Search

Introduction: This phase I study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the carboplatin paclitaxel combination, given without routine growth factor support to previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer., Patients and Methods: Fifty patients (one stage IIIa, 31 stage IIIb and 18 stage IV) were sequentially assigned to one of 14 treatment groups in which paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered in doses ranging from 130 to 235 mg/m2 and from 230 to 375 mg/m2 , respectively. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h intravenous infusion using non-polyvinylchloride tubing and connectors. The carboplatin infusion, over 30 min, was administered at the completion of the paclitaxel infusion., Results: The MTD for the combination has been reached at 235 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and at 375 mg/m2 of carboplatin. The combination shows a good safety profile with very few and brief episodes of neutropenia without any infectious episodes. At the doses tested thrombocytopenia did not occur at all. Among 47 assessable patients there was one complete response and 17 partial responses for an overall response rate of 38%. There has been a tendency to a dose-response relationship for the combination with only six partial responses (27%) reported in 22 patients who received paclitaxel at doses < or = 195 mg/m2 and carboplatin at doses < 350 mg/m2 and 12 partial responses in 25 patients (48%) receiving paclitaxel > 195 mg/m2 and carboplatin > or = 350 mg/m2, respectively. The median event-free survival time is 33 weeks (range, 4-156 +). With a minimum follow up duration of 57 weeks the median overall survival time is 51.81 weeks (range, 7-162 +) and the 1-year survival rate is 49%., Conclusion: In advanced NSCLC the carboplatin-paclitaxel combination can be safely administered at the doses of 375 and 225 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, it appears to be active and well tolerated.

Twenty-three patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (median age 62 years, Karnofsky PS 50-100) were treated with cisplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1) and teniposide (80 mg/m2, days 1, 3 and 5) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced brain CT every two to three cycles of treatment. The objective response rate of brain metastases was 35% (8/23); three patients achieved complete response (CR) and five partial response (PR). The median response duration was 24 weeks for CR patients and 32 weeks for PR patients. The median survival was 21 weeks overall and 45 weeks for responding patients. Grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 28 and 9%, respectively. Two patients died from infections while in neutropenia. Cisplatin and teniposide seems an active regimen against brain metastases in NSCLC. These data may indicate the need for reconsideration of the role of chemotherapy for brain metastases of NSCLC.

Background: In our previous experience with chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the combination of mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) showed the highest activity in a three-arm randomized trial; the MIC regimen also yielded the most toxic effects, with 8% WHO grade 2-4 nephrotoxicity, 21% grade 3-4 leukopenia and 10% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. In that study cisplatin (120 mg/m2) was delivered on day 1 and ifosfamide and mitomycin on day 2. In an effort to reduce MIC toxicity a modified regimen was tested in a phase II trial: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was given on day 2 and ifosfamide on day 1 with mitomycin., Patients and Methods: From November 1993 to December 1995, 70 advanced NSCLC patients entered the trial., Results: Twenty-nine of 70 patients achieved major response (41%) with 6 complete (9%) and 23 partial remissions (33%). We recorded 4% of WHO grade 3-4 anemia, and 2% of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: We confirmed the activity of the MIC regimen in NSCLC, and the modified schedule seems to substantially improve the safety of the combination.

This ongoing phase I study sought to establish the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given without routine growth factor support to previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion. The carboplatin infusion was administered over 30 minutes immediately afterward. Patients were assigned sequentially to one of eight treatment groups in which paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered in doses ranging from 130 to 185 mg/m2 and from 230 to 350 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-four patients have been treated to date, and the maximum tolerated dose has been reached at paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 and carboplatin 350 mg/m2. The combination has an excellent safety profile, with only a few, short-lasting episodes of neutropenia observed and no evidence of infection. At the doses tested, thrombocytopenia has not occurred.

Background: High-dose radiation therapy is generally recommended as standard treatment in regionally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but median- and long-term survival remain poor. Some reports have recently shown an improvement of results in advanced NSCLC when cisplatin was included in the chemotherapy regimens. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial to determine whether induction chemotherapy before high-dose radiotherapy improves response rate and survival in stage III NSCLC over that achieved with radiotherapy alone., Patients and Methods: From March, 1984 to December, 1988, 66 consecutive patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC were randomized to one of two treatment arms; 61 were evaluable for survival and 58 for response and toxicity. Patients randomly assigned to arm A received cisplatin (CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 1) and etoposide (VP 16 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3) every 3 wks for 3 courses followed by radiotherapy 56 Gy on pre-treatment tumor volume and 40 Gy on mediastinum and bilateral supraclavicular nodes. Patients assigned to arm B received only the same radiotherapy. The 61 eligible patients were comparable in terms of age, performance status, histology and treatment., Results: Response rate was 53% in arm A and 32% in arm B. The median survival was 52 wks for the combined treatment arm and 36 wks for the radiation therapy arm. At six years of follow-up all the patients were dead. Toxicity was mild and no treatment-related deaths were recorded., Conclusion: Induction chemotherapy produced a better response rate and a trend of improved survival (4 months) but a significant survival advantage was not achieved (p < 0.11), probably because of the small number of patients enrolled in the trial.

Survival in patients with locally advanced (stage III Mo) and metastatic (Ml) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is short. Phase II studies have reported objective responses ranging from 20% to 60% using cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimens, yet few have shown improvement in median survival. In our phase II pilot studies with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16), we observed a 26% response rate; with CDDP, VP-16, and mitomycin-C, a 38% response rate was obtained in advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 156 consecutive patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC were randomized to one of three treatment arms to determine whether the chemotherapy protocols had any effect on response rate and median survival in a large, randomized study. Arm 1 consisted of CDDP (120 mg/m2 x 3 weeks); arm 2, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 given i.v. on days 1-3), repeated every 3 weeks; and arm 3, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 on days 1-3) given every 3 weeks, plus mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 on days 1, 21, and 42, then every 6 weeks, for a maximal dose of 100 mg). After 71 patients had been enrolled in the study, we stopped accrual in the CDDP arm due to a lack of response [1 complete response (CR) in 24 patients; 4%] and continued enrollment in the two combination-chemotherapy arms. In the CDDP/VP-16 arm a 30% response rate [1 CR, 18 partial responses (PRs)] was obtained, and in the CDDP/VP-16 mitomycin C arm a 26% response rate (4 CRs, 11 PRs) was seen among a total of 150 evaluable patients. Responses were observed in 31% of patients with favorable performance status (PS) (ECOG 0-1) vs 14% in patients with a poor PS (ECOG 2-3). Of patients with locally advanced disease (III Mo), 17 (33%) obtained an objective response, compared with 20 patients (20%) with metastatic disease. Median survival was 18 weeks in the CDDP arm, 35 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16 arm, and 37 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16/mitomycin C arm. The median survival in the multimodal chemotherapy arms was significantly greater than that obtained with CDDP alone. Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression in the mitomycin C-containing arm (27%, wtto grade 3-4). Our study shows that combination chemotherapy using CDDP/VP-16 is active and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with a good performance status. The addition of mitomycin C did not improve the therapeutic response.

One hundred fifty-six patients with metastatic or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized to 3-week cycles of treatment with either: (A) cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1); (B) cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1) plus etoposide (VP-16) (100 mg/m2 on days 1-3; and (C) the cisplatin plus etoposide (VP-16) regimen plus mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 on days 1, 21, and 42; then every 6 weeks for a maximum dose of 100 mg). The overall objective response rates for the combination regimens (30% with two drugs and 26% with three drugs) were superior to that obtained with one drug (4%). Likewise, the median duration of survival with the combination therapy arms (8 to 9 months) was superior to that obtained with the single agent (5 months). Both performance status and limited disease were correlated with response in all groups, and with survival in the combined chemotherapy arms. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, especially for the group receiving the three-drug regimen. In summary, combination chemotherapy using cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16) appears to be the most active and safest regimen in NSCLC.