Search

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a key component of oxygen therapy and has largely been used in patients with acute respiratory failure. We conducted a matched controlled study with the aim to compare the preventive use of oxygen therapy delivered by HFNC versus via air-entrainment mask (standard O 2 ) after extubation in adult subjects with liver transplantation for reducing postextubation hypoxemia., Methods: Twenty-nine subjects with liver transplantation who received HFNC after extubation (HFNC group) were matched 1:1 with 29 controls (standard O 2 group) chosen from an historical group of 90 subjects admitted to the ICU during the previous 36 months. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of hypoxemia at 1 h and 24 h after extubation. Secondary outcomes were the rate of weaning failure, ICU length of stay, and 28-d mortality., Results: The incidence of hypoxemia was not significantly different between the HFNC and standard O 2 groups at 1 h and 24 h after extubation. In the HFNC group, there was a trend toward a lower rate of weaning failure compared with the standard O 2 group. ICU length of stay and 28-d mortality were similar in both groups., Conclusions: Early application of HFNC in the subjects with liver transplantation did not reduce the incidence of hypoxemia after extubation compared with standard O 2 and did not modify the incidence of weaning failure, ICU length of stay, and 28-d mortality in this high-risk population of subjects. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03441854.)., Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Background: Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF, namely mechanical ventilation >48 hours) significantly affects morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LTx). Previous studies analyzed only one or two categories of PRF risk factors (preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative ones). The aims of this study were to identify PRF predictors, to assess the length of stay (LoS) in ICU and the 90-day survival according to the PRF in LTx patients., Methods: Two classification approaches were used: systematic classification (recipient-related preoperative factors; intraoperative factors; logistic factors; donor factors; postoperative ICU factors; postoperative surgical factors) and patient/organ classification (patient-related general factors; native-liver factors; new-liver factors; kidney factors; heart factors; brain factors; lung factors). Two hundred adult non-acute patients were included. Missing analysis was performed. The competitive role of each factor was assessed., Results: PRF occurred in 36.0% of cases. Among 28 significant PRF predictors at univariate analysis, 6 were excluded because of collinearity, 22 were investigated by ROC curves and by logistic regression analysis. Recipient age (OR = 1.05; p = 0.010), female sex (OR = 2.75; p = 0.018), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD, OR = 1.09; p<0.001), restrictive lung pattern (OR = 2.49; p = 0.027), intraoperative veno-venous bypass (VVBP, OR = 3.03; p = 0.008), pre-extubation PaCO2 (OR = 1.11; p = 0.003) and Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF, OR = 1.37; p<0.001) resulted independent PRF risk factors. As compared to patients without PRF, the PRF-group had longer LoS (10 days IQR 7-18 versus 5 days IQR 4-7, respectively; p<0.001) and lower day-90 survival (86.0% versus 97.6% respectively, p<0.001)., Conclusion: In conclusion, MELD, restrictive lung pattern, surgical complexity as captured by VVBP, pre-extubation PaCO2 and MEAF are the main predictors of PRF in non-acute LTx patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.