Search

Introduction: Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) often progress despite treatment and become life-threatening, with lung transplant (LTx) remaining the only curative option. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) is increasingly recognized as reliable predictor of clinical course, especially when longitudinally considered. The use of reference equations to express 6MWD as percent predicted (6MWD%) has not been previously studied in fibrosing ILDs. We sought to investigate whether the prognostic power of 6MWD% is superior to that of 6MWD expressed in meters (6MWD-m)., Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort analysis was conducted on both idiopathic pulmonary (IPF) and non-IPF fibrosing ILD patients. Patients were divided into a discovery (n = 211) and a validation (n = 260) cohort. Longitudinal changes of 6MWD% and lung function parameters were simultaneously considered. LTx-free survival at 3 years from baseline was the endpoint. Competing risks of death and LTx were considered., Results: Baseline 6MWD% and its longitudinal changes were significant predictors of LTx-free survival and independent from lung function variables. In both cohorts, on multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analysis, receiver operating characteristics analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates, 6MWD% was consistently, but only slightly superior to 6MWD-m as a predictor of LTx-free survival., Conclusion: 6MWD% has only a slight, yet detectable advantage over 6MWD-m as a predictor of survival in fibrosing ILDs. Utilizing 6MWD% may aid in risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and LTx timing optimization. However, available reference equations do have predicting limitations. Refined predictive equations and standardizing reporting practices are therefore needed to further enhance the clinical utility of 6MWD% in fibrosing ILDs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Pulmonary involvement is one of the most common extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and tenderness. All lung compartments can be interested in the course of RA, including parenchyma, airways, and, more rarely, pleura and vasculature., Areas Covered: The aim of this paper is to review the main RA lung manifestations, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical and therapeutic issues of RA-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite an increasing number of studies in the last years, pathogenesis of RA-ILD remains largely debated and the treatment of RA patients with lung involvement is still challenging in these patients., Expert Opinion: Management of RA-ILD is largely based on expert-opinion. Due to the broad clinical manifestations, including both joints and pulmonary involvement, multidisciplinary discussion, including rheumatologist and pulmonologist, is essential, not only for diagnosis, but also to evaluate the best therapeutic approach and follow-up. In fact, the coexistence of different lung manifestations may influence the treatment response and safety. The identification of biomarkers and risk-factors for an early identification of RA patients at risk of developing ILD remains a need that still needs to be fulfilled, and that will require further investigation in the next years.

Background and Objective: The identification of progression in patients with fibrosing non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represents an ongoing clinical challenge. Lung function decline alone may have significant limitations in the detection of clinically significant progression. We hypothesized that longitudinal changes of 6-min walk distance (6MWD) from baseline, simultaneously considered with measures of lung function, may independently predict survival and identifying clinically significant progression of disease., Methods: Forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing lung capacity (DLCO) and 6MWD were considered both at baseline and at 1 year in a discovery cohort (n = 105) and in a validation cohort (n = 138) from different centres. The primary endpoint was lung transplant (LTx)-free survival., Results: Average follow-up was 3 years in both cohorts. Combined incidence of deaths and LTx was 29% and 21%, respectively. No collinearity and no strong correlations were observed among FVC, DLCO and 6MWD longitudinal changes. While age, gender and BMI were not significant, 6MWD decline ≥24 m predicted LTx-free-survival significantly and independently from FVC and DLCO declines, with high sensitivity and specificity, in both the discovery and the validation cohorts. Although FVC and DLCO declines remained significant predictors of LTx-free survival, 6MWD decline was more accurate than the proposed ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT functional criteria. Results were confirmed after stratifying patients by baseline FVC., Conclusion: Longitudinal declines of 6MWD are associated with poor survival in fibrosing ILDs across a wide range of baseline severity, with high accuracy. 6MWD longitudinal decline is largely independent from lung function decline and may be integrated into the routine assessment of progression., (© 2024 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) is characterized by progression of lung parenchyma that may be observed in various autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), including rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases. From a diagnostic point of view, a UIP pattern related to ARDs may display imaging and pathological features able to distinguish it from that related to IPF, such as the "straight-edge" sign at HRCT and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates at histologic specimens. Multidisciplinary approach (MDD), involving at least pulmonologist, rheumatologist and radiologist, is fundamental in the differential diagnosis process, but MDD is also required in the evaluation of severity, progression and response to treatment, that is based on the combination of changes in symptoms, pulmonary function trends, and, in selected patients, serial CT evaluation. Differently from IPF, in patients with ARDs both functional evaluation and patient-reported outcomes may be affected by systemic involvement and comorbidities, including musculoskeletal manifestations of disease. Finally, in regards to pharmacological treatment, immunosuppressants have been considered the cornerstone of therapy, despite the lack of solid evidence in most cases; recently, antifibrotic drugs were also proposed for the treatment of progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. In ARD-ILD, the therapeutic choice should balance the need for the control of systemic and lung involvements with the risk of adverse events from multi-morbidities and -therapies. Purpose of this review is to summarize the definition, the radiological and morphological features of the UIP pattern in ARDs, together with risk factors, diagnostic criteria, prognostic evaluation, monitoring and management approaches of the UIP-ARDs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To evaluate the rate of progression towards specific autoimmune diseases (SADs) of a prospective, multi-centre cohort of patients classifiable as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF)., Methods: IPAF patients were enrolled based on specific research criteria, and jointly followed by rheumatologists and pulmonologists for at least one year with clinical check-ups, serological exams including autoimmunity, capillaroscopy and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Diagnostic assessment was repeated at least once a year, or earlier when deemed useful., Results: We enrolled 191 IPAF patients through 95 different combinations of IPAF criteria. Of these, 24.1% progressed towards SAD, mainly in connective tissue diseases but also in microscopic polyangiitis. The IPAF patients who progressed were younger than stable IPAF patients (63±10 years vs. 68±9 years, p=0.002) and had a longer follow-up (36.9±18.7 vs. 29.3±15.7 months, p=0.007), but similar severity. No parameters were associated with overall progression, but some parameters were associated with the development of specific diagnoses: Sjögren's syndrome with positivity for SSA (p=0.007, χ2 7.4); idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with mechanic's hands (p=<0.0001, χ2 12.6), organizing pneumonia pattern (p=0.01, χ2 6.1), positivity for anti-Pm/scl (p=0.04 χ2 4.1) and anti-MDA5 (p=0.04, χ2 4.2); systemic sclerosis with palmar telangiectasias (p=<0.0001 2 18.3), positivity for anti-Scl70 (p=<0.0001 χ2 12.5) and anti-PM/Scl (p=0.001 χ2 10.1)., Conclusions: IPAF patients had a rate of progression towards SAD similar to that reported in previous studies on undifferentiated connective tissue diseases, thus including some patients in which lung involvement could represent the first or even the sole clinical manifestation of a SAD.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the main CT features that may help in distinguishing a progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to SSc from COVID-19 pneumonia., Methods: This multicentric study included 22 international readers grouped into a radiologist group (RADs) and a non-radiologist group (nRADs). A total of 99 patients, 52 with COVID-19 and 47 with SSc-ILD, were included in the study., Results: Fibrosis inside focal ground-glass opacities (GGOs) in the upper lobes; fibrosis in the lower lobe GGOs; reticulations in lower lobes (especially if bilateral and symmetrical or associated with signs of fibrosis) were the CT features most frequently associated with SSc-ILD. The CT features most frequently associated with COVID- 19 pneumonia were: consolidation (CONS) in the lower lobes, CONS with peripheral (both central/peripheral or patchy distributions), anterior and posterior CONS and rounded-shaped GGOs in the lower lobes. After multivariate analysis, the presence of CONs in the lower lobes (P < 0.0001) and signs of fibrosis in GGOs in the lower lobes (P < 0.0001) remained independently associated with COVID-19 pneumonia and SSc-ILD, respectively. A predictive score was created that was positively associated with COVID-19 diagnosis (96.1% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity)., Conclusion: CT diagnosis differentiating between COVID-19 pneumonia and SSc-ILD is possible through a combination of the proposed score and radiologic expertise. The presence of consolidation in the lower lobes may suggest COVID-19 pneumonia, while the presence of fibrosis inside GGOs may indicate SSc-ILD., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To define the clinical spectrum time-course and prognosis of non-Asian patients positive for anti-MDA5 antibodies., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study., Results: 149 anti-MDA5 positive patients (median onset age 53 years, median disease duration 18 months), mainly females (100, 67%), were included. Dermatomyositis (64, 43%) and amyopathic dermatomyositis (47, 31%), were the main diagnosis; 15 patients (10%) were classified as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and 7 (5%) as rheumatoid arthritis. The main clinical findings observed were myositis (84, 56%), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (108, 78%), skin lesions (111, 74%), and arthritis (76, 51%). The onset of these manifestations was not concomitant in 74 cases (50%). Of note, 32 (21.5%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit for rapidly progressive-ILD, which occurred in median 2 months from lung involvement detection, in the majority of cases (28, 19%) despite previous immunosuppressive treatment. One-third of patients (47, 32% each) was ANA and anti-ENA antibodies negative and a similar percentage was anti-Ro52 kDa antibodies positive. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (65, 60%), organising pneumonia (23, 21%), and usual interstitial pneumonia-like pattern (14, 13%) were the main ILD patterns observed. Twenty-six patients died (17%), 19 (13%) had a rapidly progressive-ILD., Conclusions: The clinical spectrum of the anti-MDA5 antibodies-related disease is heterogeneous. Rapidly-progressive ILD deeply impacts the prognosis also in non-Asian patients, occurring early during the disease course. Anti-MDA5 antibody positivity should be considered even when baseline autoimmune screening is negative, anti-Ro52 kDa antibodies are positive, and radiology findings show a NSIP pattern.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with rheumatic diseases, such as connective-tissue diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic vasculitis. Some patients with ILD secondary to rheumatic disease (RD-ILD) experience acute exacerbations, with sudden ILD progression and high mortality during or immediately after the exacerbation, and a very low 1-year survival rate. In the ILD subtype idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), an acute exacerbation is defined as acute worsening or development of dyspnoea associated with new bilateral ground-glass opacities and/or consolidations at high-resolution CT, superimposed on a background pattern consistent with fibrosing ILD. However, acute exacerbation in RD-ILD (AE-RD-ILD) currently has no specific definition. The aetiology and pathogenesis of AE-RD-ILD remain unclear, but distinct triggers might include infection, mechanical stress, microaspiration and DMARD treatment. At this time, no effective evidence-based therapeutic strategies for AE-RD-ILD are available. In clinical practice, AE-RD-ILD is often empirically treated with high-dose systemic steroids and antibiotics, with or without immunosuppressive drugs. In this Review, we summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, management and prognosis of AE-RD-ILD, enabling the similarities and differences with acute exacerbation in IPF to be critically assessed., (© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.)

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have an array of immunomodulatory treatment options compared with IPF, due to their inflammatory component. However, there is a relative paucity of guidance on the management of this heterogeneous group of diseases. In ILDs other than IPF, immunosuppression is the cornerstone of therapy, with varying levels of evidence for different immunomodulatory agents and for each specific ILD. Classification of ILDs is important for guiding treatment decisions. Immunomodulatory agents mainly include corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and rituximab. In this review, the available evidence for single agents in the most common ILDs is first discussed. We then reviewed practical therapeutic approaches in connective tissue disease-related ILD and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, scleroderma-related ILD, vasculitis and dermatomyositis with hypoxemic respiratory failure, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis sarcoidosis, fibrosing organizing pneumonia and eosinophilic pneumonia. The treatment of acute exacerbations of ILD is also discussed. Therapy augmentation in ILD is dictated by the recognition of progression of disease. Criteria for the evaluation of progression of disease are then discussed. Finally, specific protocol and measures to increase patients' safety are reviewed as well, including general monitoring and serologic surveillance, Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, patients' education, genetic testing for azathioprine, MMF serum levels and cyclophosphamide administration protocols. Immunomodulatory therapies are largely successful in the management of ILDs and can be safely managed with the application of specific protocols, precautions and monitoring.

Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents the main pulmonary involvement in primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS). A proportion of patients with pSS develop a progressive fibrosing form of ILD, but no data are available about the prevalence of these patterns in pSS patients. Aim of this monocentric, cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence of fibrosing patterns in pSS patients with ILD., Methods: All consecutive patients fulfilling classification criteria for pSS with a new or previous diagnosis of ILD were enrolled in the study. Diagnosis of ILD was always performed by mean of HRCT and specific patterns were identified according to current classification criteria and divided in two groups according to the detection of a fibrotic pattern., Results: Thirty-four pSS-ILD patients were enrolled in the study (males/females 3/31, median age 69.5 years, median pSS duration 47.5 months). Fibrotic pattern was detected in 52.9% of patients, namely: UIP (13 patients, 38.2%), fibrotic NSIP (4, 11.8%), fibrotic OP (1 2.9%) and group 2 (16 pts, 47.1%) including NSIP (6, 17.6%), OP (4, 11.8%), LIP (2, 5.9%) and unclassifiable (4, 11.8%). These patients were younger and with a shorter pSS duration at ILD diagnosis, in particular ILD diagnosis was prior or concurrent to pSS in 83.3% of cases compared to 62.5% in the group of nonfibrotic pattern (P<0.05)., Conclusion: Our data suggest a high prevalence of this pulmonary clinical phenotype in pSS-ILD patients. Since the course of progressive fibrosing pneumonia generally results in respiratory failure, this result could be worthy of further studies., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Nonidiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF) progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of ILDs, often challenging to diagnose, although an accurate diagnosis has significant implications for both treatment and prognosis. A subgroup of these patients experiences progressive deterioration in lung function, physical performance, and quality of life after conventional therapy. Risk factors for ILD progression include older age, lower baseline pulmonary function, and a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. Management of non-IPF P-ILD is both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic. Antifibrotic drugs, originally approved for IPF, have been considered in patients with other fibrotic ILD subtypes, with favorable results in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Disclosure B.F. Collins declares personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim outside of the submitted work. F. Luppi declares grants and personal fees from Roche and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim outside of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), tools to assess patient self-report of health status, are now increasingly used in research, care and policymaking. While there are two well-developed disease-specific PROMs for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), many unmet and urgent needs remain. In December 2019, 64 international ILD experts convened in Erice, Italy to deliberate on many topics, including PROMs in ILD. This review summarises the history of PROMs in ILD, shortcomings of the existing tools, challenges of development, validation and implementation of their use in clinical trials, and the discussion held during the meeting. Development of disease-specific PROMs for ILD including IPF with robust methodology and validation in concordance with guidance from regulatory authorities have increased user confidence in PROMs. Minimal clinically important difference for bidirectional changes may need to be developed. Cross-cultural validation and linguistic adaptations are necessary in addition to robust psychometric properties for effective PROM use in multinational clinical trials. PROM burden of use should be reduced through appropriate use of digital technologies and computerised adaptive testing. Active patient engagement in all stages from development, testing, choosing and implementation of PROMs can help improve probability of success and further growth., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Kalluri reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Luppi reports grants and lecture fees from Roche and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: A. Vancheri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Vancheri reports grants and personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E. Balestro reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Varone reports unrestricted grants, consultancy and lecture fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: N. Mogulkoc has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Cacopardo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Bargagli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Renzoni reports grants from Boeringher Ingelheim, and lecture fees from Boeringher Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Torrisi reports personal fees from Hoffman La-Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Calvello has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Libra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Pavone has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Bonella reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and consultancy fees from BMS, Galapagos, GSK and Savara, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V. Cottin reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion and Roche/Promedior; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Bayer/MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene/BMS, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, AstraZeneca and Fibrogen, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Valenzuela reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Galapagos and BMS, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Wijsenbeek reports grants and other funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche, and other funding from Respivant, Galapagos, Novartis and Savara, outside the submitted work. All fees and grants were paid to her institution. Conflict of interest: E. Bendstrup reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, and personal fees from Galapagos and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a frequent extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) deeply impacting both quality of life and overall prognosis. Areas covered: A literature search was performed including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Many retrospective studies investigated the possible risk factors for RA-related ILD (RA-ILD), aiming to identify patients at risk. Among them, males, smokers, positivity of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies have been associated with RA-ILD, such as some genetic haplotypes. Usual interstitial pneumonia is the histologic and radiologic pattern most frequently observed, followed by nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Since lung involvement can represent the RA onset, an early differential diagnosis with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia can be difficult or sometimes impossible. High-resolution computed tomography represents the gold standard for ILD diagnosis, while multidisciplinary discussion should be required to assess disease staging, severity and progression.  Expert opinion: Management of RA-ILD patients is challenging due to the lack of evidence-based data regarding both assessment and treatment. Moreover, the high variability of clinical presentation and evolution makes it difficult to establish the correct therapeutic strategy. Currently, multidisciplinary approach, including at least rheumatologists, pulmonologists, and radiologists, is desirable to define therapy and follow-up strategies.

Introduction: Main clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection are characterized by fever, dyspnea, and interstitial pneumonia, frequently evolving in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)., Areas Covered: Features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents some common points with interstitial lung disease (ILD) both idiopathic and related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), typically characterized by a chronic progression over time and possibly complicated by acute exacerbation (AE). The study of common pathogenetic mechanisms, such as the involvement of toll-like receptor 4, could contribute to the knowledge and treatment of idiopathic and RA-ILD. Moreover, hyperinflammation, mainly characterized by increase of effector T-cells and inflammatory cytokines, and activation of coagulation cascade, observed in COVID-19 related ARDS have been already shown in patients with AE of idiopathic and RA-ILD. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, together with a manual search in COVID-resource centers of the main journals., Expert Opinion: Despite the uncertainty about pathogenetic aspects about COVID-19- pneumonia, it could be a possible model for other forms of ILD and AE. The great amount of data from studies on COVID-19 could be helpful in proposing safe therapeutic approaches for RA-ILD, in understanding pathogenesis of usual interstitial pneumonia and to develop new therapeutic strategies for AE.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is considered the most frequent and serious pulmonary complication in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), with the majority of the studies indicating a prevalence of about 20%, and resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Although ILD was historically described as a late manifestation of pSS, more recently, a high variability of the time of onset of pSS-ILD has been observed and from 10 to 51% of patients can develop ILD years before the onset of pSS. Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia is highly typical for SS, but it occurs only in a few cases, while the most common ILD pattern is nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, followed by usual interstitial pneumonia and organising pneumonia. Multidisciplinary discussion can be necessary in pSS cases with ambiguous clinical findings, when differential diagnosis with IIPs might be very difficult. Up to date, available data do not allow to establish an evidence-based treatment strategy in pSS-ILD. Glucocorticoids are empirically used, usually in association to immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of pSS should facilitate the development of new therapies. Recently, a trial showed the efficacy of the antifibrotic drug nintedanib in slowing progression of various interstitial lung diseases, including patients with connective tissue diseases. The aims of this review are to describe clinical features, imaging, pathology, together with diagnostic criteria, prognosis and management of pSS-ILD patients.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of systemic vasculitides that predominantly affect small vessels, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Pulmonary involvement is frequently observed in AAV patients, with various possible phenotypes in the different diseases. In the last years, among the possible types of lung involvement, a growing interest has been addressed to the interstitial lung disease (ILD). Prevalence of ILD is higher in MPA than in GPA; in fact, ILD has been reported in up to 45% of MPA patients and in 23% of GPA. Anti-MPO antibodies are the main ANCA subtype associated to ILD, in about 46-71% of cases, while anti-PR3 antibodies are reported in 0-29% of patients. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) frequently detects interstitial lung abnormalities in AAV, up to 66% of patients with MPA, even if with an unclear clinical relevance, specifically in asymptomatic patients. Ground glass opacities, mainly consistent with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), are the most frequent finding in MPA patients, but reticulations, interlobular septal thickening and honeycombing are also reported. ILD significantly affects quality of life and survival, with mortality increased 2 to 4 times, particularly higher in MPA patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Currently, immunosuppressive therapy is considered also as a possible treatment of ILD. However, a careful evaluation of progression and severity of lung involvement, should guide the treatment decision in the single patient. In this review, we discuss the available evidence on clinical features, diagnostic work-up, prognosis and management of AAV-ILD.

Background and Objective: Recently the term "interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features" (IPAF) has been proposed to identify patients with interstitial lung disease and autoimmune characteristics, not fulfilling the criteria for specific connective tissue diseases (CTD). Only few data are available about the clinical and serological features of IPAF patients, their survival and the possible evolution in a CTD. The aims of the study were to investigate the demographic and clinico-serologic features of patients with IPAF, their relationship to survival, and the possible evolution in a definite CTD., Patients and Methods: Fifty-two patients were consecutively enrolled and prospectively followed for 45 ± 31.6 months. Data about disease onset, serological, clinical and therapeutic features, pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography were periodically repeated. The survival of patients with IPAF was compared with that of 104 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)., Results: The clinical domain for IPAF was satisfied in 44 patients, serological domain in 49 and the morphological domain in 29 patients. During the follow-up, a definite CTD was diagnosed in 7 patients, in particular Sjogren's syndrome in 4 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 2, and polymyositis in the last. The estimated 5-year survival of IPAF patients 69.5 ± 7.8%, significantly higher than survival observed in IPF patients, and the baseline value of FVC and DLCO were the only factors associated to death., Conclusions: IPAF seems to a distinct entity, with a low tendency to evolve in a definite CTD. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to better define the clinical evolution and the outcome of IPAF., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The prevalence and natural history of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs), and their response to commonly used treatments in real life are largely unknown., Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of PF-ILD patients attending 2 Italian referral centers (San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, and San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan) from January 1, 2011, to July 31, 2019., Methods: From a cohort of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD patients with at least 2-year follow-up, we selected only those with progressive disease, defined as per the INBUILD trial, collecting their demographical, clinical, and functional data., Results: Out of the 245 fibrosing ILD patients, 75 (31%) were classified as PF-ILDs (median age 66 years, 60% males), most frequently idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (28%), followed by connective tissue disease-associated ILD (20%), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis (17% each). Most patients (81%) were categorized as PF-ILDs because of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10%, while 19% experienced a marginal FVC decline (between 5 and 10%) associated with worsening respiratory symptoms or increasing extent of fibrotic changes on high-resolution computed tomography. Disease progression occurred after a median of 18 months from ILD diagnosis. The vast majority (93%) of PF-ILD patients received prednisolone, alone (40%) or associated with steroid-sparing agents (52%), and 35% of treated patients developed treatment-related adverse events. After ILD progression, the median survival was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) years, with a 2- and 3-year mortality rate of 4 and 20%, respectively., Conclusions: In a real-life setting, approximately one-third of the fibrosing ILD patients showed a progressive course despite treatment. Studies aimed to better phenotype this subgroup of patients are needed., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe systemic manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of ILD, but its routine use for screening programs is not advisable because of both high cost and X-ray exposure. Velcro crackles at lung auscultation occur very early in the course of interstitial pneumonia, and their detection is an indication for HRCT. Recently, we developed an algorithm (VECTOR) to detect the presence of Velcro crackles in pulmonary sounds and showed good results in a small sample of RA patients. The aim of the present investigation was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of VECTOR in a larger population of RA patients, compared with that of the reference standard of HRCT, from a multicentre study., Methods: To avoid X-ray exposure, we enrolled 137 consecutive RA patients who had recently undergone HRCT. Lung sounds of all patients were recorded in 4 pulmonary fields bilaterally with a commercial electronic stethoscope (ES); subsequently, all HRCT images were blindly evaluated by a radiologist, and audio data were analysed by means of VECTOR., Results: Fifty-nine of 137 patients showed ILD (43.1%). VECTOR correctly classified 115/137 patients, showing a diagnostic accuracy of 83.9% and a sensitivity and specificity of 93.2 and 76.9%, respectively., Conclusions: VECTOR may represent the first validated tool for the screening of RA patients who are suspected for ILD and who should be directed to HRCT for the diagnosis. Moreover, early identification of RA-ILD could contribute to the design of prospective studies aimed at elucidating unclear aspects of the disease.

There are over 200 interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). In addition to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a percentage of patients with other ILDs also develop progressive fibrosis of the lung during their disease course. Patients with progressive-fibrosing ILDs may show limited response to immunomodulatory therapy, worsening symptoms and lung function and, ultimately, early mortality. There are few data for ILDs that may present a progressive fibrosing phenotype specifically, but we believe the burden and healthcare costs associated with these conditions may be comparable to those reported in IPF. This review discusses the burden of ILDs that may present a progressive fibrosing phenotype and the factors impacting healthcare utilisation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C. Holtze reports non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim (writing assistance), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: K. Flaherty reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim (consultancy – IPF 2016), Genentech (consultancy – IPF 2015), Veracyte (consultancy – IPF 2017), Roche (consultancy – IPF 2017), France Foundation (IPF CME content and presentations), Fibrogen (consultancy – IPF 2016) and Sanofi-Genzyme (consultancy – IPF 2017), outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Kreuter reports grants and personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: F. Luppi reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Roche, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: T. Moua has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Vancheri reports grants and personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.B. Scholand reports other from Boehringer Ingelheim (advisory board and investigator in clinical trials), Genentech (advisory board and investigator in a clinical trial), Fibrogen (investigator in a clinical trial), and Global Blood Therapeutics (investigator in a clinical trial), outside the submitted work. In addition, M.B. Scholand has a patent “Apparatus, compositions and methods for assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease progression among rapid and slow decline conditions” issued., (Copyright ©ERS 2018.)

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune systemic disease characterized by diffuse fibrosis of skin and visceral organs due to different genetic, infectious, and/or environmental/occupational causative factors, including the inhalation of silica dust., Objectives: To investigate serum trace elements including silicon (s-Si) levels in SSc patients living in a restricted geographical area with high density of worksites with silica exposure hazard., Methods: This case-control study included 80 SSc patients (M:F 10:70; aged 58.4 ± 11.9SD years, mean disease duration 10.1 ± 7.8SD) and 50 age-/sex-matched healthy control subjects consecutively investigated at our University-based Rheumatology Unit. Patients and controls were evaluated for environmental/occupational exposure categories (structured questionnaire), morphological characterization of serum micro-/nanoparticles (Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy microanalysis), and quantitative assessment of trace elements (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy)., Results: Among various categories, only occupational exposure to silica dust was recorded in a significant proportion of SSc patients compared to controls (55% vs. 11%; p < .0001). Qualitative analysis showed serum silica micro- and nanoparticles in all exposed patients. Quantitative evaluation evidenced significantly higher s-Si levels in SSc patients versus controls (p < .0001); in addition, higher s-Si levels were detected in patients with occupational exposure (p < .0001), diffuse cutaneous SSc (p = .0047), myositis (p = .0304), and/or lung fibrosis (p = .0004) compared to those without; notably, the severity of lung fibrosis scoring positively correlated with s-Si levels (p < .0001)., Conclusions: The study first demonstrated high s-Si levels in exposed SSc patients; this element might represent a pathogenetic co-factor of more severe clinical phenotypes, mainly diffuse scleroderma with lung fibrosis., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: "Velcro-type" crackles on chest auscultation are considered a typical acoustic finding of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease (FILD), however whether they may have a role in the early detection of these disorders has been unknown. This study investigated how "Velcro-type" crackles correlate with the presence of distinct patterns of FILD and individual radiologic features of pulmonary fibrosis on High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)., Methods: Lung sounds were digitally recorded from subjects immediately prior to undergoing clinically indicated chest HRCT. Audio files were independently assessed by two chest physicians and both full volume and single HRCT sections corresponding to the recording sites were extracted. The relationships between audible "Velcro-type" crackles and radiologic HRCT patterns and individual features of pulmonary fibrosis were investigated using multivariate regression models., Results: 148 subjects were enrolled: bilateral "Velcro-type" crackles predicted the presence of FILD at HRCT (OR 13.46, 95% CI 5.85-30.96, p < 0.001) and most strongly the Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) pattern (OR 19.8, 95% CI 5.28-74.25, p < 0.001). Extent of isolated reticulation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.62-2.57, p < 0.001), honeycombing (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.24-2.83, < 0.01), ground glass opacities (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.32, p < 0.001) and traction bronchiectasis (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.32, p < 0.05) were all independently associated with the presence of "Velcro-type" crackles., Conclusions: "Velcro-type" crackles predict the presence of FILD and directly correlate with the extent of distinct radiologic features of pulmonary fibrosis. Such evidence provides grounds for further investigation of lung sounds as an early identification tool in FILD.

The diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis is fundamental to improving their survival rate. In particular, the average survival time of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis with pulmonary implications is approximately 3 years. The gold standard for confirming the diagnosis of this disease is computer tomography. However, it is very difficult to raise diagnosis suspicion because the symptoms of the disease are extremely common in elderly people. The detection of the so-called velcro crackle in lung sounds can effectively raise the suspicion of an interstitial disease and speed up diagnosis. However, this task largely relies on the experience of physicians and has not yet been standardized in clinical practice. The diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases based on thorax auscultation still represents an underexplored field in the study of rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, we investigate the problem of the automatic detection of velcro crackle in lung sounds. In practice, the patient is auscultated using a digital stethoscope and the lung sounds are saved to a file. The acquired digital data are then analysed using a suitably developed algorithm. In particular, the proposed solution relies on the empirical observation that the audio bandwidth associated with velcro crackle is larger than that associated with healthy breath sounds. Experimental results from a database of 70 patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis demonstrate that the developed tool can outperform specialized physicians in terms of diagnosing pulmonary disorders. The overall accuracy of the proposed solution is 90.0%, with negative and positive predictive values of 95.0% and 83.3%, respectively, whereas the reliability of physician diagnosis is in the range of 60-70%. The devised algorithm represents an enabling technology for a novel approach to the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent evidences show that Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is effective in patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). It is still unclear whether disease severity and/or etiology might impact on the reported benefits. We designed this prospective study 1) to confirm the efficacy of rehabilitation in a population of patients with ILDs and 2) to investigate whether baseline exercise capacity, disease severity or ILD etiology might affect outcomes., Methods: Forty-one patients (IPF 63%, age 66.9 ± 11 ys) were enrolled in a standard PR course in two centers. Lung function, incremental and endurance cyclo-ergometry, Six Minutes Walking Distance (6MWD), chronic dyspnea (Medical Research Council scale-MRC) and quality of life (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-SGRQ) were recorded before and at the end of PR to measure any pre-to-post change. Correlation coefficients between the baseline level of Diffuse Lung Capacity for Carbon monoxide (DLCO), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), 6MWD, power developed during incremental endurance test, GAP index (in IPF patients only) and etiology (IPF or non-IPF) with the functional improvement at the 6MWDT (meters), at the incremental and endurance cyclo-ergometry (endurance time) and the HRQoL were assessed., Results: Out of the 41 patients, 97% (n = 40) completed the PR course. Exercise performance (both at peak load and submaximal effort), symptoms (iso-time dyspnea and leg fatigue), SGRQ and MRC significantly improved after PR (p < .001). Patients with lower baseline 6MWD showed greater improvement in 6MWD (Spearman r score = - .359, p = .034) and symptoms relief at SGRQ (r = -.315, p = .025) regardless of underlying disease., Conclusion: Present study confirms that comprehensive rehabilitation is feasible and effective in patients with ILD of different severity and etiology. The baseline submaximal exercise capacity inversely correlates with both functional and symptom gains in this heterogeneous population.

Primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) involved about 10-20% of patients. In 20% of cases, ILD can be diagnosed before pSS; anyway, few studies have investigated the frequency of ILD as the first clinically relevant manifestation of pSS, generally referred to retrospective studies. Aim of our prospective study was to describe prevalence, clinical, serological, and instrumental features of non-sicca onset pSS patients with interstitial lung involvement. During a period of 48 months, all consecutive patients diagnosed as pSS were enrolled. For all patients, the reason for the first visit was recorded. When present, ILD was categorized as definite, possible, or inconsistent with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, according to the current criteria. ILD was the main presenting symptom in 13/77 new diagnoses of pSS patients; in particular, 6/13 patients were initially diagnosed as idiopathic ILD, and only later developed clinical manifestations suggestive for pSS; ILD-pSS patients were older than others and showed a higher EULAR primary Sjögren's syndrome disease activity index. A radiologic definite or possible UIP pattern was detected in 12/13 pSS. For the first time, we prospectively observed a prevalence of 16.8% of non-sicca onset pSS patients with ILD. Interestingly, UIP pattern was the most frequently detected, while typical autoantibodies were often absent. These features stressed the importance of differential diagnosis in the first stage of the disease, considering the possible poorer prognosis in this subgroup of patients. Multidisciplinary approach is crucial for a correct and early diagnosis, at both onset and follow-up.

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by inflammation and/or fibrosis of the lungs, varying from idiopathic interstitial pneumonias to secondary variants, including the ILDs associated to connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In addition, a number of patients are recognized as unclassifiable ILD (U-ILD), because of the inability to reach a definite diagnosis; some of them show autoimmune manifestations not fulfilling the classification criteria of a given CTD. The term interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has been recently proposed for this particular ILD subset., Methods: Here, we report our experience resulting from the integrated - pneumology/rheumatology - approach to patients with suspected ILDs or CTDs referred to our university-based Center for the Rare Pulmonary Diseases and Rheumatology Unit, from January 2009 to June 2015, with particular attention to the above-mentioned U-ILD, IPAF, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). The comparative analysis of these clinical variants was carried out; moreover, the observed findings were compared with the results of the updated review of the literature., Results: After the first clinical assessment, the U-ILD were identified in 50 patients; afterwards, on the basis of clinico-serological and radiological findings U-ILD group was subdivided into 2 subgroups, namely U-ILD without any clinical extra-thoracic manifestations and/or immunological alterations (15 pts) and IPAF according to the above-mentioned classification criteria (35 pts). Patients with either IPAF or U-ILD were compared with a series of 52 stable UCTD (disease duration ≥3 years), followed at our Rheumatology Unit. Some important differences were evidenced among the 3 series of U-ILD, IPAF, and UCTD: firstly, female gender was more frequent in patients with UCTD (86%) or IPAF (69%) compared with U-ILD (60%) or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (24%; p=0.001). In addition, UCTD patients were younger and showed longer disease duration. More interestingly, both UCTD and IPAF series show a comparable prevalence of various clinical manifestations, with the exception of the interstitial lung involvement detectable in a very small percentage of UCTD patients. Concordantly, the review of the literature evidenced two main subsets of U-ILD, one is characterized by isolated unclassifiable interstitial pneumonia and another one composed by subjects with clinically prevalent lung involvement in the setting of not definite CTD, the recently proposed IPAF., Conclusion: We hypothesize that IPAF and UCTD might represent two clinical variants of the same systemic autoimmune disorders. The marked difference regarding the prevalence of ILD, which is the clinical hallmark of IPAF but very rare in UCTD, may at least in part reflect a selection bias of patients generally referred to different specialist centers, i.e. pneumology or rheumatology, according to the presence/absence of clinically dominant ILD, respectively. Well-integrated, interdisciplinary teams are recommended for the assessment and management of these patients in the clinical practice. Finally, the cooperation between multidisciplinary groups with different experiences may be advisable for a validation study of the proposed nomenclature and classification criteria of these indefinable ILD/CTD variants., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Impaired diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was frequently observed in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, generally related to the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, in clinical practice abnormally low DLCO values may be found also in the absence of these SSc complications. The objective was to investigate the prospective clinical relevance of isolated DLCO reduction at baseline in SSc patients. Ninety-seven SSc female patients (age at the diagnosis: 51.3±14.5 years; disease duration: 10.4±6.6 years; limited/diffuse skin subsets: 92/5), without any clinical, radiological (high resolution computed tomography), and echocardiographic manifestations of ILD or PAH at baseline, nor other lung or heart diseases able to affect DLCO, were recruited at our Rheumatology Centre. Patients with DLCO &lt;55% (15 patients; group A) were compared with those with normal DLCO (82 patients; group B), at baseline and at the end of follow-up. At baseline, patients of group A showed significantly higher percentage of anticentromere autoantibodies compared to group B (13/15, 86.6% vs 48/82, 58.5%; p=0.044). More interestingly, at the end of long-lasting clinical follow-up (11.6±6.7 years), pre-capillary PAH (right heart catheterization) solely developed in some patients of group A (3/15, 20% vs 0/82; p=0.003). In SSc patients, the presence at baseline of isolated, marked DLCO reduction (&lt;55% of predicted) and serum anticentromere autoantibodies might characterize a peculiar SSc subset that may precede the development of PAH. Therefore, careful clinical follow-up of patients with isolated moderate-severe DLCO reduction should be mandatory.