Search

Background: For patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations, osimertinib is the standard of care. Investigating the activity and safety of osimertinib in patients with EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations is of clinical interest., Patients and Methods: Patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with confirmed EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations were eligible. Patients were required to have measurable disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients were required to be EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive. The primary objective was objective response rate, and secondary objectives were progression-free survival, safety, and overall survival. The study used a two-stage design with a plan to enroll 17 patients in the first stage, and the study was terminated after the first stage due to slow accrual., Results: Between May 2018 and March 2020, 17 patients were enrolled and received study therapy. The median age of patients was 70 years (interquartile range 62-76), the majority were female (n = 11), had a performance status of 1 (n = 10), and five patients had brain metastases at baseline. The objective response rate was 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23% to 72%], and the radiographic responses observed were partial response (n = 8), stable disease (n = 8), and progressive disease (n = 1). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.0-15.2 months), and the median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 7.3-29.2 months). The median duration on treatment was 6.1 months (range 3.6-11.9 months), and the most common adverse events (regardless of attribution) were diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and dyspnea., Conclusions: This trial suggests osimertinib has activity in patients with these uncommon EGFR mutations., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The phase III PACIFIC trial (NCT02125461) established consolidation durvalumab as standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no disease progression following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In some cases, patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC are considered operable, but the relative benefit of surgery is unclear. We report a post hoc, exploratory analysis of clinical outcomes in the PACIFIC trial, in patients with or without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC., Materials and Methods: Patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression after ≥2 cycles of platinum-based, concurrent CRT were randomized 2 : 1 to receive durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; once every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) or placebo, 1-42 days after CRT. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS; assessed by blinded independent central review according to RECIST version 1.1) and overall survival (OS). Treatment effects within subgroups were estimated by hazard ratios (HRs) from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Of 713 randomized patients, 287 (40%) had stage IIIA-N2 disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. With a median follow-up of 14.5 months (range: 0.2-29.9 months), PFS was improved with durvalumab versus placebo in both patients with [HR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.65] and without (HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80) stage IIIA-N2 disease. Similarly, with a median follow-up of 25.2 months (range: 0.2-43.1 months), OS was improved with durvalumab versus placebo in patients with (HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.39-0.79) or without (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.57-1.06) stage IIIA-N2 disease. Durvalumab had a manageable safety profile irrespective of stage IIIA-N2 status., Conclusions: Consistent with the intent-to-treat population, treatment benefits with durvalumab were confirmed in patients with stage IIIA-N2, unresectable NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for patients who are deemed operable., Competing Interests: Disclosure SS reports participating on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, BeiGene, Eli Lilly, and Varian Medical Systems; and institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Varian Medical Systems, and ViewRay Inc. MÖ reports receiving personal fees from Janssen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and MSD; and reports receiving a research grant from Janssen. DD reports receiving institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Genentech, Guardant Health, Janssen Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, G1 Therapeutics, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, AbbVie, ARMO Biosciences, Immunomedics, Eli Lilly, Merus NV, and Daiichi Sankyo. AV reports receiving personal fees for participating in a speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca. DV reports receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca; receiving institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche; undertaking a consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MDS Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech; and receiving travel/accommodation/expenses from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche. SM reports receiving institutional research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and receiving travel/accommodations/expenses from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical. RH reports participating on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Seagen, and Roche; receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Seagen, and Roche; receiving research funding (paid to the institution) from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Onosec, Roche, and Seagen; and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Novartis. CF-F reports receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca; participating in a speaker’s bureau and an advisory board for AstraZeneca (fees paid to institution); is a scientific committee member/chair for AstraZeneca; and reports receiving research funding and travel, accommodations, or expenses from AstraZeneca and Elekta. LP-A reports being board member of Genomica; participating in a leadership role for ALTUM Sequencing; participating in a speaker’s bureau for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merk Serono, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche/Genentech; receiving honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Incyte, Ipsen, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Sysmex, and Takeda; receiving research funding (paid to the institution) from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kura Oncology, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and PharmaMar; and receiving travel, accommodations, or expenses from Roche, AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca Spain, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda. YLW reports receiving institutional research support from Roche, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim; receiving consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Roche, and Merck; and receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/China, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Merck. HM is an employee of AstraZeneca and holds stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. PAD is a former employee of AstraZeneca and holds stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. SJA reports a consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Achilles Therapeutics, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, CBMG, Celsius Therapeutics, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Memgen, Merck, RAPT Therapeutics, Samyang, Tarus Therapeutics, and Venn Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Acquired resistance (AR) to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade is frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in a majority of initial responders. Patients with AR may have unique properties of persistent antitumor immunity that could be re-harnessed by investigational immunotherapies. The absence of a consistent clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade and lack of uniform criteria for ensuing enrollment in clinical trials remains a major barrier to progress; such clinical definitions have advanced biologic and therapeutic discovery. We examine the considerations and potential controversies in developing a patient-level definition of AR in NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. Taking into account the specifics of NSCLC biology and corresponding treatment strategies, we propose a practical, clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade for use in clinical reports and prospective clinical trials. Patients should meet the following criteria: received treatment that includes PD-(L)1 blockade; experienced objective response on PD-(L)1 blockade (inclusion of a subset of stable disease will require future investigation); have progressive disease occurring within 6 months of last anti-PD-(L)1 antibody treatment or rechallenge with anti-PD-(L)1 antibody in patients not exposed to anti-PD-(L)1 in 6 months., Competing Interests: Disclosure AJS reports consulting/advising role to J&J and Perceptive Advisors. SJA reports consulting/advising role from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, CBMG, AstraZeneca, Memgen, RAPT, and Venn, Achilles Therapeutics, Celsius, Samyang Biopharma, Glaxo Smith Klein, Amgen, other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Rapt, Achilles Therapeutics, Celsius, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, grants from Novartis; expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, CBMG, AstraZeneca, Memgen, RAPT, and Venn, Achilles Therapeutics, Celsius, Samyang Biopharma, Glaxo Smith Klein, Amgen, other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Rapt, Achilles Therapeutics, Celsius, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, grants from Novartis. MMA reports grants and personal fees from Genentech, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants from Lilly, personal fees from Maverick, personal fees from Blueprint Medicine, personal fees from Syndax, personal fees from Ariad, personal fees from Nektar, personal fees from Gritstone, personal fees from ArcherDx, personal fees from Mirati, personal fees from NextCure, personal fees from EMD Serono. EF reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Blue Print Medicines, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Medscape, personal fees from Merck KGaA, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from PeerVoice, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from prIME Oncology, personal fees from Puma Biotechnology, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Springer, personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from TouchIME, grants from Grant for Oncology Innovation (GOI), grants from Fundación Merck Salud, outside the submitted work; and Grífols: Independent Member of the Board. JG reports grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Takeda, grants and personal fees from Blueprint, grants and personal fees from Loxo, personal fees from Oncorus, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Incyte, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Agios, personal fees from Amgen, grants from Array, grants from Tesaro, grants from Moderna, grants from Adaptimmune, grants from Alexo, personal fees from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from EMD Serono, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Mirati. SNG reports personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Nektar, other from Genentech, other from Ariad/Takeda, other from Iovance Biotherapeutics, during the conduct of the study. FSH reports grants, personal fees and other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from EMD Serono, grants, personal fees and other from Novartis, personal fees from Surface, personal fees from Compass Therapeutics, personal fees from Apricity, personal fees from Aduro, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Pionyr, personal fees from 7 Hills Pharma, personal fees from Verastem, personal fees from Torque, personal fees from Rheos, personal fees from Kairos, personal fees from Bicara, from Psioxus Therapeutics, other from Pieris Pharmaceutical, from Zumutor, from Corner Therapeutics, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Checkpoint Therapeutics, outside the submitted work; In addition, FSH has a patent Methods for Treating MICA-Related Disorders (#20100111973) with royalties paid, a patent Tumor antigens and uses thereof (#7250291) issued, a patent Angiopoiten-2 Biomarkers Predictive of Anti-immune checkpoint response (#20170248603) pending, a patent Compositions and Methods for Identification, Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Melanoma using PD-L1 Isoforms (#20160340407) pending, a patent Therapeutic peptides (#20160046716) pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides (#20140004112) pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides (#20170022275) pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides (#20170008962) pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides Patent number: 9402905 issued, a patent Methods of using pembrolizumab and trebananib pending, a patent Vaccine compositions and methods for restoring NKG2D pathway function against cancers Patent number: 10279021 issued, a patent Antibodies that bind to MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A Patent number: 10106611 issued, and a patent Anti- galectin antibody biomarkers predictive of anti-immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenesis responses. Publication number: 20170343552 pending. MLJ reports other from Achilles Therapeutics, grants and other from AstraZeneca, grants and other from Atreca, grants and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and other from Calithera Biosciences, grants and other from EMD Serono, grants and other from Roche/Genentech, grants and other from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and other from Gritstone Oncology, grants and other from Guardant Health, grants and other from Incyte, grants and other from Janssen Research and Development, grants and other from Lilly, grants and other from Merck, grants and other from Mirati Therapeutics, grants and other from Novartis, grants and other from Pfizer, grants and other from Sanofi-Aventis, grants from AbbVie, grants from Acerta Pharma, grants from Adaptimmune, grants and other from Amgen, grants from Apexigen, grants from Array BioPharma, grants from BeiGene, grants from Checkpoint Therapeutics, grants from Corvus Pharmaceuticals, grants from CytomX, grants and other from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Dynavax Technologies, grants from Genmab, grants from Genocea Biosciences, grants from Hengrui Therapeutics, grants from Immunocore, grants from Jounce Therapeutics, grants from Kadmon Pharmaceuticals, grants from Loxo Oncology, grants from Lycera, grants from Neovia Oncology, grants from OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, grants from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, grants from Shattuck Labs, grants from Stem CentRx, grants from Syndax Pharmaceuticals, grants from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, grants from Tarveda, grants from University of Michigan, grants and other from WindMIL Therapeutics, grants from TCR2 Therapeutics, grants from Arcus Biosciences, grants and other from Ribon Therapeutics, grants from Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals, other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Astellas, personal fees from Otsuka, grants from BerGenBio, grants from Foundation Medicine, other from G1 Therapeutics, grants from Tmunity Therapeutics. NBL reports grants and personal fees for CME lectures from MSD and BMS. CML reports other from Cepheid, other from Syros, other from Foundation Medicine, other from Novartis, other from Astra Zeneca, other from Takeda, other from Amgen, other from Blueprints Medicine, other from Genentech, other from Eli Lilly/Loxo, other from Pfizer, other from Roche, other from Achilles, from null, outside the submitted work. TM reports personal fees from AbbVie, Inc., personal fees and other from ACEA Pharma, personal fees and other from Alpha Biopharma Co. Ltd., personal fees and other from Amgen, personal fees and other from Amoy Diagnostics Co. Ltd., grants, personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees and other from BeiGene, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants, personal fees and other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees and other from Blueprint Medicines Corporation, personal fees and other from CStone Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and other from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees and other from Eisai, personal fees and other from Fishawack Facilitate Ltd., other from geneDecode, personal fees and other from Gritstone Oncology Inc., personal fees and other from Guardant Health, personal fees and other from Hengrui Therapeutics, personal fees and other from Ignyta Inc., personal fees and other from IQVIA, personal fees and other from Incyte Corporation, personal fees from InMed Medical Communication, personal fees and other from Janssen, personal fees and other from Lilly, personal fees and other from Loxo-Oncology, personal fees and other from Lunit, Inc., personal fees from MD Health (Brazil), personal fees from Medscape/WebMD, grants, personal fees and other from Merck Serono, grants, personal fees and other from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees and other from Mirati Therapeutics Inc., personal fees from MoreHealth, grants, personal fees and other from Novartis, personal fees and other from OrigiMed, personal fees from PeerVoice, personal fees from Physicians' Education Resource, personal fees from P. Permanyer SL, grants, personal fees and other from Pfizer, Inc, personal fees from prIME Oncology, personal fees and other from Puma Technology Inc, personal fees from Research to Practice, grants, personal fees and other from Roche, personal fees and other from Sanofi-Aventis R&D, personal fees and other from Takeda, personal fees from Touch Medical Media, other from Virtus Medical Group, personal fees and other from Yuhan Corporation, other from AstraZeneca PLC, other from Hutchison Chi-Med, other from Sanomics Ltd., grants from Clovis Oncology, grants from SFJ Pharmaceuticals, grants from XCovery, outside the submitted work. MP reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees from ELI LILLY, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and non-financial support from B Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal fees and non-financial support from Chugai, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Illumina, personal fees from Gritstone, outside the submitted work. MR reports personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Mirati, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Samsung, outside the submitted work. BS reports personal fees from Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Loxo Oncology, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from PharmaMar, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. J-CS reports other from AstraZeneca, other from AstraZeneca, during the conduct of the study; other from Gritstone Oncology, other from Daiichi Sankyo, other from Relay Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. DSWT reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Celgene, grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from LOXO, personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Takeda, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Merrimack, outside the submitted work. SP reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Biocartis, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Bistrol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Debiopharm, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, personal fees from Foundation Medicine, personal fees from Illumina, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Merrimack, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pharma Mar, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Seattle Genetics and Takeda, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Takeda, non-financial support from Sponsored by Amgen, non-financial support from AstraZeneca, non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, non-financial support from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, non-financial support from Clovis, non-financial support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, non-financial support from Illumina, non-financial support from Merck Sharp and Dohme, non-financial support from Merck Serono, non-financial support from Novartis, non-financial support from Pfizer, non-financial support from Sanofi, personal fees from Bioinvent, outside the submitted work. All fees to institution. MDH reports personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Genentech/Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Mirati, personal fees from Syndax, personal fees and other from Shattuck Labs, personal fees from Nektar, personal fees and other from Immunai, personal fees and other from Arcus, from Eli Lilly, during the conduct of the study; In addition, Dr. Hellmann has a patent A patent filed by Memorial Sloan Kettering related to the use of tumor mutational burden to predict response to immunotherapy (PCT/US2015/062208) licensed to PGDx., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the PACIFIC trial, durvalumab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) versus placebo, with manageable safety, in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without progression after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We report exploratory analyses of outcomes by tumour cell (TC) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or placebo ≤12 months, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history, but not PD-L1 status. Where available, pre-CRT samples were tested for PD-L1 expression (immunohistochemistry) and scored at pre-specified (25%) and post hoc (1%) TC cut-offs. Treatment-effect hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from unstratified Cox proportional hazards models (Kaplan-Meier-estimated medians)., Results: In total, 713 patients were randomly assigned, 709 of whom received at least 1 dose of study treatment durvalumab (n = 473) or placebo (n = 236). Some 451 (63%) were PD-L1-assessable: 35%, 65%, 67%, 33%, and 32% had TC ≥25%, <25%, ≥1%, <1%, and 1%-24%, respectively. As of 31 January 2019, median follow-up was 33.3 months. Durvalumab improved PFS versus placebo (primary-analysis data cut-off, 13 February 2017) across all subgroups [HR, 95% confidence interval (CI); medians]: TC ≥25% (0.41, 0.26-0.65; 17.8 versus 3.7 months), <25% (0.59, 0.43-0.82; 16.9 versus 6.9 months), ≥1% (0.46, 0.33-0.64; 17.8 versus 5.6 months), <1% (0.73, 0.48-1.11; 10.7 versus 5.6 months), 1%-24% [0.49, 0.30-0.80; not reached (NR) versus 9.0 months], and unknown (0.59, 0.42-0.83; 14.0 versus 6.4 months). Durvalumab improved OS across most subgroups (31 January 2019 data cut-off; HR, 95% CI; medians): TC ≥ 25% (0.50, 0.30-0.83; NR versus 21.1 months), <25% (0.89, 0.63-1.25; 39.7 versus 37.4 months), ≥1% (0.59, 0.41-0.83; NR versus 29.6 months), 1%-24% (0.67, 0.41-1.10; 43.3 versus 30.5 months), and unknown (0.60, 0.43-0.84; 44.2 versus 23.5 months), but not <1% (1.14, 0.71-1.84; 33.1 versus 45.6 months). Safety was similar across subgroups., Conclusions: PFS benefit with durvalumab was observed across all subgroups, and OS benefit across all but TC <1%, for which limitations and wide HR CI preclude robust conclusions., Competing Interests: Disclosure LP-A is a board member of Genomica and has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Pharmamar, Novartis, Celgene, Sysmex, Amgen, and Incyte, and travel, accommodations or expenses from Roche, AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca Spain, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer; AS has received advisory fees from Array BioPharma and Incyte, honoraria from CytomX Therapeutics, AstraZeneca/MedImmune and Merck, research funding from LAM Therapeutics, and institutional research support from Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, NewLink Genetics, Incyte, AbbVie, Ignyta, LAM Therapeutics, TrovaGene, Takeda, MacroGenics, CytomX Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Loxo, and Arch Therapeutics; DR has received honoraria from Merck and Nanobiotix, consultant fees from AstraZeneca and Suvica, and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, Genentech, and Nanobiotix; DP has received advisory or lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, and Roche, honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, and Roche, institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Medimmune, Sanofi-Aventis, Taiho Pharma, Novocure, and Daiichi Sankyo, and travel, accommodations or expenses from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Merck, Novartis, prIME Oncology, and Pfizer; DD has received institutional research funding from E.R. Squibb and Sons, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Celgene, and Roche; AV has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Seattle Genetics; RH has received advisory fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Eli Lilly; SS has received research grants from Varian Medical Systems and ViewRay Inc., and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Celgene; CJL has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Takeda, and Gilead; and travel, accommodations or expenses from Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Pfizer; BAP has received advisory fees from AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and institutional research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb. A-MB and PAD are full-time employees of AstraZeneca with stock ownership; HB is an independent contractor, funded by AstraZeneca; CW was a full-time employee of AstraZeneca when the work was completed; SJA has received advisory fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Cellular Biomedicine Group, and Memgen; CF-F has received research funding and travel support from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Elekta, and travel support from Pfizer; the remaining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Long-term data with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Two phase III trials demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and a favorable safety profile with the anti-programmed death-1 antibody nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (CheckMate 017) and nonsquamous (CheckMate 057) NSCLC. We report results from ≥3 years' follow-up, including subgroup analyses of patients with liver metastases, who historically have poorer prognosis among patients with NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. The primary end point of each study was OS. Patients with baseline liver metastases were pooled across studies by treatment for subgroup analyses., Results: After 40.3 months' minimum follow-up in CheckMate 017 and 057, nivolumab continued to show an OS benefit versus docetaxel: estimated 3-year OS rates were 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 14% to 21%] versus 8% (95% CI, 6% to 11%) in the pooled population with squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC. Nivolumab was generally well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified. Of 854 randomized patients across both studies, 193 had baseline liver metastases. Nivolumab resulted in improved OS compared with docetaxel in patients with liver metastases (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91), consistent with findings from the overall pooled study population (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81). Rates of treatment-related hepatic adverse events (primarily grade 1-2 liver enzyme elevations) were slightly higher in nivolumab-treated patients with liver metastases (10%) than in the overall pooled population (6%)., Conclusions: After 3 years' minimum follow-up, nivolumab continued to demonstrate an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. Similarly, nivolumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in patients with liver metastases, and remained well tolerated., Clinical Trial Registration: CheckMate 017: NCT01642004; CheckMate 057: NCT01673867.

While mutations in the KRAS oncogene are among the most prevalent in human cancer, there are few successful treatments to target these tumors. It is also likely that heterogeneity in KRAS-mutant tumor biology significantly contributes to the response to therapy. We hypothesized that the presence of commonly co-occurring mutations in STK11 and TP53 tumor suppressors may represent a significant source of heterogeneity in KRAS-mutant tumors. To address this, we utilized a large cohort of resected tumors from 442 lung adenocarcinoma patients with data including annotation of prevalent driver mutations (KRAS and EGFR) and tumor suppressor mutations (STK11 and TP53), microarray-based gene expression and clinical covariates, including overall survival (OS). Specifically, we determined impact of STK11 and TP53 mutations on a new KRAS mutation-associated gene expression signature as well as previously defined signatures of tumor cell proliferation and immune surveillance responses. Interestingly, STK11, but not TP53 mutations, were associated with highly elevated expression of KRAS mutation-associated genes. Mutations in TP53 and STK11 also impacted tumor biology regardless of KRAS status, with TP53 strongly associated with enhanced proliferation and STK11 with suppression of immune surveillance. These findings illustrate the remarkably distinct ways through which tumor suppressor mutations may contribute to heterogeneity in KRAS-mutant tumor biology. In addition, these studies point to novel associations between gene mutations and immune surveillance that could impact the response to immunotherapy.

The advances that have been made over the past decade in the field of gene transfer as well as in the fields of immunology and the molecular biology of tumorigenesis have brought to reality the possibility of using gene transfer as an anti-cancer treatment modality. The published results of clinical trials using this approach to date have been very limited, and a considerable amount of work still needs to be done in order to make this an effective treatment modality. However the developments that have occurred in the past several years indicate that this modality will become efficacious in the foreseeable future.

Nine patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer were entered into a phase II trial designed to determine the feasibility of giving a combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus cisplatin concurrent with thoracic radiation. Paclitaxel was given as a 24-hour infusion (135 mg/m2) followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) every 4 weeks, for a total of four cycles. Thoracic radiation was given concurrently with the first two cycles of chemotherapy, for a total dose of 64.8 Gy over 6 weeks. Neutropenia and esophagitis were the most common toxicities, with 66% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 55% experiencing grade 3 or 4 esophagitis. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity developed in 33% of patients. All patients were able to receive the full dose of radiation, although half of the patients required some modification of the chemotherapy regimen. There was one complete response and four partial responses, yielding a 56% overall response rate. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to treat patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer with paclitaxel/cisplatin plus concurrent thoracic radiation, with a degree of toxicity comparable with that associated with a degree of toxicity comparable with that associated with other concurrent combined-modality regimens for this disease.