC.

Background: Viaspan (University of Wisconsin [UW]) solution is the gold standard for abdominal organ preservation. Celsior (CEL) is an extracellular-type, low-potassium, low-viscosity solution, initially used for heart and lung preservation. We have performed a prospective multicenter study to compare the role of these cold-storage solutions on kidney and liver recovery after transplantation., Patients and Methods: From March 15, 2000 to December 31, 2001, 441 (172 CEL and 269 UW) renal transplants (RT) and 175 (79 CEL and 96 UW) liver transplants (LT) were included in the study., Results: Perfusate volume used was significantly lower in the UW group, being 4,732 +/- 796 mL versus 5,826 + 834 mL in the CEL group (P < 0.001). In LT, median total bilirubin serum levels were significantly higher at 5 and 7 posttransplant days in the UW group (90.6 and 92.3 micromol/L, respectively) as compared with CEL (51.3 and 63.4 micromol/L, respectively). After LT, primary nonfunction (PNF) rates in the CEL and UW groups were 3.8% and 4.2% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 83.3% versus 85.4% (P = NS) and 89.9% versus 90.6% (P = NS). After RT, delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 23.2% and 22.7% (P = NS), respectively; PNF rates were 1.9% and 1.7% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 92.3% versus 94.2% (P = NS) and 99.4% versus 97.7% (P = NS)., Conclusions: CEL solution was shown to be as effective as UW in both liver and kidney preservation. In LT patients, biliary function recovery is significantly better in the CEL group. CEL solution represents an efficacious option in multiorgan harvesting.

Background: Insulin resistance is a key factor in the pathogenesis of hepatogenous diabetes and influences the prognosis of chronic liver diseases. In vivo assessment of insulin resistance in humans is expensive; therefore, surrogate indices based on a fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations (HOMA-IS, QUICKI) were proposed. This study aimed to test whether these simple indices are reliable measures of insulin sensitivity in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation (LTx)., Methods: HOMA-IS and QUICKI were compared with insulin sensitivity as assessed with the gold standard technique (insulin clamp) in 20 patients with liver cirrhosis, in 36 patients after LTx, and in 25 matched healthy subjects (predominantly men). To test whether these indices may be applied also in prospective studies, 10 patients with liver cirrhosis were studied longitudinally before and 2 years after LTx., Results: Both HOMA-IS and QUICKI were associated with insulin sensitivity in patients with liver cirrhosis (r=0.63, P=0.005 and r=0.60, P=0.009) and in LTx patients (r=0.41, P=0.02 and r=0.46, P=0.05). Both were able to detect the improvement of insulin sensitivity after LTx in the patients studied prospectively., Conclusions: HOMA-IS and QUICKI are simple reliable tools to assess insulin sensitivity in clinical and epidemiologic investigations of chronic liver disease before and after LTx.

Background: Hypermetabolism, insulin resistance, and diabetes are common in patients with liver cirrhosis., Objective: We assessed whether diabetes and insulin resistance influence postabsorptive energy homeostasis in these patients and whether liver transplantation (LTx) and immunosuppressive drugs affect these relations., Design: Twenty-six patients with liver cirrhosis (16 with and 10 without diabetes) were studied with an insulin clamp and indirect calorimetry. Eleven of these subjects were studied 9 mo after LTx to longitudinally assess its effects. To cross-sectionally explore a longer follow-up period, we studied 65 patients 6, 14, and 32 mo after LTx. Seven patients with chronic uveitis (receiving immunosuppressive therapy) and 20 healthy subjects served as control subjects., Results: Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with cirrhosis had insulin resistance (S(I(clamp)); P < 0.03) and higher measured resting energy expenditure (REE) as a percentage of predicted REE than did healthy subjects (107.6 +/- 1.8% compared with 97.4 +/- 2.3%; P < 0.03), and these 2 alterations were associated (R(2) = 0.119, P = 0.0002). The longitudinal study showed an improvement in the 2 variables after LTx, but full restoration was not achieved. The cross-sectional analysis confirmed this observation in patients studied 6 mo (n = 28) after LTx. In patients studied 14 (n = 21) and 32 mo (n = 16) after LTx, S(I(clamp)) and measured REE as a percentage of predicted REE were not significantly different from those in control subjects., Conclusions: In patients with liver cirrhosis, higher-than-normal postabsorptive REE was associated with insulin resistance regardless of diabetes. This abnormality persisted in patients studied 6-9 mo after LTx but improved simultaneously with the improvement in insulin sensitivity thereafter.

Two hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related cirrhosis in 11 European Liver Transplant Centers were collected. The male/female ratio was 184/44, with a median age of 41 years (13-66). In 55 patients (24%) hepatocellular carcinoma was associated with liver disease. All cases were stratified for pre-orthotopic liver transplantation viral characteristics: HBV-DNA neg/HBeAg neg: 106 patients (47%), HBV-DNA neg/Delta pos: 80 (35.5%), HBV-DNA pos/HBeAg pos: 28 (12.5%), other 14 (5%). In 49 patients (21.4%) post-orthotopic liver transplantation passive prophylaxis with anti-HBs immunoglobulins was not followed, while in 179 patients the anti-HBs serum titer was kept above 100-200 mU/ml. Overall 5-year actuarial survival of the series was 54%. One hundred and eighty-five patients were evaluable for HBsAg reappearance in the serum at various intervals after orthotopic liver transplantation. Overall 3-year HBV-free survival of these patients was 55%. There was a significant difference in 3-year HBV-free survival between HBV-DNA neg (52%), HBV-DNA pos (13%) and Delta pos (73%) patients ( p: 0.03). Sixty-three percent of patients in the prophylaxis group were HBV-free, compared to only 25% of untreated patients ( p>0.001). Three-year HBV-free survival in patients with or without HCC was 44% and 59%, respectively. Cox-multivariate analysis revealed that only post-transplantation prophylaxis ( p: 0.003) and pre-transplantation viral activity ( p: 0.004) can be considered as independent factors affecting HBV recurrence. Candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV-cirrhosis should not be excluded from orthotopic liver transplantation, supporting the idea of a higher risk of post-transplantation viral reactivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of orthotopic liver transplantation in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is controversial, and determining which patients are likely to have a good outcome after liver transplantation is difficult. Methods: We studied 48 patients with cirrhosis who had small, unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas and who underwent liver transplantation. In 94 percent of the patients, the cirrhosis was related to infection with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or both. The presence of tumor was confirmed by biopsy or serum alpha-fetoprotein assay. The criteria for eligibility for transplantation were the presence of a tumor 5 cm or less in diameter in patients with single hepatocellular carcinomas and no more than three tumor nodules, each 3 cm or less in diameter, in patients with multiple tumors. Twenty-eight patients with sufficient hepatic function underwent treatment for the tumor, mainly chemoembolization, before transplantation. After liver transplantation, the patients were followed prospectively for a median of 26 months (range, 9 to 54). No anticancer treatment was given after transplantation. Results: The overall mortality rate was 17 percent. After four years, the actuarial survival rate was 75 percent and the rate of recurrence-free survival was 83 percent. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurred in four patients (8 percent). The overall and recurrence-free survival rates at four years among the 35 patients (73 percent of the total) who met the predetermined criteria for the selection of small hepatocellular carcinomas at pathological review of the explanted liver were 85 percent and 92 percent, respectively, whereas the rates in the 13 patients (27 percent) whose tumors exceeded these limits were 50 percent and 59 percent, respectively (P = 0.01 for overall survival; P = 0.002 for recurrence-free survival). In this group of 48 patients with early-stage tumors, tumor–node–metastasis status, the number of tumors, the serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration, treatment received before transplantation, and 10 other variables were not significantly correlated with survival. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for small, unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. (N Engl J Med 1996;334:693-9.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]