Search

Background and Aim: Target‐controlled infusion (TCI) uses averaged pharmacokinetic datasets derived from population samples to automatically control the infusion rate. Bispectral index (BIS) technology non‐invasively measures levels of consciousness during surgical procedures. We compared the efficacy and safety of propofol TCI with or without BIS monitoring for sedation during advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 200 patients who were premedicated with midazolam 2 mg and alfentanil 0.4 mg before undergoing advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy. The initial target blood concentration of propofol was set at 1.0 μg/mL, and adjustments of 0.2 μg/mL were made as necessary to maintain moderate‐to‐deep sedation. Patients were randomized to either the BIS‐blind group and evaluated for depth of anesthesia by monitoring scores of 1–2 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (n = 100) or to the BIS‐open group and monitored by BIS scores of 60–80 (n = 100). The primary outcome was the total amount of propofol required to maintain anesthesia. Secondary outcomes were sedation‐induced adverse events, recovery, and quality of sedation (endoscopist and patient satisfaction). Results: The mean propofol infusion rate was significantly higher in patients not monitored by BIS scores than in those who were (5.44 ± 2.12 vs 4.76 ± 1.84 mg/kg/h; P = 0.016). Levels of satisfaction were higher for endoscopists who used BIS monitoring than in those who did not. Conclusions: Mean infusion rates were higher in propofol TCI without BIS monitoring compared with propofol TCI with BIS during advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopists expressed satisfaction with BIS monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Double-lumen endotracheal tubes and bronchial blockers are the two lung separation devices most commonly used for lung resection. The preference and outcomes of choosing different lung separation devices have not been discussed in the literature.Methods: This study was conducted using the data of 2 million patients randomly chosen from the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2011 and 2016. We selected patients who underwent lung resection surgery and surveyed their demographic data and trends of double-lumen endotracheal tube and bronchial blocker use. To determine the influence of endotracheal tubes on clinical outcomes, we computed multiple linear regressions of the number of deaths within 30 days after surgery, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and medical cost.Results: The use of bronchial blockers in Taiwan has steadily increased from 6.13% to 11.33% from 2011 to 2016. Anaesthesiologists working in regions with higher thoracic surgery volumes preferred bronchial blockers over double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Bronchial blockers were the preferred choice in women, elderly individuals, patients with more comorbidities, and those undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries. After adjustment for sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries, we found that patients in whom bronchial blockers were applied had shorter hospital stays.Conclusion: The use of bronchial blockers is increasing as the experience of anaesthesiologists increases. Although double-lumen endotracheal tubes remain the principal choice for lung separation in Taiwan, clinical outcomes of the bronchial blocker group were not inferior to those of the double-lumen endotracheal tube group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Identifying risk factors for premature totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) catheter removal is crucial; however, because of the diversity of study methodologies, there is no consensus on such factors. The objective of the present study was to identify such risk factors by applying a cohort design study with a long-term follow-up period.Methods: For this cohort study, we selected cancer patients who had newly implanted TIVADs between July 2008 and December 2008. The follow-up period lasted until September 2012. Univariate analysis was performed for age, gender, cancer type, TIVAD brand, puncture site, sidedness of puncture, and catheter tip position. The hazard ratio (HR) of potential risk factors was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier curves were applied for catheter survival analysis.Results: Our study consisted of 240 people, with 5 people lost to follow-up. The cumulative premature catheter removal rate of all TIVADs was 9.8%, with the most common reason for premature removal being port-associated blood stream infection (PABSI), which proved to be highest in patients with hematology cancer (27.8%) and upper gastrointestinal cancer (19.4%). Suboptimal tip position (HR 5.13, 95% confidence interval 1.73-15.21) was also a risk factor for premature removal, and it was correlated with symptomatic TIVAD occlusion (p = 0.0004).Conclusions: PABSI was the most common reason for premature catheter removal, with a varied incidence rate between different cancer types. Suboptimal tip position was also a risk factor. Confirming the final tip position after implantation is crucial. Infection control is important for TIVAD care, especially in high-risk cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]