Search

Background: The volume-outcome relationship in patients with severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear and is important for establishing a system for the medical care of severe COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the association between institutional case volume and outcomes in patients with ventilated COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed patients with severe COVID-19 on ventilatory control aged > 17 years who were enrolled in the J-RECOVER study, which is a retrospective multicenter observational study conducted between January 2020 and September 2020 in Japan. Based on the ventilated COVID-19 case volume, the higher one-third of institutions were defined as high-volume centers, the middle one-third as middle-volume centers, and the lower one-third as low-volume centers. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality during hospitalization due to COVID-19. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality and ventilated COVID-19 case volume was performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores and in-hospital variables. To estimate the multiple propensity score, we fitted a multinomial logistic regression model, which fell into one of the three groups based on patient demographics and prehospital factors. Results: We analyzed 561 patients who required ventilator management. In total, 159, 210, and 192 patients were admitted to low-volume (36 institutions, < 11 severe COVID-19 cases per institution during the study period), middle-volume (14 institutions, 11–25 severe cases per institution), and high-volume (5 institutions, > 25 severe cases per institution) centers, respectively. After adjustment for multiple propensity scores and in-hospital variables, admission to middle- and high-volume centers was not significantly associated with in-hospital death compared with admission to low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46–1.29] and adjusted odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI: 0.44–1.33], respectively). Conclusions: There may be no significant relationship between institutional case volume and in-hospital mortality in patients with ventilated COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to evaluate the association between ICU patient volume before the COVID-19 pandemic and the outcomes of ventilated COVID-19 patients. We analyzed ventilated patients with COVID-19 aged > 17 years and enrolled in the J-RECOVER study, a retrospective multicenter observational study conducted in Japan between January and September 2020. Based on the number of patients admitted to the ICU between January and December 2019, the top third institutions were defined as high-volume centers, the middle third ones as middle-volume centers, and the bottom third ones as low-volume centers. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality and ICU patient volume was performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores. Among 461 patients, 158, 158, and 145 patients were admitted to low-volume (20 institutions), middle-volume (14 institutions), and high-volume (13 institutions) centers, respectively. Admission to middle- and high-volume centers was not significantly associated with in-hospital death compared with admission to low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55–2.25] and adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI: 0.31–1.94], respectively). In conclusion, institutional intensive care patient volume prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was not significantly associated with in-hospital death in ventilated COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate volume-outcome relationship in paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods: This post hoc analysis of the SOS-KANTO 2012 study included data of paediatric OHCA patients <18 years old who were transported to the 53 emergency hospitals in the Kanto region of Japan between January 2012 and March 2013. Based on the paediatric OHCA case volume, the higher one-third of institutions (more than 10 paediatric OHCA cases during the study period) were defined as high-volume centres, the middle one-third institutions (6-10 cases) were defined as middle-volume centres and the lower one-third of institutions (less than 6 cases) were defined as low-volume centres. The primary outcome measurement was survival at 1 month after cardiac arrest. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for 1-month survival and paediatric OHCA case volume were performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores. To estimate the multiple propensity score, we fitted a multinomial logistic regression model, which fell into one of the three groups as patient demographics and prehospital factors.Results: Among the eligible 282 children, 112, 82 and 88 patients were transported to the low-volume (36 institutions), middle-volume (11 institutions) and high-volume (6 institutions) centres, respectively. Transport to a high-volume centre was significantly associated with a better 1-month survival after adjusting for multiple propensity score (adjusted odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-6.17).Conclusion: There may be a relationship between institutional case volume and survival outcomes in paediatric OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the effect of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on short-term neurological outcomes and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We retrospectively analysed data collected between June 2014 and December 2019 from the Japanese OHCA registry. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent ECPR were included. We divided the patients into those who received IABP and those who did not receive IABP. The primary outcome was the 30-day favourable neurological outcomes in survived patients. The secondary outcome was the 30-day survival. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounding factors after multiple imputations of missing data. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression analysis after PSM to adjust for confounding factors after IABP initiation. Among 2135 adult patients who underwent ECPR, 1173 received IABP. In 842 matched patients, IABP use was associated with survival (aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.39–2.83; p < 0.001). However, IABP use was not significantly associated with the 30-day neurologically favourable outcome in 190 survived patients (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79–1.89; p = 0.36). The use of IABP in patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR was associated with 30-day survival. Among survived patients, there was no significant association between IABP use and 30-day neurological outcome. A further well-designed prospective study is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]