Search

• Prophylactic brain and/or consolidative chest radiation improves survival. • Brain and/or chest radiation's OS effect is > immunotherapy or palliative care. • Patients selected for radiation had characteristics associated with better survival. • Only 11.4% of patients received any radiation after systemic therapy. • Patients receiving chemo/immunotherapy are less likely to receive radiation. The role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic brain radiation for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients is controversial. We investigated the factors associated with the use of any radiation therapy (RT) and whether RT has a benefit to overall survival (OS) in patients receiving any systemic therapy and whether this benefit is the same if Chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IO) is used. The NCDB database was queried from years 2017–2019. Patients receiving systemic therapy- STX (CT or CT-IO) had to have at least 6 months of follow-up and have no brain metastases at diagnosis. All RT patients had to receive upfront systemic therapy, be treated 2–6 months from diagnosis, and if treated to the brain received 25 Gy in 10 fractions only. Multi-variable analyses (MVA) were used to determine factors associated with OS and selection for any radiation. Propensity matching for factors affecting OS were used to generate Kaplan-Meier OS curves. Log-rank tests were used to determine differences in Kaplan Meier survival curves for the effects of RT on OS. The total number of patients receiving RT/STX or STX alone as well as their median follow-up (months) were (890, 17.0 mn) and (6898, 14.0mn). The median time to the start of STX and RT were 22.9 days and 152 days, respectively. MVA noted that RT had a greater effect on OS (Thorax, Brain, Both Brain/Thorax – HRs = 0.80, 0.77, 0.70) than other interventions including IO (HR 0.87) and palliative care without RT (HR 1.06). Selection for radiation depended significantly upon factors affecting OS (HR) including lack of liver metastases, females, age and Charlson co-morbidity index, but did not depend upon insurance status, race, or county income/high school graduation rates. Propensity-score matched OS curves noted the same significant effects of RT on OS in those receiving CT +/- IO, CT-IO, and CT alone with HRs of 0.68/0.68/0.68 for thoracic RT, 0.72/0.72/0.70 for brain RT, and 0.60/0.60/0.60 for brain/thoracic RT, respectively. The patient with extensive stage small cell lung cancer who reach candidacy and receive RT may have a significant improvement in OS compared to the patients treated only with CT or CT-IO. Combined thoracic and prophylactic brain RT seems to be better than either one alone. The impact of radiation whether given to one or two sites may be more beneficial than immunotherapy added to chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Second lung cancer incidence is rising rapidly in females. • Second lung cancer incidence in females greatly exceeds all other second cancers. • Prolonged lung cancer surveillance after the definitive surgical resection is needed. • Surgery for early-stage, second lung cancers yields similar OS and LCSS as primary resection. The Lung Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS), likely due to finding early-stage NSCLC. The purpose of our investigation is to evaluate whether long-term surveillance strategies (4+ years after surgical resection of the initial lung cancer(1LC)) would be beneficial in NSCLC patients by assessing the rates of second lung cancers(2LC) and the OS/LCSS in patients undergoing definitive surgery in 1LC as compared to 2LC (>48 months after 1LC) populations. SEER13/18 database was reviewed for patients during 1998–2013. Log-rank tests were used to determine the OS/LCSS differences between the 1LC and 2LC in the entire surgical group(EG) and in those having an early-stage resectable tumors (ESR, tumors <4 cm, node negative). Joinpoint analysis was used to determine rates of second cancers 4−10 year after 1LC using SEER-9 during years 1985–2014. The rate of 2LCs was significantly less than all other second cancers until 2001 when the incidence of 2LCs increased sharply and became significantly greater than all other second cancers in females starting in year 2005 and in men starting in year 2010. OS/LCSS, adjusted for propensity score by using inverse probability weighting, demonstrated similar OS, but worse LCSS for 2LCs in the EG, but similar OS/LCSSs in the ESR group. Because the rate of 2LCs are increasing and because the OS/LCSS of the 1LC and 2LC are similar in early-stage lesions, we feel that continued surveillance of patients in order to find early-stage disease may be beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]