Search

The number of residential consumers with solar PV and batteries, aka prosumers, has been increasing in recent years. Incentives now exist for prosumers to operate their batteries in more profitable ways than self-consumption mode. However, this can increase prosumer exports or imports, resulting in power flows that can lead to voltage and thermal limit violations in distribution networks. This work proposes a framework for Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) to ensure the integrity of MV-LV networks by using dynamic operating limits for prosumers. Periodically, individual prosumers send their intended operation (net exports/imports) as determined by their local control to the DNO who then assesses network integrity using smart meter data and a power flow engine. If a potential violation is detected, their maximum operating limits are determined based on a three-phase optimal power flow that incorporates network constraints and fairness aspects. A real Australian MV feeder with realistically modelled LV networks and 4,500+ households is studied, where prosumers’ local controls operate based on energy prices. Time-series results demonstrate that the proposed framework can help DNOs ensure network integrity and fairness across prosumers. Furthermore, it unlocks larger profitability for prosumers compared with the use the 5kW fixed export limit adopted in Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Active power curtailment of residential PV systems is an effective way to mitigate technical issues in distribution networks. However, existing curtailment schemes can treat households unfairly; e.g., Volt-Watt schemes increasingly being adopted worldwide inherently penalize PV systems at remote locations in radial feeders. Nonetheless, whether fairness is improved or not by alternative curtailment schemes depends on how the impacts on households are considered. In this context, household-centric metrics that quantify PV harvesting, energy export and financial benefit are used along with the Jain’s fairness index to assess fairness from different perspectives. To explore the trade-offs brought by schemes that consider fairness differently, four linearized, three-phase Optimal Power Flow (OPF)-based schemes are proposed to determine, periodically, short-term curtailment settings. Using a real Australian 22kV feeder and realistically modelled LV networks with 4,500+ households, a detailed comparison is carried out considering also a Volt-Watt scheme. Results demonstrate tha tall the schemes that consider fairness are effective in removing locational penalizations. However, in terms of fairness, their performance across the adopted metrics reveals noticeable trade-offs. This highlights the need for decision-makers to determine the metric from which fairness can be based upon in a way that aligns with their respective policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rapid adoption of residential-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems in low-voltage (LV) networks combined with the falling prices of residential-scale battery energy storage (BES) systems is paving the way for a future in which customers could locally supply most of their energy needs. However, off-the-shelf (OTS) storage systems operate for the sole benefit of the customer (reducing grid imports). This means that charging might not occur during times of high PV generation, resulting in technical issues on LV and medium-voltage (MV) networks. This paper proposes an adaptive decentralized control strategy for residential-scale BES systems to reduce voltage and thermal issues whilst still benefiting customers. With this strategy, the power charging and discharging rates constantly adapt throughout the day based on clear-sky irradiance, PV generation, demand, and state of charge; significantly reducing reverse power flows and ensuring adequate storage capacity the next morning. A real Australian MV feeder with realistically modeled LV networks is studied using smart meter data. Results demonstrate that the proposed control strategy overcomes the limitations of the OTS BES. It is also shown that it can be as effective as an ideal optimization-based approach, being able to manage all technical issues without significantly affecting customers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The growing adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems around the world is presenting distribution network operators (DNOs) with technical challenges, particularly on low voltage (LV) networks. The need to mitigate these issues with simple yet effective measures in countries with high PV penetrations is likely to drive the adoption of limits on the very exports that affect this infrastructure. Defining the most adequate limit, however, requires understanding the tradeoffs between the technical benefits and the effects on PV owners. This paper proposes two methodologies: an optimal power flow (OPF) based technique to define the export limit that solves technical problems with minimal curtailment, and a Monte Carlo based analysis to investigate the spectrum of such tradeoffs considering different PV penetrations and export limits. A real U.K. residential LV network with 180 customers is analyzed using realistic 1-min resolution daily load and PV generation profiles across seasons. Results demonstrate that, for DNOs, the OPF-based approach is effective in determining the most technically adequate export limit. However, for policy makers, the spectrum of tradeoffs provided by the Monte Carlo approach can help defining export limits that reduce curtailment at the expense of partially mitigating technical issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]