Search

Background: Osimertinib is the treatment of choice for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, novel strategies to improve the duration of disease control are still urgently needed. Aspirin has been shown to decrease cancer incidence and improve outcomes in various malignancies. Therefore, we evaluated a cohort of patients who received osimertinib with or without concurrent use of aspirin to assess whether the addition of aspirin may lead to improved clinical outcomes., Methods: MD Anderson Cancer Center GEMINI database was retrospectively queried for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who received osimertinib with or without concurrent use of aspirin for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 365 patients were identified including 77 which had concurrent use of aspirin. Patients in the aspirin-osimertinib group had significantly improved PFS (21.3 vs 11.6 months; HR, 0.52; 95 % CI, 0.38-0.70) and OS (Not reached vs 32.3 months; HR, 0.56; 95 % CI, 0.35-0.91) compared to osimertinib group. In subgroup analyses, the aspirin-associated PFS benefit was observed in patients with and without central nervous system (CNS) metastases, as well as in osimertinib first-line setting and in subsequent line setting. The median PFS in EGFR 19Del patients was longer than EGFR L858R patients with osimertinib, and when aspirin was added, the median PFS significantly improved in both groups regardless of lines of therapy. The benefit from aspirin was independent of age, gender, TP53 mutational status, or PD-L1 positivity., Conclusion: Concurrent aspirin use with osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was associated with improved survival, regardless of lines of therapy, CNS metastatic status, EGFR mutation type, age, gender, TP53, and PD-L1 status., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: NCT01725165 was a phase II prospective trial in which patients with non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to local consolidative therapy (LCT) versus maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O)., Methods and Materials: Peripheral blood from patients enrolled on NCT01725165 were labeled as (1) baseline, (2) early follow-up (FU) if obtained in the first or second FU evaluation (6-18 weeks), and (3) late FU if obtained in the third to sixth FU evaluations (22-50 weeks). All patients who underwent LCT and were included in this analysis received radiation. Among 49 randomized patients, 21 patients underwent T cell CDR3 variable region sequencing using immunoSEQ, 31 patients underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis using next-generation sequencing with a 1021 cancer gene panel, and cytokine concentration was assayed in 19 patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All analyses were exploratory and not corrected for multiple testing., Results: No associations were identified between baseline T cell repertoire and ctDNA metrics with patient outcomes. Among baseline cytokines, interleukin 1α was the only cytokine associated with both overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.5; P = .0006) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9; P = .03). At early FU, LCT was associated with decreased ctDNA burden, including lower number of detected mutations (median, 2 [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-6] vs 6 [IQR, 4-18]) and decreased average variable allele frequency (VAF; median, 0.006 [IQR, 0.003-0.010] vs 0.011 [IQR, 0.007-0.014]) compared with MT/O. Among 6 patients with serial ctDNA analysis, a rise in ctDNA detected mutation burden preceded clinical progression by 6.7 months. At early FU, LCT was associated with changes in T cell clonality that suggested oligoclonal expansion specifically increased T cell clonality (median, 0.15 [IQR, 0.12-0.24] vs 0.10 [IQR, 0.05-0.13]) and frequency of top 10 clones (median, 0.14 [IQR, 0.06-0.18] vs 0.21[IQR, 0.19-0.28])., Conclusion: LCT was associated with decreased ctDNA burden and oligoclonal expansion at early FU timepoints. Baseline interleukin 1α was associated with improved patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Window of opportunity trials in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are challenging but can yield important translational information about a novel agent., Methods: We treated patients with MPM (N = 24) with 4 weeks of oral dasatinib followed by surgery with or without radiotherapy and then an optional 2 years of maintenance dasatinib. The primary end point was biomarker modulation of phosphorylated (p) Src Tyr419 ., Results: For all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and the median overall survival was 19.1 months. No significant responses were seen after 4 weeks of dasatinib therapy; however, modulation of median p-Src Tyr419 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores was seen: the median pretreatment score was 70 (interquartile range 37.5-110), and the median posttreatment score was 41.9 (interquartile range 4.2-60) (p = 0.004). A decrease in p-Src Tyr419 levels after dasatinib correlated with improved median PFS (6.9 months versus 0.94 months [p = 0.03]), suggesting that p-Src Tyr419 is a viable pharmacodynamic biomarker for dasatinib in MPM. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) pathway analysis correlated high PDGFR beta [PDGFRB) level (in the cytoplasm [hazard ratio] (HR) = 2.54, p = 0.05], stroma [HR = 2.79, p = 0.03], and nucleus [HR = 6.79, p = 0.023]) with a shorter PFS. Low (less than the median) cytoplasmic p-PDGFR alpha IHC levels were predictive of a decrease in positron emission tomography/computed tomography standard uptake values levels after dasatinib therapy (p = 0.04), whereas higher-than-median IHC scores of PDGFRB (cytoplasmic [HR = 2.8, p = 0.03] and nuclear [HR = 6.795, p = 0.02]) were correlated with rising standard uptake values levels., Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no significant efficacy signal, and dasatinib monotherapy will not continue to be studied in MPM. However, our study demonstrated that PDGFR subtypes (platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and PDGFRB) may have differential roles in prognosis and resistance to antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are important potential therapeutic targets that require further investigation., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: New prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions in early stage non-small cell lung cancer are necessary to improve patient outcomes. In this report, we assess the utility of a predefined mRNA expression signature of cell-cycle progression genes (CCP score) to define 5-year risk of lung cancer-related death in patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma., Experimental Design: A CCP score was calculated from the mRNA expression levels of 31 proliferation genes in stage I and stage II tumor samples from two public microarray datasets [Director's Consortium (DC) and GSE31210]. The same gene set was tested by quantitative PCR in 381 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumors. Association of the CCP score with outcome was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis., Results: In univariate analysis, the CCP score was a strong predictor of cancer-specific survival in both the Director's Consortium cohort (P = 0.00014; HR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.43-3.02) and GSE31210 (P = 0.0010; HR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.42-3.56). In multivariate analysis, the CCP score remained the dominant prognostic marker in the presence of clinical variables (P = 0.0022; HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.29-3.17 in Director's Consortium, P = 0.0026; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32-3.53 in GSE31210). On a quantitative PCR platform, the CCP score maintained highly significant prognostic value in FFPE-derived mRNA from clinical samples in both univariate (P = 0.00033; HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.39-3.17) and multivariate analyses (P = 0.0071; HR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.10)., Conclusions: The CCP score is a significant predictor of lung cancer death in early stage lung adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and may be a valuable tool in selecting patients for adjuvant treatment., (©2013 AACR.)