Search

Background: New guidelines propose a minimum 5-year survival of 60% for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to evaluate the 5- and 10-year survival rates after transplantation for the expanded criteria for HCC., Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 208 patients who underwent LDLT for the expanded criteria (the largest tumor diameter of ≤10 cm, any tumor number, and alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] level of <1000 ng/mL) and analyzed 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence risk (RR) rates., Results: With a median follow-up of 65.1 months (IQR, 19.1-80.2), the 5- and 10-year OS and RR rates were 67.0% and 61.0% and 20.5% and 22.5%, respectively. The largest tumor diameter of >6 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.7-8.2; P = .001) and AFP level of >400 ng/mL (HR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.8-9.0; P = .001) were predictors of recurrence. Patients outside the Milan criteria (MC) were grouped into low- and high-risk HCC based on tumor size and AFP level. For low-risk HCC (tumor size of <6 cm, any tumor number, and AFP level of <400 ng/mL), the 5-year RR was comparable to the MC and increased the transplant pool by 35.7% (P > .5). The median number of tumors and the rate of microvascular invasion in the high-risk group, low-risk group, and MC were 2.0 (1.0-3.2), 4.0 (2.0-5.0), and 1.0 (1.0-2.0) (P < .001) and 72.2% (13/18), 44.0% (22/50), and 22.8% (32/140) (P < .001), respectively., Conclusion: The expanded criteria met the benchmark for 5-year survival. LDLT for the low-risk HCC in the expanded criteria was associated with an acceptable RR., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-term medical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in voluntary liver donors remain under investigated. The objective of the current study was to report long-term medical outcomes and re-evaluate QOL in living liver donors., Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of donors who underwent donor hepatectomy between 2012 and 2018. We investigated long-term outcomes in 7 domains. These include medical problems, surgical procedures, work-related issues, pregnancy outcomes, psychiatric interventions, willingness to donate again, and long-term mortality. QOL was evaluated using short-form 36., Results: The median follow-up time was 61.4 months (53.3-83.7). Among 698 donors, 80 (11.5%) experienced medical problems, 4 (0.6%) had work-related issues, and 20 (2.9%) needed psychiatric assistance. Surgery was performed in 49 donors (7%), and females were more likely to have undergone incisional hernia repair (5.8% vs 1.9%, P = .006). There were 79 postdonation pregnancies including 41 normal vaginal deliveries (51.9%), 35 cesarean sections (44.3%), and 3 miscarriages (3.8%). Willingness to donate again was reported by 658 donors (94.3%). Donors whose recipients were alive were more likely to donate again (95.5% vs 90.5%, P = .01). There were 3 deaths (0.4%) in the long-term. The mean physical composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 86.7 ± 13.9 and 76.5 ± 20.9 (P = .001), and the mean mental composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 92.1 ± 13.5 and 80.7 ± 16 (P = .001)., Conclusion: The overall long-term outlook in living liver donors is promising. QOL parameters might deteriorate over time and frequent re-evaluation might be considered., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure of outcome and provides superior assessment of quality of care after surgery. TO after major living donor hepatectomy (MLDH) has not been assessed. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of TO and its associated factors, after MLDH., Methods: This was a single center retrospective review of living liver donors who underwent MLDH between 2012 and 2021 (n = 1022). The rate of TO and its associated factors was determined., Results: Among 1022 living donors (of whom 693 [67.8%] were males, median age 26 [range, 18-54] years), TO was achieved in 714 (69.9%) with no donor mortality. Majority of donors met the cutoffs for individual outcome measures: 908 (88.8%) for no major complications, 904 (88.5%) for ICU stay ≤ 2 days, 900 (88.1%) for hospital stay ≤ 10 days, 990 (96.9%) for no perioperative blood transfusion, 1004 (98.2%) for no 30-day re-admission, and 1014 (99.2%) for no post-hepatectomy liver failure. Early donation era (before streamlining of donor operative pathways) was associated with failure to achieve TO [OR 1.4, CI 1.1-1.9, P = 0.006]. TO was achieved in 506/755 (67%) donors in the early donation era versus 208/267 (77.9%) in the later period (P = 0.001)., Conclusion: Despite zero mortality and low complication rate, TO was achieved in approximately 70% donors. TO was modifiable and improved with changes in donor operative pathway., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Occasionally, a recipient's native hepatic arteries are not suitable for reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The use of the great saphenous vein (GSV) conduits in such patients is seldom practiced since arterial conduits from deceased donors are available. Here, we share our experience with a significantly large group of LDLT recipients who underwent arterial reconstruction with GSV conduits., Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent LDLT between 2012 and 2017. Patients who had arterial reconstruction using native hepatic arteries (group 1)(n = 452) were compared with those who had GSV interposition conduits for reconstruction (group 2)(n = 21). We compared hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) rate, allograft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, and actuarial 5-year survival in the two groups., Results: HAT was seen in 0/452 (0%) versus 1/21(4.7%) patients (P = 0.04). Allograft dysfunction was seen in 89/423 (21%) versus 6/19(31.5%) (P = 0.2) patients. Overall mortality was 81/452 (17.9%) versus 8/21(38%) (P = 0.02). Death after a biliary complication was seen in 24/452 (5.3%) versus 4/21 (19%) patients (P = 0.02). Actuarial 1- and 5-year overall survival was 85% versus 67% and 79% versus 58% (P = 0.008)., Conclusion: GSV conduits are a suboptimal alternative for establishing hepatic arterial inflow in LDLT, but remain valuable in ominous situations.

Objective: To determine the outcome of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) donors from the first liver transplant program in Pakistan., Study Design: Cohort study., Place and Duration of Study: Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from April 2012 to August 2014., Methodology: A total of 100 live donors who underwent hepatectomy were included. Demographics, etiologies, graft characteristics and operative variables were retrospectively assessed. Outcome was assessed based on morbidity and mortality., Results: Median donor age was 28 (17 - 45) years and median body mass index (BMI) was 24 kg/m2 (15 - 36). Male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Hepatitis B and C were the most common underlying etiologies and accounted for 79/100 (79%) of LDLT&#039;s. Overall, 93/100 (93%) donors donated a right lobe graft. Median estimated graft weight to recipient body weight (GW/BW) ratio was 1.03 (0.78 - 2). Standard arterial anatomy was present in 56% donors. The 90-day morbidity was 13/100 (13%) and overall morbidity was 17/100 (17%). Bile leak was encountered in 3 (3%) patients. There was no donor mortality., Conclusion: Acceptable short-term donor outcomes were achieved in an LDLT program in Pakistan with careful donor selection and planning.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the only treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) where cadaveric donors are not available. In developing countries, the inception of LDLT programs remains a challenge. The first successful liver transplantation program in Pakistan started transplantation in 2012. The objective of this study was to report outcomes of 100 LDLT recipients in a developing country and to highlight the challenges encountered by a new LDLT program in a resource-limited setting. We retrospectively reviewed recipients who underwent LDLT between April 2012 and August 2014. Demographics, etiology, graft characteristics, and operative variables were assessed. Outcome was assessed on the basis of morbidity and mortality. All complications of ≥ 3 on the Clavien-Dindo grading system were included as morbidity. Estimated 1-year survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and a Log-rank test was used to determine the significance. Outcomes between the first 50 LDLTs (group 1) and latter 50 LDLTs (group 2) were also compared. Median age was 46.5 (0.5-72) years, whereas the median MELD score was 15.5 (7-37). The male to female ratio was 4:1. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus was the most common indication (73% patients). There were 52 (52%) significant (≥ grade 3) complications. The most common morbidities were bile leaks in 9 (9%) and biliary strictures in 14 (14%) patients. Overall mortality in patients who underwent LDLT for ESLD was 10.6%. Estimated 1-year survival was 87%. Patients who underwent transplantation in the latter period had a significantly lower overall complication rate (36% versus 68%; P = 0.01). Comparable outcomes can be achieved in a new LDLT program in a developing country. Outcomes improve as experience increases., (© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)