Search

The objective of this study was to create a new treatment for lung cancer using solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) loaded with gemcitabine (GEM) and epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) that can be administered through the nose. We analyzed the formulation for its effectiveness in terms of micromeritics, drug release, and anti-cancer activity in the benzopyrene-induced Swiss albino mice lung cancer model. We also assessed the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, biocompatibility, and hemocompatibility of GEM-EGCG SLNs. The GEM-EGCG SLNs had an average particle size of 93.54 ± 11.02 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.146 ± 0.05, and a zeta potential of -34.7 ± 0.4 mV. The entrapment efficiency of GEM and EGCG was 93.39 ± 4.2% and 89.49 ± 5.1%, respectively, with a sustained release profile for both drugs. GEM-EGCG SLNs had better pharmacokinetics than other treatments, and a high drug targeting index value of 17.605 for GEM and 2.118 for EGCG, indicating their effectiveness in targeting the lungs. Blank SLNs showed no pathological lesions in the liver, kidney, and nasal region validating the safety of SLNs. GEM-EGCG SLNs also showed fewer pathological lesions than other treatments and a lower hemolysis rate of 1.62 ± 0.10%. These results suggest that GEM-EGCG SLNs could effectively treat lung cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Aim: Sequential treatment with paclitaxel (PTXL) and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered clinically beneficial for non-small-cell lung cancer. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a nano-system capable of sequential release of PTXL and GEM within cancer cells., Methods: PTXL-ss-poly(6- O -methacryloyl-d-galactopyranose)-GEM (PTXL-ss-PMAGP-GEM) was designed by conjugating PMAGP with PTXL via disulfide bonds (-ss-), while GEM via succinic anhydride (PTXL:GEM=1:3). An amphiphilic block copolymer N-acetyl-d-glucosamine(NAG)-poly(styrene-alt-maleic anhydride) 58 -b-polystyrene 130 acted as a targeting moiety and emulsifier in formation of nanostructures (NLCs)., Results: The PTXL-ss-PMAGP-GEM/NAG NLCs (119.6 nm) provided a sequential in vitro release of, first PTXL (redox-triggered), then GEM (pH-triggered). The redox- and pH-sensitive NLCs readily distributed homogenously in the cytoplasm. NAG augmented the uptake of NLCs by the cancer cells and tumor accumulation. PTXL-ss-PMAGP-GEM/NAG NLCs exhibited synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro and strongest antitumor effects in tumor-bearing mice compared to NLCs lacking pH/redox sensitivities or free drug combination., Conclusion: This study demonstrated the abilities of PTXL-ss-PMAGP-GEM/NAG NLCs to achieve synergistic antitumor effect by targeted intracellularly sequential drug release., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2020 Liang et al.)

Formulated forms of cancer therapeutics enhance the efficacy of treatment by more precise targeting, increased bioavailability of drugs, and an aptitude of some delivery systems to overcome multiple drug resistance of tumors. Drug carriers acquire importance for anti-cancer interventions via targeting tumor-associated macrophages with active molecules capable to either eliminate them or change their polarity. Although several packaged drug forms have reached the market, there is still a high demand for novel carrier systems to hurdle limitations of existing drugs on active molecules, toxicity, bioeffect, and stability. Here, we report a facile assembly and delivery methodology for biodegradable polymeric multilayer capsules (PMC) with the purpose of further use in injectable drug formulations for lung cancer therapy via direct erosion of tumors and suppression of the tumor-promoting function of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. We demonstrate delivery of low-molecular-weight drug molecules to lung cancer cells and macrophages and provide details on in vivo distribution, cellular uptake, and disintegration of the developed PMC. Poly-l-arginine and dextran sulfate alternately adsorb on a ∼500 nm CaCO 3 sacrificial template followed by removal of the inorganic core to obtain hollow capsules for consequent loading with drug molecules, gemcitabine or clodronate. The capsules further compacted upon loading down to ∼250 nm in diameter via heat treatment. A comparative study of the capsule internalization rate in vitro and in vivo reveals the benefits of a diminished carrier size . We show that macrophages and epithelial cells of the lungs and liver internalize capsules with efficacy higher than 75%. Using an in vivo mouse model of lung cancer, we also confirm that tumor lungs better retain smaller capsules than the healthy lung tissue. The pronounced cytotoxic effect of the encapsulated gemcitabine on lung cancer cells and the ability of the encapsulated clodronate to block the tumor-promoting function of macrophages prove the efficacy of the developed capsule loading method in vitro. Our study taken as a whole demonstrates the great potential of the developed PMC for in vivo treatment of cancer via transporting active molecules, including those that are water-soluble with low molecular weight, to both cancer cells and macrophages through the bloodstream.

Background: Compared to polymeric nanoparticles prepared using non-lipid surfactants, lecithin addition forms larger nanoparticles and exhibits higher drug loading and the stability of nanoparticles can be conferred by adding Vitamin E Polyethylene Glycol Succinate (TPGS) into the formulation., Aim: The aim of this study is to prepare Gemcitabine (Gem) loaded lecithin/PLGA nanoparticles. Moreover, the effect of TPGS and sodium cholate (SK) on the preparation of lecithin/PLGA nanoparticles was compared., Methods: It was found that while PC addition into PLGATPGS nanoparticles formed larger particles (251.3± 6.0 nm for Gem-PLGATPGS NPs and 516,9 ± 3.9 nm for Gem-PLGA-PCTPGS NPs), the particle size of PLGASK nanoparticles was not affected by lecithin addition (p>0.05;)., Results: In cytotoxicity studies, it was found that the SK-MES-1 cell inhibition rates of Gem-PLGATPGS NPs, Gem-PLGA-PCTPGS NPs, Gem-PLGASK NPs, Gem-PLGA-PCSK NPs were similar with free Gem (p>0.05;). In cytotoxicity studies, it was found that the encapsulation into nanoparticles did not change the cytotoxicity of the drug. However, higher cellular uptake has been observed when the lecithin was used in the preparation of PLGA nanoparticles., Conclusion: Compared with free Gem, the Gem-loaded nanoparticles enhanced the uptake of the drug by SK-MES-1 cells which can increase the effect of gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer therapy., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Gemcitabine hydrochloride (GCH) is drug of choice for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. This project aims to formulate GCH-loaded spherulites for lung targeting using soyabean phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol (Chol) and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino(polyethylene glycol)-2000]. Vesicles were characterised for size, entrapment efficiency, drug release and in vitro cytotoxicity. Radiolabelling of GCH was done using reduced technetium-99 m to study biodistribution in Sprague-Dawley rats. Discrete and spherical, PEGylated and non-PEGylated spherulites with an average size of 200 nm as seen in transmission electron microscopy had an entrapment efficiency of 76.28% and 77.42%, respectively. PEGylated spherulites showed sustained release followed by non-PEGylated and plain drug. GCH spherulites exhibited significantly higher cytotoxicity and apoptosis at reduced concentration than GCH solution. The radiolabelled complex showed high binding and radiolabelling efficiency. Gamma scintigraphy showed that GCH-loaded PEGylated spherulites were able to localise within lungs in higher concentration than non-PEGylated followed by plain drug.

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the establishment of a human cancer xenograft model using samples from computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsy. Fresh tumor tissues obtained from 10 cancer patients by CT-guided percutaneous biopsy were subcutaneously inoculated into NOD-Prkdcem26Il2rgem26Nju (NCG) mice to establish human patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models. The formation of first and second generation xenografts was observed, and tumor volume was recorded over time. Tumor tissue consistency between the PDTX model and primary tumors in patients was compared using H&E staining and immunohistochemistry. Pharmacodynamic tests of clinically used chemotherapeutic drugs were conducted on second generation xenografts, and their effects on tumor growth and body weight were observed. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy samples were successfully collected from 10 patients with advanced cancers. The PDTX model was established in mice using tumor samples obtained from 4 cancer patients, including one small cell carcinoma sample, two adenocarcinoma samples, and one squamous cell carcinoma sample. The success rate was 40%. The obtained PDTX model maintained a degree of differentiation, and morphological and structural characteristics were similar to primary tumors. The pharmacodynamic test of chemotherapeutic drugs in the PDTX model revealed a therapeutic effect on tumor growth, as expected. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy samples can be effectively used to establish a PDTX model, and test these chemotherapy regimens.

Gemcitabine (GmcH) is an effective anti-cancer agent used in the chemotherapy of lung cancer. However, the clinical applications of GmcH has been impeded primarily due to its low blood residence time, unfavorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile, and poor penetration in the complex environment of lung cancer cells. Thus, the present study aims to formulate GmcH loaded mannosylated solid lipid nanoparticles (GmcH-SLNs) for improving its drug uptake into the lung cancer cells. GmcH-SLNs were prepared by emulsification and solvent evaporation process, and surface modification was done with mannose using ring opening technique. The cellular toxicity and cell uptake studies were performed in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line. The developed nanoformulation appears to be proficient in targeted delivery of GmcH with improved therapeutic effectiveness and enhanced safety., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) were coated with gelatin type B by means of the two-step desolvation method. Drug loading by adsorption was studied under various conditions such as different temperature, contact time, pH, and initial gemcitabine concentration. Further, Langmuir isotherm curves were constracted and constants were calculated. According to the Langmuir isotherm, the Gibbs free energy of the adsorption process at 25°C was - 4.74 kJ/mol. On the other hand, this value at 37°C was - 7.86 kJ/mol. In vitro drug release was performed at pH levels of 5 and 7.4, with gemcitabine-loaded magnetic gelatin nanoparticles and free gemcitabine, and both the results were subsequently compared.

Objectives: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, with up to 25% of patients presenting with metastases at the time of diagnosis. Despite pulmonary metastasectomy many patients go on to develop pulmonary recurrence, which might be linked to the presence of lung micrometastases. In this setting, the adjuvant administration of high-dose chemotherapy by isolated lung perfusion (ILP) has shown encouraging results. However, the tolerance to and efficacy of modern gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy regimens during adjuvant ILP remain unknown. We conducted a dose-escalating preclinical study to evaluate the immediate and delayed toxicity of GEM in a pig model to define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated concentration., Methods: Twenty-three pigs were given increasing concentrations of GEM during ILP, and were awakened at the end of the procedure. The concentrations of GEM were 40, 80, 160, 320, 640 and 1280 µg/ml. Serum and lung samples were taken to measure GEM concentrations. Pulmonary damage was evaluated by histological examination and cleaved caspase-3 detection. Immediate and delayed (1 month) toxicity were recorded., Results: All of the animals underwent successful ILP with GEM. No systemic leak was observed. The three pigs that received a concentration of GEM of 1280 µg/ml died of hypoxia after lung recirculation at the end of the procedure. Eleven pigs survived for 1 month. Major lung toxicity was observed for the concentration of GEM of 640 µg/ml, both at the end of the procedure and after 1 month. DLT was defined at the concentration of 640 µg/ml and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined at the concentration of 320 µg/ml., Conclusions: ILP with GEM is a safe and reproducible technique in this large-animal model, which includes 1 month of survival. The MTD in this pig model was a concentration of GEM of 320 µg/ml., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Combination therapy in cancer is now opted as a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. However, effective delivery of drugs in combination at the tumor site is marred by low bioavailability and systemic toxicity of individual drugs. Polymer therapeutics is indeed an upcoming approach for the combinational drug delivery in favor of better cancer management. Hence, the objective of our investigation was to develop a dual drug PEGylated system that carries two chemotherapeutic drugs simultaneously for effective treatment of cancer. In this regard, we have synthesized Pem-PEG-Gem, wherein pemetrexed (Pem) and gemcitabine (Gem) are conjugated to a heterobifunctional polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer for the effective treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Our results demonstrate enhanced bioavailability of the individual drugs in Pem-PEG-Gem in comparison with the drugs in their native form. The developed Pem-PEG-Gem showed enhanced cell death with respect to their native counterparts when treated singly or in combination against NSCLC cells. This might be attributed to better cellular internalization through the process of macropinocytosis and synergistic cytotoxic action of Pem-PEG-Gem in NSCLC cells. Hence, we propose the above dual drug based polymer therapeutic approach suitable for better clinical application in the treatment of NSCLC., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study is the assessment of gel technology based on a lauroyl derivative of gemcitabine encapsulated in lipid nanocapsules delivered subcutaneously or intravenously after dilution to (i) target lymph nodes, (ii) induce less systemic toxicity and (iii) combat mediastinal metastases from an orthotopic model of human, squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer Ma44-3 cells implanted in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. The gel technology mainly targeted lymph nodes as revealed by the biodistribution study. Moreover, the gel technology induced no significant myelosuppression (platelet count) in comparison with the control saline group, unlike the conventional intravenous gemcitabine hydrochloride treated group (P<0.05). Besides, the gel technology, delivered subcutaneously twice a week, was able to combat locally mediastinal metastases from the orthotopic lung tumor and to significantly delay death (P<0.05) as was the diluted gel technology delivered intravenously three times a week., From the Clinical Editor: Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. A significant proportion of patients with this disease have lymph node metastasis. In this study, the authors investigated the use of lipid nanocapsules, loaded with the lipophilic pro-drug gemcitabine for targeting tumors in lymph nodes after subcutaneous injection. This delivery method was shown to be effective in controlling tumor progression and may be useful in future clinical use., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This phase I/II study determined the maximal tolerable dose, dose limiting toxicities, antitumor activity, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ruthenium compound NAMI-A in combination with gemcitabine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients after first line treatment., Methods: Initial dose escalation of NAMI-A was performed in a 28 day cycle: NAMI-A as a 3 h infusion through a port-a-cath at a starting dose of 300 mg/m(2) at day 1, 8 and 15, in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) at days 2, 9 and 16. Subsequently, dose escalation of NAMI-A in a 21 day schedule was explored. At the maximal tolerable dose level of this schedule an expansion group was enrolled of which 15 patients were evaluable for response., Results: Due to frequent neutropenic dose interruptions in the third week, the 28 day schedule was amended into a 21 day schedule. The maximal tolerable dose was 300 and 450 mg/m(2) of NAMI-A (21 day schedule). Main adverse events consisted of neutropenia, anemia, elevated liver enzymes, transient creatinine elevation, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, fatigue, and renal toxicity., Conclusion: NAMI-A administered in combination with gemcitabine is only moderately tolerated and less active in NSCLC patients after first line treatment than gemcitabine alone.

Introduction: Cigarette smoke associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can induce key drug-metabolizing enzymes of cytochrome P450 and isoforms of the glucuronyl transferases families. These enzymes metabolize several systemic therapies for lung cancer. Induction of these enzymes may lead to accelerated clearance with resultant impact on systemic therapy efficacy and toxicity in smokers compared with nonsmokers. This article reviews published literature regarding the influence of smoking as it relates to alteration of metabolism of systemic therapy in lung cancer., Methods: A structured search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/MEDLINE identified relevant articles. Data were abstracted and analyzed to summarize the findings., Results: Studies that analyzed pharmacokinetic data were prospective. Smokers receiving erlotinib exhibited rapid clearance, requiring a higher dose to reach equivalent systemic exposure compared with nonsmokers. Smokers receiving irinotecan also demonstrated increased clearance and lower systemic exposure. There was no difference in clearance of paclitaxel or docetaxel in smokers. Chemotherapy-associated neutropenia was worse in nonsmokers compared with smokers in patients treated with paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, and gemcitabine., Conclusions: Systemic therapy for lung cancer has a narrow therapeutic index such that small changes in plasma concentrations or exposure in smokers may result in suboptimal therapy and poor outcomes. Smoking cessation must be emphasized at each clinical visit. However, prospective trials should take into consideration the effects of smoking history on drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy. The metabolizing enzyme phenotype in smokers may require individualized dose algorithms for specific agents.

Gemcitabine is a deoxycytidine analog that is widely used in the chemotherapy of many solid tumors. However, acquired tumor cell resistance often limits its use. Previously, we discovered that 4-(N)-stearoyl gemcitabine solid lipid nanoparticles (4-(N)-GemC18-SLNs) can overcome multiple acquired gemcitabine resistance mechanisms, including RRM1 overexpression. The present study was designed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the 4-(N)-GemC18-SLNs' ability to overcome gemcitabine resistance. The 4-(N)-GemC18 in the 4-(N)-GemC18-SLNs entered tumor cells due to clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the 4-(N)-GemC18-SLNs into the lysosomes of the cells, whereas the 4-(N)-GemC18 alone in solution entered cells by diffusion. We substantiated that it is the way the 4-(N)-GemC18-SLNs deliver the 4-(N)-GemC18 into tumor cells that allows the gemcitabine hydrolyzed from the 4-(N)-GemC18 to be more efficiently converted into its active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), and thus more potent against gemcitabine-resistant tumor cells than 4-(N)-GemC18 or gemcitabine alone. Moreover, we also showed that the RRM1-overexpressing tumor cells were also cross-resistant to cytarabine, another nucleoside analog commonly used in cancer therapy, and 4-(N)-stearoyl cytarabine carried by solid lipid nanoparticles can also overcome the resistance. Therefore, formulating the long-chain fatty acid amide derivatives of nucleoside analogs into solid lipid nanoparticles may represent a platform technology to increase the antitumor activity of the nucleoside analogs and to overcome tumor cell resistance to them., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the pharmacological effects of different erlotinib (ER) and gemcitabine (GM) combination schedules by in vitro and in vivo experiments and PK/PD models in non-small cell lung cancer cells., Methods: H1299 cells were exposed to different ER combined with GM schedules. Cell growth inhibition was analyzed to evaluate these schedules. A preclinical in vivo study was then conducted to compare tumor suppression effects of different schedules in H1299 xenografts. PK/PD models were developed to quantify the anti-tumor interaction of ER and GM., Results: Synergism was observed when ER preceded GM, but other sequences showed antagonism. The optimal in vitro schedule, or interval schedule, was applied to the animal study, which showed greater anti-tumor effect than simultaneous group. PK/PD models implied that interaction of the two drugs was additive in simultaneous treatment but synergistic in interval schedule. The simulation results showed that interval schedule can delay tumor growth for a longer time, and demonstrated more evident anti-tumor effect compared with simultaneous group if the treatment duration was longer., Conclusions: Interval schedule of the two drugs can achieve synergistic anti-tumor effect, and is superior to simultaneous treatment.

Background: The lung is a frequent site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. After surgical resection, lung metastases recurrences have been related to the presence of micrometastases, potentially accessible to a high dose chemotherapy administered via adjuvant isolated lung perfusion (ILP). We sought to determine in vitro the most efficient drug when administered to CRC cell lines during a short exposure and in vivo its immediate and delayed tolerance when administered via ILP., Methods: First, efficacy of various cytotoxic molecules against a panel of human CRC cell lines was tested in vitro using cytotoxic assay after a 30-minute exposure. Then, early (operative) and delayed (1 month) tolerance of two concentrations of the molecule administered via ILP was tested on 19 adult pigs using hemodynamic, biological and histological criteria., Results: In vitro, gemcitabine (GEM) was the most efficient drug against selected CRC cell lines. In vivo, GEM was administered via ILP at regular (20 µg/ml) or high (100 µg/ml) concentrations. GEM administration was associated with transient and dose-dependant pulmonary vasoconstriction, leading to a voluntary decrease in pump inflow in order to maintain a stable pulmonary artery pressure. After this modulation, ILP using GEM was not associated with any systemic leak, systemic damage, and acute or delayed histological pulmonary toxicity. Pharmacokinetics studies revealed dose-dependant uptake associated with heterogenous distribution of the molecule into the lung parenchyma, and persistent cytotoxicity of venous effluent., Conclusions: GEM is effective against CRC cells even after a short exposure. ILP with GEM is a safe and reproducible technique.

Background: This study quantified the impact of drug pathway-associated genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Thirty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC were sampled for plasma concentrations of gemcitabine, difluoro-deoxy uridine (dFdU), intracellular gemcitabine triphosphates (dFdCTP), and unbound platinum concentrations after gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) i.v. followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). We analyzed 13 germline single nucleotide polymorphisms and one deletion-glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1-within six drug pathway-associated genes (GSTM1, GSTP1, cytidine deaminase (CDA), solute carrier (SLC) 28A1, SLC28A2, and deoxycytidine kinase). PK models were fitted to the data using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, and genetic data were tested on drug PK and hematological toxicity., Results: Patients carrying the nonsynonymous CDA SNP 79A >C (CDA*2) had a 21% lower gemcitabine clearance as compared to wild-type patients (outcomes and complications.0.0009), but the risk for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia (61% vs. 32%, P = 0.07) and severe neutropenia (17% vs. 5%, P = 0.26) was not significantly higher. Other gene polymorphisms were not associated with drug PK parameters or hematological toxicity. The known functional mutant variant CDA*3 was not found in any of the patients., Conclusions: Although the mutant CDA*2 allele results in an increased exposure to gemcitabine in Caucasian patients, this study gives no definite conclusion on the clinical relevance of this finding. Further studies should look into the relationship between CDA genotypes, plasmatic CDA activity, and clinical outcome in patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Background: We investigated the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and feasibility of aerosolized gemcitabine (GCB) in patients with lung carcinoma., Method: Eleven patients with carcinoma localized in the lungs were studied in a dose escalation study of aerosolized GCB administered 1 day/week for 9 consecutive weeks. Safety data, scintigraphic assessment of the delivered dose and pharmacokinetic monitoring were analyzed. Patients were treated with doses of between 1 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg (dose in the nebulizer), using a new inhaler device (Aeroneb Pro with an Idehaler Chamber)., Results and Conclusions: The total dose of GCB delivered to the patient's lung was 42±16% of the initial amount of dose in the nebulizer. Safety data showed no hematologic toxicity, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity. At 4 mg/kg, one patient experienced grade 4 pulmonary toxicity (bronchospasm), which was the dose-limiting toxicity. Grade 2 and 3 toxic effects included fatigue, vomiting, dyspnea, and cough. Overall response: minor response in one patient, stable disease in four patients, progressive disease in four patients. Pharmacokinetic data showed very low plasma GCB levels. Maximal plasma concentration was observed at the end of nebulization. Aerosolized gemcitabin was safe, with minimal toxicity, for patients with lung carcinoma.

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib plus gemcitabine/cisplatin for first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activities were evaluated., Methods: Patients ≥18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 and stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were included in this open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation phase I study. Treatment was administered in 3-week cycles: oral sunitinib 37.5 or 50mg/day intermittently (Schedule 2/1: 2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) or 25mg continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule with intravenous infusions of gemcitabine (1000 or 1250 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) day 1)., Results: A total of 28 evaluable patients were assigned to four dose levels. Most adverse events (AEs) on the Schedule 2/1 MTD were mild to moderate. Dose delays due to myelosuppression occurred on both schedules, limiting treatment to a median of four cycles. Four of 18 evaluable patients (22%) on Schedule 2/1 and 1 of 6 patients (17%) on the CDD schedule had confirmed partial responses., Conclusions: The MTD was identified as sunitinib 37.5mg (Schedule 2/1), gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2), and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), with most AEs being mild to moderate. However, frequent dose delays due to myelosuppression occurred. There was evidence of antitumor activity with this combination., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To investigate the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine (dFdC) administered on d 1 and 5 plus cisplatin administered on d 1 in chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: In each combination cycle, gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) as a 30 min intravenous (iv) infusion on d 1 and 5 followed by cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) as a 3 h iv infusion on d 1 every 3 weeks. There was an interval of 1 h between the two infusions. Clinical response and toxicity of the regimen were observed. Furthermore, the plasma concentrations of gemcitabine (dFdC) and its metabolite (dFdU) at different time points were detected during the first cycle of infusion. Pharmacokinetic software (PKS) was used to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of gemcitabine and its metabolite dFdU., Results: A total of 28 patients was enrolled in the study. The median age was 54 years (range 27-75 years), and most patients were in good clinical condition. Twenty-seven patients received two or more treatment cycles. The overall clinical response rate was 33.3%. The median overall survival time was 13 months. The estimated median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 55.6%. Toxicities were tolerated. The main toxicity was myelosuppression; 35.7% of patients had grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities and 28.6% had grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities, which were commonly gastrointestinal responses. The pharmacokinetic parameters of dFdC and dFdU were not different between pre- and post-administration of gemcitabine on d 1 and 5. dFdU was minimal (0.729+/-0.637 microg/mL) before gemcitabine was infused on d 5, and gemcitabine was not present., Conclusion: The regimen is active and well tolerated in chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC. After gemcitabine was administered on d 1 and 5, the pharmacokinetic parameters of dFdC and dFdU showed no difference from those before the infusion, and dFdU was minimal before gemcitabine was administered on d 5.

Objective: To study the impact of the 79A>C polymorphism in the cytidine deaminase (CDA) gene on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 20) received gemcitabine 1,125 mg/m(2) as a 30 min i.v. infusion as part of treatment for NSCLC. Plasma samples were collected during 0-6 h after gemcitabine administration. Gemcitabine and dFdU were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The CDA 79A>C genotype was determined with PCR and DNA sequencing., Results: Gemcitabine was rapidly cleared from plasma and undetectable after 3 h. The allele frequency of the 79A>C polymorphism was 0.40. Diplotypes were distributed as A/A n = 8, A/C n = 8 ,and C/C n = 4. No significant differences were found between the different CDA genotypes and gemcitabine or dFdU AUC, clearance, or half-life., Conclusion: The 79A>C polymorphism in the CDA gene does not have a major consistent and signficant impact on gemcitabine pharmacokinetics.

Introduction: Although some studies have suggested that gemcitabine delivered as a fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion of 10 mg/m(2)/min could be more effective than when administered as the standard 30-min infusion, the available pharmacokinetic data are still too limited to draw definitive conclusions. This study is aimed to investigate the plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine given as FDR at doses of 600 and 1,200 mg/m(2) in combination with 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Method: The patients were divided into two groups receiving different initial doses of the drug: 4 patients received 600 mg/m(2) gemcitabine 60-min i.v. infusion and 4 patients 1,200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine 120-min i.v. infusion both as a FDR of 10 mg/m(2)/min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (at first cycle). At the second cycle, all patients were treated with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m(2) 120-min i.v. infusion (FDR of 10 mg/m(2)/min) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. At each cycle, gemcitabine was administered alone on day one, and in combination with 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on day 8. Plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on blood samples collected at defined time points before, during and after gemcitabine infusion., Results: The plasmatic pharmacokinetic parameters were clearly different when the patients received a higher gemcitabine dose in the second cycle compared to the lower dose of the first course; in the same time, the intracellular drug levels were not modified. Comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of different patients treated at different dose levels, the results appeared to be quite similar., Conclusions: A substantially higher accumulation of metabolites in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was observed when the longer infusion time was employed, suggesting a pharmacological advantage for this treatment schedule.

Introduction: Selective pulmonary artery perfusion (SPAP) is an experimental drug infusion method for the treatment of lung cancer that aims to achieve more effective T(umour) and lymph N(ode) down-staging. The aim of this experiment was to compare drug uptake of gemcitabine and carboplatin during SPAP and intravenous infusion (IV)., Material and Methods: SPAP was performed in 12 pigs using clinically applied doses of gemcitabine (1.25g/m(2), n=4) and carboplatin (AUC 5, n=4) and a combination of both (n=4). All animals underwent catheterisation of the left pulmonary artery and furthermore a left thoracotomy and lumbotomy for tissue sampling. After 2min of SPAP, 30min of blood flow occlusion was performed in order to delay drug washout from the lung. Two additional groups were infused intravenously (IV) using the same dose of gemcitabine (n=4) and carboplatin (n=4). Peak concentrations and area under the curve (AUC) were compared with t-tests., Results: Significantly higher pulmonary gemcitabine peak concentrations (p

Bortezomib combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced tumors, predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed an unexpected transient drop in the deoxycytidine plasma levels, a marker for gemcitabine activity. This study investigates the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effect of bortezomib on gemcitabine in NSCLC and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Gemcitabine metabolites, including difluoro-dCTP (dFdCTP), were studied in PBMCs from bortezomib/gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients and from volunteers and NSCLC cells (H460 and SW1573) exposed to 4 h simultaneous or sequential treatments of gemcitabine (50 μmol/L, 4 h) and bortezomib (100 nmol/L, 2 h). Gemcitabine total phosphate levels measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in PBMCs from bortezomib/gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients were strongly reduced after 90 min (-82.2%) up to 4 h post-gemcitabine infusion compared with gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients. Accordingly, bortezomib/gemcitabine combinations reduced dFdCTP in PBMCs treated ex vivo. Surprisingly, differential effects were observed in NSCLC cells. dFdCTP decreased after 4 h following gemcitabine removal in H460 but continued to increase for 24 h in SW1573. However, dFdCTP significantly increased (2-fold) in both cell lines in the bortezomib → gemcitabine exposure, coinciding with a major reduction in cell growth compared with single drugs, and the highest increase of deoxycytidine kinase expression, possibly mediated via E2F-1. Bortezomib affects differently gemcitabine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in PBMCs and NSCLC cells, suggesting that PBMCs are not adequate to evaluate the anticancer activity of bortezomib/gemcitabine combinations. The bortezomib → gemcitabine/cisplatin schedule appeared a safe and active combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC and the bortezomib → gemcitabine was the most cytotoxic combination in NSCLC cells. The increase of deoxycytidine kinase and dFdCTP might contribute to this synergistic interaction and supports its further clinical investigation.

Beta-L-dioxolane-cytidine (L-OddC; BCH-4556; troxacitabine), a novel L-configuration deoxycytidine analogue, was under clinical trials for treating cancer. The cytotoxicity of L-OddC is dependent on its phosphorylation to L-OddCTP by phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and its subsequent addition into nuclear DNA. Because PGK is induced with hypoxia, the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and PGK of H460 cells (human non-small cell lung carcinoma) in vitro and in vivo was studied. In culture, hypoxic treatment induced the protein expression of PGK by 3-fold but had no effect on the protein expression of other L-OddC metabolism-associated enzymes such as apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1, deoxycytidine kinase, CMP kinase, and nM23 H1. Using a clonogenic assay, hypoxic treatment of H460 cells rendered cells 4-fold more susceptible to L-OddC but not to gemcitabine (dFdC) following exposure to drugs for one generation. Using hypoxia response element-luciferase reporter system, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry, it was found that hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and PGK expression increased and could be correlated to tumor size. Despite dFdC being more toxic than L-OddC in cell culture, L-OddC (300 mg/kg i.p.) had a stronger antitumor activity than dFdC in H460 xenograft-bearing nude mice. Furthermore, L-OddC retained approximately 50% of its antitumor activity with oral gavage compared with i.p. delivery. Oral administration of L-OddC (600 mg/kg p.o.) had a similar area under the curve value compared with i.p. injection of dFdC (300 mg/kg i.p.). In conclusion, the hypoxia, which commonly exists in non-small cell lung carcinoma or other solid tumors resistant to radiotherapy or chemotherapy, is a favorable determinant to enhance the antitumor activity of L-OddC in vivo.

Aim: This study aims to determine if intracellular formation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), an active metabolite of gemcitabine, is saturable at doses used for treatment of Asian patients with lung cancer., Methods: From a phase II trial, plasma concentrations of gemcitabine, its inactive metabolite 2'-2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), and mononuclear cell concentrations of gemcitabine-triphosphate were measured in 56 and 33 patients, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and metabolites were modeled using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). A reduced dataset of ten randomly selected patients was employed to compare first-order and saturable formation of dFdCTP from gemcitabine., Results: The median population clearance estimate for dFdCTP formation with the full dataset was 70.2 L/h/70 kg/1.7 m. Modeling Michaelis-Menten formation of dFdCTP on a reduced dataset estimated K(m) to be 3.6 times higher than the maximum gemcitabine concentration (72.2 microM) measured in this study., Conclusions: The results showed that first-order and nonsaturable clearance described intracellular dFdCTP formation at clinically applied doses of gemcitabine.

Background: : Lipoplatin is a new liposomal cisplatin that already has been tested in solid tumors, with encouraging results. The purpose of the current study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of a 21-day regimen of lipoplatin plus a fixed dose of gemcitabine in patients with refractory or resistant nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of

Lung cancer represents a major health problem. Cytostatic and radiotherapeutic treatment is limited because of dose-limiting systemic toxicity and surgery as a result of its invasive nature. Therefore, we developed a catheterization model of selective pulmonary artery perfusion (SPAP) combining the properties of isolated lung perfusion and i.v. treatment to achieve higher local drug levels and equivalent systemic exposure. Sixteen pigs underwent SPAP using a clinically applied dose of gemcitabine (1 g/m(2)). They furthermore underwent thoracotomy for tissue sampling. Three groups were treated with SPAP for 2 min with normal pulmonary blood flow, 50 and 90% flow reduction. Another group had SPAP for 10 min with normal blood flow. All the SPAP groups underwent catheterization of the left pulmonary artery. An additional group (n = 4) was infused i.v. for 30 min using the same dose. Concentrations were analyzed with analysis of variance. Pulmonary peak concentrations (p = 0.01) and areas under the curve (AUC) (p = 0.001) of SPAP for 2 and 10 min were significantly higher compared with i.v., whereas SPAP for 10 min resulted in the highest AUC (p = 0.045) compared with SPAP for 2 min. Flow reduction during SPAP resulted in inhomogeneous distribution. Liver levels, AUC (serum), and wet-to-dry ratios of all the SPAP groups were not significantly different compared with i.v. SPAP resulted in higher lung concentrations, whereas systemic exposure was comparable with i.v. Therefore, we advocate SPAP as a new method to be tested clinically to achieve down-staging of the tumor and lymph node status in lung cancer.

Gemcitabine, 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (dFdC) is a pyrimidine antimetabolite employed against several human malignancies. It undergoes intracellular activation to the pharmacologically active triphosphate form (dFdCTP) and metabolic inactivation to the metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU). In order to investigate the human plasma pharmacokinetics of dFdC and dFdU, we developed and validated an HPLC-MS/MS method, adding 2'-deoxycytidine as internal standard and simply precipitating the protein with acetonitrile. The method requires a small sample (125 microl), and it is rapid and selective, allowing good resolution of peaks from the plasma matrix in only 7 min. It is sensitive, precise and accurate, with overall precision, expressed as CV%, always less than 10.0% for both analytes and high recovery: > or = 80%. The limits of detection for dFdC and dFdU were 0.1 and 1.1 ng/ml, but considering the high concentrations in the plasma of patients investigated, we set the limit of quantitation at 20 ng/ml (0.08 microM) for dFdC and 250 ng/ml for dFdU, and validated the assay up to the dFdC concentration of 6.0 microg/ml (22.8 microM). The method was successfully used to study the drug pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II trial with gemcitabine administered as a fixed dose-rate infusion., ((c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and relationship between plasma concentrations at the end of infusion (C(end of infusion)) and toxicity profile of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were given gemcitabine by 120 min infusion [at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m(2)/min] on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, immediately followed by carboplatin AUC 5 by 4 h infusion on day 1. C (end of infusion) of gemcitabine was determined by ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)., Results: By the close-out date, in our study population, the estimated median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months (95% CI 4-10 months), median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI 11.2-12.8 months). The mean value of C (end of infusion) of 21 eligible patients was 16.48 +/- 8.07 micromol/l (range 27.43-2.87 micromol/l). The main hematological toxicities were transient grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. The mean percentages of reduction of WBC, NEC, PLTC and Hb of 21 eligible patients were 38.3 +/- 38.1%, 31.3 +/- 73.6%, 31.8 +/- 53.5% and 12.0 +/- 12.2%, respectively. The analysis of the C(end of infusion) of gemcitabine and the percentage of reduction in WBC showed a significant correlation (r(2) = 0.4575; p < 0.05). A significant correlation (r(2) = 0.5671; p < 0.05) was also observed between the percentage of reduction of PLTC and C(end of infusion) of gemcitabine infusion., Conclusion: The clinical data in this trial supports the further evaluation the regimen in advanced NSCLC patients, due to its predictable kinetic behavior and less severe toxicity profile than expected.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between peak concentration (Cmax) of gemcitabine at fixed-dose-rate and its hematological toxicity profile in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Twenty-one patients received gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate (1200 mg/m2 over 120 min) with carboplatin. Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine were measured by ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography., Results: The mean value of Cmax in 21 eligible patients was(4.95+/-2.42) microg *ml(-1). The main hematological toxicity was grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The mean percentages of reduction of WBC, NEC, PLTC and Hb of 21 patients were (38.3+/-38.1)%, (31.3+/-73.6)%, (31.8+/-53.5)% and (12.0+/-12.2)%, respectively. The C(max)of gemcitabine and the percentage of reduction in WBC showed a significant correlation (r2=0.4575, P<0.05). A significant correlation (r2=0.5671, P<0.05) was also observed between the percentage of reduction of PLTC and Cmaxof gemcitabine., Conclusion: The results of relationship between Cmax and toxicity profile suggest that gemcitabine administration should be individualized in order to decrease the occurrence of ADR.

Purpose: To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors., Experimental Design: Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD., Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule., Conclusions: Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.

Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study of triplet chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (CDDP), docetaxel (DCT) and gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Fifty-three untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. All drugs were given on days 1 and 8. The doses of CDDP and DCT were fixed at 40 mg/m(2) and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. In the phase I portion, a dose escalation study of GEM with starting dose of 400 mg/m(2) was conducted and primary objective in the phase II portion was response rate., Results: The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of GEM were determined as 800 mg/m(2) because grade 3 non-hematological toxicity (liver damage, diarrhea, and fatigue) developed in three of nine patients evaluated at that dose level. In pharmacokinetic analysis, C (max) and AUC of dFdC and dFdU were increased along with the dose escalation of GEM. However, no relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity or response was observed. Objective response rate was 34% and median survival time was 11.7 months. Though major toxicity was myelosuppression, there were no life-threatening toxicities., Conclusion: These results indicate that this triplet chemotherapy is feasible and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Objective: To conduct a randomized comparative trial of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity profile treatment with 1200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine using standard 30-min infusion or fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion [10 mg/(m(2) x min)] on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC (area under curve) 5 on day 1 in Chinese non-small-cell cancer patients. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study., Methods: Plasma gemcitabine concentrations were measured by ion-pair reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography. Antitumoral activity and toxicity of gemcitabine was assessed according to World Health Organization criteria., Results: The obtained mean parameters, such as T(1/2) (elimination half time), AUC, and CL (clearance), were consistent with those reported in literature. Qualified response rate in our study was 33.3% for standard arm and 50% for FDR arm. Additional 50% and 33.3% patients contracted stable disease (SD) in standard arm and FDR arm, respectively. The predominant toxicity was hematologic, and patients in the standard infusion arm experienced consistently more hematologic toxicity., Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic and clinical data in this trial support the continued evaluation of the FDR infusion strategy with gemcitabine.

Background: Conventional treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BM) is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The efficacy is limited. It might be increased by a potent radiosensitizer such as gemcitabine, which is believed to cross the disrupted blood-brain barrier. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine given concurrently with WBRT., Methods: Patients with BM from NSCLC were included. The dose of WBRT was 3750 cGy (total 15 times, 3 weeks). Gemcitabine was given concurrently with WBRT on days 1, 8 and 15. The starting dose was 400 mg/m(2), escalated by 100 mg/m(2) increments. At least three patients were included per level. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological or grade 2 neurological toxicity. When two or more patients experience DLT, the MTD was reached., Results: A total of 16 patients were included; 69% had a performance status (PS) 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG). A total of 69% had concurrent active extra cranial diseases. All had more than 3 BM. Up to 600 mg/m(2) (level 3) no neurology toxicity was observed. At 600 mg/m(2) two out of 9 patients developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. One of the two patients' thrombocytopenia was confused with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). At 700 mg/m(2) two out of 4 patients developed neurotoxicities. One developed grade 3 seizure and cognitive disorder. Another patient developed suspected grade 2 muscle weakness., Conclusions: The MTD was reached at a dose of 700 mg/m(2). The dose of 600 mg/m(2) would be considered for further study.

Purpose: To compare the pharmacology of the paclitaxel-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin and paclitaxel-gemcitabine combinations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Twenty-four chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive one of the three regimens. Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacologic parameters in mononuclear cells were compared and related to toxicity and efficacy., Results: Pharmacological parameters of gemcitabine and cisplatin were not influenced by the combination with one of the other agents, while the paclitaxel clearance was significantly lower for the combination with cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine (P=0.024). The percentage decrease in platelets was significantly higher for the gemcitabine combinations (P=0.004) and related to the dFdCTP-Cmax (P=0.030). Pharmacologic parameters were not related to response or survival., Conclusions: Gemcitabine and cisplatin pharmacology were not influenced by the combination with one of the other agents, while paclitaxel has a lower clearance in combination with cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine.

Background: Isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) is an experimental technique for the treatment of pulmonary metastases. We hypothesized that part of the drug taken up by the lung during ILuP is washed out during the flush procedure. Therefore, we investigated gemcitabine uptake at different inflow concentrations, and the effect of delayed clamp release after ILuP on lung levels was studied., Methods: Thirty rats had ILuP during 30 minutes using gemcitabine perfusate levels of 1.3, 2.7, 4.0, 5.3, and 6.7 mg/mL. Another 37 rats underwent ILuP with gemcitabine perfusate levels of 6.7 mg/mL during 6 minutes followed by a 5-minute flush and 30 or 60 minutes of reperfusion, while two other groups had ILuP and delayed clamp release for 30 or 60 minutes followed by a 5-minute flush. All effluent and lung samples were stored for later analysis. Results were evaluated using Friedmann two-way analysis and two-way analysis of variance., Results: At 6 minutes, steady-state of gemcitabine uptake was achieved for all inflow concentrations and a linear relation (r = 0.933, p < 0.0001) between effluent and lung levels was observed. Delayed clamp release resulted in significantly higher lung levels compared with immediate restoration of blood circulation after ILuP (456% at 30 minutes and 828% at 60 minutes)., Conclusions: Effective gemcitabine lung levels are already achieved after 6 minutes of ILuP with 6.7 mg/mL followed by delayed clamp release during 30 minutes instead of the clinically applied 30 minutes ILuP.

Background: Intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels can be optimised by administering gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion., Patients and Methods: Patients with chemonaive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised to receive gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) over 75 min (arm A) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min (arm B) on days 1 and 8 every three week cycle. Carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered in both treatment arms on day 1 of each cycle. End points were activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of plasma and intracellular gemcitabine., Results: 76 patients were randomised. Response rate was 34% in arm A and 42% in arm B. Toxicity and quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Mean plasma Cmax(gemcitabine) and mean dFdCTP AUC in arm A was 20.8 microM +/- 17.2 microM and 35,079 +/- 18,216 microM*min respectively and in arm B, 41.2 +/- 13.9 microM and 32 249 +/- 11 267 microM*min respectively. dFdCTP saturation was reached in Arm B but not in Arm A., Conclusion: The saturability of dFdCTP accumulation in Arm A suggests optimal delivery of gemcitabine is achieved using fixed rate infusion compared to 30-min infusion. Fixed dose rate gemcitabine is active and feasible, supporting the concept of fixed dosing rate of gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC. However, this entails a longer infusion time with associated higher costs involved.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with Her2-overexpressing stages IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to study the relationship between results from the two methods for determining levels of Her2 overexpression. Chemonaive patients were eligible if they had stages IIIB or IV NSCLC with either a Her2 score of at least 1+ by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis or a serum Her2 shed antigen level of at least 15 ng/ml by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Treatment consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day one plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) days one and eight plus trastuzumab 4 mg/kg day one and 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter on a 21-day cycle for six cycles followed by weekly maintenance trastuzumab therapy. Of the 21 patients enrolled, 8 (38%) patients had a partial response. The 1-year survival rate was 62% (13/21). Median time to progression was 36 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed no interaction between trastuzumab and gemcitabine plus cisplatin. In patients screened for this study, Her2 expression was zero in 283/360 (79%); 1+ in 32/360 (9%); 2+ in 27/360 (8%); and 3+ in 18/360 patients (5%). Serum Her2 shed antigen was >15 ng/ml in 27/ 288 (9%) patients. Of patients who had both Her2 assays, 24% (4/17) with ELISA scores >15 ng/ml had IHC scores of 3+, compared with only 2% (3/145) of the patients <15 ng/ml and 4% (7/162) of all patients. The addition of trastuzumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine was well tolerated, but further study will be required to determine whether this combination is superior to chemotherapy alone. This may be demonstrated if only those patients with Her2, having a score of IHC 3+ were eligible. Since IHC 3+ is rare in NSCLC, performing IHC in only those patients with serum Her2 shed antigen >15 ng/ml would greatly increase the efficiency of IHC screening though at the cost of excluding nearly half the patients with Her2 scores of 3+ on IHC analysis. Thus, if sequential screening consisting of serum ELISA followed by IHC analysis is implemented, it may make a trastuzumab trial feasible but should ultimately be supplanted by another screening system if trastuzumab is shown to be beneficial to some patients with IHC Her2 scores of 3+.

Purpose: To establish the maximum dose intensity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine on a weekly or two-weekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV were randomized to receive weekly or two-weekly courses of gemcitabine on day 1 and cisplatin on day 2. An interpatient dose escalation scheme was used, and pharmacokinetics were determined for both agents in plasma and WBCs., Results: Seventy-three patients were included, 32 on the weekly schedule and 41 on the two-weekly schedule. Fifty patients received all planned courses. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and trombocytopenia on the weekly schedule and ototoxicity on the two-weekly schedule. Most common nonhematological toxicities consisted of nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The highest dose intensity of cisplatin could be achieved on the two-weekly schedule, and therefore, further development of the weekly schedule was abandoned. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin 90 mg/m(2). More than half (53%) of patients achieved an objective response on the two-weekly schedule, versus 23% in the weekly treatment arm. The pharmacokinetic studies revealed a significant interaction: gemcitabine reduced both GG and AG platinum-DNA intrastrand adducts in WBCs., Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) with cisplatin at a dose intensity of 50 mg/m(2)/week is feasible on a two-weekly administration scheme in NSCLC patients.

Purpose: Gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2) per min has been reported to achieve plasma steady-state concentrations ranging from 10 to 20 microM in patients with acute leukemia. These concentrations have been shown to saturate the intracellular accumulation of the active triphosphate metabolite. We designed this pharmacokinetic study to assess the ability of a fixed dose rate of gemcitabine to achieve the desired steady-state concentration in the absence and presence of paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: A group of 14 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2) over 3 h on days 1 and 8 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) over 80 min on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Patients received gemcitabine alone on cycle (C) 1, day (D) 1. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 80 min during infusion and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C2D1, C4D1 and C6D1., Results: Of 13 patients included in the pharmacokinetic analysis, 61% achieved the desired steady-state concentration (C(ss)) with gemcitabine alone (C1D1), whereas only 0 to 45% of patients achieved the desired C(ss) with paclitaxel and gemcitabine, depending on the treatment cycle. Paclitaxel significantly decreased systemic clearance (Cl(T); P=0.012) and volume of distribution (V(d); P=0.050) and significantly increased C(ss) ( P=0.009). Gemcitabine plasma pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated great interpatient variability in the absence of paclitaxel (C(ss) 30%, Cl(T) 30%, V(d) 55%). Interpatient and intrapatient variability in gemcitabine pharmacokinetics were not observed when gemcitabine was administered in combination with paclitaxel (P>0.05)., Conclusions: Gemcitabine plasma pharmacokinetic parameters are significantly altered in the presence of paclitaxel.

Background: Toxicity and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine (GCB) were evaluated in a rat model of isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) and compared to intravenous (iv) infusion., Materials and Methods: CC531S adenocarcinoma cells were incubated in vitro for 24 h with GCB. Cell survival was determined 4 days after GCB treatment with the sulforhodamine B test. In a first in vivo experiment, Wag/Rij rats underwent left ILuP with 20 mg/kg (n = 3), 40 mg/kg (n = 6), 80 mg/kg (n = 6), 160 mg/kg (n = 6), or 320 mg/kg (n = 6) of GCB and a control group (n = 6) with buffered starch. After 3 weeks, right pneumonectomy was performed. Furthermore, survival was determined for rats treated with iv infusion of 40 mg/kg (n = 10), 80 mg/kg (n = 10), 160 mg/kg (n = 10), or 320 mg/kg (n = 6) of GCB and a control group (n = 6) treated with saline (0.9% NaCl). In a second experiment lung and serum GCB levels were determined for rats treated with iv infusion (160 mg/kg, n = 6) and rats which had ILuP (160 mg/kg, n = 6; 320 mg/kg, n = 6)., Results: Incubation of the CC531S adenocarcinoma cells with GCB led to a 50% decrease (P < 0.05) in the number of cells compared to controls at a dose of 23.6 nM. After 90 days, the mortality for rats treated with 320 mg/kg iv GCB was 100% compared to 17% after ILuP for the same dose. ILuP with 160 and 320 mg/kg resulted in significantly higher lung levels of GCB compared to iv therapy without any systemic leakage., Conclusions: GCB ILuP is well-tolerated to a maximum dose of 320 mg/kg and results in significantly higher GCB lung levels with undetectable serum levels compared to iv treatment.

Background: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are two of the most active agents in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pharmacologic investigation of the combination regimens including these drugs may offer a valuable opportunity in treatment optimization. The present study investigates the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC within a phase I study., Patients and Methods: Patients were given i.v. paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 by one-hour infusion followed by gemcitabine 1,500, 1,750 and 2,000 mg/m2 by 30-min administration. Plasma levels of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Concentration-time curves were modeled by compartmental and non-compartmental methods and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships were fitted according to a sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model., Results: Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics did not change as a result of dosage escalation of gemcitabine from 1,500 to 2,000 mg/m2. A nonproportional increase in gemcitabine peak plasma levels (Cmax, from 18.56 +/- 4.94 to 40.85 +/- 14.85 microg/ml) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC, from 9.99 +/- 2.75 to 25.01 +/- 9.87 h x microg/ml) at 1,500 and 2,000 mg/m, respectively, was observed, suggesting the occurrence of saturation kinetics at higher doses. A significant relationship between neutropenia and time of paclitaxel plasma levels > or = 0.05 micromol/l was observed, with a predicted time of 10.4 h to decrease cell count by 50%. A correlation was also observed between percentage reduction of platelet count and gemcitabine Cmax, with a predicted effective concentration to induce a 50% decrease of 14.3 microg/ml., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the lack of interaction between drugs, the nonproportional pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine at higher doses and the Emax relationship of paclitaxel and gemcitabine with neutrophil and platelet counts, respectively. In addition, gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 is the recommended dosage in combination with paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 for future phase II studies, due to its predictable kinetic behaviour and less severe thrombocytopenia than expected.

Background: The good efficacy-toxicity ratio of both docetaxel and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stimulates the investigation of the combination of these drugs as a first line chemotherapy. This two-step study firstly aimed at determining the maximum tolerated and recommended doses of docetaxel given every 3 weeks in combination with a fixed dose of gemcitabine; the phase I study paid particular attention to pharmacokinetics. Afterwards, the safety and efficacy of the recommended dose was carefully assessed in the phase II-step., Methods: The following range of docetaxel dosages were tested in the phase I study; 60, 75, 85, and 100 mg m(-2) given on day 8 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) delivered on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Haematopoietic growth factors were not allowed. The treatment was delivered on an outpatient basis. Main eligibility criteria consisted of stage III b or IV histologically proven NSCLC, Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status PS < or =2, age < or =70 years, measurable disease, adequate blood counts, chemistry, and no symptomatic brain metastasis., Results: Four centres enrolled 49 patients (eight having been pre-treated); 16 in phase I and 33 in phase II. The maximal tolerated dose was almost reached at the last dose level (i.e. docetaxel, 100 mg m(-2)). Consequently, we considered the 85 mg m(-2) level as the recommended dose. There was a positive relationship of the docetaxel dose to the area under the curve of this drug. Toxicity was assessable in all patients. Among the 200 cycles delivered, 192 were assessable for this feature. Main toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia affecting 23 patients (47% of the population; 23% of the cycles). Six febrile episodes were recorded leading to two treatment-related deaths. Another patient died from congestive cardiac failure. In addition, six patients experienced interstitial pneumonitis, (one half considered as severe), two of them having received the recommended dose. All patients recovered from this toxicity after corticosteroids. Fourteen patients out of the whole population (29%; 95% CI [17-43], including ten patients receiving the recommended dose), achieved an objective response. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 0.3-29.4). Median survival was 11.2 months (95% CI [8.3-13.2]), and the 1-year survival rate was 45%., Conclusion: Gemcitabine, 1000 mg m(-2) days 1 and 8 in combination with docetaxel, 85 mg m(-2), day 8, given every 3 weeks could be considered as an active regimen with manageable toxicities in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. This study deserves further comparisons with classical platinum-based regimens.

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) and paclitaxel (TAX) are active, non-cross-resistant drugs in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of GEM and TAX given weekly in chemo-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Escalating doses of GEM (800-2000 mg/m2) and TAX (60-100 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks to 35 patients with advanced NSCLC. Plasma pharmacokinetics of TAX and GEM was assessed at the three higher dose-levels., Results: Dose-escalation was discontinued in absence of MTD because of increased cumulative toxicity leading to dose modification or treatment delay at levels 6 and 7 (TAX 100 mg/m2 plus GEM 1750 and, respectively, 2000 mg/m2). Hematological toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia in 3% of cycles, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one cycle and febrile neutropenia in three cycles. Maximal non-hematological toxicity was grade 3 elevation in serum transaminases and grade 2 neuro-sensory toxicity in 8% and 5% of cycles, respectively. At the two higher dose-levels a non-linear pharmacokinetics of GEM was observed with a remarkable variability of Cmax and AUC. No pharmacokinetic interactions were reported. Objectives responses were seen at all dose levels, with an overall response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 25.5%-62.6%) in 30 evaluable patients., Conclusions: The weekly administration of GEM and TAX is very well tolerated, and has shown promising antitumor activity in NSCLC. In view of the cumulative toxicity and of the pharmacokinetic profile of GEM, doses of 1500 mg/m2 of GEM and 100 mg/m2 of TAX are recommended for phase II studies.

2'-deoxy-2'-methylidenecytidine (DMDC) is a potent deoxycytidine analogue. Preclinical studies of DMDC demonstrated activity against a variety of murine and human tumors in cell cultures and murine models and indicate enhanced antitumor activity of DMDC when it was administered in a manner that provided prolonged systemic exposure. In view of this observation, this study was designed to determine the toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic profile of DMDC. DMDC was given p.o. under fasting conditions for 14 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. The starting dose was 12 mg/m2/day. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out on days 1 and 14 of the first cycle. Fourteen patients received 22 courses of DMDC. The dose-limiting toxicities were anorexia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. General fatigue was the common nonhematological toxicity. The maximum-tolerated dose was 18 mg/m2/day, at which two of six patients developed grade 3 toxicities. This dose level could also be considered for Phase II testing with this schedule. At the 18-mg/m2/day dose level, the mean terminal half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) on day 1 were 1.7496 h, 112.9 ng/ml, and 399.8 ng x h/ml, respectively. Forty to 50% of the administered dose was recovered in the urine, indicating a good bioavailability and resulting significant systemic exposure to the drug, which may enable chronic oral treatment.

Purpose: To assess possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and paclitaxel in a phase I/II study in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients with advanced NSCLC received the following in a 3-week schedule: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 minutes, days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 150 (n = 9) or 200 mg/m(2) (n = 9) before gemcitabine (3 hours, day 1). Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in mononuclear cells were studied., Results: Gemcitabine did not influence paclitaxel pharmacokinetics at 150 and 200 mg/m(2) (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 7.7 and 8.8 micromol/ L. h, respectively; maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], 3.2 and 4.0 micromol/L, respectively), and paclitaxel did not influence that of gemcitabine (C(max), 30 +/- 3 micromol/L) and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. Paclitaxel, however, dose-dependently increased the C(max) of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), the active metabolite of gemcitabine, from 55 +/- 10 to 106 +/- 16 pmol/10(6) cells.( )No significant difference in the AUC of dFdCTP was observed. Moreover, the gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination significantly increased ribonucleotide levels, most pronounced for adenosine triphosphate (six- to seven-fold). Postinfusion paclitaxel AUC was related to pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0. 79; P <.001) and to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0.61; P =.009). The latter was also related to the duration of paclitaxel concentration above 0.1 micromol/L (r = 0.62; P =.007). Gemcitabine C(max )was related to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0. 58; P =.01), pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0.77; P <. 001), and to plasma creatinine (r = 0.5; P =.03). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were not related to response or survival., Conclusion: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were related to the percentage decrease in platelets. Paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, nor did gemcitabine affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, but paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation. This might enhance the antitumor activity of gemcitabine.

Gemcitabine has demonstrated single-agent activity in advanced, incurable non-small cell lung cancer, yielding response rates of > or =20%, and, in combination with cisplatin, response rates of 30% to 60%. Carboplatin causes much less nonhematologic toxicity than cisplatin, and initial therapy with carboplatin yields equivalent survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer compared with cisplatin combinations and other cisplatin analogs, despite a lower response rate. Carmichael and colleagues have identified a maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin of area under the curve 5.2 mg/mL/min administered monthly in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. This combination produced a response rate of 31% and a median survival of 45 weeks in 13 evaluable patients. A subsequent phase I evaluation reversing the carboplatin and gemcitabine sequence (gemcitabine --> carboplatin day 1) demonstrated no difference in toxicities, pharmacodynamics, or maximum tolerated dose. At Fox Chase Cancer Center and elsewhere, similar phase I trials will determine the maximum tolerated doses of each agent in combination using a compressed schedule with carboplatin administered every 3 weeks and gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 only.