Search

Aim: To evaluate site‐related changes in periodontal pocket depth (PPD) after non‐surgical periodontal therapy and to identify predictors for PPD changes in a retrospective patient data analysis. Materials and Methods: PPD, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, tooth mobility (TM), furcation involvement (FI), abutment status, adherence to supportive periodontal care (SPC) and SPC follow‐ups were obtained from fully documented patient data before periodontal therapy (baseline, T0), after active periodontal therapy (APT, T1) and during SPC (T2). PPD changes were classified into deteriorated or unchanged/improved at the site level. Multi‐level logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing PPD changes during SPC. Results: This retrospective study included 51 females and 65 males (mean T0 age: 54.8 ± 10.1 years, 25 smokers, 12 diabetics) suffering from Stage III/IV periodontitis. Evaluation outcome: T0/16,044 sampling sites/2674 teeth; T1/15,636/2606; T2/14,754/2459. During 9.0 ± 2.3 years SPC, PPD decreased (−1.33 ± 0.70 mm) by 21.8% of the sites, remained unchanged by 41.4% and increased (1.40 ± 0.78 mm) by 36.8%. Distopalatal FI (p <.001, odds ratio [OR]: 0.252, 95% confidence interval [CI] for OR: 0.118–0.540), residual pockets (p <.001, OR: 0.503, 95% CI: 0.429–0.590) and TM Degrees I–III (Degree I: p =.002, OR: 0.765, 95% CI: 0.646–0.905; Degree II: p =.006, OR: 0.658, 95% CI: 0.489–0.886; Degree III: p =.023, OR: 0.398, 95% CI: 0.180–0.879) correlated significantly with increasing PPD. Conclusions: Over 75% of PPD remained unchanged or increased during SPC. Distopalatal FI, TM Degrees I–III and residual pockets after APT lead to worsening of periodontal pockets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To analyse the efficacy of non‐surgical therapy (NST) in terms of pocket closure (PC) and changes in percentage and number of pockets. Materials and Methods: Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched up to January 2020. Prospective studies with a minimum follow‐up of 12 months and presenting data in terms of PC or number or percentage of pocket depths (PDs) before and after NST on systemically healthy patients were included. Random‐effect meta‐analyses were performed. Results: After screening 4610 titles and abstracts, 27 studies were included. Of these, 63.9% of PC was reported by one study. The percentage of PDs ≤3 mm changed from 39.06% to 64.11% with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 26.14% (p <.001). This accounted for a relative increase of healthy sites of 64.13%. The mean percentage of PD ≥5 mm was 28.23% and 11.71% before and after treatment, respectively, with a WMD of 15.50% (p <.001). The WMD in the number of PDs ≥5 mm before and after treatment was 24.42 (p =.036). The mean number of residual PPD ≥5 after NST was 14.13. Conclusions: NST is able to eradicate the majority of the pockets. However, residual pockets after NST may remain and should be considered cautiously for further treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: No nomogram of peri‐implantitis was reported before which is valuable for risk‐estimating, clinical decision‐making, and better‐patients‐communicating. Purpose To identify the risk indicators and develop a nomogram prediction model of peri‐implantitis in treated severe periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with 214 implants. Periodontal and peri‐implant parameters were evaluated at implant surgery procedure (T1), and at follow‐up (T2). Risk factors were analyzed by logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations. Nomogram was developed and the discriminatory ability of the model was analyzed. Results: The incidence of peri‐implantitis at patient‐level and implant level were 16% and 11.2% respectively, with no implant lost. The variables associated with peri‐implantitis were the PDT1 ≥ 6 mm (%) > 10%, the implant position, length, and diameter after adjusting for covariates. A nomogram prediction model of peri‐implantitis were developed with factors of PD T1 ≥ 6 mm (%) > 10% and implant placed in posterior. The area under the ROC curves of stepwise model was 0.794. Conclusions: The residual pockets and implants position were identified as predictors for the peri‐implantitis. The nomogram can be used to estimate the risk of peri‐implantitis in treated severe periodontitis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]