Search

Background: We tested the hypothesis that 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP, Triapine) may enhance response to re-treatment with gemcitabine by enhancing intracellular uptake of gemcitabine in a phase II study., Method: Patients who had prior exposure to gemcitabine as a first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were given weekly infusions of 3-AP and gemcitabine for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, repeated every 28 days. Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected to evaluate the effect of 3-AP on pharmacokinetics and intracellular uptake of gemcitabine., Result: Twelve patients were treated with a median of two treatment cycles without objective response, hence the study was terminated at interim analysis. Four patients had stable disease and the median time to progression was 3 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.7 to 9.1 months). Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (two patients), hypoxia (three patients) and dyspnea (one patient). Four patients developed reversible symptomatic methemoglobinemia during 3-AP infusion, with mild to moderately elevated methemoglobin levels that ranged from 7.8 to 17.6% of the total hemoglobin concentration. Limited pharmacokinetic data did not suggest any clinically relevant pharmacological influence of 3-AP on gemcitabine., Conclusion: 3-AP did not enhance clinical response to gemcitabine in this cohort of patients with prior exposure to gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. Further development of 3-AP in lung cancer is challenged by its potential of causing methemoglobinemia and hypoxia, which could be problematic in patients with compromised pulmonary reserves.

Objective: This is a randomized phase II study designed to compare the toxicity profile of a non-platinum-based with a platinum-based regimen in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Eighty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomized either to gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, 30-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15) and oral etoposide (50 mg, days 1-14; GE group) or gemcitabine at the same schedule and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 15; GP group). The primary endpoint is toxicity, and secondary endpoints include response rate, survival outcome and quality of life (QOL)., Results: The incidence of WHO grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 29, 44 and 22% (GE group), and 28, 49 and 23% (GP group), respectively (p = 0.75, 0.95 and 0.87, respectively). The rate of grade 2 or above nausea was numerically higher in the GP arm, but the difference was not statistically significant (GE 15.5%, GP 27.7%, p = 0.20). The rate of vomiting in the GE and GP arms was 20.0 and 20.5%, respectively (p = 0.96). However, subjective changes in QOL scores on nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the GP arm (p = 0.001). Other symptoms including sore mouth and hair loss were significantly higher in the GE arm (p = 0.003 and 0.007, respectively). There were also significant differences observed in emotional (p = 0.014), cognitive (p = 0.028) and social functioning (p = 0.034) in favor of GP. The differences in tumor response (35.5 and 46.5% for GE and GP, respectively) were not significantly different. Median time to disease progression (33.8 and 40.7 weeks, respectively) and overall survival (41.4 and 57.3 weeks, respectively) were of borderline significance in favor of the GP arm (p = 0.055)., Conclusion: This toxicity profile of GE is similar to GP, but the apparent inferior efficacy may discourage further investigation., ((c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The current study was conducted to examine the pattern and the predictive factors of distant metastases (DM) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after primary radiotherapy treatment., Methods: Data from all five regional cancer centers in Hong Kong were collected retrospectively and pooled for the current study, which was coordinated by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study Group. The sample was comprised of all 2915 patients with NPC without DM at the time of presentation who were treated with radiotherapy in 1 of the 5 cancer centers during the period between January 1996 and December 2000., Results: DM was found to be the leading cause of NPC failure, with a 5-year actuarial rate of 14.9% in this patient cohort. Despite the poor overall survival (OS) of these patients, those with lung metastasis alone represented a distinctive group associated with a significantly better OS. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) N classification, UICC T classification, advanced age, and male gender were found to be significant and independent determinants for DM., Conclusions: Long-term survival is possible in patients with distant metastatic NPC confined to the lung. An aggressive approach to treatment for this group of patients should be considered., (Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Increased expression of metalloproteinases is associated with poor prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant treatment with the metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat could prolong survival in responding patients with SCLC after chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: SCLC patients in complete or partial remission were eligible. They were stratified by radiotherapy (early, late, or none), stage (extensive or limited), response (complete or partial), and cooperative group (National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group or European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). They were randomized to receive marimastat 10 mg or placebo orally bid for up to 2 years., Results: There were 532 eligible patients (266 marimastat and 266 placebo). Stage was limited for 279 patients (52%) and extensive for 253 (48%). Best response to induction therapy was complete remission for 176 patients (33%), partial remission for 341 (64%), and 15 patients (3%) had undergone surgical resection. The median time to progression for marimastat patients was 4.3 months compared with 4.4 months for placebo patients (P =.81). Median survivals for marimastat and placebo patients were 9.3 months and 9.7 months, respectively (P =.90) Toxicity was generally limited to musculoskeletal symptoms (18% grade 3/4 for marimastat). Dose modifications for musculoskeletal toxicity were required in 90 patients (33%) on the marimastat arm, and 87 (32%) permanently stopped marimastat because of toxicity. Patients on marimastat had significantly poorer quality of life at 3 and 6 months., Conclusion: Treatment with marimastat after induction therapy for SCLC did not result in improved survival and had a negative impact on quality of life.

Background: Topotecan (9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycampthothecin) is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor with promising efficacy in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Combination with a topoisomerase II inhibitor may potentate the therapeutic effect of topotecan, although there has been conflicting preclinical information on the combination. The objectives of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and to determine the efficacy of the sequential combination of intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with SCLC., Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed, limited or extensive stage SCLC were eligible. The dose escalation scheme of three cohorts (six patients per cohort) started at intravenous topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days and oral etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days (21-day cycles). Subsequent dose levels involved escalation of topotecan to 0.75 mg/m(2) per day and 1.0 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days. A Phase II study was conducted at one dose level below the maximum tolerated dose. The authors alternated the drug sequence with each consecutive cycle and compared the hematologic toxicity between the two sequences., Results: Thirty-six patients (21 patients with limited disease and 15 patients with extensive disease) received a total of 173 courses of sequential combination chemotherapy (topotecan --> etoposide, 88 courses; etoposide --> topotecan, 85 courses). The authors identified dose levels for the Phase II study as follows: topotecan, 0.75 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days; and etoposide, 50 mg twice daily for 7 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. At this dose level, the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and the incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were 25% and 10.9%, respectively. Two patients died from neutropenic sepsis. There was no significant difference in hematologic toxicities between the two sequences. Complete and partial response rates were 5.6% and 55.6%, respectively (limited disease, 9.5% and 66.75%; extensive disease, 0% and 40%, respectively). The median progression free survival was 31.9 weeks (limited disease, 36.1 weeks; extensive disease, 28.9 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 25.6-36.0 weeks), and the median overall survival was 52.4 weeks (limited disease, 54.9 weeks; extensive disease, 30.1 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 39.6-57.7 weeks)., Conclusions: Combination therapy with topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is a safe and effective regimen for patients with SCLC. Future research on this combination should focus on an oral regimen for patients with extensive disease and poor tolerance to cisplatin. The authors recommend an oral dosage of topotecan at 1.2 mg/m(2) per day (equivalent to intravenous topotecan at 0.75 mg/m(2) per day) for 5 days followed by etoposide 50 mg twice daily for 7 days., (Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10836)

Background: The authors have designed a non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). This regimen capitalizes on the mild toxicity of gemcitabine, a novel nucleoside analog., Methods: A total of 46 chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Eligible patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15, plus oral etoposide 50 mg daily for 14 days, which was increased to 21 days if there was no World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 or 4 toxicity in the 1st 2 cycles (each cycle was 28 days long). All patients were included for analysis of response and survival according to an intention-to-treat principle., Results: The overall response rate was 43.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30. 7-60.2%). There was 1 complete response (2.2%) and 19 partial responses (41.3%). The median survival was 48.0 weeks (95% CI, 38. 1-75.9 weeks) and the 1-year survival rate was 45% (95% CI, 29-62%). The median time to progression for all patients was 39.2 weeks (95% CI, 35.7-49.7 weeks). World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 and 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was reported in 29%, 32%, and 18% of patients, respectively. Two patients had reactivation of hepatitis B viral infection that resulted in WHO Grade 4 hepatic dysfunction. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon., Conclusions: This non-cisplatin-based regimen of gemcitabine and oral etoposide achieved a high response and survival rate. Toxicity appeared to be less severe than that associated with existing cisplatin-based regimens. A randomized study of this regimen versus a cisplatin-based regimen is indicated., (Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: To determine whether an intensive weekly chemotherapy regimen plus thoracic irradiation is superior to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with ESCLC were considered eligible for the study if they were younger than 68 years, had a performance status of 0 to 2, and were free of brain metastases. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) or alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine/etoposide and cisplatin (CAV/EP). Consolidative thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation were given to patients responding to CODE and according to investigator discretion on the CAV/EP arm., Results: The fidelity of drug delivery on both drug regimens was equal, and more than 70% of all patients received the intended protocol chemotherapy. Although rates of neutropenic fever were similar, nine (8.2%) of 110 patients on the CODE arm died during chemotherapy, whereas one (0.9%) of 109 patients died on the CAV/EP arm. Response rates after chemotherapy were higher (P =.006) with CODE (87%) than with CAV/EP (70%). However, progression-free survival (median of 0.66 years on both arms) and overall survival (median, 0.98 years for CODE and 0. 91 years for CAV/EP) were not statistically different., Conclusion: The CODE regimen increased two-fold the received dose-intensity of four of the most active drugs in small-cell lung cancer compared with the standard CAV/EP regimen while maintaining an approximately equal total dose. Despite supportive care (but not routine prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), there was excessive toxic mortality with the CODE regimen. The response rate with CODE was higher than that of CAV/EP, but progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved. In view of increased toxicity and similar efficacy, the CODE chemotherapy regimen is not recommended for treatment of ESCLC.

Purpose: To assess the impact of age on the delivery, tolerance, and efficacy of thoracic irradiation (TI) for limited small cell lung cancer (L-SCLC)., Methods and Materials: This is a retrospective review of data from 608 patients 80 years or less with L-SCLC, who participated in two previously reported randomized trials (BR3 and BR.6) of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. All patients received the same chemotherapy, consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine (CAV), and etoposide cisplatin (EP) delivered either in sequential or alternating sequence. In BR.3, TI was given after chemotherapy with randomization to 25 Gy in 10 fractions or 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions. In BR.6, TI (40 Gy in 15 fractions) was given concurrently with EP with randomization to either the early (with cycle 2, week 4) or late (with cycle 6, week 16) arm., Results: A total of 665 patients entered these two trials. Of these, 608 patients were eligible for analysis, 300 in BR.3 and 308 in BR.6. Five hundred and twenty patients were under age 70 and 88 patients were 70 years or older. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. In BR3, 179 patients (60%) participated in radiotherapy randomization (61% young, 52% elderly), and 176 patients actually received TI. In BR.6, randomization occurred at study entry for all patients, and 282 (91.6%) patients received TI (92% young, 88% elderly). More patients of both age groups randomized to receive late TI did not receive TI (13% and 14%) than those randomized to the early TI arm (3%) of BR.6. We could identify no tendency to reduce field sizes to minimize toxicity in either age group at higher doses of TI. Once TI was started, there was no difference between the two age groups with regards to the proportion of patients who completed TI, although elderly patients were less likely to complete high dose TI. Of those who completed TI, there was no difference in the time to complete TI, mean dose delivered or in the incidence of acute and late TI-related toxicities. No statistical difference in response rate, local relapse rate, or overall survival was seen between young and older age groups., Conclusion: In summary, in the dose range examined, age does not appear to impact on the delivery, tolerance or efficacy of TI in the combined modality management of L-SCLC. Potentially curative combined modality treatment should not be withheld on the basis of age.

Thirty-one patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine followed by surgery. Response rates to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy were 50% and 53.3% respectively. Complete surgical resection was possible for 62.5% of patients. Median survival times were 16.2 and 18.7 months for radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy-surgery respectively (P = Ns), with no long-term improvement in survival seen with combined-modality treatment.

Purpose: To determine the significance to patients of changes in health-related quality-of-life (HLQ) scores assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)., Patients and Methods: A subjective significance questionnaire (SSQ), which asks patients about perceived changes in physical, emotional, and social functioning and in global quality of life (global QL) and the QLQ-C30 were completed by patients who received chemotherapy for either breast cancer or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In the SSQ, patients rated their perception of change since the last time they completed the QLQ-C30 using a 7-category scale that ranged from "much worse" through "no change" to "much better." For each category of change in the SSQ, the corresponding differences were calculated in QLQ-C30 mean scores and effect sizes were determined., Results: For patients who indicated "no change" in the SSQ, the mean change in scores in the corresponding QLQ-C30 domains was not significantly different from 0. For patients who indicated "a little" change either for better or for worse, the mean change in scores was about 5 to 10; for "moderate" change, about 10 to 20; and for "very much" change, greater than 20. Effect sizes increased in concordance with increasing changes in SSQ ratings and QLQ-C30 scores., Conclusion: The significance of changes in QLQ-C30 scores can be interpreted in terms of small, moderate, or large changes in quality of life as reported by patients in the SSQ. The magnitude of these changes also can be used to calculate the sample sizes required to detect a specified change in clinical trials.

Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic importance of age on response rate and survival in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and to determine the effect of age on chemotherapy dose delivery and toxicity., Patients and Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of data from two multicenter, randomized trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) in which 608 SCLC patients who presented with limited disease (LD) all received the same chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV), and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) administered in an immediate or delayed alternating fashion, plus cranial and thoracic irradiation., Results: There were 520 patients aged less than 70 years, and 88 > or = 70. No significant differences existed between the two age groups in baseline characteristics, including treatment protocol, performance status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. There were more men in the older group (P = .05). Overall response rates were comparable (78% v 82%, P = .50), and 5-year survival rates were also similar (P = .14), with 11% alive in the younger group and 8% in the older group. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival when analyzed as a continuous variable in a univariate model (P = .01), but it was no longer an independent prognostic factor in our multivariate regression analysis. An analysis of chemotherapy delivery between the two age groups showed that patients aged > or = 70 years received lower total doses of each drug compared with the intended full protocol dose, primarily as a result of dose omissions, rather than dose reductions. The frequency of dose delays was not different between groups. No significant differences were seen in the incidence of either hematologic or most nonhematologic toxicities., Conclusion: Age is not a significant adverse prognostic variable in SCLC patients with LD. Moderately aggressive chemotherapy may be delivered safely to elderly patients with a good performance status, although modest attenuation of therapy through either dose reduction or omission may occur more frequently in this population.

The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n = 143) and ovarian cancer (n = 111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n = 160) and a heterogeneous group of other cancers (n = 121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.

Purpose: The probability of treatment resistant cells developing in a tumor, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which has a rapid cell cycle time, is a function of the number of tumor cells present and of time. Theoretically, the development of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be minimized by using all treatment modalities early in the treatment program., Methods and Materials: The importance of the timing of loco-regional radiotherapy was assessed in a multi-institution randomized study. Three hundred and eight patients with limited small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) were given three cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine alternating with three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin. In addition, patients were randomized to receive locoregional radiotherapy: 40 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks with treatment planning techniques to limit the spinal cord dose to be < or = 35 Gy either with the first cycle (early) or with the sixth cycle of chemotherapy (late). Responding patients received prophylactic brain irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions in 2 weeks) after completion of locoregional radiotherapy and chemotherapy., Results: 96% of the 155 eligible patients allocated to the "early" arm and 87% of the 153 allocated to the "late" arm received locoregional radiotherapy; 26 patients did not receive locoregional radiotherapy. The mean field sizes were similar in both arms. The mean radiation doses were significantly less in the "early" arm (p = 0.0319 Wilcoxon rank sum test). Any differences in the frequency of toxicities were minor. All patients have been followed for at least 2 years and the median follow up is 4 years. 64% had a complete response in the "early" arm compared with 56% in the "late" arm (p = 0.137). Survival was measured from the start of chemotherapy. There was a significant improvement in survival in the "early" arm; median survival was 21.2 months compared with 16.0 months in the "late" arm (p = .008 log rank test). Survival at 2, 3, and 4 years was 40%, 32%, and 25%, respectively, for the "early" arm and 33%, 22%, and 15% for the "late" arm. There were 232 (75%) recurrences among those patients whose disease recurred. The proportion who had local recurrence within the radiation field was 41% and 39% for "early" and "late" treatment arms respectively. The proportion of brain metastases in the "late" arm (28%) was significantly higher than in the "early" arm (18%) p = .0425 Fishers' exact test., Conclusion: We conclude that early administration of locoregional radiotherapy in a combined modality treatment is superior to late consolidative locoregional radiotherapy in limited small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: The importance of the timing of thoracic irradiation (TI) in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was assessed in a randomized trial., Methods: All 308 eligible patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) alternating with etoposide and cisplatin (EP) every 3 weeks for three cycles of each chemotherapy regimen. Patients randomized to early TI received 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to the primary site concurrent with the first cycle of EP (week 3), and late TI patients received the same radiation concurrent with the last cycle of EP (week 15). After completion of all chemotherapy and TI, patients without progressive disease received prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks)., Results: Although complete remission rates were not significantly different between the two arms, progression-free survival (P = .036) and overall survival (P = .008) were superior in the early TI arm. Patients in the late TI arm had a higher risk of brain metastases (P = .006)., Conclusion: The early administration of TI in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage SCLC is superior to late or consolidative TI.