Anagnostopoulou P, Latzin P, Jensen R, Stahl M, Harper A, Yammine S, Usemann J, Foong RE, Spycher B, Hall GL, Singer F, Stanojevic S, Mall MA, Ratjen F, and Ramsey KA
Background: The multiple breath nitrogen washout (N 2 MBW) technique is increasingly used to assess the degree of ventilation inhomogeneity in school-aged children with lung disease. However, reference values for healthy children are currently not available. The aim of this study was to generate reference values for N 2 MBW outcomes in a cohort of healthy Caucasian school-aged children., Methods: N 2 MBW data from healthy Caucasian school-age children between 6 and 18 years old were collected from four experienced centres. Measurements were performed using an ultrasonic flowmeter (Exhalyzer D, Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) and were analysed with commercial software (Spiroware version 3.2.1, Eco Medics AG). Normative values and upper limits of normal (ULN) were generated for lung clearance index (LCI) at 2.5% (LCI 2.5% ) and at 5% (LCI 5% ) of the initial nitrogen concentration and for moment ratios (M 1 /M 0 and M 2 /M 0 ). A prediction equation was generated for functional residual capacity (FRC)., Results: Analysis used 485 trials from 180 healthy Caucasian children aged from 6 to 18 years old. While LCI increased with age, this increase was negligible (0.04 units·year -1 for LCI 2.5% ) and therefore fixed ULN were defined for this age group. These limits were 7.91 for LCI 2.5% , 5.73 for LCI 5% , 1.75 for M 1 /M 0 and 6.15 for M 2 /M 0 , respectively. Height and weight were found to be independent predictors of FRC., Conclusion: We report reference values for N 2 MBW outcomes measured on a commercially available ultrasonic flowmeter device (Exhalyzer D, Eco Medics AG) in healthy school-aged children to allow accurate interpretation of ventilation distribution outcomes and FRC in children with lung disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P. Anagnostopoulou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Latzin reports personal fees from Gilead, Novartis, Polyphor, Santhera, Schwabe, Vertex, Vifor and Zambon, as well as grants from Vertex, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Jensen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Stahl reports personal fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Harper has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Yammine has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Usemann has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.E. Foong has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Spycher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.L. Hall reports grants from the NHMRC and the Australia and USA CF Foundation, and non-financial support (loan of equipment) from ndd, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: F. Singer reports personal fees from Vertex and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Stanojevic has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.A. Mall reports grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (82DZL004A1) and the Einstein Foundation Berlin (EP-2017-393), during the conduct of the study, and personal fees advisory board work, consultancy and lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Ratjen reports grants and personal fees for consultancy from Vertex, plus personal fees for consultancy from Novartis, Bayer, Roche and Genetech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.A. Ramsey has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)