Search

Objectives: Content-based image retrieval systems (CBIRS) are a new and potentially impactful tool for radiological reporting, but their clinical evaluation is largely missing. This study aimed at assessing the effect of CBIRS on the interpretation of chest CT scans from patients with suspected diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD)., Materials and Methods: A total of 108 retrospectively included chest CT scans with 22 unique, clinically and/or histopathologically verified diagnoses were read by eight radiologists (four residents, four attending, median years reading chest CT scans 2.1± 0.7 and 12 ± 1.8, respectively). The radiologists read and provided the suspected diagnosis at a certified radiological workstation to simulate clinical routine. Half of the readings were done without CBIRS and half with the additional support of the CBIRS. The CBIRS retrieved the most likely of 19 lung-specific patterns from a large database of 6542 thin-section CT scans and provided relevant information (e.g., a list of potential differential diagnoses)., Results: Reading time decreased by 31.3% (p < 0.001) despite the radiologists searching for additional information more frequently when the CBIRS was available (154 [72%] vs. 95 [43%], p < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher overall diagnostic accuracy (42.2% vs 34.7%, p = 0.083) when the CBIRS was available., Conclusion: The use of the CBIRS had a beneficial impact on the reading time of chest CT scans in cases with DPLD. In addition, both resident and attending radiologists were more likely to consult informational resources if they had access to the CBIRS. Further studies are needed to confirm the observed trend towards increased diagnostic accuracy with the use of a CBIRS in practice., Key Points: • A content-based image retrieval system for supporting the diagnostic process of reading chest CT scans can decrease reading time by 31.3% (p < 0.001). • The decrease in reading time was present despite frequent usage of the content-based image retrieval system. • Additionally, a trend towards higher diagnostic accuracy was observed when using the content-based image retrieval system (42.2% vs 34.7%, p = 0.083)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Clinical Issue: Smoking-related interstitial lung diseases are a heterogeneous group of pulmonary abnormalities. The correct diagnosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications. This article introduces the most common smoking-related interstitial lung diseases and describes a structured approach to support the diagnostic workflow., Practical Recommendations: Computed tomography is pivotal in the diagnostic workflow of smoking-related interstitial lung diseases and may reduce the number of unnecessary lung biopsies. To achieve high diagnostic accuracy, a standardized scanning protocol, and a structured assessment approach should be utilized. During inflammatory stages of respiratory bronchiolitis (RB), respiratory bronchiolitis interstitial lung diseases (RB-ILD), and desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP), cessation of smoking as well as the use of steroids are the treatment of choice. In case of fibrotic changes (e.g., in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF]), antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib and pirfenidone may be used. Patients with suspected smoking-related interstitial lung disease should be discussed in interdisciplinary board meetings., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Clinical Issue: Diffuse parenchymal lung diseases include a heterogeneous group of diseases of the lung parenchyma, the alveolar spaces, the vessels and the airways, which can be triggered by various pathomechanisms, such as inflammation and fibrotic changes. Since the therapeutic approaches and prognoses differ significantly between the diseases, the correct diagnosis is of fundamental importance. In routine clinical practice, next to the patients' history, the clinical presentation, the laboratory findings and the bronchoscopy, imaging plays a central role in establishing a diagnosis., Practical Recommendations: The diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases is an enormous challenge for clinicians, radiologists as well as pathologists and should therefore preferably be carried out in a multidisciplinary setting. Since patients often present with unspecific, respiratory symptoms, chest radiographs are the first imaging method used. Many patterns of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (e.g., ground-glass opacities and consolidations), their distribution (e.g., cranial-caudal) and the presence of additional findings (e.g., mediastinal lymphadenopathy) are often already detectable on chest X‑rays. However, the imaging reference standard and thus, an integral part of the assessment of diffuse parenchymal lung disease, is the chest HR-CT. In some cases, the pattern of the HR-CT is pathognomonic, in others it is unspecific for a disease, so that further diagnostic steps are necessary., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To investigate the intra- and inter-scanner repeatability and reproducibility of CT radiomics features (RF) of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD)., Methods: For this prospective, IRB-approved test-retest study, CT data of sixty fILD patients were acquired. Group A (n = 30) underwent one repeated CT scan on a single scanner. Group B (n = 30) was scanned using two different CT scanners. All CT data were reconstructed using different reconstruction kernels (soft, intermediate, sharp) and slice thicknesses (one and three millimeters), resulting in twelve datasets per patient. Following ROI placement in fibrotic lung tissue, 86 RF were extracted. Intra- and inter-scanner RF repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for corresponding kernels and slice thicknesses, and between lung-specific and non-lung-specific reconstruction parameters. Furthermore, test-retest lung volumes were compared., Results: Test-retest demonstrated a majority of RF is highly repeatable for all reconstruction parameter combinations. Intra-scanner reproducibility was negatively affected by reconstruction kernel changes, and further reduced by slice thickness alterations. Inter-scanner reproducibility was highly variable, reconstruction parameter-specific, and greatest if either soft kernels and three-millimeter slice thickness, or lung-specific reconstruction parameters were used for both scans. Test-retest lung volumes showed no significant difference., Conclusion: CT RF of fILD are highly repeatable for constant reconstruction parameters in a single scanner. Intra- and inter-scanner reproducibility are severely impacted by alterations in slice thickness more than reconstruction kernel, and are reconstruction parameter-specific. These findings may facilitate CT data and RF selection and assessment in future fILD radiomics studies collecting data across scanners., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)