Search

Purpose: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the predominant subtype of lung cancer, with increasing evidence showing clinical benefits of immunotherapy. However, a lack of integrated profiles of complex LUAD immune microenvironments hampers the application of immunotherapy, resulting in limited eligible patient populations as well as drug resistance problems. Here, we aimed to systematically profile the immune signatures of LUADs and to assess the role of the immune microenvironment in patient outcome. Methods: We systematically profiled the immune signatures of LUADs deposited in the TCGA and GEO databases using a total of 730 immune-related genes. Differential expression analysis was used to identify dysregulated genes. Univariate Cox analysis followed by robust likelihood-based survival analysis and multivariate Cox analysis were applied to construct an immune-related prognostic model. Results: We found that differentially expressed immune genes were mainly enriched in immune cell proliferation, migration, activation and the NF-κB and TNF signaling pathways. The 10-immune gene predictive model that we constructed could differentiate LUAD patients with different overall survival times in several datasets, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.67, 0.69, 0.72 and 0.74. LUAD patients with high- or low-risk scores exhibited distinct immune cell compositions, which may explain the prognostic significance of our model. Conclusions: Our results add to the current knowledge of immune processes in LUADs and underscore the critical role of the immune microenvironment in LUAD patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Although low-dose computed tomography has been confirmed to have meaningful diagnostic utility, lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both genders worldwide. Thus, a novel panel with a stronger diagnostic performance for lung cancer is needed. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a new panel in lung cancer diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and seven autoantibodies were measured and statistically analyzed in samples from healthy controls and patients with lung cancer. The 316 candidates enrolled in this study were randomly assigned into two groups for the training and validation of a diagnostic panel. Results: An optimal panel with four biomarkers (CEA, CA125, Annexin A1-Ab, and Alpha enolase-Ab) was established, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.897, a sensitivity of 86.5%, a specificity of 82.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.3%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.7%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 84.8% for the training group. The panel was validated, with an AUC of 0.856 and a sensitivity of 87.5% for the validation group. Furthermore, the new panel performed significantly better in lung cancer screening than did CEA and CA125 in all of the cohorts (p<.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of CEA and CA125 was significantly enhanced through their combination with two autoantibodies (Annexin A1-Ab, and Alpha enolase-Ab). Optimization of the measured autoantibodies is critical for generating a panel to detect lung cancer in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]