Search

The present article is an abridged English translation of the Japanese Clinical Guidelines for Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (second edition), published in September 2019. These guidelines consist of a total of 212 pages and are unique worldwide in that they cover female lower urinary tract symptoms other than urinary incontinence. They contain two algorithms for "primary treatment" and "specialized treatment," respectively. These guidelines, consisting of six chapters, address a total of 26 clinical questions including: (i) treatment algorithms; (ii) what are female lower urinary tract symptoms?; (iii) epidemiology and quality of life; (iv) pathology and illness; (v) diagnosis; and (vi) treatment. When the patient's symptoms mainly involve voiding and post-micturition symptoms, specialized treatment should be considered. In the event of voiding symptoms concurrent with storage symptoms, residual urine should be measured; if the residual urine volume is <100 mL, then diagnosis and treatment for storage symptoms is prioritized, and if the volume is ≥100 mL, then specialized treatment should be considered. When storage symptoms are the primary condition, then the patient is subject to the primary treatment algorithm. Specialized treatment for refractory overactive bladder includes botulinum toxin injection and sacral nerve stimulation. For stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment is indicated, such as urethral slings. The two causes of voiding symptoms and post-micturition symptoms are lower urinary tract obstruction and detrusor underactivity (underactive bladder). Mechanical lower urinary tract obstruction, such as pelvic organ prolapse, is expected to improve with surgery., (© 2021 The Japanese Urological Association.)

The present article is the abbreviated English translation of the Japanese guidelines for male lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia updated as of the end of 2016. The target patients are men aged >50 years complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms, with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the target readers are non-urological general physicians and urologists. Mandatory assessment for general physicians is medical history, physical examination, urinalysis and measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen. Additional mandatory assessment for urologists is symptoms and quality of life assessment by questionnaires, uroflowmetry, residual urine measurement, and prostate ultrasonography. Nocturia requires special attention, as it can result from nocturnal polyuria and/or sleep disturbance rather than lower urinary tract disorders. Functional lower urinary tract disorders with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia are primarily managed by conservative therapy and medications, such as α 1 -blockers and phosphodiesterase-type 5 inhibitors. Use of other medications or combination pharmacotherapy is to be reserved for urologists. 5α-Reductase inhibitors and anticholinergics or β3 agonists are indicated for men with enlarged prostates and overactive bladder symptoms, respectively. Surgical intervention for bladder outlet obstruction is considered for persistent symptoms or benign prostatic hyperplasia-related comorbidities. Surgical modalities should be optimized by the patient's characteristics, performance of equipment and the surgeon's experience., (© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of silodosin versus tadalafil for treating lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH)., Methods: After informed consent, patients with LUTS/BPH were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive silodosin 8 mg/day or tadalafil 5 mg/day for 8 weeks (Period 1). Patients treated with tadalafil entered an exploratory phase and received silodosin or tadalafil for another 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) with Period 1 treatment., Results: Both silodosin and tadalafil demonstrated statistically significant improvement in IPSS total symptom score, with a mean ± standard deviation change of -10.1 ± 6.4 (P < 0.0001) and -8.0 ± 6.3 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The former reduction was significantly greater than the latter (P = 0.0277). Adverse drug reactions occurred at a rate of 23.4% with silodosin and 8.4% with tadalafil. No serious adverse drug reactions were documented, suggesting that both drugs were well tolerated. Moreover, results of Period 2 showed that switching to silodosin from tadalafil achieved a faster onset of improvements in IPSS Quality of Life Index score and total Overactive Bladder Symptom Score., Conclusions: Silodosin achieved significantly greater improvement than tadalafil, with a higher incidence of adverse drug reactions. The risk-benefit profiles obtained in this study will provide useful information for optimal pharmacological treatment of LUTS/BPH. Our results suggest that silodosin can be one of the first-line therapies for rapid and efficient relief in patients with LUTS/BPH., (© 2017 The Authors. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tadalafil plus α 1 -blocker combination therapy in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia., Methods: The present multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study compared the effects of tadalafil and a placebo added to ongoing α 1 -blocker therapy. A total of 171 Japanese patients were randomized., Results: Tadalafil combined with an α 1 -blocker did not decrease blood pressure in the orthostatic test. The only statistically significant differences in vital signs between the combination and monotherapy groups were diastolic blood pressure and pulse (P = 0.0194 and 0.0313, respectively). However, these changes were not considered clinically meaningful. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.1% (47/167) and 24.2% (39/161) of patients in the combination therapy and α 1 -blocker monotherapy groups, respectively. Additionally, 56.7% (89/157) of patients preferred combination therapy to monotherapy, though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.0937). There was a statistically significant reduction in the International Prostate Symptom Score voiding subscore in the combination therapy group (P = 0.0442)., Conclusions: Concurrent treatment with tadalafil and an α 1 -blocker seems to be safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Adding tadalafil to baseline α 1 -blocker therapy does not translate in adverse effects on the blood pressure. Patients tend to prefer combination therapy over monotherapy, and there seems to be a clinical benefit when using combination therapy., (© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association.)

In the elderly, various factors except the urological abnormality of lower urinary tracts often participate in the lower urinary tract dysfunction. The elderly person often causes the change of the general systemic function (basic ability for daily living activity, a cognitive func- tion, emotion or feeling). In addition, the condition such as frailty and sarcopenia are ob- served in considerably high rate in the elderly. Such conditions may have an influence on the lower urinary tract dysfunction and adversely lower urinary tract dysfunction may cause the aggravation of a systemic function. Therefore, in the medical care of the elderly with lower urinary tract dysfunction, we have to take care of not only urological disease but also general systemic condition. In this review, I describe characteristic conditions in the elderly such as frailty and sarcopenia, and introduce the comprehensive geriatric assessment, which is the necessary tool for evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in the elderly.

Aim: Lower urinary tract symptoms often limit activities of daily life and impair quality of life in the elderly. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether regional white matter hyperintensity (WMH) can predict lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease., Methods: The participants were 461 patients aged 65-85 years diagnosed with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Patients and their caregivers were asked about symptoms of lower urinary tract symptoms (urinary difficulty, frequency and incontinence). Cognition, behavior and psychological symptoms of dementia and medication were evaluated. WMH and brain atrophy were analyzed using an automatic segmentation program. Regional WMH was evaluated in the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes., Results: Patients with urinary incontinence showed significantly greater volume of WMH. WMH increased with age, especially in the frontal lobe. WMH in the frontal lobe was closely associated with urinary incontinence after adjustment for brain atrophy and classical confounding factors., Conclusions: Frontal WMH was a predictive factor for urinary incontinence in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Urinary incontinence in demented older adults is not an incidental event, and careful insight into regional WMH on brain magnetic resonance imaging might greatly help in diagnosing individuals with a higher risk of urinary incontinence., (© 2015 Japan Geriatrics Society.)

The "Japanese Clinical Guideline for Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms," published in Japan in November 2013, contains two algorithms (a primary and a specialized treatment algorithm) that are novel worldwide as they cover female lower urinary tract symptoms other than urinary incontinence. For primary treatment, necessary types of evaluation include querying the patient regarding symptoms and medical history, examining physical findings, and performing urinalysis. The types of evaluations that should be performed for select cases include evaluation with symptom/quality of life (QOL) questionnaires, urination records, residual urine measurement, urine cytology, urine culture, serum creatinine measurement, and ultrasonography. If the main symptoms are voiding/post-voiding, specialized treatment should be considered because multiple conditions may be involved. When storage difficulties are the main symptoms, the patient should be assessed using the primary algorithm. When conditions such as overactive bladder or stress incontinence are diagnosed and treatment is administered, but sufficient improvement is not achieved, the specialized algorithm should be considered. In case of specialized treatment, physiological re-evaluation, urinary tract/pelvic imaging evaluation, and urodynamic testing are conducted for conditions such as refractory overactive bladder and stress incontinence. There are two causes of voiding/post-voiding symptoms: lower urinary tract obstruction and detrusor underactivity. Lower urinary tract obstruction caused by pelvic organ prolapse may be improved by surgery., (© 2015 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objectives: To examine the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in Asian men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia., Methods: Asian men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to once-daily placebo (n=154), tadalafil 2.5 mg (n=151), tadalafil 5.0 mg (n=155) or tamsulosin 0.2 mg (active control, n=152) for 12 weeks., Results: Total International Prostate Symptom Score least-squares mean changes from baseline to end-point significantly improved with tadalafil 2.5 mg (-4.8, P=0.003) and 5 mg (-4.7, P=0.004) versus placebo (-3.0). Significant improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score versus placebo was observed earlier (week 2) for tadalafil 5.0 mg than for tadalafil 2.5 mg (week 8). Significant improvements (P<0.05) in both tadalafil groups versus placebo were observed for the International Prostate Symptom Score voiding subscore, International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life, and for Patient and Clinician Global Impressions of Improvement. Significant improvements versus placebo were observed in the International Prostate Symptom Score storage subscore for tadalafil 5.0 mg (-1.7, P=0.021), but not tadalafil 2.5 mg (-1.5, P=0.072). No significant improvements in benign prostatic hyperplasia Impact Index or improvements in peak urinary flow rates were observed with tadalafil 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg versus placebo. Tamsulosin treatment resulted in significant improvements versus placebo across all efficacy parameters, except for peak urinary flow rates. Safety results were consistent with the known tadalafil and tamsulosin safety profiles., Conclusions: Tadalafil once daily represents an effective and well tolerated medical treatment for Asian men presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia., (© 2012 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and useful signs to differentiate detrusor underactivity from bladder outlet obstruction in men with non‐neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Methods: A total of 638 treatment‐naive men with non‐neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent subjective and objective evaluations were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction groups based on urodynamic findings, and compared parameters obtained from questionnaires and non‐invasive tests. Detrusor underactivity was defined as bladder contractility index ≤100 and bladder outlet obstruction index ≤40, whereas bladder outlet obstruction was defined as bladder contractility index >100 and bladder outlet obstruction index >40. Results: Of 638 patients, 145 (22.7%) had detrusor underactivity and 273 (42.8%) had bladder outlet obstruction. Total international prostate symptom score and international prostate symptom score‐voiding subscore were significantly higher in the detrusor underactivity group. There were significant differences in prostate volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion, and all uroflowmetry parameters between the two groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower intravesical prostatic protrusion (cut‐off value 8.2 mm), lower bladder voiding efficiency (cut‐off value 70%), and the presence of sawtooth and interrupted waveform on uroflowmetry were significant predictive factors for detrusor underactivity. In particular, the incidence of sawtooth and interrupted waveform was significantly higher in the detrusor underactivity group (80%) than in the bladder outlet obstruction group (12.8%), which showed both high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (87.2%) in differentiating detrusor underactivity from bladder outlet obstruction. Conclusions: Sawtooth and interrupted waveform on uroflowmetry can be a useful predictive factor for detrusor underactivity. In addition, lower intravesical prostatic protrusion and bladder voiding efficiency can be of supplementary use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Assess the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once-daily in Asian men with lower urinary tract symptoms by pooling data from three clinical studies. Methods Data on 1199 Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese men given tadalafil 5 mg ( n = 601) or placebo ( n = 598) were pooled from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week studies. Efficacy measures included International Prostate Symptom Score, and Patient and Clinician Global Impressions of Improvement. These measures were also assessed for patient subgroups (age categories, baseline disease severity and/or prostate volume, prior alpha-blocker treatment). Safety measures included adverse events, including those in selected body systems. Efficacy measure changes throughout treatment were assessed by mixed-effect model repeated-measures analysis; baseline to end-point changes for the total population and subgroups were evaluated by analysis of covariance. Results Tadalafil 5 mg led to significant improvement ( vs placebo) in all International Prostate Symptom Scores at all time-points (week 4 P ≤ 0.013 for all measures; week 8 P ≤ 0.005, week 12 P < 0.001). End-point results for both global impressions scales also favored tadalafil (both P < 0.001 vs placebo). Tadalafil efficacy was similar between patient subgroups of varied disease severity (interaction P = 0.097), prior alpha-blocker use ( P = 0.580), and prostate volume ( P = 0.921). The drug was slightly less effective in older men (interaction P = 0.042). No unexpected adverse events were reported, and no meaningful adverse effects were observed in visual, auditory, or cardiovascular systems. Conclusions Tadalafil 5 mg once-daily for 12 weeks is efficacious and safe in Asian men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Tadalafil is also effective in men of different ages, disease severity, prior alpha-blocker exposure, and prostate volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is a shortened version of the clinical guideline for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which has been developed in Japan for symptomatic men aged 50 years and over irrespective of presumed diagnoses. The guideline was formed on the PubMed database between 1995 and 2007 and other relevant sources. The causes of male LUTS are diverse and attributable to diseases/dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract, prostate, nervous system, and other organ systems, with benign prostatic hyperplasia, bladder dysfunction, polyuria, and their combination being most common. The mandatory assessment should comprise medical history, physical examination, urinalysis, and measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen. Symptom and quality of life questionnaires, bladder diary, residual urine measurement, urine cytology, urine culture, measurement of serum creatinine, and urinary tract ultrasonography would be optional tests. The Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score Questionnaire may be useful in quickly capturing important symptoms. Severe symptoms, pain symptoms, and other clinical problems would indicate urological referral. One should be careful not to overlook underlying diseases such as infection or malignancy. The treatment should be initiated with conservative therapy and/or medicine such as α1-blockers. Treatment with anticholinergic agents should be reserved only for urologists, considering the risk of urinary retention. The present guideline should help urologists and especially non-urologists treat men with LUTS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]