Search

Background: Selecting pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (COMB) for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an important issue in clinical practice. We previously conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study of patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as a first-line treatment. Here, we report updated data and evaluate the long-term outcomes., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of 298 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as first-line treatment between December 2018 and January 2020. We reviewed the medical records and assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity using a prolonged data cutoff., Results: In total, 164 (median age: 74 years) and 134 (median age: 68 years) patients received MONO and COMB, respectively; patients who received COMB were younger and had better performance statuses (0-1). At the prolonged data cutoff, the median follow-up was 20.2 (range: 0.1-41.4) months. The median progression-free survivals were 7.5 and 13.1 months, and overall survivals (OSs) were 17.2 and 33.7 months for MONO and COMB, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 21.9% and 20.1% for the MONO and COMB, respectively. With prolonged follow-up, although COMB demonstrated an OS benefit and higher objective response rate than MONO, in the propensity score matching analysis COMB didn't demonstrate a significant benefit compared to the MONO., Conclusions: COMB may be effective as a first-line treatment for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in a selected subset of patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Backgrounds: The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, little is known about the predictive factors of durvalumab efficacy in this population. This study aimed to validate the predictive use of inflammation-related parameters in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CCRT plus durvalumab., Methods: We recruited 76 LA-NSCLC patients who received CCRT followed by durvalumab from 10 Japanese institutions. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were measured before (pre-treatment) and 2 months after (post-treatment) durvalumab induction. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) after durvalumab therapy., Results: The median follow-up time was 17 (range, 3.3-35.8) months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 26.1 and 33.7 months, respectively. Durvalumab was discontinued in 47 (61.8%) patients, with non-infectious pneumonitis being the most common reason. Post-treatment CAR (cutoff, 0.2) was a significant stratifying factor in survival comparison (<0.2 vs. ≥ 0.2, median PFS, not-reached vs. 9.6 months. Log-rank, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model showed that post-treatment CAR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio, 3.16, p = 0.003)., Conclusions: This study suggests that post-treatment CAR has predictive value for LA-NSCLC patients treated with CCRT plus durvalumab consolidation therapy., (© 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

It is not clear whether pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (COMB) should be selected for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibiting high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%). We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of 300 patients with NSCLC exhibiting high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as first-line treatment between December 2018 and January 2020. We reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients with no driver mutations, and assessed the patient characteristics, therapeutic regimens, treatment periods, and adverse events. In total, 166 (55%; median age: 74 years) and 134 (45%; median age: 68 years) patients received MONO and COMB, respectively. Patients were younger and had better performance status (0-1) in the COMB group (p < 0.01). With a median follow-up time of 10.6 (range: 0.1-20.6) months, the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months with MONO and 13.1 months with COMB. The objective response rate was 42.2% with MONO and 67.9% with COMB. With respect to treatment discontinuation, 36 out of 166 (21.7%) and 28 out of 134 (20.1%) patients discontinued MONO and COMB, respectively. In conclusion, COMB may be a promising option for first-line treatment for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression and good performance status., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: In the LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 trials, afatinib improved overall survival in previously untreated patients with EGFR 19del mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to chemotherapy. The appropriate management of adverse events and dose reduction of afatinib are important for EGFR-positive NSCLC patients. We conducted a retrospective and observational study of patients treated with first-line afatinib for EGFR-positive NSCLC in Nagano prefecture, Japan, focusing on efficacy and toxicities., Methods: We retrospectively collected the medical records of NSCLC patients initially treated with afatinib between May 2014 and March 2018., Results: A total of 62 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median body surface area (BSA) of 1.57 m 2 were included. The overall response rate was 87.7% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.7 months. The median PFS was similar between standard initial dose (40 mg) and reduced initial doses (30 and 20 mg) (15.7 vs. 14.2 months; P = 0.978). The frequency of dose reduction and the discontinuation rate in the 40 mg daily dose group was higher in patients with BSA < 1.58 m 2 (100%) compared to BSA ≥ 1.58 m 2 (68.2%) (P = 0.014). The frequency of diarrhea was higher in patients with BSA < 1.58 m 2 (93.5%) compared to BSA ≥ 1.58 m 2 (71.0%) (P = 0.02)., Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, first-line afatinib was well managed and was equally as effective as in previous clinical trials of EGFR-positive NSCLC. BSA is considered a predictive marker for appropriate afatinib dose reduction., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: This phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/pemetrexed combined with 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab followed by pemetrexed/bevacizumab maintenance therapy as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) limited to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-wild type., Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-wild type NSCLC aged < 75 years old were enrolled in the study. The patients were treated with four cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 , day 1), pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 , days 1), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1), every 3 weeks, followed by pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance until progression for achieving a response over stable disease after induction chemotherapy., Results: Partial response and stable disease were observed in 35 (objective response rate: 70, 95% CI: 55.4-82.1%) and 9 patients, respectively, and 39 (78%) patients received pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 12.0 months (95% CI: 7.5-16.5 months) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 22.2-39.8 months), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (14%), nausea (10%), anorexia (18%), and hypertension (8%). Coagulation disorder was observed in one patient, but all of these events were reversible and resulted in no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: The combination of cisplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab followed by pemetrexed/bevacizumab maintenance therapy exhibited favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity profiles in patients with EGFR-wild type non-squamous NSCLC (UMIN-CTR number: UMIN000003645).

Background: Afatinib has been available in Japan for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since May 2014. We conducted an observational study in patients treated with afatinib in Nagano prefecture, focusing on response and associated toxicities., Methods: We analyzed the clinical records of NSCLC patients treated with afatinib between May 2014 and February 2015., Results: The records of a total of 73 patients (27 men, 46 women) with a median age of 69 years (range: 42-85 years) were analyzed. Afatinib was administered to 11 patients as a first-line therapy, but it was predominantly administered as a fifth-line or beyond therapy (32 cases, 43.8%). The overall response rates for afatinib as a first-line therapy and beyond second-line therapy were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.2-100.0%) and 27.1% (95% CI: 14.5-39.7%), respectively. The main toxicities grade >3 included diarrhea (8.2%), skin rash (6.8%), nausea (6.8%), and appetite loss (6.8%). A low body surface area (BSA) (<1.5m 2 ) was significantly associated with a higher frequency of diarrhea grade >2, compared with a higher BSA (≥ 1.5m 2 ). Forty-eight patients (63.0%) were treated without a dose reduction of afatinib., Conclusions: Although the survival benefit with afatinib remains unclear, our observational analysis demonstrated the feasibility of using afatinib for EGFR-mutated NSCLC in clinical practice. In particular, a relatively high level of drug delivery is possible. In addition, a lower BSA may be a predictor of diarrhea in patients treated with afatinib., (Copyright © 2016 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This phase I/II study was designed to evaluate a combination of irinotecan and S-1 a new regimen for salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: The study group comprised patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had previously received at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients received irinotecan on days 1, 15 and oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice daily as a fixed dose) on day 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle., Results: In the phase I part, irinotecan was given in escalating doses of 70 (Level 1), 80 (Level 2), and 90 mg/m(2) (Level 3). Three of the 5 patients given Level 3 had dose-limiting toxicity, and Level 2 (80 mg/m(2) of irinotecan) was designated as the recommended dose. In phase II, 38 patients received a median of 7.4 cycles of irinotecan at the recommended dose. The overall response rate was 15.8 % (90 % confidence interval (CI): 6.1-25.5 %), and the median progression-free and overall survival times were 4.5 months (95 % CI: 3.5-5.0) and 15.0 months (95 % CI: 9.5-20.6) months, respectively. Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3 or higher toxicity included neutropenia in 17.9 % of the patients, thrombocytopenia in 5.1 % and nausea in 7.7 %., Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and irinotecan was considered an effective salvage regimen in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and feasibility of combination with nedaplatin (NDP) and paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifteen patients under 75 years old, with unresectable NSCLC who had not previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with a performance status of 0-1, were enrolled. The dose escalation levels (NDP/Paclitaxel; mg/m2 day 1) were 80/150 (level 1), 80/180 (level 2), 90/180 (level 3) and repeated every 28 days. All patients receiving level 3 had dose-limiting toxicity. One patient developed grade 4 neutropenia with infection, two had incomplete recovery of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia by the 28th day after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Non-hematologic toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and hypersensitivity reaction, were tolerated. Three of the 15 patients achieved partial responses. We concluded that the recommended dose was paclitaxel 180 and NDP 80 mg/m2 due to the hematologic toxicity.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, feasibility, and efficacy of bi-weekly-administered paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In a dose-escalation study, 18 patients, under 75 yr old, with unresectable NSCLC that had relapsed or was resistant after platinum-containing chemotherapy with performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel and gemcitabine bi-weekly. The dose escalation levels of paclitaxel (mg/m2) at a fixed dose of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 were 110 (level 1), 130 (level 2), 150 (level 3), and 170 (level 4), respectively. All patients were eligible for evaluation of toxicities. At level 4, one patient developed an infection with grade 3 neutropenia and two other patients developed severe neurotoxicity (over grade 3). Thus, the recommended dose for phase II was paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 due to dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Partial response was seen in 4 cases of the 18 assessable patients, with an overall response of 22%. Bi-weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine is feasible and appears to be an efficacious combination chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy in refractory and recurrent patients with NSCLC who had been previously exposed to platinum-containing chemotherapy.